This method on UIEvent gets you more touch positions, and I think it's useful for a drawing app, to respond with greater precision to the position of the Pencil stylus. Is there a similar thing in macOS, for mouse or tablet events? I found this property mouseCoalescingEnabled, but the docs there don't describe how to get the extra events.

Since macOS 26 Beta 1, I notice that the window reopening behavior had changed. Say there are two desktops (spaces), one might: open an app window in desktop 1 close that window switch to desktop 2 reopen the app window (by click on dock tile, spotlight search...) Prior to macOS 26, that window will always reopen in current desktop. This is IMO the right behavior because these windows are most likely transient (message app, chat app, utilities app or note app). In macOS 26, however, will switch to desktop 1 (where the window is closed) and reopen the window in desktop 1. This is weird to me because: Window is "closed", hence it should not be attached to desktop 1 anymore, unlike minimize. Switching desktop interrupts user's current workflow. It's annoying to switch back specially when there're many desktops. This behavior is inconsistent. Some reopen in current desktop, some reopen in previous desktop. Apps like Music, Notes and Calendar reopened in previous desktop, while Mail, Messages, and Freeform reopened in current desktop. I did a little bit of experiment, and find out that apps that reopened in current desktop are most likely because they take an extra step to release the window when it's closed. I believe this is a bug, so I fire a feedback (FB18016497) back in beta 1. But I did not get any response or similar report from others, to a point that I kinda wonder if this is intended. I can easily force my app to reopen in current desktop by nullifying my window controller in windowWillClose, but this behavior essentially change how one can use the Spaces feature that I think I should bring this up to the community and see what other developers or engineers thinks about it.

Hi all, Sharing a reproducible UIKit issue I’m seeing across multiple iPadOS 26 betas, with a tiny sample attached and a short video. Short video https://youtu.be/QekYNnHsfYk Tiny project https://github.com/yoasha/ListSwipeOvershootReproSwift Summary In a UISplitViewController (.doubleColumn), a UICollectionView using list layout shows a large leading-swipe overshoot when the split view is expanded (isCollapsed == false). The cell content translates roughly 3–4× the action width. Repros with appearance = .plain and .grouped Does not repro with .insetGrouped Independent of trailing provider (issue persists when trailing provider is nil) Collapsed split (compact width) behaves correctly Environment Devices: iPad Air (3rd gen), iPadOS 26.0 (23A5326a) → Repro Simulators: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4), iPadOS 26.0 beta 6 → Repro Also tested on device: iPadOS 26 beta 5, 6, 7, 8 Xcode: 26.0 beta 6 (17A5305f) Steps to reproduce Launch the sample; ensure the split is expanded (isCollapsed == false). In the secondary list, set Appearance = Plain (also repros with Grouped). Perform a leading swipe (LTR: swipe right) on any row. Actual: content shifts ~3–4× the action width (overshoot). Expected: content translates exactly the action width. Switch Appearance = InsetGrouped and repeat the leading (swipe right) gesture → correct (no overshoot). Feedback Assistant FB ID: FB19785883 (full report + attachments filed; this forum thread mirrors the repro for wider visibility) Minimal code (core of the sample) If anyone from Apple needs additional traces or a sysdiagnose, I can attach promptly. Thanks! // Secondary column VC (snippet) var cfg = UICollectionLayoutListConfiguration(appearance: .plain) // also .grouped / .insetGrouped cfg.showsSeparators = true cfg.headerMode = .none cfg.leadingSwipeActionsConfigurationProvider = { _ in let read = UIContextualAction(style: .normal, title: "Read") { _,_,done in done(true) } read.backgroundColor = .systemBlue let s = UISwipeActionsConfiguration(actions: [read]) s.performsFirstActionWithFullSwipe = false return s } // Trailing provider can be nil and the bug still repros for leading swipe: cfg.trailingSwipeActionsConfigurationProvider = nil let layout = UICollectionViewCompositionalLayout.list(using: cfg) let collectionView = UICollectionView(frame: view.bounds, collectionViewLayout: layout) // … standard data source with UICollectionViewListCell + UIListContentConfiguration // Split setup (snippet) let split = UISplitViewController(style: .doubleColumn) split.preferredDisplayMode = .oneBesideSecondary split.viewControllers = [ UINavigationController(rootViewController: PrimaryTableViewController()), UINavigationController(rootViewController: SecondaryListViewController()) ]

I need more time to adapt to the new iOS 26 UI, so I set the "UIDesignRequiresCompatibility" attribute to "Yes." This works, but now all large titles are not aligned with the content. Below you can see an example, but I have the issue with all large titles. All good on iOS 18. Does anyone have an idea why and how can i fix it?

