I have app, which I developed and published: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/selfie-horoscopes/id1437164941?ls=1&mt=8After approval I decided to make update and added IAP subscription.And got this:We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved.Why so? 🙂
Search results for
4.3
572 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Please fix this issue we have a dating app and I have already looked up in the whole App Store there is no app similar to our app. Apple have rejected our app under 4.3 design spam which is very unethical.I have already spoke with Jessica in app review team she agree to approve the app but it is keep getting rejected. Please fix this concern our app name is Hayy. and Apple app ID is 1589894321.
I've been updating an old app developed previously by someone else. He stopped working on this app some time ago, and my client assigned this job to me (this app developer previously worked for my client). He deleted his version from the App Store. But. when I try to publish my version (with the same name, features etc. only with some minor updates) it gets rejected with: 4.3 Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam. I've contacted the review team, telling them that there are no other apps like this one and that Im doing it with the consent of the same app company. But they keep sending me the same message. Unfortunately the original app creator can't move his app onto my account (his apple developer membership expired). And now I don't have a clue how to publish the new version, maybe its because of the different app bundle id? (For some reason it says that the o
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect
Tags:
App Review
App Store Connect
Do your apps have the same icon ? Read those older posts: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/46910 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/114079 Did you consider inApp purchase, as recommended in guidelines ? 4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough fart, burp, flashlight, fortune telling, dating, drinking games, and Kama Sutra apps, etc. already. We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience. Spamming the store may lead to your removal from the Apple Developer Program.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect
Tags:
No. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/ 4.3 Spam
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Assuming you are a registered MFI developer then the spec for the QR code is documented in the HomeKit Accessory Protocol Specification - in version R15 of that spec it is in section 4.3. You can download the spec from the MFI website when you log in on your account.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
I've used PyInstaller to create an arm mach-o of a hello world python file. I then tried to sign the file using codesign and got the following error: language main executable failed strict validation When I create an x86_64 mach-o using the same method the codesign works without any issues. I'm using an arm64 only python 3.9 and PyInstaller version 4.3 I've tried codesigning on both M1 and intel, and codesigning a hello world compiled from C file with gcc works. Also, I've tried looking at the file compiled with PyInstaller using otool and haven't seen any issues.
I said this enhancement report on apple bug Reporter site. Now is closed.why you not see that issue?👿😠Reopen, my report plsss.What missing? very much!!Sample?3rd api (then the developer add more functions for iOS wifi hotspot e.g create wifi hotspot without mobile data)iOS wifi hotspot is always in background (even if no device is connected. even if you leave the menu) + time out option- Why? If other iOS device connect to iOS wifi hotspot, and other iOS device go to standby mode (~1min iPhone and ~1-3min iPad or more) then automatically disconnects from the hotspot (designed first iOS - iOS 10 beta 2)Then wifi hotspot is off. what now? Open settings from iOS wifi hotspot, now hotspot is available again. This is not good!! See my report again!!Again!! This missing!!Since first iOS - iOS 10 beta 2 has not the function in wifi settings: wifi never turn off in standby modeSince iOS 4.3 - iOS 10 beta 2 (iOS wifi hotspot) on a better design and user-friendly concept!!
Hi Jinkal, I come across your question in other post in relation to the “4.3 spam - your app primarily features astrology, horoscopes, palm reading, fortune telling or zodiac reports. as such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store” just wondering if your app has successfully surpass this issue in the end? I’m coming across the same issue. Any lights shed would be appreciated.
Topic:
Programming Languages
SubTopic:
Swift
Tags:
I have an iMac 2014 5k with 32 GB Ram, The system can't manage the memory. most of the time I have 4.3% to 12% free memory. And the speed is so low for simple tasks.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Core OS
Tags:
I have read the disconnected documentation for adding a simple complication that ONLY launches my app using the asset images I've created in various sizes for various families along with the ComplicationController code, but the complications never appear (with no errors). I would like to support Watch Series 1 with OS 4.3 on up. There never seems to be one place where this simple, default function is documented. What are the steps and code required to just launch a Watch app from a complication?
Guideline 4.3 - DesignWe noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved.*************************************************************************Do we need to return to the era of repeated wheel building?*************************************************************************First of all, please forgive my poor English. My English is very poor, so I used translation tools.Get down to business:The APP submitted for review has not been released successfully for more than four months, with a delay of 2 months, 4.3 rejected twice and 2 months.The newly submitted APP was originally intended to be the APP before the update of the updated version. However, due to the large UI adjustment, it was submitted as a new APP because t
There are a number of app genres that the App Store reviewers decided to be too saturated. Among those are astrology, horoscope, palm-reading, and similar tell-your-future-from-your-biometric apps. If your app is one of those, you can't publish it on the App Stores. You could try publishing it as a Developer ID macOS application – use Catalyst if it's an iOS app. However there are other causes of Guideline 4.3 Spam rejection: Publishing similar apps that differs only in content. Publishing white-label apps under your own Developer Account. A competitor's app looks similar to yours. Search the web for How to Pass App Store Review: Guideline 4.3 Spam to find out how to diagnose the problem further as well as some potential solutions.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
Hi, We keep receiving this response from the App Store review: Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted by you or another developer to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Apps that simply duplicate content or functionality create clutter, diminish the overall experience for the end user, and reduce the ability of developers to market their apps. Next Steps Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines. Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program. Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review. And those are the main steps to reproduce the issue: Create our app. Submit the app to the App Store. The app got approved. Our business has requested a different bundle ID. Remove our app. Recreate our app with a different bundle ID. Submit the app to the App Store. App got rejected. Several messages, emails hav
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect
Tags:
App Review
App Store Connect
App Binary
App Submission
This is an interesting thread, thanks for the orig post. I was under the impression that Metal was almost always faster than OpenCL because OpenCL is and old and clunky higher level API, but Metal goes right to the metal as they say. I guess not? I would suggest looking into the global memory access times if you can, e.g. the read-write refs to the device declared arrays. I am unsure of the latest tools for this, but you can try to check into the problem by removing device arrays from the picture and just doing fake calculations. E.g. try to set up some local arrays in thread or threadgroup storage instead of device storage for the arrays xyin, xyout and spherical_params (see https://developer.apple.com/metal/Metal-Shading-Language-Specification.pdf section 4.3) and dont even bother to initialize them. Just let the array dereferences and calculations stay the same in your kernel and let it run on bogus float data in those threadgroup arrays. See if it is faster. It should be a lot faster. If it is fa
Topic:
Graphics & Games
SubTopic:
General
Tags: