Here we go again! A bigger company copied some of my ideas from my android app since apple is still rejecting. The redesinged it a little bit to fit 4.3 Design: Spam and got approved a couple of weeks ago. Bad enough.. so I redesinged my App the same way and resubmitted it. And guess what.. Still rejected because of 4.3 Design: Spam. THIS IS UNFAIR TREATMENT! THIS IS FU*CKING NOT OKAY! I am so mad right now. I have a meeting with a lawyer tomorrow. You should do the same!
4.3
405 results found
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Guidelines 4.3 is in place for very good reasons - Take a look at the Google play store. Be creative and be unique instead of trying to game the system with copy cat apps.
I have an iMac 2014 5k with 32 GB Ram, The system can't manage the memory. most of the time I have 4.3% to 12% free memory. And the speed is so low for simple tasks.
Yes I also have the Betas Profile installed, and after installing a few weeks ago it updated after installing the profile, but nothing since then. Under about my watch has version 4.3 (15T212) is that the latest.
I just updated to the latest watchOS 4.3 beta 3 (15T5187e) and the problem is resolved. The cards now show up again and you can use them for payment with Apple Pay.
This seems like a bug and you can report it directly to apple at https://feedbackassistant.apple.com You could also first check if it is still in the latest version of Xcode (4.3), as it might already be fixed.
With two apps having the same functionality but different branding, you're more likely to have problems with 4.3 (Spam). Apple has been pretty rigorous enforcing that rule over the past few years.
If you go to theapp's page within the AppStore it'll at least say Installing with a 4.3 GB download appearing in Launch Pad but again.. it hangs and waits forever
Hello, it would be considered as spamming. Check out section 4.3 in the review guidelines. 4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough ****, burp, flashlight, and Kama Sutra apps already. Spamming the store may lead to your removal from the Developer Program.
The version I submitted is 1.0.1, and the build is 105. I only added features and optimizations to the original version, so it is judged as 4.3. Did the review compare my 1.0 version as a duplicate value
I also just got my container app rejected for 4.3... They tell you to create a container app and then they reject it... So expect it to be rejected. I had to submit to the review board because I know they will not read my comment. Good Luck
Assuming you are a registered MFI developer then the spec for the QR code is documented in the HomeKit Accessory Protocol Specification - in version R15 of that spec it is in section 4.3. You can download the spec from the MFI website when you log in on your account.
After installing Beta 3 tonight found that Crashplan is borked. The UI is totally unresponsive and unusable. Suspect it has something to do with the Apps Java dependence. It seems to continue to run backups but nothing with the UI works. I've seen a few forums in which folks are saying it does work but I'm not sure that is really the case. I've submitted diagnostics logs, and information to Apple and Crashplan. Recommend those experiencing the same problems report through the proper support channels.
my Chinese Chess Game be rejected 2 times. the reason: We continued to notice that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam. What I'm more curious about is where is the measurement standard for this sentence? According to this reply same feature set as other apps , should APPLE STORE have only one chess games, and the others are considered spam? but why there are so many Chess game there? do they have different features? based on that reply, I think, I am not a chess player. or I am not playing IOS chess game. my APP should be the strongest AI already. have Large End Game Database for play. have self define board for play With AI. any suggestion of make different features set?
Hi, I have a VPN app that was developed using Flutter, and all of the codebase was created on our own. We are not using any code templates or etc. However it constantly gets rejected due to this reason. My suspicion is that I was originally developing this app using another developer account, and we had submitted it to TestFlight before. If I remove this app from my older account, would it still be considered as a duplication of existing app?