I am developing an App in iPadOS26 beta. I try to switch "Multitasking & Gestures" setting to “Full Screen Apps“ in the code of App. Is there any public API available to implement it. By the way, my App is a Cordova App. Thank you

Hi, In the WWDC25 session Elevate an app with Swift concurrency (timestamps: 8:04 and later), the StickerViewModel is shown annotated with @Observable but not @MainActor. The narration mentions that updates happen on the main thread, but that guarantee is left implicit in the calling code. In Swift 6, though, one of the major benefits is stronger compiler enforcement against data races and isolation rules. If a view model were also annotated with @MainActor, then the compiler could enforce that observable state is only updated on the main actor, preventing accidental background mutations or updates that can cause data races between nonisolated and main actor-isolated uses. Since @Observable already signals that state changes are intended to be observed (and in practice, usually by views), it seems natural that such types should also be main-actor isolated. Otherwise, we’re left with an implicit expectation that updates will always come from the main thread, but without the compiler’s help in enforcing that rule. This also ties into the concept of local reasoning that was emphasized in other Swift 6 talks (e.g. Beyond the basics of structured concurrency). With @MainActor, I can look at a view model and immediately know that all of its state is main-actor isolated. With only @Observable, that guarantee is left out, which feels like it weakens the clarity that Swift 6 is trying to promote. Would it be considered a best practice in Swift 6 to use both @Observable and @MainActor for UI-facing view models? Or is the intention that SwiftUI developers should rely on calling context to ensure main-thread updates, even if that means the compiler cannot enforce isolation? Thanks!

I have a standard Mac project created using Xcode templates with Storyboard. I manually removed the window from the Storyboard file and use ViewController.h as the base class for other ViewControllers. I create new windows and ViewControllers programmatically, implementing the UI entirely through code. However, I've discovered that on all macOS versions prior to macOS 26 beta, the application would trigger automatic termination due to App Nap under certain circumstances. The specific steps are: Close the application window (the application doesn't exit immediately at this point) Click on other windows or the desktop, causing the application to lose focus (though this description might not be entirely accurate - the app might have already lost focus when the window closed, but the top menu bar still shows the current application immediately after window closure) The application automatically terminates In previous versions, I worked around this issue by manually executing [[NSApplication sharedApplication] run]; to create an additional main event loop, keeping the application active (although I understand this isn't an ideal approach). However, in macOS 26 beta, I've found that calling [[NSApplication sharedApplication] run]; causes all NSButton controls I created in the window to become unresponsive to click events, though they still respond to mouse enter events. Through recent research, I've learned that the best practice for preventing App Nap automatic termination is to use [[NSProcessInfo processInfo] disableAutomaticTermination:@"User interaction required"]; to increment the automatic termination reference count. My questions are: Why did calling [[NSApplication sharedApplication] run]; work properly on macOS versions prior to 15.6.1? Why does calling [[NSApplication sharedApplication] run]; in macOS 26 beta cause buttons to become unresponsive to click events?

I have an Apple Watch Series 6 (Model: M00H3LL/A) that was working perfectly before I updated it to watchOS 26.0 beta on 21st August 2024. The update process completed smoothly while the watch was on the charger, but immediately after the update the display became extremely dim. It’s not completely black, but so faint that it’s very difficult to see. I’ve already tried setting the brightness to maximum and also enabled maximum brightness under Accessibility settings, but the issue remains. I also tried force restarting the watch (holding the Digital Crown and side button together), but that did not resolve the issue. I know this is not a hardware issue, since the problem appeared immediately after the update, and at times the display briefly returns to normal brightness for just a few milliseconds (like a flicker). My current watchOS version is 26.0 (23R5350a).Could you please advise on how I can fix this, or confirm if this is a known issue with the beta version? Thank you.

