Hello, creating a simple-as-it-gets Slider in SwiftUI and then running that app on Mac Catalyst with the macOS idiom enabled, the app crashes: struct ContentView: View { @State private var sliderValue: Double = 0.4 var body: some View { VStack { Slider(value: $sliderValue) } .padding() } } running this will result in an exception: _setMinimumEnabledValue: is not supported on UISlider when running Catalyst apps in the Mac idiom. See UIBehavioralStyle for possible alternatives. This is obviously not ideal and also apparently no documented. Is there a workaround for this? It used to work for on macOS Sonoma. macOS 26 RC Xcode 26 RC FB20191635 Thanks!

Hello, I'm using LongPressGesture to provide haptic & color change feedback on a long press action. This fails to call the .updating(_:body:) method on every iOS 18.0 beta. It works fine on iOS 17. The following code, taken directly from Apple's documentation illustrates the problem. The .updating() closure is never called, while the .onEnded() closure is called correctly. Instead of a gradual color transition the example code generates a delayed sharp switch from Red to Blue, preventing interactive user feedback. struct LongPressGestureView: View { @GestureState private var isDetectingLongPress = false @State private var completedLongPress = false var longPress: some Gesture { LongPressGesture(minimumDuration: 3) .updating($isDetectingLongPress) { currentState, gestureState, transaction in gestureState = currentState transaction.animation = Animation.easeIn(duration: 2.0) } .onEnded { finished in self.completedLongPress = finished } } var body: some View { Circle() .fill(self.isDetectingLongPress ? Color.red : (self.completedLongPress ? Color.green : Color.blue)) .frame(width: 100, height: 100, alignment: .center) .gesture(longPress) } } Can anyone share tips on a workaround or potential fix application-side?

We are trying to implement live caller id lookup, there is lack of documentation and we would like to understand few blockers that we have: Based on this documentation page: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/identitylookup/setting-up-the-http-endpoints-for-live-caller-id-lookup: What exactly should accept/return these endpoints?. There is no detailed description of the response/request schema for any endpoint. What are the usage scenarios of the "/key" method? If it is possible to get a more detailed explanation regarding Evaluation Key usage as it is not clear from the available documentation. Based on this step by step implementation description: https://github.com/apple/live-caller-id-lookup-example/blob/main/Sources/PIRService/PIRService.docc/Authentication.md: The 6th step: "Authentication server returns the list of public keys (potentially through a proxy)". What is the endpoint path and response format expected by the iOS system? This step refers to calling the '/config' endpoint ? The 8th step: "Authentication server verifies the User Token and returns the public key that is associated with the User Tier. ..." What is the the endpoint path and request/response format expected by the iOS system? The 9th step: "The system constructs a Privacy Pass token request using the specific public key. The token request is sent along with the User Token to the authentication server". What is the request/response format expected by the iOS system? The 11th step: "When a PIR request is made, the system attached an unused Privacy Pass token to the request. The PIR node can use the public key to verify that the token is valid and that assures that the request is authorized". What is the request/response format expected by the iOS system? On executing refreshPIRParameters fom app I get this error: LiveCallerIDLookupManager.shared.refreshPIRParameters(forExtensionWithIdentifier: LiveCallerIdExtensionName) Unable to query status due to errors: server error (Access DeniedAccess DeniedYou don't have permission to access "http://www.example.com/config" on this server.Reference #18.cdde00d4.1738074526.3a38870https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.cdde00d4.1738074526.3a38870) Why it tries to reach example.com/config but not our serviceURL or tokenIssuerURL? Any help would be appreciated.

