On MacOS, I know that App Groups (com.apple.security.application-groups) do not require a provisioning profile.
I was wondering if it's possible to sign them "ad hoc" and have it work? So maybe use a random TEAMID prefix and have it work?
I would only need the app to work locally (for testing), not be distributed in that fashion, of course.
Demystify code signing and its importance in app development. Get help troubleshooting code signing issues and ensure your app is properly signed for distribution.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hi all,
I’ve run into a signing/entitlements problem that shows up only on Big Sur (11.x).
The very same .app launches perfectly on Monterey (12), Ventura (13), Sonoma (14 / 14.5) and Sequoia (15).
Failure on macOS 11
com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (application.app.myapp.exams.566312.566318[1602]):
removing service since it exited with consistent failure –
OS_REASON_CODESIGNING |
When validating …/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app/Contents/MacOS/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1:
Code has restricted entitlements, but the validation of its code signature failed.
Unsatisfied Entitlements:
Binary is improperly signed.
Launching from Terminal:
open -a "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
kLSNoLaunchPermissionErr (-10826) | Launchd job spawn failed with error: 153
What I’ve already checked
# signature itself
codesign -dvvv "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => valid, Authority = Developer ID Application, runtime enabled
# full deep/strict verification
codesign --verify --deep --strict -vvv "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => “satisfies its Designated Requirement”
# Gatekeeper assessment
spctl --assess --type execute --verbose=4 "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => accepted (override security disabled)
# embedded provisioning profile matches bundle ID
codesign -d --entitlements :- "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app" | plutil -p -
security cms -D -i "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile" \
| plutil -extract Entitlements xml1 -o -
# => both show the AAC entitlement and everything looks in order
# notarization ticket
stapler validate "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => “The validate action worked!”
Deployment target: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 11.0
Entitlement added: com.apple.developer.automatic-assessment-configuration = true
Provisioning profile: generated this year via Developer ID, includes the assessment entitlement and nothing else unusual.
Runtime code: we call AEAssessmentSession's network configuration part only on 12 + (guarded with @available(macOS 12.0, *)).
Has anyone hit this mismatch on 11.x? Could Big Sur be expecting something older or idk?
Any pointers appreciated!
Thanks!
We were recently approved for the "User Assigned Device Name" for a specific app Identifier. The "Additional Capabilities" tab isn't present on that App ID. I am an admin in the developer portal, and this does not appear for the account holder as well. Any help would be appreciated.
I am subscribed to an individual developer license.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/configuring-network-extensions
"Network Extension" does not appear in the Capability section in Xcode. Below is my Xcode screenshot.
We are facing following message "A timestamp was expected but was not found" during codesign for following .dylib and .pkg and it cause notarization process failed.
We are facing this issue for last 3 days.
we have access for timestamp.apple.com and 17.0.0.0/8 and we didn't change firewall settings. We are facing this issue randomly and not for all time(scenario is 3:1).
We tried the below command to sign the package,
codesign --verbose --deep --force --timestamp --options=runtime --sign ""
Kindly let us know how to fix this probelm.
traceroute timestamp.apple.com
traceroute to timestamp.v.aaplimg.com (17.157.80.35), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
....
10 17.0.9.19 (17.0.9.19) 185.693 ms
17.0.9.17 (17.0.9.17) 180.932 ms 189.060 ms
11 * * *
12 17.0.17.141 (17.0.17.141) 191.513 ms *
17.0.17.137 (17.0.17.137) 183.086 ms
13 * * *
14 * * *
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
We have an enterprise application which customers are using since long.
Suddenly some customers have reported they are unable to open app in iOS 18 OS. On lower versions like 17 it is working fine.
We have a deploy this enterprise application on our server from that link our customer can download and install the app in iPhone. Now they are blocked due to this error. After installing the app when they open app below error message is shown to them.
"AppName" is no longer available.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
It seems as though requesting External Link Account Entitlement via the form is a bit of a black box. Is there a way to check on the status of our request? The app review team has informed me that they don't have any connection to the Account Entitlement teams so they unfortunately cannot help.
Is there a way to check on our apps status or what we might need to change to have External Link Account Entitlement granted? Thanks
I received this email and i cannot for the life of me figure out how to renew a distritbution certificate and create a request for signature certificate. This is all so confusing and not easy to follow at all. Please help, my distribution certificates expires on October 27th.
