I'm trying to implement my first in-app purchase, and I've created the IAP in App Store Connect, and created a sandbox account.
When I open Settings > Developer in the iPhone Simulator, there is a "Sandbox Apple Account" option at the bottom.
If I click the blue "Sign In" link I'm asked for the email and password, so I enter the correct credentials for the sandbox account. The "Sign In" text goes grey for a few seconds, then it goes blue again. It never changes to show that I'm signed in. Should it? (I think so.)
Do I need to sign into the Simulator's Apple Account, too? (I don't think so.)
Anyway, aside from that, in my app the IAP is listed and I have a button to purchase it. When I click it I'm asked for the email and password to sign into the Apple Account. I enter the correct sandbox email and password (they are definitely correct) and I see this in the Xcode console:
Purchase did not return a transaction: Error Domain=ASDErrorDomain Code=530 "(null)" UserInfo={client-environment-type=Sandbox, NSUnderlyingError=0x600000d0c7b0 {Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=100 "Authentication Failed The authentication failed." UserInfo={NSMultipleUnderlyingErrorsKey=(
"Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=2 \"Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse.\" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse., AMSDescription=Password reuse not available for account, AMSFailureReason=The account state does not support password reuse.}",
"Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=0 \"Authentication Failed Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure.\" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Authentication Failed Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure., AMSDescription=Authentication Failed, AMSFailureReason=Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure.}"
), AMSDescription=Authentication Failed, NSDebugDescription=Authentication Failed The authentication failed., AMSFailureReason=The authentication failed.}}}
Why is it talking about password reuse? AFAIK, I have only one sandbox account for this app (and none for any of my other apps), and this is the only one of my apps that has an IAP.
Any ideas on how to get an IAP working? Thanks!
StoreKit
RSS for tagSupport in-app purchases and interactions with the App Store using StoreKit.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Created
We previously had a non-renewing subscription. I think we remove it. However, the subscription is still listed on the app's page in the App Store. How can I remove this mention?
The availability is still checked for all countries.
Thanks,
Cody.
Stripe offers variable payment structures, also known as "irregular recurring payments," which include:
Usage-based billing: Charges amounts based on usage during the billing cycle (e.g., minutes used or energy consumed).
Quantity-based billing: Charges a pre-agreed amount based on quantity (e.g., number of users in a subscription).
Is it possible to implement this type of billing in the Apple Store for apps? How would variations in amounts be handled?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Tags:
Subscriptions
App Store Connect
In-App Purchase
App Store Receipts
I'm adding my first in-app purchase to an app, and I'm finding the process incredibly frustrating.
Aside from the Apple Developer Documentation not being clear enough, and kind of glossing over the technical steps required (and their sample code being woefully inadequate), App Store Connect and the testing sandbox simply don't work as they say they do.
For example, in my app I've purchased the IAP and now I want to request a refund. I select the purchase, I choose a refund reason, and this page says, "To set up a test for approved refunds, select any refund reason on the refund request sheet, and submit the sheet. The App Store automatically approves the refund request in the testing environment."
Well, when I re-launch the app the purchase is still there. I can't request a refund again because it says this is a duplicate refund request, so it knows that the purchase has had a request, and it's supposed to have automatically refunded it, but it clearly hasn't.
So, I try clearing the purchase history via the Settings app > Developer > Sandbox Apple Account. Same thing. Purchase remains.
Try clearing purchase history in App Store Connect. Same thing.
How on Earth does anyone get an in-app purchase to work when the entire testing environment is so badly executed?
How do I get past this? The IAP is the last part of the app that needs to be implemented, and I've lost a week on this already.
Hello, I’m trying to change the business model of my app to in-app subscriptions. My goal is to ensure that previous users who paid for the app have access to all premium content seamlessly, without even noticing any changes.
I’ve tried using RevenueCat for this, but I’m not entirely sure it’s working as expected. I would like to use RevenueCat to manage subscriptions, so I’m attempting a hybrid model. On the first launch of the updated app, the plan is to validate the app receipts, extract the originalAppVersion, and store it in a variable. If the original version is lower than the latest paid version, the isPremium variable is set to true, and this status propagates throughout the app. For users with versions equal to or higher than the latest paid version, RevenueCat will handle the subscription status—checking if a subscription is active and determining whether to display the paywall for premium features.