Summary As presented in the SwiftUI WWDC video, the new tabViewBottomAccessory should allow for unique contents for .inline. This is what was presented as being used for the Apple Music miniplayer. However, the functionality seems to be either missing or unintuitive. As seen in the photos attached, not only does .inline functionality not seem to do anything, but the inline accessory also has misaligned elements that cannot be fixed by conditionally modifying the contents. Build Target iOS 26.0 Details This problem recurs on physical devices, simulators, and Xcode previews. Here is a view I've constructed for use as a tabViewBottomAccessory: struct FitnessToolbarAccessory: View { @Environment(\.tabViewBottomAccessoryPlacement) var placement var body: some View { if (placement == .inline) { Text("hello") } else { HStack { HStack { Image(systemName: "dumbbell.fill") VStack(alignment: .leading) { Text("Active Workout") Text("Push Day - Chest") .font(.system(size: 13)) } Spacer() Image(systemName: "pause.fill") } .padding() } } } } Here is the result, working as expected in expanded mode: And here is the result in inline mode after minimizing the tabViewBottomAccessory: The content of this inline accessory is clearly incorrect, as it was specified to contain a Text view containing "hello". Additionally, the contents seem to have some incorrect alignment. This occurs regardless of the contents of the accessory, even plain text.

When I dismiss a view presented with .navigationTransition(.zoom), the source view gets a weird background (black or white depending on the appearance) for a couple of seconds, and then it disappears. Here’s a simple code example. import SwiftUI struct NavigationTransition: View { @Namespace private var namespace @State private var isSecondViewPresented = false var body: some View { NavigationStack { ZStack { DetailView(namespace: namespace) .onTapGesture { isSecondViewPresented = true } } .fullScreenCover(isPresented: $isSecondViewPresented) { SecondView() .navigationTransition(.zoom(sourceID: "world", in: namespace)) } } } } struct DetailView: View { var namespace: Namespace.ID var body: some View { ZStack { Color.blue Text("Hello World!") .foregroundStyle(.white) .matchedTransitionSource(id: "world", in: namespace) } .ignoresSafeArea() } } struct SecondView: View { var body: some View { ZStack { Color.green Image(systemName: "globe") .foregroundStyle(Color.red) } .ignoresSafeArea() } } #Preview { NavigationTransition() }

"Use location, address and addressRepresentations instead" Is it possible to know what kind of "Address" a MapItem is representing (State, County, Neighborhood etc) after a MKGeocodingRequest? Is it possible to find out the CLRegion or similar of an map item. (Now when we cannot read it from the Placemark)

demo code : - (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect { CGContextRef context = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext(); // Flip the coordinate system CGContextSetTextMatrix(context, CGAffineTransformIdentity); CGContextTranslateCTM(context, 0, self.bounds.size.height); CGContextScaleCTM(context, 1.0, -1.0); NSDictionary *attrs = @{NSFontAttributeName: [UIFont systemFontOfSize:20], NSForegroundColorAttributeName: [UIColor blueColor], NSUnderlineStyleAttributeName: @(NSUnderlineStyleThick), }; // Make an attributed string NSAttributedString *attributedString = [[NSAttributedString alloc] initWithString:@"Hello CoreText!" attributes:attrs]; CFAttributedStringRef attributedStringRef = (__bridge CFAttributedStringRef)attributedString; // Simple CoreText with CTFrameDraw CTFramesetterRef framesetter = CTFramesetterCreateWithAttributedString(attributedStringRef); CGPathRef path = CGPathCreateWithRect(self.bounds,NULL); CTFrameRef frame = CTFramesetterCreateFrame(framesetter,CFRangeMake(0, 0),path,NULL); //CTFrameDraw(frame, context); // You can comment the line 'CTFrameDraw' and use the following lines // draw with CTLineDraw CFArrayRef lines = CTFrameGetLines(frame); CGPoint lineOrigins[CFArrayGetCount(lines)]; CTFrameGetLineOrigins(frame, CFRangeMake(0, 0), lineOrigins); for (int i = 0; i < CFArrayGetCount(lines); i++) { CTLineRef line = CFArrayGetValueAtIndex(lines, i); CGContextSetTextPosition(context, lineOrigins[i].x, lineOrigins[i].y); // CTLineDraw(line, context); // You can comment the line 'CTLineDraw' and use the following lines // draw with CTRunDraw // use CTRunDraw will lost some attributes like NSUnderlineStyleAttributeName, // so you need draw it by yourself CFArrayRef runs = CTLineGetGlyphRuns(line); for (int j = 0; j < CFArrayGetCount(runs); j++) { CTRunRef run = CFArrayGetValueAtIndex(runs, j); CTRunDraw(run, context, CFRangeMake(0, 0)); } } } this code will use CTRunDraw to draw the content , and the underline will draw and show normally in iOS17 & Xcode 15 , But when you build it with XCode16 & iOS18 beta . the underline will be missing .

