“offloading”

and someone tried removing all cards, removing apple wallet, restarting and reinstalling it ? if I understand well, the problem comes from the wallet notification not coming at the good time so resetting maybe can make the trick . BTW got the same problem, when I pay with apple wallet, dont got the wallet notification, so the shortcut return failed . tried resetting, rewritting the shortcut, offloading shortcut etc nothing work, so maybe the problem is wallet ? ps: how did you founded the shortcut trace ?

These are the Developer Forums, where developers of apps for Apple's platforms ask each other for hints and tips on coding. Your question is more of a product support one, so I'd suggest you ask it over at the Apple Support Forums. Thanks. System data is the System, i.e. iOS plus necessary files such as logs and cache files. That number will stay pretty static. There's not really a lot you can do to reduce that. Try and offload some of your data to iCloud. Enable iCloud Photos and turn on Optimise iPhone Storage in Settings > Apps > Photos. Regardless, you have a 64GB iPhone, which isn't that big these days. It might've been fine five years ago, but not really now.

I’m still not entirely sure I understand where you’re going with this, but let’s start with some basic info. First, this header is defined by the virtio spec: https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.1/virtio-v1.1.html Next, my general advice is: On the transmit path (packets from the VM), the virtio header can be used to indicate whether checksum offload is requested or not, and also whether they are transmitting a TCP large segment (TSO). On the receive path (packets going to the VM), the virtio header communicates whether the checksum has already been validated and doesn’t need to be checked. It can also indicate a large receive offload packet and the number of segments that were aggregated. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

@Engineer we are working on an alternative approach to renew the attestation in case of these failures. We still want to use a possession factor secured in Secure Enclave for device binding. And for that we are planning to use a PrivateKey Are you aware if this offloading issue only impacts app attestation or can the same issue happen with keys created via Secure Encalve too? Thanks

We've in a very similar situation too and suspect many of our users are unwillingly churning as the app is offloading automatically because our users mainly use the extension and not the app itself. I hope we can soon get some transparency about what causes these automatic offboardings. It is about size, days of not opening the app, or whether the app does not communicate with the OS.

Oh, there are so many pitfalls here )-: The System keychain is a filed-based keychain. To modify it you must have file system permissions to change the file. That means running as root. Using sudo for this is tricky because of execution context issues. There are two relavent bits of execution context here: BSD and security. The sudo command changes the first but not the second. That can result in a lot of ‘fun’ edge cases. In this specific situation I think the only relevant edge case is the default keychain, which is easy to work around. However, keep an eye out for this in other situations where you use the security-related APIs from sudo. Note TN2083 Daemons and Agents talks about execution contexts in some detail. File-based keychains use an access control system based on ACLs. If program A adds a keychain item and program B tries to access it, one of two things happens by default: If B is in a GUI context, the user gets a dialog asking whether to allow this. If not, the access fails. Your -T argument is

The issue with the keys not working when an app is offloaded/reloaded and when an app is restored from backup (or migrated to a new device) is known. It has to do with the backed up key information no longer matching the on device information after a restore. The AppAttest team is aware of this, and is working on a solution in an upcoming iOS release. In the meantime, the workaround is to follow the standard guidance when encountering key errors, and to generate a new key and attest it. Argun Tekant /  DTS Engineer / Core Technologies

Hi, @DTS Engineer [quote='820617022, DTS Engineer, /thread/771298?answerId=820617022#820617022'] The queue architecture above handles this. Every queue has an associated dispatch queue, which lets you control parallel packet processing. [/quote] In the RSS feature of Windows (e.g., as described on the website https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/netcx/rsc-offload), the driver developer uses NET_ADAPTER_RECEIVE_SCALING_HASH_SECRET_KEY to request a hash key from the system. This hash key is then used with an algorithm to calculate a hash value, which determines the specific QueueID. Then, I reviewed this document IOUserNetworkRxSubmissionQueue/withpool As I understand it, if I need 4 queues, they can be created using withPool to initialize IOUserNetworkPacketQueueId queueId[0~3]. Each queue extracts packets from the same IOUserNetworkPacketBufferPool, with capacity and bufferCount set as uint32_t capacity, uint32_t bufferCount. However, I am uncertain how to declare or assign valu

Tx/Rx Multiqueue, Yes. A DEXT can have multiple IOUserNetworkRxSubmissionQueue/IOUserNetworkRxCompletionQueue and IOUserNetworkTxSubmissionQueue/IOUserNetworkTxCompletionQueue. RSS The queue architecture above handles this. Every queue has an associated dispatch queue, which lets you control parallel packet processing. NS/ARP offload Your DEXT is directly controlling your hardware so, yes, I think this is something you could configure your hardware to do. RSC, PTP or packet timestamping and TSN. I'm not entirely sure how all of those are handled but it might be helpful to look at the NetworkingDriverKit Constants list. __ Kevin Elliott DTS Engineering, CoreOS/Hardware

tl;dr - you might want to check for offloaded apps. Those might count towards a high System Data usage as well. Just adding to the discussion since I recently discovered that offloaded app storage counts towards the System Data usage. It might have been mentioned here, but I just skimmed throught the responses... In my case I had ~65Gb System Data usage, but when re-downloading one specific video app it became evident that 50Gb of those were from that app. So after re-downloading, System Data usage was reduced by 50Gb - but of course that was just moved to Applications. But now it's at least evident what app is using those 50Gb:s, giving me a fair chance to clean it up.

Documents or an Application Support directory in the Library. From everything I’ve read, it seems that Apple’s intent is Library/Application Support. Which is the correct location? Application Support - though it doesn’t really matter except in the case where you have a mixture of “documents” that the user needs to have access to via e.g. the Files app and “non-documents” that they shouldn’t. the app stopped displaying what was two years of data in SQLite. I haven’t yet tested for index corruption, however one of the programmers believes this resulted from an iOS update that needed space and cleared data in the cache (but that makes no sense to myself). You weren’t storing it in the Caches directory, or using the “don’t backup” xattr, were you? OS updates can “offload” apps, but I’ve not seen any reports of that causing problems. Do you vacuum your sqlite db?