In a sandbox environment, it seems to work fine, but I’ve often encountered situations where the receipt doesn’t exist. I haven’t found a way to test this behavior properly in production. For example, I uploaded the app to TestFlight, but it doesn’t validate the actual transaction for a previously purchased version of the app. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems TestFlight doesn’t confirm whether I installed or purchased a paid version of the app.
I need to be 100% sure that users who previously paid for the app won’t face any issues with this migration. Is there any method to verify this behavior in a production-like scenario that I might not be aware of?
I’m sharing the code here to see if you can confirm that it will work as intended or suggest any necessary adjustments.
func fetchAppReceipt(completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) {
// Check if the receipt URL exists
guard let receiptURL = Bundle.main.appStoreReceiptURL else {
print("Receipt URL not found.")
requestReceiptRefresh(completion: completion)
return
}
// Check if the receipt file exists at the given path
if !FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: receiptURL.path) {
print("The receipt does not exist at the specified location. Attempting to fetch a new receipt...")
requestReceiptRefresh(completion: completion)
return
}
do {
// Read the receipt data from the file
let receiptData = try Data(contentsOf: receiptURL)
let receiptString = receiptData.base64EncodedString()
print("Receipt found and encoded in base64: \(receiptString.prefix(50))...")
completion(true)
} catch {
// Handle errors while reading the receipt
print("Error reading the receipt: \(error.localizedDescription). Attempting to fetch a new receipt...")
requestReceiptRefresh(completion: completion)
}
}
func validateAppReceipt(completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) {
print("Starting receipt validation...")
guard let receiptURL = Bundle.main.appStoreReceiptURL else {
print("Receipt not found on the device.")
requestReceiptRefresh(completion: completion)
completion(false)
return
}
print("Receipt found at URL: \(receiptURL.absoluteString)")
do {
let receiptData = try Data(contentsOf: receiptURL, options: .alwaysMapped)
print(receiptData)
let receiptString = receiptData.base64EncodedString(options: [])
print("Receipt encoded in base64: \(receiptString.prefix(50))...")
let request = [
"receipt-data": receiptString,
"password": "c8bc9070bf174a8a8df108ef6b8d2ae3" // Shared Secret
]
print("Request prepared for Apple's validation server.")
guard let url = URL(string: "https://buy.itunes.apple.com/verifyReceipt") else {
print("Error: Invalid URL for Apple's validation server.")
completion(false)
return
}
print("Validation URL: \(url.absoluteString)")
var urlRequest = URLRequest(url: url)
urlRequest.httpMethod = "POST"
urlRequest.httpBody = try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: request)
URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: urlRequest) { data, response, error in
if let error = error {
print("Error sending the request: \(error.localizedDescription)")
completion(false)
return
}
guard let data = data else {
print("No response received from Apple's server.")
completion(false)
return
}
print("Response received from Apple's server.")
do {
if let json = try JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data) as? [String: Any] {
print("Response JSON: \(json)")
// Verify original_application_version
if let receipt = json["receipt"] as? [String: Any],
let appVersion = receipt["original_application_version"] as? String {
print("Original application version found: \(appVersion)")
// Save the version in @AppStorage
savedOriginalVersion = appVersion
print("Original version saved in AppStorage: \(appVersion)")
if let appVersionNumber = Double(appVersion), appVersionNumber < 1.62 {
print("Original version is less than 1.62. User considered premium.")
isFirstLaunch = true
completion(true)
} else {
print("Original version is not less than 1.62. User is not premium.")
completion(false)
}
} else {
print("Could not find the original application version in the receipt.")
completion(false)
}
} else {
print("Error parsing the response JSON.")
completion(false)
}
} catch {
print("Error processing the JSON response: \(error.localizedDescription)")
completion(false)
}
}.resume()
} catch {
print("Error reading the receipt: \(error.localizedDescription)")
requestReceiptRefresh(completion: completion)
completion(false)
}
}
Some of these functions might seem redundant, but they are intended to double-check and ensure that the user is not a previous user. Is there any way to be certain that this will work when the app is downloaded from the App Store?
Thanks in advance!
With the imminent suspension of SHA-1 on App Store receipts, we desperately need an objective C code sample demonstrating how to calculate the same SDH-256 hash on device to compared with the hash from the App Store receipt.
