An ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest rejection email looks as follows: ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest- Your app includes "<path/to/SDK>", which includes , an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a privacy-impacting third-party SDK. Starting February 12, 2025, if a new app includes a privacy-impacting SDK, or an app update adds a new privacy-impacting SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. For more details about this policy, including a list of SDKs that are required to include signatures and manifests, visit: https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements. Glossary ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest: An email that includes the name and path of privacy-impacting SDK(s) with no privacy manifest files in your app bundle. For more information, see https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements. : The specified privacy-impacting SDK that doesn't include a privacy manifest file. If you are the developer of the rejected app, gather the name of the SDK from the email you received from Apple, then contact the SDK's provider for an updated version that includes a valid privacy manifest. After receiving an updated version of the SDK, verify the SDK includes a valid privacy manifest file at the expected location. For more information, see Adding a privacy manifest to your app or third-party SDK. If your app includes a privacy manifest file, make sure the file only describes the privacy practices of your app. Do not add the privacy practices of the SDK to your app's privacy manifest. If the email lists multiple SDKs, repeat the above process for all of them. If you are the developer of an SDK listed in the email, publish an updated version of your SDK that includes a privacy manifest file with valid keys and values. Every privacy-impacting SDK must contain a privacy manifest file that only describes its privacy practices. To learn how to add a valid privacy manifest to your SDK, see the Additional resources section below. Additional resources Privacy manifest files Describing data use in privacy manifests Describing use of required reason API Adding a privacy manifest to your app or third-party SDK TN3182: Adding privacy tracking keys to your privacy manifest TN3183: Adding required reason API entries to your privacy manifest TN3184: Adding data collection details to your privacy manifest TN3181: Debugging an invalid privacy manifest

I am using XCode (Version 26.0.1 (17A400)) -> Archive -> Distribute App (or Validate App) to upload my iOS app into App Store Connect. However I am always getting this error: Uploading SPI errors: Validation failed (409) The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Rebuild the app and resubmit. NSUnderlyingError : Validation failed (-19241) The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Rebuild the app and resubmit. code : STATE_ERROR.VALIDATION_ERROR I tried exporting the app as an IPA and uploading with Transporter, but I see the same error. I couldn't find any other useful logs or error messages. More info: I have created the app in App Store Connect and this is my first time uploading. The app can build and run on my physical phone and emulator without any problem. Would be great to get some help! Thanks!

Hell Apple Developer Community, I need help with the Upload of my Project to AppStore Connect. I’ve got an Error Message, that tells me something is missing in the Info.plist file. Can somebody help me?

Hi there, I dont now what to do anymore and you help is more than appreciated. My app + subscriptions has been certified before 8 days on Monday, 8th but my subscriptions are not shown in the App Store. That leads to a loading spinner since 8 days in my production app! I have an email, where I see that the app + all 6 subscriptions has been approved. On the other hand I see that my subscriptions are still in review and dont see them below the app in the App Store. I was given last week on Tuesday (before 7 days) an expedite review for the subscriptions, because the Apple developer support was writing that the subscriptions are not yet certified. The expedite review has not taken place since 7 days or its not true what the Apple Developer Support is writing (subscriptions need to be reviewed). I think the subscriptions are not linked to the app and I am in a dead lock situation. I need your help, because I have fears that I receive 1 star recommendations and the developer support cannot help me since 8 days. Best regards Tino Link to the App: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/vario-one/id1605797423

How many times can I transfer my apps from one account to another, and then to another account?

I understand how frustrating ASO can be when progress feels slow. To grow beyond keyword optimization, it helps to learn from indie developer resources, communities, and guides that focus on practical app marketing strategies and visibility.

Should you rely only on organic installs, or would a mix of strategies work better? Isn’t optimizing keywords and refining creatives essential for higher visibility? Would running Apple Search Ads not further amplify reach? And doesn’t encouraging strong reviews ultimately help in improving both ranking and credibility?

App Store Optimization in 2026 requires a more strategic, data driven approach as Apple’s algorithms evolve and user expectations continue to rise. This overview covers the key ASO trends iOS developers should focus on, including AI powered keyword insights, product page optimization, conversion focused testing, and advanced localization to drive sustainable organic growth.

User spending on mobile apps keeps rising, but competition is growing faster, making App Store Optimization a critical pillar of mobile growth by improving visibility, reducing cost per install, and driving stronger organic performance. This post highlights the most important ASO trends for 2026, including AI driven optimization, user intent focus, localization, creative testing, analytics, and privacy first strategies to help apps grow consistently on the App Store.

Hello, I would like guidance on how to correctly release an app using Unlisted App Distribution. We have an iPad-only app that is intended for a limited and specific audience (not for public discovery on the App Store). We do not want the app to be searchable on the App Store, but only accessible via a direct link shared with approved users. Could you please clarify: The correct steps in App Store Connect to submit and release an app as Unlisted Whether approval for Unlisted App Distribution is required before submission, and how to request it Any specific App Review notes or documentation that should be provided during submission Common reasons apps are rejected for Unlisted App Distribution and how to avoid them The app does not use Apple Business Manager or Apple School Manager, and is not intended for public distribution. Thank you for your guidance.

When attempting to access the (Certificates Identifiers & Profiles) page, I receive the message "Unable to find a team with the given Team ID to which you belong". Even while set as a developer or as an admin I still receive the same message above.

The entire 'Certificates, IDs & Profiles' section is missing from developer.apple.com portal for one of the accounts I am a developer for. The Team is also missing from the dropdowns in Xcode in Code Signing. The organization account membership is paid through July 2026, and I do not see that the Account Holder needs to sign any agreements. I am a user on other accounts, and none of them have this issue. Does anyone know what's going on?

Hello, I have a problem regarding my App review. The issue: "Guideline 3.1.2 - Business - Payments - Subscriptions Issue Description The submission did not include all the required information for apps offering auto-renewable subscriptions. The app's metadata is missing the following required information: A functional link to the Terms of Use (EULA). If you are using the standard Apple Terms of Use (EULA), include a link to the Terms of Use in the App Description. If you are using a custom EULA, add it in App Store Connect." My explanation: I'm using Apple's original EULA in my app. The EULA was already in the "About" section. It redirects to the EULA page on Apple's official website. However, since my app also has a payment screen, I added the same information below the payment screen and submitted it for review again. Unfortunately, it's still being rejected for the same reason. I've requested a full, detailed explanation via email, but they keep sending me the same copy-and-paste message. I want to resolve this issue as soon as possible, so I decided to ask you here. Please check the screenshots and let me know what's the problem. Best regards, DryreL

Hi, I really need help to resolve the issue with submitting build made with 26.2 for review to release TestFlight build to external testers. I'm always getting "This build is using a beta version of Xcode and can’t be submitted". I tried everything from cleaning DerivedData to fully reinstalling Xcode and tools to 26.2. Even tried earlier Xcode release versions and after pressing Submit for review I always face the same issue. Nothing helps and I can't share my first app with volunteers to test. By Jan 6 2026, my Xcode 26.2 is up to date with App Store and in Xcode Organizer I choose App Store Connect and press Distribute.

Hello, Our Xcode Cloud builds are successfully archiving but fail every time during the "Export archive for app-store distribution" step. The issue appears to be a persistent authentication failure with App Store Connect that we are unable to resolve. Primary Error: The build logs show a critical authentication failure. IDEDistribution.critical.log shows: App Store Connect request for store configuration failed for account Session Proxy Provider... Unable to authenticate with App Store Connect. DVTITunesSoftwareService.log specifies the error is DVTITunesSoftwareServiceFoundation.DVTServicesSessionProviderCredentialITunesAuthenticationContextError.proxy. The build process eventually terminates during the IDEDistributionSymbolsStep with an Rsync failed error, which we believe is a symptom of the earlier authentication failure. Troubleshooting Already Performed: We have already taken the following steps without success: Verified the account used for the integration has "Account Holder" and "Admin" roles. Confirmed that Xcode Cloud's automatic signing is working correctly and is able to create new provisioning profiles. Thoroughly checked the App Store Connect web UI under Users and Access > Integrations > Xcode Cloud for a way to reset the connection, but no such option exists. Removed and re-added the Apple ID in the Xcode application's settings (Xcode > Settings > Accounts) on a local Mac. Our hypothesis is that the integrated authentication session between Xcode Cloud and App Store Connect is invalid or stale, and there is no user-facing way to reset it. Has anyone else encountered this "Session Proxy Provider" authentication error with Xcode Cloud? Is there a known solution or a different method to force a re-authentication of the service connection? Any guidance from Apple engineers or other developers would be greatly appreciated. (Developer Support Case: 102717975870)

Our app have been waiting for a review for a whole day. We need this as soon as possible since it has a huge effect on our users' expereice. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ziina-pay-get-paid-instantly/id1507246381

Hello, According to documentation, the App Store does not re-download the entire app when updating, but instead generates an update package containing only the changed content compared to the previous version. I’d like to clarify the following points: 1. Granularity of file changes If only part of a large file changes, does the update package include the entire file, or does it patch only the modified portions within that file? 2. Guideline on separating files The documentation recommends separating files that are likely to change from those that are not. How should this be interpreted in practice? 3. Verifying the diff result Is there a way for developers to check the actual diff result of the update package generated by the App Store without submitting the app? Is there a diff command tool or comparison method closer to the actual App Store update process? 4. Estimating update size during development For apps with large-scale resources, minimizing update size is critical. Are there any tools or best practices to estimate the size of the update package before submitting to the App Store? Any clarification or reference materials would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Hello, I am encountering the following error when uploading a build to App Store Connect: ITMS-90555: Thinned app size is too large – Your on-demand resources in the universal variant are 30 GB, which exceeds the maximum allowable size. After app thinning, the total size of your on-demand resource asset packs in any variant must be less than 30 GB. Our application includes a large amount of font resources delivered via ODR. Before making structural changes, I need clarification because the documentation does not fully explain how ODR size calculations work per variant. Environment Xcode: (latest stable) Distribution method: App Store submission ODR total size before thinning: approximately (28 GB) Build processing fails immediately with the ITMS-90555 error Questions How exactly does App Thinning compute the size of ODR asset packs per variant? Is ODR size evaluated: Per device-specific variant, Or is the “universal variant” treated as an additional variant that must independently stay under 30GB? The documentation mentions a 30GB limit per variant, but the universal variant error message is ambiguous. If device-specific variants are below 30GB but only the “universal variant” exceeds it, is the build still rejected? In our case: iPhone-only variants appear to be below the limit, But the universal variant exceeds 30GB due to aggregated resources. Is this expected behavior? Best practices for managing very large ODR sets (e.g., fonts) Fonts are small individually, but thousands of them produce very large ODR groups. Is there recommended guidance from Apple for: Structuring ODR bundles to avoid the universal variant exceeding the limit Segmenting ODR by device class / feature sets Any alternative packaging strategies Are there tools or logs that reveal how App Store Connect decides variant groupings and ODR size? At the moment, the failure only shows the ITMS-90555 error without further detail. Case-ID for DTS reference DTS advised submitting this question here. Case-ID: 17273913 Any clarification from Apple engineers or community members who have navigated ODR size limits would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!

Hello everyone, few days back I posted about how apple rejected my build and now after 3 days, they replied back in a very unclear, and I am not being able to understand what they really mean by that. Context :- In my app, when the user clicked on "export" button, it should show the export options, however, if the user is not on a lifetime plan, it should open the "premium" popup / modal to allow them to purchase. Now, this modal loades project based on storekit IN app purchases I added, and locally I tested using the `.storekit` file and everything worked fine. However, before archieveing the build for app store connect, I remove the local file form "edit" scema, and I thought it should load automatically based on the IAP, because I added the IAP to the app build in the console as well. But now, apple responded with this after 3 days :- Issue Description The app exhibited one or more bugs that would negatively impact App Store users. Bug description: "Export" button brings up an empty sheet that seems like a In-App Purchase. (Please see attached screenshot) Next Steps Test the app on supported devices to identify and resolve bugs and stability issues before submitting for review. If you are unable to reproduce the bug, try the following: - For new apps, uninstall all previous versions of your app from a device, then install and follow the steps to reproduce. - For app updates, install the new version as an update to the previous version, then follow the steps to reproduce. They are saying that the premium modal is showing empty. However, what am I suppose to do here? Its working as expected, it needs to show the IAP which I already added? Can someone please guide here a bit, I am on a verge of cry, after waiting for 3 days, they replied with no clear answer and probably gonna take another week ( because of weekend tommorow ) and I am not sure what they really mean by that? This is screenshot of loaded modal and without loaded modal :-

We need clarification on the following scenario and whether the requested actions are possible. Currently, we have an Enterprise iOS application that is distributed internally through Microsoft Intune using an Enterprise Apple Developer account. We are now planning to release the same application publicly via the Apple App Store using an App Store (public) Apple Developer account. While attempting to create a new app in App Store Connect, we are unable to proceed because the Bundle Identifier is already registered under the Enterprise account, and Apple does not allow creating another app with the same identifier. We would like clarification on the following points: Is it possible to move or transfer an app (or its Bundle Identifier) from an Enterprise Apple Developer account to a Public/App Store Apple Developer account? If yes, what is the recommended process to do so? If not, what alternatives are available while retaining the same Bundle Identifier? 2. If the app is successfully published on the App Store using the same Bundle Identifier, what will happen to users who already have the Enterprise version installed via Intune? Will their existing app automatically update from the App Store? Or will they need to uninstall the Enterprise version and install the App Store version manually? We would appreciate your guidance on the supported approach and best practices for this transition to ensure a smooth migration for existing users.

I have an app approved for testing, it shows that I have been notified, but does not show in Test Flight. Completely unsure of what to do. ??