Search results for

“testflight the requested app is not avaliable”

416,614 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to 26.4 RC documentation omits Foundation?!
Yep, seeing the same thing. There's a lot of other stuff broken with Xcode 26.4. For example, the Swift symbol NSTextAttachment.character is gone and we have to use NSAttachmentCharacter which in turn produces an error when compiling with Xcode 26.3 and earlier. (FB22341879). And then there's the broken Claude Agent support which forces you to re-login every few hours. Paired with the fact that macOS 26.4 cannot run Address Sanitizer builds from Xcode 26.3 and earlier, and you thus HAVE to use Xcode 26.4, I'm very frustrated with Apple's software quality right now.
1d
"Unable to Add for Review" DAC7 Error, can no longer submit App Updates
Hello everyone, Since roughly 12 hours i can no longer submit updated to my Apps, i always get a Unable to Add for Review with To submit new apps or avoid potential payment blocks, add compliance information for Directive on Administrative Cooperation–7th Amendment (DAC7).. I of course already a few weeks ago went to the Business sections and selected No as it does not apply to us. I tried a lot but cannot make submissions work. I also contacted the Apple support but got no Feedback yet, does anyone have the same issue? What i tried: Switching DAC7 from No to Yes and then back to No again Private Browsing (Cache reset) Checked all other Agreementes, all is fine and active I fail to see any issue and assume it is an Apple central issue as they 1st of April rolled out the new DAC7 compliance check. With many greetings Robert
59
0
1.4k
1d
Reply to Tahoe 26.4 breaks custom paths with NetFSMountURLSync?
[quote='882693022, DTS Engineer, /thread/821197?answerId=882693022#882693022'] Yes. To be clear, I was simply pointing out how kNAUIOptionKey was involved with this, not suggesting removing it was a fully acceptable alternative. [/quote] That makes sense and is how I interpreted it. For now I had to disable it though so user do not run into issues. Or better set: I do not get bombarded with support questions 😊 [quote='882693022, DTS Engineer, /thread/821197?answerId=882693022#882693022'] Yes, that's the right place. What was the feedback number? [/quote] Feedback number: FB22380104 Thank you for the details on mounting inside app's container. Learning something new every day 😉
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
1d
Reply to SFAuthorizationPluginView
Hmmm, it sounds like this is a new effort, in which case I’m going to ask you to start a DTS code-level support request so that we can have a short private conversation about this. Once that’s done, I’d be happy to respond to any remaining questions here. IMPORTANT When you open the support request, the form will ask whether anyone from Apple sent you that way. Enter the URL of this forums thread into that field. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
1d
Reply to notarytool not completing
You can expect that most uploads will be notarised quickly. Occasionally, some uploads are held for in-depth analysis and may take longer to complete. As you notarise your apps, the system will learn how to recognise them, and you should see fewer delays. For lots of additional info about notarisation, see Notarisation Resources. Specifically, it links to a Q&A with the notary service team that’s quite instructive. [quote='821270021, northofm25, /thread/821270, /profile/northofm25'] This was working fine up until about the 28th March 2026. [/quote] My experience, based on helping folks here in the forums, is that the majority of people reporting “held for in-depth analysis” delays are new developers. However, that’s not universally true. See my comments here. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Notarization Tags:
1d
Reply to UIApplication.canOpenURL not working without Safari
I'm dealing with the same issue as OP. Starting iOS 26.2, after uninstalling Safari the canOpenUrl-function returns false while it's possible to call the open method. I don't see why I should start a new post thread because it's exactly the same issue as mentioned in this post. It's so easy to reproduce... guard let url = URL(string: https://www.apple.com) else { return } if UIApplication.shared.canOpenURL(url) { UIApplication.shared.open(url) } else { print(Could not open URL) }
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: UIKit
1d
DCDevice last_update_time issue
