missing package product

The code completion in Swift with previous versions (prior to 7) was a bit hit and miss, but having upgraded to 7 I'm not getting any code completion at all when trying to use 'po' in the console with Swift. Anything that can be reset or changed to get this working, or is there a replacement command for 'po' that I should be using?This is demonstrable with a brand new iOS single view project in Swift, so isn't related to the inclusion of Objective C code.Objective C only projects work fine.Using 7A121L

App Transport Security (ATS) is a technology that requires an app to either support best practice HTTPS security or statically declare its security limitations via a property in its Info.plist. ATS is officially documented Bundle Resources > Information Property List NSAppTransportSecurity and Preventing Insecure Network Connections. This post contains a summary of the latest ATS developments. For more background on ATS, see:WWDC 2015 Session 706 Security and Your AppsWWDC 2015 Session 711 Networking with NSURLSessionWWDC 2016 Session 706 What’s New in SecurityWWDC 2017 Session 701 Your Apps and Evolving Network Security StandardsApp Transport Security TipLegacy ATS documentationApp Transport Security and App ReviewAt WWDC 2016 Apple announced that by the end of 2016 App Review will require “reasonable justification” for many ATS exceptions. This is not a technical change in the OS but rather a new App Review policy. The WWDC 2016 presentation has some general background to this but if you’re looking for s

I want a video on my app.I have this codeimport UIKitimport MediaPlayerclass MPMoviePlayerController : UIViewController { override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() var url:NSURL = NSURL(string: /Users/valeriasiragusa/Documents/1/ESAME APP PORTFOLIO/Portfolio/Portfolio/MPMoviePlayerController.swift)! var moviePlayer = MPMoviePlayerController(contentURL: url) //Missing argument for parameter bundle in call moviePlayer.view.frame = CGRect(x: 20, y: 100, width: 200, height: 150) moviePlayer.movieSourceType = MPMovieSourceType.File self.view.addSubview(moviePlayer.view) moviePlayer.prepareToPlay() moviePlayer.play() }}Can you solve my problem?

Hi,I'm hoping Apple developers are reading these forums to get their attention.I was very excited to learn in WWDC 2015 videos about Apple’s new SDK for steering behaviour. The game I recently released uses a library I developed that does exactly that and I was intrigued to see how Apple are going to define the SDK and how good it will be (I’m hoping it will be good in the future). (reference to my library with full sources if interested: Steering Behaviour.From my experience developing the library this is a tricky subject, especially the tuning aspects of it. To get an Agent to follow a path requires careful setting of the agent mass, speed and acceleration parameters (and in Apple's case, the prediction time). More over, if you want to get a formation of Agents following a path, or following a leader in a specific formation this tuning becomes even more challenging.Unfortunately, as it stands right now, Apple’s implementation is very, very hard to tune/debug and it becomes unpredictable. For example, I was

I have hundreds of computer in PM and when I have a device group up I know I'm missing one member but I have no way to sort the list by name. Instead it's out of order. For example I have one lab right now with 35 Macs. Currently I have 34 showing up in hte PM group. I have a paper in front of me that has 1-35 and I'm going down the list to cross out the one that's listed since theres no way to sort the list in order.

I skipped installing beta 1 on my iPhone and watch. Yesterday I installed beta 2 on my iPhone which resulted in my loosing pairing with my watch, which is still on watchos1. I managed to repair the beta2 iPhone with the watchos1 watch, but after repeated installs of the beta2 watch profile, the watch app still says that the watch is already on the latest version (1.01). The iPhone is registered in devices on the developer portal. Am I missing a step? Wasting much time with this. Thanks

I have a project that contains an App, a custom keyboard and an embedded framework. A bit of context...The app was created as an ObjC project a while ago, the keyboard was also started as ObjC. The embedded framework was added later as ObjC as well.The project is being converted to Swift. I can see the Swift compiler options in the project but setting a value at the project level trickles down into User-Defined settings at the target level.Here's a screenshot of what I'm trying to explain.On the left is the project-level settings, on the right are the target-level settings.Please note that creating a new project with the same setup does show the Swift compiler settings.How can I make these settings show up? What are the impacts of having these settings in User-Defined? Are they going to act the same way?

Hello everyone,We want to use xCode Server to run automated tests, and we encouter a problem here. xCode Server picks up wrong target when it builds the test scheme.Here is the details. We have three targets, call it OurApp, OurApp-ent, and AutomatedTests. The AutomatedTests target is a test target with host application being set to OurApp. A scheme called AutomatedTests is created based on the AutomatedTests target. So this scheme SHOULD only depend on the OurApp target and it should NOT depend on OurApp-ent target. If we build or run this AutomatedTests scheme within xCode, it works fine. It builds only the AutomatedTests target and the OurApp target.Then we create a Bot based on this AutomatedTests scheme. Then we have trouble. Sometimes xCode Server just builds the OurApp and AutomatedTests targets. This is correct. But SOMETIMES, xCode Server decides to build the OurApp-ent target as well, without any change in the source code or the settings! And this will fail because both OurApp and OurApp-ent go to t

A simple playground use case:protocol Timeout { var timeout: Double { get } } extension Timeout { var timeout: Double { return 30.0} } class A: Timeout { } class B: Timeout { var timeout: Double { return 0 } } class C: A { var timeout: Double { return 0 } } func testTimeout(obj: AnyObject) { if let o = obj as? Timeout where o.timeout > 0 { print((o) has timeout value: (o.timeout)) } else { print((obj) has NO timeout) } } /: A and B gave expected result */ testTimeout(A()) A has timeout value: 30.0 testTimeout(B()) B has NO timeout /: expect C to say no timeout, but instead it gave Timeout extension's value! */ testTimeout(C()) C has timeout value: 30.0It shows when C derive from A, which used Timeout protocol extension's default timeout property, C lost the ability to provide its own implementation for the protocol... This sounded like a bug to me...