Building for iOS Simulator, but the linked and embedded framework ‘XX.framework‘ was built for

Hello, We are experiencing a recurring issue when running iOS apps in the Rosetta simulator on Xcode 26. Environment: Xcode: 26.0 macOS: 15.7.3 Simulator: Intel-based (Rosetta) simulators Languages: Both Swift and Objective-C Issue: When launching an app in a Rosetta simulator, the app frequently freezes or fails to run. In many cases, Xcode reports that the debugger has lost connection. Xcode error message: Lost connection to the debugger on “iPhone 12”. Domain: IDEDebugSessionErrorDomain Code: 22 Failure Reason: Message from debugger: lost connection Console log: assertion failed: GPR thread_set_state is unimplemented for NewThread (ThreadContextRegisterState.cpp:920 host_gpr_state_from_guest_state) Observed behavior: Rebuilding after fully quitting the simulator sometimes resolves the issue temporarily. Disabling Scheme > Run > Debug executable allows the app to run normally, but debugging (breakpoints, etc.) becomes unavailable. The issue does no

One of our apps (built with Xcode 26.1.1 and distributed via TestFlight) crashes upon launch on iOS 17 with Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGKILL) and Termination Reason: CODESIGNING 2 Invalid Page. I have never seen this before. Any pointers? On iOS 18 & 26 this does not happen btw.

QuickLookAR shares the actual USDZ model instead of the original website URL — critical copyright and data leak issue on iOS 26 Since iOS 26, QuickLookAR (or ARQuickLookPreviewItem) no longer preserves the original web URL when sharing a model. Instead of sending the link to the hosted file, the system directly shares the actual USDZ model file with the recipient. This is a critical regression and a severe breach of intellectual property protection, as it exposes proprietary 3D models that must never be distributed outside of the controlled web environment. In earlier iOS versions (tested up to iOS 18), QuickLookAR correctly handled sharing — the share sheet would send the website link where the model is hosted, not the file itself. Starting with iOS 26, this behavior has changed and completely breaks the intended secure flow for AR experiences. Our project relies on allowing users to view models in AR via QuickLook, without ever transferring the

Original Problem We use codesign and notarytool in a scripted environment to build and distribute binaries daily. We also do manual builds by logging into the build server using SSH. This has been working for many years, but after updating to a new Developer ID Application certificate, codesign was failing with errSecInternalComponent and the console logs showed errSecInteractionNotAllowed. Summary of Resolution Attempting to fix the problem resulted in multiple copies of the same Certificate which were NOT shown by Keychain Access. I had to run security delete-identity multiple times to clear out the redundant Identities and then imported the certificate using the security CLI tool. Details I originally followed these instructions for requesting and installing a new certificate: https://developer.apple.com/help/account/certificates/create-developer-id-certificates/ Tip: Use the security tool intead These instructions fail to mention two critical points: 1) they assume the machine y

In an ObjC framework I'm developing (a dylib) that is loaded into JRE to be used via JNI (Zulu, Graal, or native image from Graal+ a JAR) I implemented a naive method that collects current memory footprint of the host process: It collects 5 numbers into a simple NSDictionary with NSString keys (physical footprint, default zone bytes used and allocated, and sums for used and allocated bytes for all zones. The code ran for some time, but at certain point my process started crashing horribly in this method -- at the last line, accessing the dictionary. Here's the code: -(NSDictionary *)memoryState { NSMutableDictionary *memoryState = [NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithCapacity:8]; // obtain process current physical memory footprint, in bytes. task_vm_info_data_t info; mach_msg_type_number_t count = TASK_VM_INFO_COUNT; kern_return_t kr = task_info(mach_task_self(), TASK_VM_INFO, (task_info_t)&info, &count); [memoryState setObject:(kr == KERN_SUCCESS) ? @(info.phys_footprint) : [NSNull null] forKe

Hi everyone, I am attempting to generate an Ad Hoc provisioning profile for my iOS app that includes MusicKit capabilities, but the generated .mobileprovision file consistently lacks the required entitlement, despite the configuration appearing correct in the developer portal. The Issue: I have enabled MusicKit under the App Services tab for my App ID. I have saved this configuration, verified it is checked in the UI, and then regenerated and downloaded my provisioning profile. However, when I inspect the internal contents of the .mobileprovision file, the Entitlements dictionary does not contain the com.apple.developer.music-kit key. It only contains the standard keys (Team ID, App ID, etc.). Steps Taken: Created a brand new App ID to rule out legacy data issues. Explicitly enabled MusicKit under the App Services tab for this new identifier. Created a fresh Ad Hoc Distribution profile linked to this new ID. Downloaded the profile and inspected the file structure: the MusicKit entitlement is

How to resolve this error ? Unsupported Swift Architecture while trying to run my code. I am.using Apple laptop with M1 chip with 10 core, Mac os 26.1, xcode 26.1, simulator 26.1. THIS IS VERY URGENT FOR MY PROJECT DELIVERY. ANY PROMPT HELP IS MUCH APPRECIATED. possible to connect some expert via conference call ?

I see this in Tahoe Beta release notes macOS now supports the Apple Sparse Image Format (ASIF). These space-efficient images can be created with the diskutil image command-line tool or the Disk Utility application and are suitable for various uses, including as a backing store for virtual machines storage via the Virtualization framework. See VZDiskImageStorageDeviceAttachment. (152040832) I'm developing a macOS app using the Virtualization framework and need to create disk images in the ASIF (Apple Sparse Image Format) to make use of the new feature in Tahoe Is there an official way to create/resize ASIF images programmatically using Swift? I couldn’t find any public API that supports this directly. Any guidance or recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks!

Hi! I recently had an idea to build an iOS app that allows users to create a system-level block of specified web domains by curating a blacklist on their device. If the user, for instance, inputs *example.com to their list, their iPhone would be blocked from relaying that network traffic to their ISP/DNS, and hence return an error message (iPhone can't open the page because the address is invalid) instead of successfully fetching the response from example.com's servers. The overarching goal of this app would be to allow users to time-block their use of specified websites/apps and grant them greater agency over their technology consumption, and I thought that an app that blocks traffic at the network level, combined with the ability to control when to/not to allow access, would be a powerful alternative to the existing implementations out there that work more on the browser-level (eg. via Safari extension, which is isolated to the scope of user's Safari browser) or via Screen Time (which can

I'm building a content filtering app using NEURLFilterManager and NEURLFilterControlProvider (introduced in iOS 26). The app uses a PIR server for privacy-preserving URL filtering. Everything works with development-signed builds, but App Store export validation rejects: Entitlement value url-filter-provider for com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension — not supported on iOS I have Network Extensions enabled on my App IDs in the developer portal, but the provisioning profiles don't seem to include url-filter-provider, and I don't see a URL filter option in the Capability Requests tab. What I've tried: Entitlement values: url-filter-provider, url-filter — both rejected at export Extension points: com.apple.networkextension.url-filter, com.apple.networkextension.url-filter-control — both rejected Regenerating provisioning profiles after enabling Network Extensions capability My setup: iOS 26, Xcode 26 Main app bundle: com.pledgelock.app URL filter extension bun

Hey! Wa are developing a VPN app for iOS and whenever we enable enforceRoutes we see 20% to 30% download and upload speed drop. Here are example results from our environment: | Upload | Download | ------------------------------------------ enforceRoutes off | 337.65 | 485.38 | ------------------------------------------ enforceRoutes on | 236.75 | 357.80 | ------------------------------------------ Is this behavior known and expected? Is there anything we can do to mitigate the effect of enforceRoutes in our application? Test were performed on iOS 26.2.1.