We are currently experiencing an unexpected issue with the DeviceCheck query_two_bits endpoint. According to the official documentation (Accessing and Modifying Per-Device Data), the last_update_time field should represent the month and year when the bits were last modified. The Issue: For several specific device tokens, our server is receiving a last_update_time value that is set in the future. Current Date: April 2026 Returned last_update_time: 2026-12 (December 2026) Here is a response: { body: {bit0:false,bit1:true,last_update_time:2026-12}, headers: { Server: [Apple], Date: [Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:05:23 GMT], Content-Type: [application/json; charset=UTF-8], Transfer-Encoding: [chunked], Connection: [keep-alive], X-Apple-Request-UUID: [53e16c38-d9f7-4d58-a354-ce07a4eaa35b], X-Responding-Instance: [af-bit-store-56b5b6b478-k8hnh], Strict-Transport-Security: [max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains], X-Frame-Options: [SAMEORIGIN], X-Content-Type-Options: [nosniff], X-XSS-Protection: [1; mode=block
0
0
16
1d
Reply to Need MetricKit Implementation details for MacOS background Application, mainly for
Hi, We installed again via the same full PKG installer. On the very first launch after this second install, we received approximately 48 hours of past metric payloads through pastPayloads. We are not sure what was different between the two full installs. Is there something on the system side that could cause the first install to not deliver payloads, and then a subsequent install to start delivering them? Diagnostic payload test results — following your suggested steps: Host app (UI process): Launched the app Ran: `killall -ABRT HostApp Process Dismissed the crash report window Relaunched the app ✅ didReceiveDiagnosticPayloads: was called promptly on relaunch. Network Extension (tunnel process): Ran: `sudo killall -ABRT NEProcess Dismissed the crash report window Waited for the tunnel to restart automatically ❌ No diagnostic payload was delivered. didReceiveDiagnosticPayloads: was never called in the NE's subscriber. So, could u comment if MetricKit works
1d
Waiting for the Developer Account
Hi everyone, I enrolled in the Developer Program 6 days ago and I'm still unable to access my account. I'm hoping someone here can help or that this gets the attention of Apple staff. Here's my situation: I enrolled on Saturday and completed the process on the website The fee has been successfully charged to my bank account I received both a purchase acknowledgement and an invoice from Apple Despite all of this, the Apple Developer website still shows Complete your purchase as if nothing happened I already opened a support case, but have not received any response whatsoever No activation, no update, and no communication from Apple I have proof of payment (bank statement, order confirmation, and invoice), so this does not appear to be a payment issue on my end. Has anyone experienced this and managed to get it resolved? Thanks guys.
0
0
30
2d
DeviceCheck query_two_bits returns last_update_time in the future — what could cause this?
Hi everyone, I'm integrating Apple's DeviceCheck API into my app and have run into a strange issue that I can't find documented anywhere. The Problem When I call Apple's DeviceCheck query endpoint (POST https://api.devicecheck.apple.com/v1/query_two_bits), the response occasionally returns a last_update_time value that is in the future — ahead of the current server time. Example response: { bit0: true, bit1: false, last_update_time: 2026-05 // future month, not yet reached } What I've Checked My server's system clock is correctly synced via NTP The JWT token I generate uses the current timestamp for the iat field This doesn't happen on every device — only on some specific devices The issue is reproducible on the same device across multiple calls Questions Is last_update_time sourced from the device's local clock at the time update_two_bits was called? Or is it stamped server-side by Apple? Could a device with an incorrectly set system clock (set to the future) cause Apple's servers to record
0
0
22
2d
Reply to Request for Clearer App Review Feedback and Faster Review
Thank you for your response and for your help. I have now received another rejection with similar concerns under Guideline 2.3.1(a) and Guideline 4.2. At this time, I still do not have enough specific information to determine which exact screen, feature, or user flow is causing the issue. I will continue to follow up through App Store Connect. If possible, I would sincerely appreciate more concrete guidance, such as the relevant screen, reproduction steps, or a screenshot/screen recording, so I can make the correct changes. Thank you again for your support.
2d
Reply to 26.4 RC documentation omits Foundation?!
Yep, seeing the same thing. There's a lot of other stuff broken with Xcode 26.4. For example, the Swift symbol NSTextAttachment.character is gone and we have to use NSAttachmentCharacter which in turn produces an error when compiling with Xcode 26.3 and earlier. (FB22341879). And then there's the broken Claude Agent support which forces you to re-login every few hours. Paired with the fact that macOS 26.4 cannot run Address Sanitizer builds from Xcode 26.3 and earlier, and you thus HAVE to use Xcode 26.4, I'm very frustrated with Apple's software quality right now.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
"Unable to Add for Review" DAC7 Error, can no longer submit App Updates
Hello everyone, Since roughly 12 hours i can no longer submit updated to my Apps, i always get a Unable to Add for Review with To submit new apps or avoid potential payment blocks, add compliance information for Directive on Administrative Cooperation–7th Amendment (DAC7).. I of course already a few weeks ago went to the Business sections and selected No as it does not apply to us. I tried a lot but cannot make submissions work. I also contacted the Apple support but got no Feedback yet, does anyone have the same issue? What i tried: Switching DAC7 from No to Yes and then back to No again Private Browsing (Cache reset) Checked all other Agreementes, all is fine and active I fail to see any issue and assume it is an Apple central issue as they 1st of April rolled out the new DAC7 compliance check. With many greetings Robert
Replies
59
Boosts
0
Views
1.4k
Activity
1d
Reply to Tahoe 26.4 breaks custom paths with NetFSMountURLSync?
[quote='882693022, DTS Engineer, /thread/821197?answerId=882693022#882693022'] Yes. To be clear, I was simply pointing out how kNAUIOptionKey was involved with this, not suggesting removing it was a fully acceptable alternative. [/quote] That makes sense and is how I interpreted it. For now I had to disable it though so user do not run into issues. Or better set: I do not get bombarded with support questions 😊 [quote='882693022, DTS Engineer, /thread/821197?answerId=882693022#882693022'] Yes, that's the right place. What was the feedback number? [/quote] Feedback number: FB22380104 Thank you for the details on mounting inside app's container. Learning something new every day 😉
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Reply to SFAuthorizationPluginView
Hmmm, it sounds like this is a new effort, in which case I’m going to ask you to start a DTS code-level support request so that we can have a short private conversation about this. Once that’s done, I’d be happy to respond to any remaining questions here. IMPORTANT When you open the support request, the form will ask whether anyone from Apple sent you that way. Enter the URL of this forums thread into that field. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Reply to How to change TabView background color with SwiftUI?
This no longer works for the iOS 26 Tab Bar, any suggestions?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Reply to notarytool not completing
You can expect that most uploads will be notarised quickly. Occasionally, some uploads are held for in-depth analysis and may take longer to complete. As you notarise your apps, the system will learn how to recognise them, and you should see fewer delays. For lots of additional info about notarisation, see Notarisation Resources. Specifically, it links to a Q&A with the notary service team that’s quite instructive. [quote='821270021, northofm25, /thread/821270, /profile/northofm25'] This was working fine up until about the 28th March 2026. [/quote] My experience, based on helping folks here in the forums, is that the majority of people reporting “held for in-depth analysis” delays are new developers. However, that’s not universally true. See my comments here. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Notarization Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Reply to UIApplication.canOpenURL not working without Safari
I'm dealing with the same issue as OP. Starting iOS 26.2, after uninstalling Safari the canOpenUrl-function returns false while it's possible to call the open method. I don't see why I should start a new post thread because it's exactly the same issue as mentioned in this post. It's so easy to reproduce... guard let url = URL(string: https://www.apple.com) else { return } if UIApplication.shared.canOpenURL(url) { UIApplication.shared.open(url) } else { print(Could not open URL) }
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: UIKit
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
DCDevice last_update_time issue
We are currently experiencing an unexpected issue with the DeviceCheck query_two_bits endpoint. According to the official documentation (Accessing and Modifying Per-Device Data), the last_update_time field should represent the month and year when the bits were last modified. The Issue: For several specific device tokens, our server is receiving a last_update_time value that is set in the future. Current Date: April 2026 Returned last_update_time: 2026-12 (December 2026) Here is a response: { body: {bit0:false,bit1:true,last_update_time:2026-12}, headers: { Server: [Apple], Date: [Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:05:23 GMT], Content-Type: [application/json; charset=UTF-8], Transfer-Encoding: [chunked], Connection: [keep-alive], X-Apple-Request-UUID: [53e16c38-d9f7-4d58-a354-ce07a4eaa35b], X-Responding-Instance: [af-bit-store-56b5b6b478-k8hnh], Strict-Transport-Security: [max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains], X-Frame-Options: [SAMEORIGIN], X-Content-Type-Options: [nosniff], X-XSS-Protection: [1; mode=block