Right now, the traffic light buttons overlapped on my iPad app top corner on windows mode (full screen is fine). How do I properly design my app to avoid the traffic light buttons? Detect that it is iPadOS 26?

Hello, community and Apple engineers. I need your help. Our app has the following issue: NavigationStack pushes a view twice if the NavigationStack is inside TabView and NavigationStack uses a navigation path of custom Hashable elements. Our app works with issues in Xcode 18 Beta 13 + iOS 18.0. The same issue happened on previous beta versions of Xcode 18. The issue isn’t represented in iOS 17.x and everything worked well before iOS 18.0 beta releases. I was able to represent the same issue in a clear project with two simple views. I will paste the code below. Several notes: We use a centralised routing system in our app where all possible routes for navigation path are implemented in a View extension called withAppRouter(). We have a enum RouterDestination that contains all possible routes and is resolved in withAppRouter() extension. We use Router class that contains @Published var path: [RouterDestination] = [] and this @Published property is bound to NavigationStack. In the real app, we need to have an access to this path property for programmatic navigation purposes. Our app uses @ObservableObject / @StateObject approach. import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @StateObject private var router = Router() var body: some View { TabView { NavigationStack(path: $router.path) { NavigationLink(value: RouterDestination.next, label: { Label("Next", systemImage: "plus.circle.fill") }) .withAppRouter() } } } } enum RouterDestination: Hashable { case next } struct SecondView: View { var body: some View { Text("Screen 2") } } class Router: ObservableObject { @Published var path: [RouterDestination] = [] } extension View { func withAppRouter() -> some View { navigationDestination(for: RouterDestination.self) { destination in switch destination { case .next: return SecondView() } } } } Below you can see the GIF with the issue: What I tried to do: Use iOS 17+ @Observable approach. It didn’t help. Using @State var path: [RouterDestination] = [] directly inside View seems to help. But it is not what we want as we need this property to be @Published and located inside Router class where we can get an access to it, and use for programmatic navigation if needed. I ask Apple engineers to help with that, please, and if it is a bug of iOS 18 beta, then please fix it in the next versions of iOS 18.0

With the introduction of the new matchedTransitionSource from iOS 18, we can apply a zoom transition in the navigation view using .navigationTransition(.zoom) This works well for zoom animations. However, when I try to apply a matched geometry effect to views that are similar in the source and destination views, the zoom transition works, but those views don't transition seamlessly as they do with a matched geometry effect. Is it possible to still use matched geometry for subviews of the source and destination views along with the new navigationTransition? Here’s a little demo that reproduces this behaviour: struct ContentView: View { let colors: [[Color]] = [ [.red, .blue, .green], [.yellow, .purple, .brown], [.cyan, .gray] ] @Namespace() var namespace var body: some View { NavigationStack { Grid(horizontalSpacing: 50, verticalSpacing: 50) { ForEach(colors, id: \.hashValue) { rowColors in GridRow { ForEach(rowColors, id: \.self) { color in NavigationLink { DetailView(color: color, namespace: namespace) .navigationTransition( .zoom( sourceID: color, in: namespace ) ) .edgesIgnoringSafeArea(.all) } label: { ZStack { RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 5) .foregroundStyle(color) .frame(width: 48, height: 48) Image(systemName: "star.fill") .foregroundStyle(Material.bar) .matchedGeometryEffect(id: color, in: namespace, properties: .frame, isSource: false) } } .matchedTransitionSource(id: color, in: namespace) } } } } } } } struct DetailView: View { var color: Color let namespace: Namespace.ID var body: some View { ZStack { color Image(systemName: "star.fill") .resizable() .foregroundStyle(Material.bar) .matchedGeometryEffect(id: color, in: namespace, properties: .frame, isSource: false) .frame(width: 100, height: 100) } .navigationBarHidden(false) } } #Preview { ContentView() }

struct ContentView: View {   @State var isPresented = false   var body: some View {     Button {       isPresented.toggle()     } label: {       Text("Button")     }     .sheet(isPresented: $isPresented) {       SubView()     }   } } struct SubView: View {   @State var text = ""   var body: some View {     NavigationStack {       TextEditor(text: $text)         .toolbar {           ToolbarItemGroup(placement: .bottomBar) {             Button("Click") {             }           }           ToolbarItemGroup(placement: .keyboard) {             Button("Click") {             }           }         }     }   } }

