App sandbox not enabled. The following executables must include the "com.apple.security.app-sandbox" entitlement with a Boolean value of true in the entitlements property list: [( "com.xx.pkg/Payload/xx.app//Contents/Resources/ss-local", "ccom.xx.pkg/Payload/xx.app//Contents/Resources/v2ray-plugin" )] Refer to App Sandbox page at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/app_sandbox for more information on sandboxing your app. (ID: ca7d4fde-0f0d-4a71-9eee-a01692797549)

A few months ago I requested access to the com.apple.developer.contacts.notes entitlement, which I now have access to. While running on 'Debug' build configuration, everything works as expected. When creating a 'Release' build, however, the entitlement does not appear to be included with the app, as the console reports that fetching the note for each contact fails. When I try to add the "Contact Notes" capability in Xcode, under the 'Release' tab in the project settings, the capability appears for a few seconds, then disappears when I move to a different tab and return. This does not happen for the 'Debug' configuration. Attempted Resolutions: Changing the signing configuraiton from 'Automatic' to 'Manual', using a manually generated provisioning profile. I manually inspected the provisioning profile using the terminal to ensure it included the entitlement. Creating a separate entitlement file with com.apple.developer.contacts.notes, adding it to the root of the project. Ensuring that the path to this file is correct on the 'Release' configuration. Ensuring 'Contacts Notes Field Access' is enabled under 'Additional Capabilities' in the Developer portal. Adding the capability on Xcode. Below is the inspector displaying the provisioning profile for the 'Debug' Configuration: And the following image below shows the inspector details for the 'Release' Configuration provisioning profile: When I use a manual provisioning profile and an entitlements file at the root of the project, Xcode displays this strange error:

Hello,I have released macOS version of my game before iOS Version, after releasing macOS version, cannot run & debug my game on Xcode getting error ; Provisioning profile "iOS Team Provisioning Profile: com.codepad.motorush" doesn't include the com.apple.application-identifier entitlement. please take a look to screenshot view.

We're seeing an issue where our app builds that previously were working suddenly started failing to install through TestFlight. When the user hits Update in TestFlight, they get an error message "The profile can't be installed. Try again.". Double checked the certificates and provisioning profiles, rebuilt and deployed the app, still same issue. We subsequently tried side loading the ipa file using XCode hoping for more detail. The install failed there as well, with the following error message: "Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement." Seems like a good lead but haven't found much. Our provisioning profiles have the "beta-reports-active: true" entitlement and anyway haven't changed since it was working previously. Any idea what could be going on here? Here's the full error from XCode: Error installing 'APP.ipa', ERROR: Error Domain=com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError Code=3002 "Failed to install the app on the device." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to install the app on the device., NSURL=file:///APP.ipa, NSUnderlyingError=0x60000372ea00 {Error Domain=IXUserPresentableErrorDomain Code=14 "Unable to Install “APP”" UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0x60000372e5e0 {Error Domain=MIInstallerErrorDomain Code=13 "Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.)" UserInfo={FunctionName=-[MIInstallableBundle _installEmbeddedProfilesWithError:], LegacyErrorString=ApplicationVerificationFailed, SourceFileLine=308, LibMISErrorNumber=-402620385, NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.)}}, NSLocalizedDescription=Unable to Install “APP”, NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.), NSLocalizedFailureReason=This app cannot be installed because its integrity could not be verified.}}} Domain: com.apple.dt.DVTCoreDevice Code: -1 User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2024-06-19 19:40:04 +0000"; } -- System Information macOS Version 14.2.1 (Build 23C71) Xcode 15.2 (22503) (Build 15C500b) Timestamp: 2024-06-19T14:40:04-05:00