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
16
Activity
1d
Reply to Need MetricKit Implementation details for MacOS background Application, mainly for
Hi, We installed again via the same full PKG installer. On the very first launch after this second install, we received approximately 48 hours of past metric payloads through pastPayloads. We are not sure what was different between the two full installs. Is there something on the system side that could cause the first install to not deliver payloads, and then a subsequent install to start delivering them? Diagnostic payload test results — following your suggested steps: Host app (UI process): Launched the app Ran: `killall -ABRT HostApp Process Dismissed the crash report window Relaunched the app ✅ didReceiveDiagnosticPayloads: was called promptly on relaunch. Network Extension (tunnel process): Ran: `sudo killall -ABRT NEProcess Dismissed the crash report window Waited for the tunnel to restart automatically ❌ No diagnostic payload was delivered. didReceiveDiagnosticPayloads: was never called in the NE's subscriber. So, could u comment if MetricKit works
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Reply to App stuck on “Ready for Distribution” – Trader status not provided / DSA in review
I have a client with the same situation. DSA is In Review for 1 month now. we didnt notice this untill we published the app. I have opened a ticket at support to find out what the problem is.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d
Waiting for the Developer Account
Hi everyone, I enrolled in the Developer Program 6 days ago and I'm still unable to access my account. I'm hoping someone here can help or that this gets the attention of Apple staff. Here's my situation: I enrolled on Saturday and completed the process on the website The fee has been successfully charged to my bank account I received both a purchase acknowledgement and an invoice from Apple Despite all of this, the Apple Developer website still shows Complete your purchase as if nothing happened I already opened a support case, but have not received any response whatsoever No activation, no update, and no communication from Apple I have proof of payment (bank statement, order confirmation, and invoice), so this does not appear to be a payment issue on my end. Has anyone experienced this and managed to get it resolved? Thanks guys.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
30
Activity
2d
Apple developer registration issues
I registered for the program and received an email deducting the money. I waited two days but haven't received any response. It shows pending and still isn't finished. Please help me. I've messaged support but haven't received a reply.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
18
Activity
2d
DeviceCheck query_two_bits returns last_update_time in the future — what could cause this?
Hi everyone, I'm integrating Apple's DeviceCheck API into my app and have run into a strange issue that I can't find documented anywhere. The Problem When I call Apple's DeviceCheck query endpoint (POST https://api.devicecheck.apple.com/v1/query_two_bits), the response occasionally returns a last_update_time value that is in the future — ahead of the current server time. Example response: { bit0: true, bit1: false, last_update_time: 2026-05 // future month, not yet reached } What I've Checked My server's system clock is correctly synced via NTP The JWT token I generate uses the current timestamp for the iat field This doesn't happen on every device — only on some specific devices The issue is reproducible on the same device across multiple calls Questions Is last_update_time sourced from the device's local clock at the time update_two_bits was called? Or is it stamped server-side by Apple? Could a device with an incorrectly set system clock (set to the future) cause Apple's servers to record
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
22
Activity
2d
Reply to I have submitted my app and it has been waiting for review.
Could you please tell me what other methods there are to solve this problem and let me know the result of the App review?
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
2d
Reply to Request for Clearer App Review Feedback and Faster Review
Thank you for your response and for your help. I have now received another rejection with similar concerns under Guideline 2.3.1(a) and Guideline 4.2. At this time, I still do not have enough specific information to determine which exact screen, feature, or user flow is causing the issue. I will continue to follow up through App Store Connect. If possible, I would sincerely appreciate more concrete guidance, such as the relevant screen, reproduction steps, or a screenshot/screen recording, so I can make the correct changes. Thank you again for your support.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
2d