Dear Daniel,
Your Distribution Certificate will no longer be valid in 30 days. To generate a new certificate, sign in and visit Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles.
Certificate: Distribution
Team ID: M96UCKJQHT
To learn more about expired certificates, visit the certificates support page.
Best regards,
Apple Developer Relations
Hello there!
I found the page on Docs about Editing provisioning profiles: https://developer.apple.com/help/account/manage-profiles/edit-download-or-delete-profiles/
but there, are showed only cases where one should edit it or when it is expired. It is not showed the case where the profile IS ABOUT to expire. What If it is about to expire and I want to act before expiring? Somewhere on the forum I read that clicking "save" with no changes could be enough, but it is not clear to me if I need to choose something more about it.
I add a screenshot since It seems to me the UI changed a bit recently.
using Enterprise developer program, in-house distribution
I can see no certificate with dec 31 2025 (+ - 1 day) on my dev page certificates list.
but I have, among my certificates, an iOS distribution certificate with exactly nov 23 2026 es expiration date.
why are two choices present with two different expiration dates?
with which criteria should I pick one or the other?
if I have no need to change something, what should I do or do not in this screen at renewal time? (I.E. at beginning of December 2024?)
app Id should be the bundle id, is it so? but in this moment app and id are different, shouldn't they be the same?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
Signing Certificates
Provisioning Profiles
Code Signing
This is a continuation of my own old post that became inactive to regain traction. I am trying to resolve issues that arise when distributing a macOS app with a SysExt Network Extension (Packet Tunnel) outside the App Store using a Developer ID Certificate.
To directly distribute the app, I start with exporting the .app via Archive in Xcode.
After that, I create a new Developer ID provisioning profile for both the app and sysext and replace the embedded ones in the .app package.
After I have replaced the provisioning profiles and the have the entitlements files ready, I start signing the frameworks, sysext and parent app.
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>"<app>.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/<sysext>.systemextension/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/Versions/A/<fw>
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist-vpn.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/<sysext>.systemextension/Contents/MacOS/<sysext>
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app
After validation is successful with
codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=4 <app>.app
I zip the package, notarize and staple it
ditto -c -k --keepParent "<app>.app" "<app>..zip"
xcrun notarytool submit <app>.zip --keychain-profile “”<credents> --wait
xcrun stapler staple <app>.app
After that I finish creating signed and notarized .dmg/.pkg.
hdiutil create -volname “<app>” -srcfolder “<app>.app/" -ov -format UDZO ./<app>.dmg
codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.dmg
xcrun notarytool submit <app>.dmg --keychain-profile "<credentials>" --wait
xcrun stapler staple <app>.dmg
Then when I move the .dmg to a clean system, open the .dmg, move the .app to the Applications folder, the attempt to run it fails with “The application “” can’t be opened.”. When I look into the console, the gatekeeper disallows the launch job with the message:
86127 debug ProvisioningProfiles taskgated-helper ConfigurationProfiles entitlements: {
"com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension" = (
"packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension"
);
"com.apple.developer.system-extension.install" = 1;
"com.apple.developer.team-identifier" = <teamid>;
"keychain-access-groups" = (
“<teamid>.<app>.AppGroup"
);
} com.apple.ManagedClient
<app>: Unsatisfied entitlements: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension, keychain-access-groups, com.apple.developer.system-extension.install, com.apple.developer.team-identifier
LAUNCH: Runningboard launch of <app> <private> returned RBSRequestErrorFailed, error Error Domain=RBSRequestErrorDomain Code=5 "Launch failed." UserInfo={NSLocalizedFailureReason=Launch failed., NSUnderlyingError=0x600001a25830 {Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=153 "Unknown error: 153" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Launchd job spawn failed}}}, so returning -10810
I went through all possible formats (macOS-Style and iOS-Style App Group IDs) and combinations of appgroups according to the post “App Groups: macOS vs iOS: Working Towards Harmony”. But none of those work for me. The weird part is that when I try the same steps on different developer account, I am able to get the app running. What can be wrong?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Network Extension
Gatekeeper
Code Signing
Developer ID
Hi,
we have .pkg install package consisting of various sub packages. One of them contains presets and needs to be installed the the default preset location /Library/Audio/Presets. If this non-binary preset package is the only one in a .pkg choice notarization fails with:
"logFormatVersion": 1,
"jobId": "*",
"status": "Invalid",
"statusSummary": "Archive contains critical validation errors",
"statusCode": 4000,
"archiveFilename": "mypackage.pkg.zip",
"uploadDate": "2024-08-22T21:24:03.251Z",
"sha256": "*",
"ticketContents": null,
"issues": [
{
"severity": "error",
"code": null,
"path": "mypackage.pkg.zip",
"message": "Package mypackage.pkg.zip has no signed executables or bundles. No tickets can be generated.",
"docUrl": null,
"architecture": null
},
{
"severity": "warning",
"code": null,
"path": "mypackage.pkg.zip/mypackage.pkg",
"message": "b\"Invalid component package: mypackage_vstpreset Distribution file's value: #com.mycompany.mypackage.vstpreset.pkg\\n\"",
"docUrl": null,
"architecture": null
}
]
}
Not sure, but maybe its worth noting that the causing sub packge only generates a warning, but the parent package seems to escalate this into an error.