I have a UIKit app with a UIHostingController embedded as a child controller. In this UIHostingController there's a SwiftUI view which expands and collapses with an animation to show/hide content within it. The hosting controller uses .intrinsicContentSize sizing option. This all works fine, and the animation of the expand/collapse looks good so far as the SwiftUI view, in a preview for example. But running the app the hosting controller doesn't animate its view's size alongside the SwiftUI view animating its size. Instead the hosting controller jumps from the correct start/end sizes without any animation. So technically although it has the right size when the SwiftUI view is expanded/collapsed, this not a nice UX as the hosting controller jumps immediately from its small size to its larger one on expanding and vice versa for collapsing while the SwiftUI contents animates nicely. I'm assuming there's somewhere I should be calling (in some form or another) a: UIView.animate(withDuration: 0.4) { hostingController.view.layoutIfNeeded() } alongside the SwiftUI animations - but I can't see any hook between my SwiftUI view .animation(value:) function and somewhere that hosting controller could jump in alongside this animation and animate its view's frame.

I've been experimenting with Liquid Glass quite a bit and watched all the WWDC videos. I'm trying to create a glassy segmented picker, like the one used in Camera: however, it seems that no matter what I do there's no way to recreate a truly clear (passthrough) bubble that just warps the light underneath around the edges. Both Glass.regular and Glass.clear seem to add a blur that can not be evaded, which is counter to what clear ought to mean. Here are my results: I've used SwiftUI for my experiment but I went through the UIKit APIs and there doesn't seem to be anything that suggests full transparency. Here is my test SwiftUI code: struct GlassPicker: View { @State private var selected: Int? var body: some View { ScrollView([.horizontal], showsIndicators: false) { HStack(spacing: 0) { ForEach(0..<20) { i in Text("Row \(i)") .id(i) .padding() } } .scrollTargetLayout() } .contentMargins(.horizontal, 161) .scrollTargetBehavior(.viewAligned) .scrollPosition(id: $selected, anchor: .center) .background(.foreground.opacity(0.2)) .clipShape(.capsule) .overlay { DefaultGlassEffectShape() .fill(.clear) // Removes a semi-transparent foreground fill .frame(width: 110, height: 50) .glassEffect(.clear) } } } Is there any way to achieve the above result or does Apple not trust us devs with more granular control over these liquid glass elements?

An app built on Xcode 26 (beta4) presents various UIViewCOntrollers. Presentation of any UIViewController that contains a UIToolbar leads to a UIKit crash when run on an iOS 18.5 device, it does not crash when run on iOS 26. The exception logged: *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidUnarchiveOperationException', reason: 'Could not instantiate class named TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView because no class named TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView was found; the class needs to be defined in source code or linked in from a library (ensure the class is part of the correct target)' Anyone else seen this? I've submitted a bug report via Feedback Assistant, including a minimal Xcode workspace that reproduces the crash, hoping this will get some attention.

