İOS 26 beta battery %1

Contact Access Picker works on Simulator (iOS 18.6 and iOS 26.0) and on a device (iOS 18.6). Should I prepare a test project to share with you?

That makes sense. I think it's not going to be too bad for customers. The data in the containers is basically transient cache and temp files (another reason why this particular App Store restriction is probably inappropriate in this case). The user's programs are stored in NSDocument bundles wherever they put them on disk (these bundles are used by the IDE via security scoped URLs which we bookmark and pass to the XPC service in the new versions of the app). In all app versions, a customer can wipe the app container, even the group container, and as soon as they restart the IDE it's all recreated and works perfectly. I test this use case regularly and it's bullet proof. Financially, the app uses (very cheap) monthly auto renewing expenses. The app itself is free to download (the auto renewing subscription is required for building programs, and comes with a month free trial) and doesn't have any permanent in-app purchases that people would lose. I can work with the new developer (a good friend), customers, etc

Tab bars accessory views stay visible across your app, this was introduced in iOS 26.0. Please review Get to know the new design system to explore the new design system and key changes

It's a user's preference whether they want privacy-sensitive information to be redacted. This is similar to the preference that allows a user to decide if iMessage notifications on their iOS Lock Screen should show the actual message. On watchOS, a user can set their preference at Settings -> Clock -> Show Data When Locked for Lock Screen, and at Settings -> Display & Brightness -> Always On > Show Complication Data for Always On. The settings are on by default, and I guess that is why you don't see privacySensitive() working. Please confirm if that is your case, if you don't mind. For Always On, you can overwrite the user's preference by providing a different appearance based on the isLuminanceReduced environment variable. That explains why your code works when the device is in that state. If you'd really like to overwrite the user's preference for Lock Screen, you can add the Data Protection entitlement to your widget extension, and set it to NSFileProtectionComplete or NSFilePro

Hello @sadaotokuyama ! Thank you for your question. Could you please submit feedback using Feedback Assistant? And then share the ticket number here. I think understanding your usecase would be helpful for us, and you'll be able to receive updates about any changes or improvements in the future. It is true that when you modify content inside your RealityKitContent package, the entire package will need to be rebuilt. This is inconvenient, especially when you need to make frequent changes during development. For now, I recommend focusing on ways to reduce the frequency of changes you make to the asset itself that would require a rebuild in the first place. For example, are there ways you could verify changes in an external DCC? One thing you could do now: try placing your large USDZ file outside the RealityKitContent package, and inside a separate bundle, like the main bundle. Then, when you make changes to the large USDZ file, your entire RealityKitContent package won't need to be rebuilt. Depending o

Same for me, macOS 26.1 and visionOS 26.1 or 26.2 beta 1

Quinn, Thank you very much for the prompt and detailed reply. Do you happen to know if the problem might be caused by a plugin that is no longer being used but may still be referenced within my app? I ask because the only difference between the first version of my app (that sailed through to the launch file stage) and the one that fell at the first hurdle is that I added a plugin to the latter; then removed it. I tried removing all plugins from my runtime, and signing it again, but it made no difference. Thanks again.

I tried different device models, and some could trigger the task normally, such as the 15 Pro Max and 12 Pro Max. However, there were also some models, such as the 17 Pro, 15 Pro, and 15, that could not trigger the task properly. Moreover, there was no additional error information to help locate the issue. I assume you're doing this on device and not the simulator, right? And did you check the Console logs to see if an error was reported there? (look for the dasd process) I also just wanted to reiterate your other points about the BGContinuedProcessingTask API, in case someone from Apple is listening: I agree that the experience on non-Dynamic Island devices is not great. The task notification banner thing is a obtrusive and redundant. My app already displays a progress bar, so displaying another progress indicator is redundant. Moreover, the banner obscures my app's UI and does not disappear automatically like normal notifications. This leaves the user uncertain if they can safely dismiss it, or if dismissin