How can a non-binary sub package be included in a notarized parent package?
Any hints or thoughts are highly appreciated, Thanks!
Codesigned and notarized app cannot directly write files inside the app bundle (neither in my.app/Contents/Resources/ nor my.app/Contents/MacOS/).
Are there any restrictions regarding this? Is there a way to bypass these restrictions?
Here is the situation I encountered:
The main app contains several sub-apps and sub-executables.
When the main app calls the sub-apps or sub-executables, it can write files within the app bundle, but when executed directly, it cannot write files.
The app is usually opened using the GUI, and when using the command line, neither the main app nor the sub-apps/sub-executables can write files within the app bundle.
My codesigning environment is:
Sonoma 14.0 on mac mini M1.
I manually sign the app directly using the codesign command in CI instead of using Xcode.
The process will traverse all of the files and sub-apps in the app folder and sign them from the deepest paths to the shallowest paths.
I also tried applying this process to other applications, but all of them encountered the same issue of failing to write files.
The app should not be sandboxed (I did not add sandbox entitlements).
I have tried adding the entitlement com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-write, but this has not resolved the issue.
I am trying to export my AppleScript as an application and have enabled my developer ID to sign it. I, however, get an error the following error:
Any ideas?
Thank you and best regards,
pd
NOTE: macOS Sonoma 14.7.
I have multiple submissions for an app notarization. The goal is to distribute the DMG on my website rather than the app store (which I also have a submission in review for). These are the notarization logs:
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-06-23T20:26:46.597Z
id: 75972c58-bc83-44a9-b3af-4aff1b1839c3
name: Mira-Assist-Fresh.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-06-23T17:53:11.825Z
id: 4bccdfb6-6663-41d3-89bc-c0a15fbdd4b8
name: Mira Assist.zip
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-06-23T17:45:10.342Z
id: fedca538-7619-4a7f-bcc8-3199d6e4b1a6
name: Mira-Assist-1.0.0-Hardened.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-06-23T02:51:04.289Z
id: 19a866b9-e664-4641-b137-6ac852c14ac9
name: Mira Assist-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
--------------------------------------------------
createdDate: 2025-06-23T02:44:25.372Z
id: 455209e5-91dd-4324-aac0-d582f88efc95
name: Mira Assist-1.0.0.dmg
status: In Progress
The earliest of which occured more than 18 hours ago.
This is my first time submitting an app for notarization. I also have a developer account that was created ~1-2 days ago.
From what I've read online, notarization usually occurs in less than 10 minutes.
When querying for the logs, it juts says that the submission ID is invalid or the logs aren't available yet.
Submission log is not yet available or submissionId does not exist
id: 75972c58-bc83-44a9-b3af-4aff1b1839c3
Yesterday there were reported outages on the Developer ID Notary Service, but it was reported pretty late and we were able to notice the outages in real time. It says resolved now, however an error still persists:
Error: HTTP status code: 403. A required agreement is missing or has expired. This request requires an in-effect agreement that has not been signed or has expired. Ensure your team has signed the necessary legal agreements and that they are not expired.
Is there an ongoing outage at this moment that is not being reported again?
Our pipelines have been working flawlessly for months without intervention nor changes until the most recent outages
We have a Mac app that uses some restricted macOS entitlements, thus to test it we embed a development provisioning profile, that needs to contain the correct provisioning UDID.