The forced migration to SHA256 for app store receipts this month mean we have to rewrite our on device receipt validation code. However there is no documentation or objC sample code on how to validate the SHA256 hash from MAS receipts. Thje documentation at
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/technotes/tn3138-handling-app-store-receipt-signing-certificate-changes/ does not give any detail on how to validate SHA256. All my 100+ hours of experimentation and trial and error attempting to create a matching SHA256 has on device have failed.
We desperately need some ObjC Sample code to validate the SHA256 hash on device. Our existing SHA1 code is still working but we expect SHA1 hashes to disappear from MAS Receipts any day now.
Tnanks for any advice !
I have two sandbox users in App Store Connect, as I'm trying to test in-app purchases and Family Sharing. They're set up fine; I can make purchases in the app.
The issue is that the refund request sheet in my app sometimes shows properly and lets me request a refund, but I'd say >80% of the time the sheet just shows "Cannot Connect" with a "Retry" button. Hitting that button doesn't ever result in the sheet showing the refund page.
The only fix for this is to delete the app from the device, and restart the device.
This has to be a joke, right? I need to be able to test this IAP, and the sandbox environment is useless most of the time. Why?
Anyone experiencing this sort of issue?
I'm considering developing an app where users can create their own subscription plans by freely setting their prices, similar to YouTube's membership feature.
I understand that in-app purchases must be used to unlock features within the app. With that in mind, I searched for APIs to enable this functionality but couldn't find relevant information.
When I contacted Apple directly, they mentioned that they couldn't provide specific answers unless the app is under review.
If anyone has knowledge about the following points, I would greatly appreciate your response:
Is it possible to implement a feature similar to YouTube's membership using in-app purchase APIs? If it's not feasible with in-app purchases, is it allowed to use external payment services like Stripe?
My IAPs no longer display for one of my apps. I'm not sure where to start to troubleshoot. Any ideas?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Hello, I’m trying to change my business model within the app, and following Apple’s documentation guidelines HERE I created this task in the main view of the app. It seems to work perfectly in the simulator, on physical devices, and on TestFlight. However, after releasing it to production and uploading the new version to the App Store, it doesn’t work, and all users, whether new or existing, are asked to subscribe. In the console, it appears to retrieve the transactions correctly, but in production, I’m not sure how to view the console or see what it’s retrieving.
Here the sandbox receipt I obtained
AppTransaction.shared obtained: {
"applicationVersion" : "1",
"bundleId" : "com.anestesiaIB.Drugs-Infusion-Calc",
"deviceVerification" : "6M0Nnw14nSEOBVTPE\/\/EfnWSwLm7LFSlrpFEwxgH74SBHp5dSzBEm896Uvo42mwr",
"deviceVerificationNonce" : "8a8238c0-0aee-41e6-bfb0-1cfc52b70fb6",
"originalApplicationVersion" : "1.0",
"originalPurchaseDate" : 1375340400000,
"receiptCreationDate" : 1737577840917,
"receiptType" : "Sandbox",
"requestDate" : 1737577840917
}
This are the processing log while verified the receipt
New business model change: 1.7
Original versionéis components: ["1", "0"]
Major version: 1, Minor version: 0
This user is premium. Original version: 1.0
This is my task...
.task {
do {
let shared = try await AppTransaction.shared
if case .verified(let appTransaction) = shared {
let newBusinessModelVersion = (1, 7) // Representado como (major, minor)
let versionComponents = appTransaction.originalAppVersion.split(separator: ".")
if let majorVersion = versionComponents.first.flatMap({ Int($0) }),
let minorVersion = versionComponents.dropFirst().first.flatMap({ Int($0) }) {
if (majorVersion, minorVersion) < newBusinessModelVersion {
self.premiumStatus.isPremium = true
isPremium = true
} else {
let customerInfo = try await Purchases.shared.customerInfo()
self.premiumStatus.isPremium = customerInfo.entitlements["premium"]?.isActive == true
isPremium = self.premiumStatus.isPremium
}
} else {
print("Error: obteining version components")
}
} else {
print("Not verified")
}
} catch {
print("Error processing transaction: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/get-v2-history-_transactionid
I would like to inquire about the detailed triggers for updating receipts in this API specification.