In the current beta of iPadOS 26.0 (23A5297m), the camera does not function properly when the following conditions are met: The device is set to Windowed Apps mode in the Settings app. Multiple application windows are present on one screen. Using AVCaptureVideoPreviewLayer. On the other hand, UIImagePicker works properly. Is this a specification of iPadOS 26 that cannot be avoided? Or is there an official solution or workaround available? Normally, the camera feed should appear within the square frame of the lower window in the attached image, but it does not.

I implemented a subclass of NSCollectionViewItem: class ViewItem: NSCollectionViewItem { override func loadView() { self.view = NSView() } } and registed to NSCollectionView: class PictureFrameThemeListView: NSCollectionView { init(viewModel: PictureFrameViewModel) { super.init(frame: .zero) self.register(ViewItem.self, forItemWithIdentifier: .item) } However, when calling makeItem(withIdentifier:for:), the following error is prompted: FAULT: NSInternalInconsistencyException: -[NSNib _initWithNibNamed:bundle:options:] could not load the nib 'Item' in bundle NSBundle What confuses me is that I registered the subclass of NSCollectionViewItem, why do NSCollectionView to init the NSNib?

I am building a centralized event handling system for UIKit controls and gesture recognizers. My current approach registers events using static methods inside a handler class, like this: internal class TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS { internal static func RegisterTouchUpInside(_ pWidget: UIControl) -> Void { pWidget.addTarget( TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.self, action: #selector(TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.WidgetTouchUpInsideListener(_:)), for: .touchUpInside ) } @objc internal static func WidgetTouchUpInsideListener(_ pWidget: UIView) -> Void { print("WidgetTouchUpInside") } } This works in my testing because the methods are marked @objc and static, but I couldn’t find Apple documentation explicitly confirming whether using ClassName.self (instead of an object instance) is officially supported. Questions: Is this approach (passing ClassName.self as the target) recommended or officially supported by UIKit? If not, what is the safer alternative to achieve a similar pattern, where event registration can remain in static methods but still follow UIKit conventions? Would using a shared singleton instance as the target (e.g., TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.shared) be the correct approach, or is there a better pattern? Looking for official guidance to avoid undefined behavior in production.

In the current beta of iPadOS 26.0 (23A5297m), the camera does not function properly when the following conditions are met: The device is set to Windowed Apps mode in the Settings app. Multiple application windows are present on one screen. Using AVCaptureVideoPreviewLayer. On the other hand, UIImagePicker works properly. Is this a specification of iPadOS 26 that cannot be avoided? Or is there an official solution or workaround available?

I’ve been testing out PaperKit from beta 1 up until 3, then took a break and on my return at beta 7 I find that the .drawing property of the PaperMarkup data model has been removed, i.e. a PKDrawing can no longer be added / modified on PaperKit. Also, the shape recognition feature seems to have been removed. I see this as a tremendous drawback. I filed feedback already: FB19893338 Please bring it back.

Is it possible to add an ornament below a tab bar like this? Or does the whole side bar have to be an ornament to build this?

NavigationLinks do not display correctly in tvOS 26. When using a Button, the correct behavior of vertically placing an Image or AsyncImage above one or two Text fields occurs. However, when using NavigationLink the image and text(s) are laid out horizontally. Attempting to fix this using a VStack prevents the text from sliding down as the NavigationLink receives focus. Using the hoverEffect modifier does not help. Using a Button (correct behavior): Using a NavigationLink without VStack: Using a NavigationLink with VStack:

For a number of complex views in my app, I need to embed scrollable objects (like List, Form or TextEditor) in a ScrollView. To do that, I need to apply a limit to the height of the embedded object. What I would like to do is set that limit to the actual height of the content being displayed in the List, Form, TextEditor, etc. (Note that this height calculation should be dynamic, so that content changes are properly displayed. I attempted the following: @State listHeight: CGFloat = .zero List { ... content here } .onScrollGeometryChange(for: CGFloat.self, of: { geometry in return geometry.contentSize.height }, action: { oldValue, newValue in if oldValue != newValue { listHeight = newValue } }) .frame(height: listHeight) .scrollDisabled(true) This does not work because geometry.contentSize.height is always 0. So it is apparent that .onScrollGeometryChangedoes not interact with the internal scrolling mechanism of List. (Note, however, that.scrollDisabled` does work.) Does anyone have a suggestion on how I might get this to work?