Typically, for test VMs, we extract the provisioning and UDID and add it to the developer portal and then re-generate the provisioning profiles.
However when we try to do this in our newly created VM (Apple Silicon), our executable won't run, and macOS logs that the provisioning profile doesn't allow the device:
2025-06-12 12:37:52.168 E taskgated-helper[27489:e97da] [com.apple.ManagedClient:ProvisioningProfiles] embedded provisioning profile not valid: file:///Applications/foo.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile error: Error Domain=CPProfileManager Code=-212 "Provisioning profile does not allow this device." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Provisioning profile does not allow this device.}
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 E taskgated-helper[27489:e97da] [com.apple.ManagedClient:ProvisioningProfiles] Disallowing com.company.foo because no eligible provisioning profiles found
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 Df amfid[112:e99b0] [com.apple.xpc:connection] [0xb34c74a00] invalidated because the current process cancelled the connection by calling xpc_connection_cancel()
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 Df taskgated-helper[27489:e97da] [com.apple.xpc:connection] [0x839144000] invalidated because the client process (pid 112) either cancelled the connection or exited
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 E amfid[112:e91ac] [com.apple.MobileFileIntegrity.framework:default] Failure validating against provisioning profiles: <private>
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 E amfid[112:e91ac] [com.apple.MobileFileIntegrity.framework:default] Restricted entitlements not validated, bailing out. Error: Error Domain=AppleMobileFileIntegrityError Code=-413 "No matching profile found" UserInfo={NSURL=<private>, NSLocalizedDescription=No matching profile found}
2025-06-12 12:37:52.169 Df amfid[112:e91ac] /Applications/foo.app/Contents/MacOS/foo not valid: Error Domain=AppleMobileFileIntegrityError Code=-413 "No matching profile found" UserInfo={NSURL=file:///Applications/foo.app/, NSLocalizedDescription=No matching profile found}
The UDID for this VM does look weird, in System Profiler:
But I can verify that this UDID string is present in the provisioning profile embedded in the app bundle:
$ security cms -D -i /Applications/foo.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile | grep -i 7cd9234e9aa4fa8ba528ee417f857b2c993a20a3
<string>7CD9234E9AA4FA8BA528EE417F857B2C993A20A3</string>
I also tried deleting the manually added device from the Developer portal and installing Xcode on the VM and letting Xcode register the device, but I end up in the same situation there. Even after letting Xcode itself register the device, it says that "this device not registered to your account" and then when I click "Register device" it changes into " already exists".
Has anyone else managed to get Mac development provisioning profiles to work in a VM?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
Entitlements
macOS
Code Signing
Virtualization
Is it possible to directly distribute a macOS app with a Developer ID Certificate that belongs to a different team?
I am trying to resolve issues that arise when distributing a macOS app with a Network Extension (Packet Tunnel) outside the App Store using a Developer ID Certificate from a different team than the app’s provisioning profiles and entitlements.
I started by attempting Direct Distribution in Xcode with automatic signing. However, it fails with the following message:
Provisioning profile "Mac Team Direct Provisioning Profile: ” failed qualification checks: Profile doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement.
I suspect the issue is that the provisioning profile allows "packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension", whereas the entitlements generated by Xcode contain "packet-tunnel-provider". When I manually modify the .entitlements file to include the -systemextension suffix, the project fails to build because Xcode does not recognize the modified entitlement. If there is a workaround for this issue, please let me know.
Due to these issues, I resorted to manually creating a signed and notarized app. My process is as follows:
Export the .app from the Xcode archive.
Since the exported .app does not contain the necessary entitlements or provisioning profile for direct distribution, I replace Contents/embedded.provisioningprofile in both the .app and the .appex network extension.
Sign the app and its components in the following order:
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>"<app>.app/Contents/PlugIns/<netext>.appex/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/Versions/A/<fw>
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist-vpn.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/PlugIns/<netext>.appex/
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app
Verify the code signature:
codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=4 <app>.app
- <app>.app: valid on disk
- <app>.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement
Create a ZIP archive using:
ditto -c -k --sequesterRsrc --keepParent <app>.app <app>.zip
Notarize the app with notarytool and staple it.
The notarization completes successfully with errors: nil.
