Hello! I am experiencing some strange bugs around DeviceActivityEvents: When creating a DeviceActivityEvent we can assign a threshold and applicationTokens. The idea is, that after the user has spent said threshold on said apps, eventDidReachThreshold is called. includesPastActivity is set to false. On iOS 26 however, it happens (quite reliably after updating to a new beta seed) quite often that eventDidReachThreshold is called immediately (after a couple of seconds) instead of waiting for the threshold to be met. Is anyone else seeing similar issues on iOS 26? Only workaround I have found is to ask users to re-grant Screen Time permissions. This only holds for about two weeks though or at most until the next iOS 26 beta update is installed. Feedback filed under: FB18061981 FB18927456

On macOS 26, I've run into a situation when a user “customizes” a folder icon with Finder by assigning/changing an SF Symbol or an emoji, QLThumbnailGenerator keeps returning the stale initially retrieved folder icon (no matter whether it had been customized or not) until my app quits. After the app is re-launched, the icon is correctly retrieved once again. let generator = QLThumbnailGenerator.shared let size: CGSize = CGSize(width: 64, height: 64) let request = QLThumbnailGenerator.Request(fileAt: url, size: size, scale: NSScreen.main!.backingScaleFactor, representationTypes: .icon) request.iconMode = true do { let thumb = try await generator.generateBestRepresentation(for: request) thumb.nsImage.size = size return thumb.nsImage } catch { print("generateThumbnail: \(error)") return nil } It seems like the QuickLook Thumbnailing cache does not invalidate automatically upon folder customization. Is there any way to manually invalidate the QuickLook Thumbnailing cache?

Hello, I submitted a request for the Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement, but haven't received status update regarding approval/rejection etc. I submitted a previous contact support ticket as well. I'm wondering the timeline and also if my request went through - currently it says 'submitted' but it's remained this way for a while... I've had other developers in communities saying they were approved earlier, so curious if it's an app issue. Thank you

Hello, I am researching the technical feasibility of developing a Default Dialer App for the EU market using the specific entitlements granted under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Our primary goal is to implement a Cellular/VoLTE-based calling system—not mVoIP—and we need to clarify whether it is possible to provide features such as STT (Speech-to-Text) and Call Summarization, which require In-call Audio Recording. Regarding the Default Dialer App Entitlement in the EU, I would like to clarify the following: Access to Raw Audio Stream: When an app is granted the Default Dialer status in the EU, does it gain programmatic access to the downlink and uplink audio streams of a cellular/VoLTE call for recording purposes? LiveCommunicationKit & Recording APIs: Does LiveCommunicationKit (or any related framework for iOS 26) provide specific APIs for a third-party dialer to capture native telephony audio? Entitlement Scope for Partners: If an EU-based partner obtains the necessary entitlements, can those entitlements be used to grant our application the authority to process cellular calls and access the associated audio data? Recommended Implementation: Are there any Apple-sanctioned methods or specific frameworks for implementing call recording for AI-driven services within the scope of the new EU-specific regulations? We need to confirm these technical boundaries to establish the implementation scope with our EU partners. Any guidance on whether a third-party app can technically and legally record cellular calls under these specific conditions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Sign-in with Apple suddently broke in my App. The button trigger the system Apple sign in modal, I can sign in without errors but then nothing happens on my App. It seems it never goes in the onCompletion. SignInWithAppleButton( .signIn, onRequest: { }, onCompletion: { // Never get called } ) The button is inside a custom modal.

Hello, I am researching the technical feasibility of developing a Default Dialer App for the EU market using the specific entitlements granted under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Our primary goal is to implement a Cellular/VoLTE-based calling system—not mVoIP—and we need to clarify whether it is possible to provide features such as STT (Speech-to-Text) and Call Summarization, which require In-call Audio Recording. Regarding the Default Dialer App Entitlement in the EU, I would like to clarify the following: Access to Raw Audio Stream: When an app is granted the Default Dialer status in the EU, does it gain programmatic access to the downlink and uplink audio streams of a cellular/VoLTE call for recording purposes? LiveCommunicationKit & Recording APIs: Does LiveCommunicationKit (or any related framework for iOS 26) provide specific APIs for a third-party dialer to capture native telephony audio? Entitlement Scope for Partners: If an EU-based partner obtains the necessary entitlements, can those entitlements be used to grant our application the authority to process cellular calls and access the associated audio data? Recommended Implementation: Are there any Apple-sanctioned methods or specific frameworks for implementing call recording for AI-driven services within the scope of the new EU-specific regulations? We need to confirm these technical boundaries to establish the implementation scope with our EU partners. Any guidance on whether a third-party app can technically and legally record cellular calls under these specific conditions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Access to Raw Audio Stream: When an app is granted the Default Dialer status in the EU, does it gain programmatic access to the downlink/uplink audio streams of a cellular call for recording purposes? LiveCommunicationKit & Recording: Does LiveCommunicationKit provide any specific APIs or delegates that allow a third-party dialer to capture call audio, or is the recording still restricted by the system’s sandbox? Entitlement Scope: If our EU partner obtains the necessary entitlements, can they authorize our application to handle the cellular call processing entirely, including the access to telephony audio data? AI Service Implementation: Are there any Apple-recommended ways to implement AI features (STT, Summarization) within a Default Dialer App without violating current iOS security architectures? We need to provide a clear "Feasibility Report" to our EU partners during upcoming meetings. Any technical guidance on whether a third-party app can legally and technically record cellular calls under this new EU-specific policy would be extremely helpful. Thank you.

Hi team: I recently update to Xcode 26.4, and I encountered crash when running to < iOS 26.4 both for physical device and Simulator with this log: dyld[1257]: Symbol not found: _$s9MetricKit10mxSignpost_3dso3log4name10signpostID__ySo03os_H7_type_ta_SVSo03OS_j1_F0Cs12StaticStringV0J0010OSSignpostI0VALSays7CVarArg_pGtF Referenced from: <164CCEB0-E1F8-3CE2-A934-2096C19C0A9A> /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/EA709A68-F76F-4D97-85C6-B71D61D68389/xxx.app/xxx.debug.dylib Expected in: <9E5EC9BB-5828-329C-A2BC-038B67060298> /System/Library/Frameworks/MetricKit.framework/MetricKit Symbol not found: _$s9MetricKit10mxSignpost_3dso3log4name10signpostID__ySo03os_H7_type_ta_SVSo03OS_j1_F0Cs12StaticStringV0J0010OSSignpostI0VALSays7CVarArg_pGtF Referenced from: <164CCEB0-E1F8-3CE2-A934-2096C19C0A9A>x /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/EA709A68-F76F-4D97-85C6-B71D61D68389/xxx.app/xxx.debug.dylib Expected in: <9E5EC9BB-5828-329C-A2BC-038B67060298> /System/Library/Frameworks/MetricKit.framework/MetricKit dyld config: DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/system/introspection DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib/libLogRedirect.dylib:/usr/lib/libBacktraceRecording.dylib:/usr/lib/libMainThreadChecker.dylib:/usr/lib/libRPAC.dylib:/usr/lib/libViewDebuggerSupport.dylib but iOS 26.4 works well. Env: Xcode: 26.4 Simulator/Physical Device: < 26.4 macOS: 26.3 Thanks for giving any help.

Hello, I’m developing an Apple Watch companion app for my swimming application and the app keeps uninstalling/disappearing from Apple Watch. I have a specific Scheme to install it to my watches, it appears there, I can debug but after a while it disappears. It’s my first app for this device but it doesn’t seem normal to me. any idea?

Hello, I've run into an issue where AssetPacks being served locally are downloading but unable to complete. try await AssetPackManager .shared .ensureLocalAvailability(of: assetPack) This method is called but never appears to complete. Even 10 minutes after the download is finished. <NSProgress: 0x10fb4fc80> : Parent: 0x0 (portion: 0) / Fraction completed: 1.0000 / Completed: 2462633379 of 2462633379 This however does not appear to be an issue in production, as the method completes 30-60 seconds after the download has finished. Issue happens across multiple devices running 26.4.1

There appears to be a data loss bug in NSFileWrapper on macOS 26.4. It may have been around longer but I just never noticed ... So I write a RTFD file wrapper: NSFileWrapper *rtfd = [attributedString RTFDFileWrapperFromRange:NSMakeRange(0, attributedString.length) documentAttributes:@{NSDocumentTypeDocumentAttribute:NSRTFDTextDocumentType}]; Now IF I use -writeToURL:options:originalContentsURL:error: without using the NSFileWrapperWritingAtomic option and I pass in an existing URL, the followings happens: -The method returns NO and populates the NSError with NSFileWriteFileExistsError, as expected. This is what I want. -BUT the existing file is nuked. It just disappears. Foundation kills it. Poof. Another thing I gotta workaround. Getting pretty ridiculous, I must say. Just my lucky day I guess. It would be wonderful if I could work on my own features and fixing my own bugs.

I’m running an experiment around generating and importing .vcf files on iOS and wanted to sanity check expected behavior with others who may have explored this deeper. Goal Programmatically generate a vCard (v3.0) that, when imported into iOS Contacts, includes: Standard fields (name, phone, email, organization, etc.) Contact photo (PHOTO) Social profile (e.g., LinkedIn via X-SOCIALPROFILE) What I tested I tried to eliminate formatting issues by using iOS itself as the source of truth. Steps: Created a new contact directly in iOS Contacts Added name, phone, email Added a contact photo Added a social profile (LinkedIn) Exported that contact as a .vcf Deleted the contact from the device Re-imported the exported .vcf Result Core fields (name, phone, email, etc.) are restored correctly Contact photo is NOT restored Social profile is NOT restored as a native social entry This happens even though: The exported .vcf clearly contains a PHOTO field The exported .vcf includes X-SOCIALPROFILE;type=linkedin:... Additional testing I also generated my own .vcf files that closely mirror the structure produced by iOS (field order, encoding, etc.), and observed the same behavior: Photo does not reliably import Social profiles do not appear as native social entries in Contacts Question Is this expected behavior on iOS? More specifically: Are PHOTO fields intentionally ignored (or restricted) during .vcf import? Is X-SOCIALPROFILE supported for import, or only used internally/exported by Contacts? Is there any supported way to programmatically create a contact with: a photo social profile entries via .vcf import? Current understanding Based on testing, it appears that: iOS may export more data than it will accept on import Some fields (like social profiles and possibly photos) may only be fully supported when created via native APIs (e.g., Contacts framework) rather than .vcf Would appreciate confirmation or any documentation pointers if this is known behavior or if there are recommended alternatives. Closing thought If this is by design, it would be helpful to know which vCard fields are officially supported for import vs. export on iOS, since the current behavior is not entirely symmetric.

Hi folks, in my application I write some logs over debugPrint or directly over print. The application is already distributed and some part of functionality failed with application traceback. I would like to ask user for providing logs from the App. Is it possible to get those logs? Thanks Petr

Hi everyone, I'm building an iOS app that uses a DeviceActivityMonitor app extension as part of the Screen Time / Family Controls API. Every time I try to upload my IPA to App Store Connect, the validation fails with this error: "Invalid Info.plist value. The value of the NSExtensionPointIdentifier key, com.apple.deviceactivity.monitor, in the Info.plist of 'Alexandria.app/PlugIns/AlexandriaActivityMonitor.appex' is invalid." Error Domain=IrisAPI Code=-19241, iris-code=STATE_ERROR.VALIDATION_ERROR What I have verified (everything looks correct): NSExtensionPointIdentifier = com.apple.deviceactivity.monitor NSExtensionPrincipalClass = AlexandriaActivityMonitor.AlexandriaActivityMonitorExtension (correctly resolved in the compiled binary, verified with plutil -p) The Swift class correctly subclasses DeviceActivityMonitor CFBundleShortVersionString matches the main app Both the main app and extension provisioning profiles explicitly contain com.apple.developer.family-controls = true (verified by inspecting embedded.mobileprovision inside the IPA) The binary code signature itself contains com.apple.developer.family-controls = true (verified with codesign -d --entitlements :-) Family Controls entitlement was requested and approved in the Developer Portal for both App IDs Tested with both Xcode 26.2 (iOS 26 SDK) and Xcode 16.4 (iOS 18 SDK) — same error in both cases The IPA is structurally correct. The error comes purely from Apple's server-side IrisAPI validator and does not correspond to anything I can identify or fix in the code or configuration. Has anyone successfully submitted an app with a DeviceActivityMonitor extension to App Store Connect recently? Is there a backend approval requirement for com.apple.deviceactivity.monitor beyond the standard Family Controls entitlement approval? Could this be a known validator bug for this specific extension type? Any help appreciated.

I have a app that has both mobile and watch versions. Recently some testers report that the watch app could not be launched if the put the app in the background and then resume. And if they kill the app and try to launch again, there is no any response when tapping the app icon. I managed to export some system logs by installing a sysdiagnose profile, and this info looks suspicious

Hi, we have several clarification questions on how SensorKit collect phone call/text message data: when people use non-native apps, e.g. WhatsApp, to make calls or messages, will they be picked up as phone call or text message by SensorKit, or will they only be counted as app usage? When people react to a message by long-press the message and thumb-up/heart it, will it be counted as one outgoing message or not? If the incoming call is not picked up, will it be counted as one phone call or not? When people text within a group, will the unique number of contacts be 1 or the number of members in the group? Thanks! Yu

Hi Apple Support, We're reaching out to clarify what appears to be unexpected behavior in the AdServices token attribution API, specifically around reinstall attribution for apps with high reinstall rates. The problem For an app with a high reinstall rate, our ASA install counts are significantly higher than what the Apple Ads dashboard reports. Total install counts across all sources match closely — the discrepancy is specifically in ASA-attributed installs. What we tested To investigate, we ran a controlled experiment: Installed an app by tapping an Apple Search Ads ad. Deleted the app. Reinstalled the app approximately 15 minutes later directly from the App Store, without tapping any ad. Fetched a new AdServices token and exchanged it with Apple's attribution API. The API returned attribution: true with the original campaign details (same campaignId, adGroupId, keywordId) and conversionType: Download. The reinstall was attributed to the ASA campaign even though the user did not interact with any ad before the second install. Question about documentation The Apple Ads help page defines a tap-through Redownload as: "A redownload is when a user downloads your app, deletes it, then downloads it again on the same device or a different one following an ad tap." Could you clarify: does "following an ad tap" mean the redownload must be directly triggered by a tap on an ad? Or does it mean any redownload that occurs within the 30-day attribution window of a prior ad tap? Question about intended token API behavior Is the AdServices token API intended to return attribution: true for installs where the user did not tap an ad before that specific install, but had interacted with an ad within the past 30 days? In other words, is the token API designed to attribute all installs within the 30-day window regardless of whether the current install was ad-driven, or should it only attribute installs that were directly preceded by an ad interaction? We would appreciate any clarification on the intended behavior, as this directly impacts how we reconcile install counts between the AdServices API and the Apple Ads dashboard. Thank you for your time.

I logged in to macOS with my localization language. try to perform following code. but always get "Documents". What do I miss? Apple Swift version 5.2.4 macOS 10.15.6 Xcode 11.6 code let paths = NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(.documentDirectory, .userDomainMask, true) if paths.count &gt; 0 {     let doc = FileManager().displayName(atPath: paths[0])     print(doc) } result Documents

Hello, Because our app package size is relatively large, part of our resources needs to be delivered through Apple-hosted asset packs. If we use the Background Assets framework to download these Apple-hosted packs, our app would only be able to support devices running iOS 26 or later. To maintain compatibility with a broader range of iOS versions, we chose to use iOS On-Demand Resources instead. However, during actual use, we found that even when these packs are marked with the initial install tag, there is still a fairly high probability (around 40%) that they are not available on the first screen after the app is launched for the first time. When we try to access them through conditionallyBeginAccessingResourcesWithCompletionHandler, the resources are unavailable, which forces us to download them again. During testing, we added event tracking and found that out of 22 users who downloaded the app, 9 had to re-download these resource packs on first launch. Each of these packs marked with the initial install tag is about 300 MB in size. We have also made sure to follow the NSBundleResourceRequest limitation that no more than 2000 × 1000 × 1000 bytes of resources should be accessed at the same time. We would like to understand why these packs, even though they are marked as initial install, still have such a high probability (around 40%) of being unavailable on the first screen at first launch.

Hi everyone, I have a question regarding the intended privacy limits of the DeviceActivityReportExtension. According to the documentation and the WWDC21 session "Meet the Screen Time API", this extension was created specifically to prevent the host application from accessing the user's underlying activity data (websites visited, app usage, screen time, etc). But I have found that my host app is actually able to reconstruct this raw activity data from the activity report. I am able to extract specific visited websites and app usage durations back into the main app. I reported this to Apple Security (Case ID: OE1100504480881 ), assuming it was a sandbox bypass. However, they closed the ticket stating that this is "expected behavior" and requires no fix. My question for Screen Time Engineers: Is the documentation incorrect? If my host app is expected to be able to read this data, is there a formal API we should be using instead of extracting it from the report extension? The current behavior contradicts the privacy limits described in the documentation, so I am confused if I should rely on this data access for my app features or if it will be patched later. Thanks.

Hi, We’re building an iOS app that uses the Screen Time APIs (FamilyControls and DeviceActivity) to display a user’s own usage metrics inside the app. With the appropriate permissions granted, we are successfully reading and presenting metrics such as: Total screen time Device pickups These metrics are already visible to the user inside our app. We would now like to introduce a user-initiated “Share” feature. The idea is to: Render selected Screen Time metrics into a shareable image card generated locally on device. Present the standard iOS share sheet (UIActivityViewController). Allow the user to share that image to Messages, social apps, etc., if they choose. Important clarifications: This is fully user-initiated. The app does not automatically transmit Screen Time data. The metrics are already displayed in-app with user permission. The share asset would be generated locally. No background export or server-side posting would occur unless explicitly triggered by the user via the share sheet. We are seeking clarification on whether there are any policy or API restrictions around: Rendering Screen Time-derived metrics into a user-facing share card Allowing user-initiated export of those metrics via the standard iOS share flow Are there any additional privacy requirements, entitlement constraints, or App Review considerations we should be aware of when implementing this? Thanks in advance for any guidance.