Issue Description: When toggling between the system keyboard and a custom input view, the keyboard height reported in subsequent keyboard notifications becomes incorrect!!! specifically missing the predictive text/suggestion bar height. Environment: Device: iPhone 11 Expected keyboard height: 346pt Actual reported height: 301pt (missing 45pt suggestion bar) Reproduction Steps: Present system keyboard → Height correctly reported as 346pt Switch to custom input view → Custom view displayed Switch back to system keyboard(no suggestion bar) → Height correctly reported as 301pt Trigger keyboard frame change → Height still incorrectly reported as 301pt despite suggestion bar being visible Expected Behavior: Keyboard height should consistently include the suggestion bar height (346pt total). Actual Behavior: After switching from custom input view, keyboard height excludes suggestion bar height (301pt instead of 346pt). key code private func bindEvents() { customTextField.toggleInputViewSubject.sink { [weak self] isShowingCustomInput in guard let strongSelf = self else { return } if isShowingCustomInput { strongSelf.customTextField.inputView = strongSelf.customInputView strongSelf.customInputView.frame = CGRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: strongSelf.view.frame.size.width, height: strongSelf.storedKeyboardHeight) } else { strongSelf.cusTextField.inputView = nil } strongSelf.customTextField.reloadInputViews() strongSelf.customTextField.becomeFirstResponder() }.store(in: &cancellables) }

In our app we have a UICollectionView with Drag&Drop functionality enable and collection view is covering the entire screen. When we drag a collection view item to the edge of the screen it does not scroll the UICollectionView instead that our item turns into the app icon and scrolling blocked. It is happening only if Stage Manager is enabled in the device and if Stage Manager is disabled it is working fine. This issue we are facing after iOS 18.6 release, before 18.6 it was working fine i.e, collection view was scrolling to next items when we dragging an item to edge of the screen, similar to the iOS calendar app when we drag an event to edge it starts scrolling the date. And in iOS 26 if we drag an item to edge, Springboard is getting crashed.

This is probably abusing the system more than it should be but maybe it is somehow possible. I have: An objective-C based storyboard iPad OS app. I'm beginning to adopt SwiftUI. I have a hosting controller with a content view that has a lazygrid of cards, which have an NSManagedObject for data. On tapping a card, a detail view opens, if in multi-tasking, a new window, if not, pushing the navigation controller (this detail view still exists in UIKit/ObjC, and is handled by sending a notification with the ObjectID, which then triggers a storyboard segue to the detail.) I have zoom transitions on all my things. They work great in Obj.C, especially now with the bar button source. On my iPhone target, I still have an old tableview, and I'm able to zoom properly - if someone changes the detail view's managed object (through a history menu), the zoom context looks up where the tableview is, and scrolls to it while popping. I'd like to somehow do this on the lazygrid - first) to just have an individual card be the zoom source, it should be able to know what the source view is to say in the prepareForSegue method just to zoom at all. and second) if the detail has changed the current ObjectID (which gets passed around as a notification), to somehow scroll the lazygrid to the right object before popping. I've looked at https://developer.apple.com/tutorials/SwiftUI/interfacing-with-uikit but this seems like swiftUI is the host. I have it the other way around, uikit hosting swiftUI pushing uikit. TIA for any pointers

Hello, First of all, I've already made a bug report here : https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/19731998 I'm facing a problem while using UIGraphicsImageRenderer to create an image, that is use to create a UIColor with a pattern via UIColor(patternImage:). It's well displayed for iOS 18.2 and lower, whereas the whole color is blank with iOS 26. -> Please find a sample project linked to the bug report ViewController.swift post that illustrates the issue, in the ViewController.swift file. I'll also link screenshots of the sample app, one built with iOS 18.2 and another with iOS 26.0. Reproduction steps : I create an image with UIGraphicsImageRenderer : let image = UIGraphicsImageRenderer().image { context in // Do anything here } Then I use this image to create a UIColor : UIColor(patternImage: image) I apply this color to the fillColor of a CAShapeLayer : shapeLayer.fillColor = UIColor(patternImage: image) Expected result : Run on iOS 26 and lower and the layer filled with the pattern color is correctly displayed, as it is on iOS 18.2 and lower. Observed result : Run on iOS 26 and the layer is filled with a blank/white color instead of the intended pattern color. Has anyone been facing the problem ? Thanks, Thibault Poujat