Search results for

4.3

572 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

AppStore Review: Is there any way to get to another reviewer?
Is there a way to resubmit an iOS app for review so that it will be verified by another Apple employee?Apple rejects our app for the third time because of spam (point 4.3 of AppStore Review Guidelines), but we don't agree with that. Our app has a lot of features that similar apps don't have. We want to get some additional information about the reason, but Apple always sends us a sample answer without any details.
1
0
664
Oct ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
Excellent points raised. I believe that the problem with 4.3 rule is that Apple does not evaluate at what point the difference in content justifies the existence of a separate app.We are developing theory test apps for the UK market and were contacted last year demanding some consolidation. We've been able to resolve it with Apple by removing all our paid apps from sale and instead using in-app purchases. I thought that it was a great solution as it indeed reduced the number of apps while allowing us to keep one app per each vehicle category (Car, Motorcycle, etc.) Recently, we've been contacted by App Review, and they now demand that we make further consolidations.From a marketing point of view, further consolidation makes no sense. Users are accustomed to seeing learning materials being separated by a vehicle category and would be puzzled if such a real-life model did not exist on the App Store. Imagine if you search for Motorcycle Theory Test and all you see are a list of Driving Theory Tests.The
Oct ’18
Reply to ITMS-90081 with Xcode 10 (10A254a)
Same here. Can`t solve it. Getting this problem during the upload to ITC after a successful build. A collegue of mine can upload the exact same app but gets than an email with the following help:Invalid Binary Architecture - iOS 3.0 introduced support for multiple binary architectures. If your binary is built for multiple architectures, your Info.plist must have a MinimumOSVersion key with a value of at least 3.0. Additionally, if your app is intended to support earlier iPhone and iPod touch models, your app must contain at least an armv6 binary; thin armv7-only binaries will not be accepted unless the armv7required device capability is also present in the Info.plist UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities key or the MinimumOSVersion key has a value of 4.3 or higher.- our deployment targets are iOS 11 and watchOS 4- the Build Setting Valid Architectures for iOS is arm64- the Build Setting Valid Architectures for watchOS is arm64_32 armv7kIn the iOS info.plist we have in the Required device capabilities with arm
Sep ’18
Register multiple developer accounts issue
Hi Apple,you forced my client to rethink it's valid white lable app solution due to the 4.3 rule (Spam restriction). Your only acceptable suggestion was to get a developer account for each of the customers for the correspondig app. The developer account forces to activate a two-factor authentication, which has to be activated on a Mac. Well it seems, that each Mac can only do it for 3 accounts, after that my client see an error, that the maxmum number of accounts is reached. My client has to migrate about 100 apps to the new accounts, how to do that without purchasing new Macs for every three accounts...?Cheers,Frustrated Developer
1
0
801
Sep ’18
setTitle for Buttons not uses complete number.
I want to set the title for a button with a double number.The problem is that the function always cuts a zero, if the last number is a 0.var number1: Double = 3.99 var number2: Double = 4.30 button.setTitle((number1), for: .normal) //Title is 3.99 button.setTitle((number2), for: .normal) // Title is 4.3 but hast to be 4.30I tried to convert it with String(number2), but the title is 4.3 too.
2
0
437
Aug ’18
Reply to Solution to template apps?
Search this forum for '4.3 spam rejection'. Apple wants you to generate a single app that can be directed by the user to a specific 'client' or 'ball team' or 'barber shop' rather than one for each client, ball team or barber shop in every town in America. Another solution may be to have each of your clients create their own developer account and submit the app under that account.4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase.......
Aug ’18
Request Authorization at Launch Time not triggering request authorisation popup
Since a recent upgrade - Xcode 9.4, WatchOS 4.3, iOS 11.4, the Request Authorization at Launch Time in my watchApp is no longer generating the request authorization pop-up on the phone.My requests are appearing as if the user had provided authorization.Yes, I have uninstalled the app and rebooted all devices many times to see if there was something left hanging around.In itself, that's not a problem, as I want my users to accept Notifications, they are intrinsic to my app, but the problem is that the Simulator is not requesting authorization and denying it incenter.requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .sound]) { (granted, error) in print(granted: (granted), error: (error!)) } }
2
0
1.2k
Jun ’18
Reply to Rejected - Guideline 4.2 - Minimal functionality
You've seen it and App Review has seen it, so we're left to our imagination what they witnessed that prompted your exact rejection, but I'd speculate that a tilt-puzzle is hardly original/unique these days. MazeTilt, HydroTilt, Tilt-to-Live, FallDown, Tilt Tilt Ladybug, Block tilt Escape, Gate Tilt, tilt The Box, Time Tilt Ball....on and on, the store seems well saturated, since at least 2010. Maybe they've just had enough...surprised they didn't just flag it w/4.3.
Jun ’18
Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
I have an app called AB Player, which is a music player that can play back user's iTunes library with speed control and A-B repeat.■ AB Player ... View on App StoreThis app was rejected becasue it violates Guideline 4.3 (Spam).I have appealed to the review board. They decided to maintaint the rejection and they told me that AB-Player app is made on the same template as many of other my apps like eLaws■ eLaws ... View on App StoreeLaws is a (sort of) law dictionary app. Users can download Japanese laws from the government website and browse locally.AB Player and eLaws are completely different apps.They are not made from a same template. They may be made from Xcode's Single view app template but that's all.I explained to them but they didn't change mind. And they didn't disclose the exact reason why they think they are made on the same template.AB Player and eLaws both use Realm Swift database frameworks and Google Mobile Ads framework, as well as UIKit, CoreText etc, but I don't think that's an issue.
23
0
8.9k
Apr ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
Here is the list of our apps that got Guideline 4.3 rejection so far...• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id926102392?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after one month)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1272669652?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after giving up the obsolete version and IP commentary book reader (id1217317638))• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id978926628?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id325361059?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id560440657?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after several phone calls)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1020070997?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1217317638?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://app-liv.jp/320090110/(told to remove on the phone because it violates Guideline 4.3)
Jun ’18