Recently, I was using this API with sort=DESCENDING&revoked=false to retrieve the expiration date of the most recent receipt and determine the subscription status. However, for some reason, an old receipt with an earlier expiration date appeared as the first receipt, and I would like to know the reason for this.
Can you provide information on what specific events or actions trigger the updating of receipts in this API?
Also, regarding https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/status, will statuses 3 and 4 not be returned in the response unless the billing grace period is enabled in the App Store?
-- Japanese
こちらのAPI仕様ですが、どのようなトリガーでレシートが更新されるのか詳細に伺いたいです。
先日このAPIを使用してsort=DESCENDING&revoked=falseで一番最初のレシートの有効期限を取得して課金状態か判断していたのですが、どういったわけか一番最初のレシートに古い有効期限のレシートが入ってきたので理由を知りたいです。
また、https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/status
のステータスはAppleStoreで請求猶予期間を有効化しないと3,4はレスポンスされませんか?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Tags:
Subscriptions
Developer Tools
App Store Receipts
App Store Server API
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/get-v2-history-_transactionid
I would like to inquire about the detailed triggers for updating receipts in this API specification.
Recently, I was using this API with sort=DESCENDING&revoked=false to retrieve the expiration date of the most recent receipt and determine the subscription status. However, for some reason, an old receipt with an earlier expiration date appeared as the first receipt, and I would like to know the reason for this.
Can you provide information on what specific events or actions trigger the updating of receipts in this API?
Also, regarding https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/status, will statuses 3 and 4 not be returned in the response unless the billing grace period is enabled in the App Store?
Hi,
In an auto-renewable subscription scenario, I receive a transaction from Product.Purchase and then send the transaction ID (e.g., 500000000738201) to my API server. After receiving the response, I called transaction.finish().
The account has purchased the subscription before and expired. So it's re-subscribe.
And then, I received a RESUBSCRIBE notification from Apple’s server to my API server. I noticed a discrepancy where the transaction ID in the notification is decreased by one (e.g., 500000000738200 instead of 500000000738201).
I’m wondering why this discrepancy occurs and how it happens.
Best regards,
RoyHuang
When simulating a Storekit error like an invalid device verification or others of that type, should we finish a failed transaction? When I test with a Storekit configuration file, all failed transactions persist after every restart. The Apple-provided sample code for Storekit 2 has transactions finished only when they are successful.
When simulating a Storekit error like an invalid device verification or others of that type, should we finish a failed transaction? When I test with a storekit configuration file, all failed transactions persist after every restart. The Apple-provided sample code for storekit 2 has transactions finished only when they are successful.
hI, I’m looking for some clarity on the rules around in app purchasing, so I play a game with in app purchases that you have random odds of getting items out of loot boxes, they split the loot into sections, so featured, mega rare, rare and common. for each of these sections they give a % chance that they show of what chance you have to get an item out of that section, I.e featured is 1.24% and common is 74% ect.
my question is should they then have to display the odds of what each item has in those sections as well or is it good enough just to have the sections with % chance? So each section could have 10 items in, should those items have a % next to as well?
any advice you can give with this would be appreciated, if needs be I can send picture examples of what I’m explaining
No matter what I do whether I delete the app or reset my phone it still prompts me to log in to the previous sandbox test account. I'm not even signed into that account on my phone or in the App Store.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
In all the illustrations of win-back offers, I see an example of "Get 3 months off, then $X/month", as seen below.
First, I'm not exactly clear how each configuration translates into an actual offer in practice:
If I want to offer 3 months off on an annual subscription, ie. only if the user pays for the annual offer (basically a 25% discount), is that possible?
If I set a "Free" type, of 3 months, I guess that would allow the user to cancel before paying for the annual, correct?
If I set a "Pay up front" type, with a 25% discount, how would that show up to the user on the App Store?
Secondly, is eligibility to an offer determined by the user elapsing on the same subscription or any subscription in the same subscription group?
Thank you
Network
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Tags:
Subscriptions
App Store Connect
In-App Purchase
Graphical Debugger
Hi, I've some issues on my application about purchases.
My app is available for iOS and tvOS.
Some part of my code is the same on both target (my purchase code is one of them).
The issue is:
Some users can't do a purchase on Apple TV (but not all and I can't reproduce)
Some users purchased on a device and are not considered as pro on the other device (logged with same apple account). Again it's not all.
Here is my store code