Hi, I’m seeing a crash when running my app on iOS 18 simulators or devices using Xcode 26 beta 3. My app’s minimum deployment target is iOS 17, and the crash does not happen when running from Xcode 16.4. The crash occurs specifically at this line: return UIStoryboard(name: storyboard.rawValue, bundle: nil) .instantiateViewController(withIdentifier: view.rawValue) Crash Details: ** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidUnarchiveOperationException', reason: 'Could not instantiate class named _TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView_ because no class named _TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView_ was found; the class needs to be defined in source code or linked in from a library (ensure the class is part of the correct target)' *** First throw call stack: (0x191c3321c 0x18f0cdabc 0x191c91ea0 0x19d740774 0x19d740a18 0x19d740cac 0x194626680 0x194dbc784 0x19d740890 0x19d740cac 0x1949aadd8 0x19d740890 0x19d740a18 0x19d740cac 0x194802e24 0x1945f008c 0x194ed1808 0x107a8bfa0 0x107a8c05c 0x1945ec128 0x19d740890 0x19d740cac 0x1945eba60 0x19d740890 0x19d740a18 0x19d740cac 0x1945f07dc 0x1945eaea4 0x19492ee80 0x10763de00 0x1076e56fc 0x1076e5674 0x1076e5e04 0x19496108c 0x194f9b9a0 0x1949072c4 0x194f998cc 0x194f9af04 0x19445139c 0x19445ac28 0x194467508 0x1079afaec 0x1079aff5c 0x1944189a0 0x194417be4 0x1944114e4 0x194411404 0x194410ab4 0x19440c1e4 0x191b28a8c 0x191b288a4 0x191b28700 0x191b29080 0x191b2ac3c 0x1ded09454 0x19453d274 0x194508a28 0x1073564f4 0x1b89fff08) terminating due to uncaught exception of type NSException The crash occurs immediately at app launch, when attempting to load a storyboard-based UITabBarController. Works as expected on: Xcode 16.4 + iOS 18 (simulator/device) Xcode 26 beta 3 + iOS 26 (simulator/device) Running from Xcode 26 beta 3 onto iOS 18 simulators or devices and it immediate crash from the particular storyboard Setup: Xcode: 26 beta 3 macOS: 15.5 iOS Simulators: iOS 18.5 Minimum deployment target: iOS 17 UIKit-based app (not using SwiftUI) No custom toolbars or host views in use explicitly Is this a known compatibility issue when building with the iOS 26 SDK and running on iOS 18? Are there any workarounds or recommendations for running apps targeting iOS 17+ on iOS 18 simulators when using Xcode 26?

When navigationTransition returns through the return gesture, the original view disappears。 The same problem occurs when using the official example。 https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swiftui/enhancing-your-app-content-with-tab-navigation xcode Version 16.4 (16F6) macOS 15.5

I've been testing the safeAreaBar modifier to develop a custom tab bar. From my understanding, this should enable the .scrollEdgeEffectStyle to work with this bar, but I don't see any effect. Could you please clarify the difference between safeAreaBar and safeAreaInset?

Hello Apple Developer Community: I have a problem with the fullscreencover. I can see the Things, that shouldn’t be visible behind it. I’m currently developing with iOS 26 and only there it happens. I hope you can help me :) Have a nice day

[Submitted as FB18870294, but posting here for visibility.] In iOS 26 beta 3 (23A5287g), implicit animations no longer work when conditionally showing or hiding rows in a Form. Rows with Text or other views inside a Section appear and disappear abruptly, even when wrapped in withAnimation or using .animation() modifiers. This is a regression from iOS 18.5, where the row item animates in and out correctly with the same code. Repro Steps Create a new iOS App › SwiftUI project. Replace its ContentView struct with the code below Build and run on an iOS 18 device. Tap the Show Middle Row toggle and note how the Middle Row animates. Build and run on an iOS 26 beta 3 device. Tap the Show Middle Row toggle. Expected Middle Row item should smoothly animate in and out as it does on iOS 18. Actual Middle Row item appears and disappears abruptly, without any animation. Code struct ContentView: View { @State private var showingMiddleRow = false var body: some View { Form { Section { Toggle( "Show **Middle Row**", isOn: $showingMiddleRow.animation() ) if showingMiddleRow { Text("Middle Row") } Text("Last Row") } } } }

When using my app's complications with either Siri Intents or App Intents after syncing .watchface files, the complications appear without names in the iOS Watch app's complication picker. This leads to complications showing as blank entries without previews in the native watch app selector. I'm using WidgetKit to create Watch complications with both approaches: AppIntents and Siri Intents. We've tried multiple approaches with our WidgetKit watch complications: Switching between IntentConfiguration and StaticConfiguration Using different naming conventions for kind strings Ensuring display names are properly set Testing across different watchOS versions But the result is always the same: after syncing .watchface files, our complications appear unnamed in the Watch app's complication picker. Is this a known limitation with .watchface syncing, a bug in the current implementation, or is there a specific requirement we're missing to maintain complication names during the sync process?