Search results for

5.1.1

400 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Module compiled with Swift 5.1 cannot be imported by the Swift 5.1.1 compiler
I have enabled Build Libraries for Distribution and cleaned the build folder but i am still getting the Module compiled with Swift 5.1 cannot be imported by the Swift 5.1.1 compiler: /Users/oliviervincent/Documents/Spliqs/SpliqsAR/HelloWorld/AudioKit-iOS/AudioKit.framework/Modules/AudioKit.swiftmodule/arm64-apple-ios.swiftmodule error.What am I missing please?(using Xcode 11.2 beta 2)
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
Oct ’19
Rejected because bad description for "NSAppleMusicUsageDescription"
My app got rejected for the following reason:Guideline 5.1.1 - Legal - Privacy - Data Collection and StorageWe noticed that your app requests the user’s consent to access their media library but does not clarify the use of the media library in the applicable purpose string.The NSAppleMusicUsageDescription or Privacy - Media Library Usage Description in my info.plist file is:My app name needs access in order to load songs from your Music Library.My app is an audio player that can import songs from the users music library, or directly play the songs if the user is an Apple Music subscriber.In iTunes Connect I have submitted an appeal to the App Review Board but haven't got any reply so far.What's wrong with my description?From the Human Interface Guidelineshttps://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/app-architecture/requesting-permission/Explain why your app needs the information. Provide custom text (known as a purpose string or usage description string) for display in the system
0
0
1.6k
Sep ’19
Private Relay Emails Bouncing
Hi,Our company integrates third party sign ins (e.g. Facebook) so we have added support for Sign in with Apple as well. However, when testing emails sent from our registered domains (verified on developer.apple.com) the emails are bouncing with the error code 550 5.1.1 bad mailbox name. Our domain is verified and our emails are sent using SendGrid from those domains.Do you have a timeline on when 3rd party email services will be supported? If it's after the public release of iOS 13, can we get confirmation on whether or not the next version of our app must support Sign in with Apple to be approved?Thanks,Tony
4
0
4.0k
Sep ’19
Reply to Unable to Send Emails to Private Relay Service
Are you able to specify what aspect of third-party mail services prevents their use? We have DKIM and SPF set up for our whitelisted SIWA domain, but don't have a reverse DNS record set up for the IP we're using (a dedicated IP used primarily with a different domain), and are getting 550 5.1.1 bad mailbox name responses. It seems like a third-party mail service with a dedicated IP and rDNS would be indistinguishable - from privaterelay.appleid.com's point of view - from running our own MTA.We can certainly set up rDNS if that's a requirement, but otherwise this is a pretty big blocking restriction for SIWA.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
Sep ’19
Emails to privaterelay.appleid.com bouncing
Hi,We are using Sign in with Apple to onboard users to our system. We need to send instructions to the user using the email provided at signup. We use Mandrill in the backend to send emails. I have configured the sender email in Individual Email Addresses under Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles in developer account (& it shows a green check mark). The emails sent to private relay addresses (e.g. xxxxxprm23@privaterelay.appleid.com) bounces.I have verified another email using gmail & it works fine.Am I missing some settings?-------------Bounce message from Mandrill-----------------------------------Received: from mail178-28.suw51.mandrillapp.com (unknown [198.2.178.28])by relay-3.us-west-2.relay-prod (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BCA20EF5for <bounce-md_31096458.5d52843d.v1-61f4bb207bb443e7a3d9e4482eb7beb3@mandrillapp.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:34:54 +0000 (UTC)Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:34:54 +0000From: postmaster@mail178-28.suw51.mandrillapp.comSubject: Delivery reportTo: bounce-md_31096458.5d
14
0
22k
Aug ’19
Reply to Is restore functionality needed if subscription is managed across multiple apps?
>all they need to do is install the app and log in.......What is the point of restoring anything?I believe all you need do is indicate in a note to App Review that you handle 'restore' through log in to your server. There is no need to do anything else.But......this means that the user is required to log into your server to 'use' the IAP. Therefore you will need to explain why you are also satisfying: 5.1.1 (v) Account Sign-In: If your app doesn’t include significant account-based features, let people use it without a log-in. Apps may not require users to enter personal information to function, except when directly relevant to the core functionality of the app.....
Aug ’19
Reply to Provide test account for Apple validation
You may have another problem with:>Its a professionnal app, so accounts are pre-created on our side, there is no account creation.The problem is that Apple requires IAP to unlock code in an app. So they may want some assurance that those accounts do not require a payment of $100 and circumvent the 70/30 revenue split. Another relevant guideline is: 5.1.1 (v) Account Sign-In: If your app doesn’t include significant account-based features, let people use it without a log-in.....
Jul ’19
Apple feedback
Hi All,I recieved below feedback on my app.. I worked with a developer who cannot work right now and I need someone to help me with the feedback.. it is really small issues but because I don't have enough knowledge to fix in Xcode..Hello,Thank you for providing this information.Regarding 5.1.1, when collecting information from the user, that information needs to have a direct benefit to the user and contribute to your apps core functionality. Apps that request information that do not provide a direct benefit to the user when signing up are not compliant with the App Store Review Guidelines.Regarding 4.0, apps should be optimized to support the device screen size or resolution it is run on. Your app displayed text and buttons overlaid onto each other. To resolve this issue, it would be appropriate to revise your app.
1
0
835
Jun ’19
Reply to App rejected Guideline 5.1.2
The issue is not 'legally' it is 'app reveiw'. Your app is collecting (aka 'compiling') personal information of people who drive by the user of the app. Herein lies your rub - 5.1.1 (viii) Apps that compile personal information from any source that is not directly from the user or without the user’s explicit consent, even public databases, are not permittedYou could try this approach with app review:1) App review - the data saved by this app is based on publicly displayed license plate data. It is viewed and recorded by the user of the app. Therefore, upon recording, this data is the property of the user of the app not the owner of the license plate. The user of the app further clarifies their data by accessing a public database. The user of this app has given permission to compile this data. This app is not in violation of 5.1.1 (viii) because the data is obtained directly from the user with the user's explicit consent.(IMHO - App Review should reject the app because of 5.1.1 (viii
Jun ’19
Information about Guidelines 5.1.1 Data Collection and Storage
According to Apple Review Guidelines 5.1 about Legal 5.1.1, indicating that developer can use National ID in the app if it’s related to the core function. In our app we are using National ID to identify the user, given both URL policy and explaination and was not allowed by Apple. We want Apple review team to explain this rule in detail and provide some examples case of core function which will be allowed by Apple.
0
0
593
Jun ’19
Reply to Inspecting Downloads for Notarization
Please forgive the late reply, I've done some additional research during Spring Break here, and it's been instructive.Since we started this process, DisplayLink has released 5.1.1 of its kext, and the installer that they have posted is supposed to be notarized. Looking at the package:Persephone:Extensions tom$ spctl -a -t install -vvvv /Volumes/DisplayLink Installer/DisplayLink Software Installer.pkg /Volumes/DisplayLink Installer/DisplayLink Software Installer.pkg: accepted source=Notarized Developer ID origin=Developer ID Installer: DisplayLink Corp (73YQY62QM3)However, the package itself doesn't have a ticket stapled to it, which means that you must have access to the internet if you want it to install correctly. The spctl action itself isn't enough for you to know you have a viable package that will install offline. However, it appears that stapler can tell you:Persephone:Extensions tom$ stapler validate -v /Volumes/DisplayLink Installer/DisplayLink Software Installer.pkg Processing: /Volumes/Dis
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: General Tags:
Apr ’19
Reply to Login to access the App
>I didn't found any info in the guidelines about thisAre you sure? There are two parts to your proposal: ✖ login to access the App and ✖✖ use of OAuth2/restful (web session/simplified) token v. sign in/pwd.See the ASRG's section 5.1.1:(v) Account Sign-In: ✖ If your app doesn’t include significant account-based features, let people use it without a log-in. Apps may not require users to enter personal information to function, except when directly relevant to the core functionality of the app or required by law. If your core app functionality is not related to a specific social network (e.g. Facebook, WeChat, Weibo, Twitter, etc.), you must provide access without a login or via another mechanism. Pulling basic profile information, sharing to the social network, or inviting friends to use the app are not considered core app functionality. The app must also include a mechanism to revoke social network credentials and disable data access between the app and social network from within the app. ✖✖ An app
Mar ’19