Hello, I referred to the official camera extension example at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coremediaio/creating_a_camera_extension_with_core_media_i_o?language=objc. I'm using CMake to build the camera extension plugin and integrate it into a Qt CMake project. When installing the system extension file, I receive a failure prompt with the following message: Error Domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain Code=8 "Invalid code signature or missing entitlements" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Invalid code signature or missing entitlements} Here are the entitlements files for the camera extension: <?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"> <plist version=\"1.0\"> <dict> <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>com.yealink.meeting.app</string> </array> </dict> </plist> The info.List.in file for the camera extension: <?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"> <plist version=\"1.0\"> <dict> <key>CMIOExtension</key> <dict> <key>CMIOExtensionMachServiceName</key> <string>$(TeamIdentifierPrefix)$(PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER)</string> </dict> </dict> </plist> And the entitlements file for the app: <?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"> <plist version=\"1.0\"> <dict> <key>com.apple.developer.system-extension.install</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>com.yealink.meeting.app</string> </array> <key>com.apple.security.device.camera</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.device.microphone</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.device.usb</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.network.client</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.network.server</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.personal-information.location</key> <true/> </dict> </plist> I'm looking forward to your response.

Hi, I have a PCI DriverKit System Extension project that our team has tested, and the entitlements are not a problem. Once we decided to place the project to the Apple Store the review team requested to add "App Sandbox" entitlement to the project. Then I added the entitlement manually to the ".entitlements" file ( I couldn't do that using the Xcode add entitlement section because since it is a driverkit project, the "App sandbox" is not visible in the entitlements page ) and re-packaged the project for distribution. Later on, I saw that the entitlement was removed during the packaging process. I also tried to add that using the "build settings" page in Xcode (the signing section ), but I had no luck. I feel like I'm being misled by the review team. Do you know if the "App sandbox" entitlement is applicable to a DriverKit project ?

Hello everyone! I'm developing framework and app for macOS for PCI devices. For communication with driverkit, I'm verifying by giving userclient access entities of system extension to app. However, the app is just a sample program, and our customer is trying to develop the app using a framework with PCI communication part. Is there a way to build a framework with my company's signature, and to build and execute it without acquiring userclient access elements by any chance by a customer developer? Moreover, userclient access is only available to developers who have subscribed to the Apple Developer Program, so I hope that client/developers do not need to obtain separate entries.

My company is developing internal security software to deploy exclusively on corporate Mac endpoints. We are using the Endpoint Security framework, which requires the restricted com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client entitlement. We were granted development access to this entitlement, but we have been denied distribution access. It's not practical to use ad-hoc provisioning for distributing the app internally to our users. Unfortunately the brief denial message did not provide any advice for a path forward. If my company signed up for the Apple Developer Enterprise Program (https://developer.apple.com/programs/enterprise/), is it possible to grant the Endpoint Security entitlement for internal enterprise distribution? Otherwise, we appear to be stuck and unable to use Endpoint Security for our internal applications.

Due to changes in macOS 15 Sequoia with respect to container privacy/privileges, I have observed warnings with one of my apps (non-sandboxed) when its subsidiary crash reporter process tries to access the host app's data folder. I THINK I've worked around this issue by granting the crash reporter and the host app access to the same application group. I'm not 100% sure how all this works except that the problem went away :) The problem is, once the problem goes away on a given system, it goes away for good! Even with subsequent attempts to open a version of the app before the fix was in place, the system warning is not presented. I've tried to reset SystemPolicyAppBundles on the app via tccutil, but it makes no difference. Using the wisdom from one of Quinn's posts (https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/706442) I set up a log stream invocation to try to gather clues, and I notice that when I launch my app now, I see messages like: Found provenance data on process: TA(82542d1beaf132a6, 2), 51084 Process was already in provenance sandbox, skipping: 51084, TA(82542d1beaf132a6, 2) I suspect this "provenance" may reflect the change in how the system treats my application. First: I wonder if it's a bug that any change in "provenance" should retroactively apply to versions of the app before the change was made. Second, I wonder if there's some way to RESET this provenance so that I can reproduce the bug again? I might be able to reproduce it by changing the bundle ID for the app but for purposes of testing against existing, shipped versions of the app, I'd love to be able to reset things for sanity-checking.