Search results for

Apple Maps Guides

151,838 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Package created with pkgbuild installs zero-byte file
Hmmm, that wasn’t the answer I was expecting. Something is clearly borked on your machine. You wrote: [quote='868691022, swdev-sos, /thread/809359?answerId=868691022#868691022, /profile/swdev-sos'] Does the pkgbuild command have a cache that can be deleted? [/quote] AFAIK that’s not the case. [quote='868691022, swdev-sos, /thread/809359?answerId=868691022#868691022, /profile/swdev-sos'] We are both using [Xcode] 16.2. [/quote] The Xcode version doesn’t matter here, but rather the OS version. Are you both on the same version of macOS? If you create a new user account on your Mac, does the problem reproduce there? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1w
Reply to App signed and notarized successfully, but macOS flags it as malicious on other machines
[quote='868752022, DMSAS, /thread/794045?answerId=868752022#868752022, /profile/DMSAS'] However, some Macs still have issues with malicious software [/quote] My advice is that you test your notarised software on a ‘clean’ machine. I generally use a VM for this. See Testing a Notarised Product. If that test fails, there’s definitely something wrong with your product and you should investigate that. I have lots of advice on that topic in Resolving Trusted Execution Problems. If that test succeeds but you receive sporadic reports of Gatekeeper problems from your users, that’s a trickier issue. It’s possible that you have a Gatekeeper problem with a specific OS release. You can investigate that by re-running the above-mentioned test process with that release. However, it’s more likely that there’s something borked on that user’s machine. That puts you in a bit of a bind: You want to help the user with their problem. But debugging their machine configuration problems isn’t really your core business. This is a bala
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: General Tags:
1w
Reply to Error -25294
Sorry I didn’t reply sooner; older versions of DevForums had a bug that meant that I didn’t see updates on this thread (that’s fixed now, so yay!). [quote='785947022, Najjii, /thread/675290?answerId=785947022#785947022, /profile/Najjii'] edit the trust settings to be able to use it normally. [/quote] Monkeying with trust settings on a code-signing certificate is a bad idea. It can trigger the dreaded errSecInternalComponent. I talk more about this in Fixing an untrusted code signing certificate. [quote='794668022, olvrwn, /thread/675290?answerId=794668022#794668022, /profile/olvrwn'] Is there any information why this does not work with iCloud Keychain? [/quote] Not really. Keychain Access is very much on the way out as a user-level feature. Witness, for example, its recent move from Applications > Utilities to /System/Library/CoreServices/Applications. Given that, it’s easy to see why big picture issues like this aren’t being addressed. Having said that, the file-based keychain is also on its way out, as e
1w
Reply to Unexpected errSecInteractionNotAllowed (-25308) When Reading Keychain Item with kSecAttrAccessibleAfterFirstUnlock in Background
[quote='809534021, Yvan.d, /thread/809534, /profile/Yvan.d'] kSecAttrAccessibleAfterFirstUnlock should allow [access] as long as the device has been unlocked at least once after reboot. [/quote] Correct. I’m aware of two common causes of this problem: There are very limited circumstances under which iOS will run third-party code before first unlock. The canonical example of this is VoIP push notifications. Sometimes these problems are caused by the keychain item not having the correct kSecAttrAccessible value. For example, where the developer shipped a version of their app that set the attribute incorrectly and fixed that in the next version, which left any user who first ran the broken version of their app with the wrong value. Beyond that, it’s hard to say what’s going on here. It’s certainly possible to imagine an OS-level bug causing a problem like this, but I’m not aware of any such bug in play right now. I have general advice about how to approach issues like this in Investigating hard-to-reproduce keyc
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
1w
Downgrade Developer Test-Device to iOS 18.7.X
Hi, I accidentally upgraded my test device (iPhone 13 mini) to iOS 26. I really need to downgrade it to 18.7.X again. It seems this isn't possible since Apple doesn't sign the .ipsw anymore. Is there really no way for a paying developer to downgrade her test devices? (Please don't tell me to use the support forums, this is a concerning a developer test device)
1
0
74
1w
Reply to Downgrade Developer Test-Device to iOS 18.7.X
[quote='809588021, sts, /thread/809588, /profile/sts'] Is there … no way for a paying developer to downgrade her test devices? [/quote] That’s correct. The only exception to this rule is if the new iOS version is a beta seed, in which case you can roll back to the previous public release. For advice on how to do that, see Apple Beta > FAQ > Support > How do I leave the Apple Beta Software Programme? [quote='809588021, sts, /thread/809588, /profile/sts'] Please don't tell me to use the support forums, this is a concerning a developer test device [/quote] This answer is the same for both developers and users. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1w
Test app consent revocation in sandboxing
I followed the method outlined in Apple's documentation to test Revocation of Consent. Our server received the notification sent by Apple, but the parsed data only contains the following content (some data has been modified for privacy, but the fields remain unchanged): { receiptType: Sandbox, bundleId: com.xxx.xxxxx, receiptCreationDate: 1764932591296, requestDate: 1764932591296, originalPurchaseDate: 1375340400000, originalApplicationVersion: 1.0, appTransactionId: 705020051250081000, originalPlatform: iOS } How can we identify that a parent/guardian has revoked authorization for a specific user? We are unable to determine which minor user should be restricted from using certain features of our app. I hope to receive a prompt response from Apple's technical experts!
1
0
99
1w
Reply to iPhone 15 Pro Max Fails to Establish Connection with MT7682 IoT Device’s AP Hotspot (Affecting Network Provisioning)
We can’t really help you with Wi-Fi level issues here on the forums. My advice here is that you file a bug so that our Wi-Fi engineering team can investigate. Make sure to include: Wi-Fi debugging information Your analysis so far Regarding the former, see the Wi-Fi for iOS/iPadOS instructions on our Bug Reporting > Profiles and Logs page. Please post your bug number, just for the record. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1w
Xcode Cloud on Apple Silicon any time soon?
I'm currently using another provider for CI/CD. They've been offering Apple Silicon builds for over a year now. When we switched over, we saw our build times cut in half. I've seen similar results locally, back when I bought an M1 Mac. So, recently, I tried to use Xcode Cloud on my project. My build time is nearly 45 minutes, where my build time on my current system is about 15 minutes, max. Since I work on a team, and we make regular commits, having a 45 minute turnaround is not ideal. When I looked at the logs of my Xcode Cloud project, I saw a lot x86_64 stuff in there, which led me to believe that Xcode Cloud is still building on Intel machines. Additionally, I run tests on my builds. The build time alone (before running tests) was almost 20 minutes. The 15-minute time I cited with my current CI/CD included build time & tests running. So, a whole cycle finishes on my current setup before tests are even run. I noticed that there was a bunch of x86_64 in the logs, which made me think that Xcode
2
0
1.1k
1w
Reply to Renaming notarized ZIP packages
[quote='809584021, st-gab, /thread/809584, /profile/st-gab'] is it possible to rename a notarized ZIP package and not to loose the notarized status? [/quote] Absolutely. I think you might benefit from reading Notarisation Fundamentals, which explains what the notary service actually does. Once you understand that, you should be able to work out for yourself what post-notarisations operations are OK. Specifically, you have watch out for any operation that breaks the seal on a code signature, such as: Modifying a Mach-O image Modifying the contents of a bundle Beyond that, everything else is pretty much fair game. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Notarization Tags:
1w
Reply to sshd-keygen-wrapper permissions problem
Earlier I wrote: [quote='867857022, DTS Engineer, /thread/806187?answerId=867857022#867857022'] And, no, I don’t have any info to share as to when that fix will actually land. [/quote] As others have noted, this is still present in the macOS 26.2 Release Candidate. Given that, it’s very likely to remain unfixed in the final release of macOS 26.2 )-: and I recommend that you plan accordingly. Beyond that, I still have no specific info to share. But, as always, it’s a good idea to test with new betas of macOS as and when we seed them. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
1w