Package the notarized app into a DMG, notarize, and staple the DMG.
The app runs successfully on the development machine. However, when moved to another machine and placed in /Applications, it fails to open. Inspecting Console.app reveals Gatekeeper is blocking the launch:
taskgated-helper <bundleid>: Unsatisfied entitlements: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension, com.apple.developer.team-identifier taskgated-helper entitlements: { "com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension" = ("packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension"); "com.apple.developer.team-identifier" = <teamid>; }
As mentioned earlier, the Developer ID Certificate used for signing belongs to a different team. We are a third-party developer and do not have access to the Developer ID Certificate of the team assigned as the team-identifier.
When I changed the bundle identifier (app ID), team, entitlements, and provisioning profiles to match the team associated with the Developer ID Certificate, the app worked.
My question is:
Is this failure caused by using a Developer ID Certificate from a different team, or should it still work if the provisioning profiles and entitlements are correctly set? Could there be an issue elsewhere in the provisioning profiles or entitlements for the original app ID?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
Network Extension
Gatekeeper
Code Signing
Developer ID
Hi!
I'm having troubles to sign my Xamarin Forms application, im getting the following error "Error : Could not find any available provisioning profiles for MyProject.iOS on iOS.". I've recently cleaned my Provisioning profiles folder ~/Library/MobileDevice/Provisioning Profiles since it wasn't being updated with my latest provisioning profile for my app. But now my provisioning profiles are not being downloaded, I'm not getting any other error on downloading profiles. I've tried from Xcode -> Settings -> Account -> Download manual profiles. Tried too open the profile downloaded from the Apple Developer Portal, also tried copy manually the provisioning profile downloaded to the previous mentioned path, none of those works.
The user that im logged in on Xcode is the admin/owner so is not a permissions issue. IDK what can be wrong or what can I try. So I'm going to be grateful for your help :(
Hi guys,
I got an error about mac notarization result return 132.
here is the stack trace on the logs:
2025-02-25 02:53:55,503 ERROR [org.ecl.cbi.ws.mac.not.xcr.not.NotarytoolNotarizer] (macos-notarization-service-pool-thread-13) Error while parsing the output after the upload of '/tmp/macos-notarization-service/pending-files/myapplication.dmg' to the Apple notarization service: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 1; Premature end of file.
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:204)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:178)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:400)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:327)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1465)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl$PrologDriver.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:1013)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:542)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:889)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:825)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:141)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1224)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:637)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:326)
at java.xml/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:197)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.PListDict.fromXML(PListDict.java:134)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.notarytool.NotarytoolNotarizer.analyzeSubmissionResult(NotarytoolNotarizer.java:39)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.NotarizationTool.upload(NotarizationTool.java:50)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.lambda$uploadFailsafe$3(Notarizer.java:65)
at net.jodah.failsafe.Functions.lambda$get$0(Functions.java:48)
at net.jodah.failsafe.RetryPolicyExecutor.lambda$supply$0(RetryPolicyExecutor.java:66)
at net.jodah.failsafe.Execution.executeSync(Execution.java:128)
at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.call(FailsafeExecutor.java:379)
at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.get(FailsafeExecutor.java:68)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.uploadFailsafe(Notarizer.java:65)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.NotarizationService.lambda$notarize$0(NotarizationService.java:192)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Do you know why?
If you have any thread or documents telling about the details of return values of the command: 'xcrun notarytool submit'
I have tried again and again to generate and install the .mobileprovision on my device for testing apps following the exact instructions. I cannot get this to work. When I tap the .mobileprovision on the device I get the error "Profile Error - This profile cannot be installed."
In Xcode in the console as I try to install the profile, this is what it shows:
`profiled (ManagedConfiguration)
Desc : Invalid Profile
US Desc: Invalid Profile
Domain : MCProfileErrorDomain
Code : 1000
Type : MCFatalError
and then
profiled
Desc : Invalid Profile
Sugg : Invalid Profile
US Desc: Invalid Profile
US Sugg: Invalid Profile
Domain : MCInstallationErrorDomain
Code : 4000
Type : MCFatalError
...Underlying error:
NSError:
Desc : Invalid Profile
US Desc: Invalid Profile
Domain : MCProfileErrorDomain
Code : 1000
Type : MCFatalError
I have been at this for days and cannot get it to work. Any help would be appreciated
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles