Search results for

İOS 26 beta battery %1

258,423 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to OnDemand VPN connection stuck in NO INTERNET
[quote='876733022, disinghal, /thread/811887?answerId=876733022#876733022, /profile/disinghal'] URL Session is calling a public endpoint. [/quote] Right, but you’ve set up your on-demand rules to say that everything generates demand. It’d be interesting to see what happens if you configure your on-demand rules to only generate demand what you load a URL that’s behind the VPN. I suspect it’ll work consistently, but if you find that’s not the case then that’d be an interesting datapoint. [quote='876733022, disinghal, /thread/811887?answerId=876733022#876733022, /profile/disinghal'] It happens intermittently. [/quote] Fair enough. But that doesn’t really contradict the position I explained above. You’ve set yourself up for failure and that you only fail in some cases. That’s a win, right? (-: Seriously though, I don’t think I’m going to be able to help you further here. You are clearly exploring the limits of what’s possible. If you want to make the case that this should work, I recommend that you do that direct
1d
URL Filter Network Extension
Hello team, I am trying to find out a way to block urls in the chrome browser if it is found in local blocked list cache. I found URL Filter Network very much suitable for my requirement. But I see at multiple places that this solution is only for Enterprise level or MDM or supervised device. So can I run this for normal user ? as my targeting audience would be bank users. One more thing how can I test this in development environment if we need supervised devices and do we need special entitlement ? When trying to run sample project in the simulator then getting below error
7
0
132
1d
Reply to URL Filter Network Extension
This is not a very difficult API to use: let url: URL = … let verdict = await NEURLFilter.verdict(for: url) switch verdict { case .unknown: … you need to decide on a policy for this case … case .allow: … continue loading the URL … case .deny: … stop loading the URL … @unknown default: … you need to decide on a policy for this case … } Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1d
IAP Purchase Fails During App Review – Circular Dependency Between App Approval and IAP Approval
Hello everyone, I’m facing an issue with In-App Purchases during App Review and would appreciate guidance from anyone who has encountered a similar situation. Context: New iOS/iPadOS app, first submission. One Non-Consumable In-App Purchase. IAP was created, fully configured, and submitted together with the app version. IAP status in App Store Connect: In Review. App includes Restore Purchase and uses standard StoreKit purchase flow. Paid Apps Agreement is accepted. Problem: During Apple’s review, when the reviewer taps the purchase button, a generic error appears: “Purchase failed. An error occurred, please try again.” Apple rejected the app under Guideline 2.1 – Performance – App Completeness, stating that the IAP shows a bug. What seems to be happening: The IAP itself is still in review and therefore not fully active, which causes the purchase attempt to fail. However, the app cannot be approved because the purchase fails, creating a circular dependency: App cannot be approved because IAP
2
0
77
1d
Reply to Persistent Tokens for Keychain Unlock in Platform SSO
[quote='876709022, siddhant-mac, /thread/815755?answerId=876709022#876709022, /profile/siddhant-mac'] is it possible on the macOS login window? [/quote] That depends on what you mean by “it”: If you’re asking whether it’s possible to reuse infrastructure used by Platform SSO then the answer is “No.” If you’re asking whether it’s possible to create an authorisation plug-in that presents a completely passwordless experience, the answer is more nuanced. You can certainly make a lot of progress, but I don’t think there’s a complete solution. Sticking points involve FileVault, as I’ve mentioned above, and unlocking the keychain. This is especially problematic when it comes to the data protection keychain. Honestly, I don’t see a good path forward for this. The authorisation plug-in mechanism has significant issues, and I’m doubtful they’ll be addressed because of limitations in that architecture. Specifically, FileVault support is pretty critical and it’s hard to see how that can happen within the current design.
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
1d
Reply to Announcing the Swift Student Challenge 2026
[quote='876690022, ZKK640, /thread/806582?answerId=876690022#876690022, /profile/ZKK640'] What are the consequences of using Xcode15? [/quote] There are a couple that spring to mind: Xcode 15 doesn’t include the iOS 26 SDK, so you won’t be able to use the latest iOS features. You won’t be able to test your submission properly, because it will ultimately be reviewed on Xcode 26. While Xcode is generally good about working with projects from older versions, the only way to be sure that it’ll work is to try it. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1d
Reply to Admin on Organization team but cannot access CIP
[quote='876718022, dridev, /thread/814235?answerId=876718022#876718022, /profile/dridev'] I am absolutely sure yes [/quote] OK. Then I recommend that you follow the support path laid out in the last bit of Team Member Can’t access Certificates, Identifiers, and Profiles. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1d
Reply to App Store Connect API ProfileCreateRequest is missing template property
I’m not an expert on the App Store Connect API, but I can speak to this part of your question: [quote='816166021, Misko_, /thread/816166, /profile/Misko_'] there is a possibility to set Entitlements, which is I understand also called as Template. [/quote] The entitlement template feature is very much an old school path. These days most access to managed entitlements is via additional capabilities. Like any other capability, you set these on your App ID and they flow through to every provisioning profile [1] you create for that App ID. These capabilities have a bunch of advantages, including Xcode integration, compatibility with automatic signing, and the ability to add any combination of the capabilities to a given profile. Given that, the template mechanism is largely deprecated. If you have existing templates you can request that they be migrated to additional capabilities. See Developer Account Help > Reference > Provisioning with capabilities > Migrating additional entitlements to capabi
1d
Reply to Notarization Stuck
You can expect that most uploads will be notarised quickly. Occasionally, some uploads are held for in-depth analysis and may take longer to complete. As you notarise your apps, the system will learn how to recognise them, and you should see fewer delays. For lots of additional info about notarisation, see Notarisation Resources. Specifically, it links to a Q&A with the notary service team that’s quite instructive. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Notarization Tags:
1d
Reply to Timed-Wait for main thread
[quote='816179021, GangOrca, /thread/816179, /profile/GangOrca'] Whereas, with conditional variables, there are no warnings. [/quote] I wouldn’t read too much into that. These warnings have to be explicitly coded, and we added that code for Dispatch semaphores because that’s the most common offender here. It wouldn’t surprise me if we added a similar warning for pthread condition variables at some point in the future. Then again, it wouldn’t surprise me if we didn’t. The pthreads API is relatively obscure. [quote='816179021, GangOrca, /thread/816179, /profile/GangOrca'] What is the recommend way? [/quote] There isn’t a supported way to block the main thread of a GUI application for long periods of time. On macOS it will SPOD, which is a terrible user experience. On other platforms the app will likely end up being killed by the watchdog. And to be clear, the issue here isn’t about the specific APIs you’re using, it’s this overall design. Speaking of iOS and friends, app termination [1] behave
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
1d
Reply to App Startup with Debugger in Xcode 26 is slow
@fpiovezan Thank you for joining the conversation. You have requested for me to: validate the state of Accessibility options run an experiment and file a new FB with logs attached After gathering our bearings, it's clear to me that I will not be able to provide anything new that was not already provided in FB20359822 . Can you please consult that FB ticket as it has all the extensive info and logs of using Xcode 26.2 with iOS 26.2, and what's also important, a project that reproduces the issue. As for the accessibility options, we are certain that we do not really enable anything on by hand, never. We are going to attach a video recording of our accessibility options to the same FB20359822.
1d
App Remains in 'Waiting for Review'
Hello, My new app has remained in the Waiting for Review status for an extended period. I initially submitted it on January 23, 2026. After several days without any progress, I submitted an inquiry on January 27 but have not yet received a response. On February 1, I canceled and resubmitted the app, wondering if there might have been an issue with the review queue, but it still remains in the Waiting for Review state. I had scheduled my marketing activities based on the typical review timeframe, but since the review has not started and there is no indication of how much longer the wait will be, it has been difficult to adjust my plans accordingly. If anyone has experienced a similar issue and managed to resolve it, I would greatly appreciate any insights you could share. Thank you for your time, and I hope you have a great day.
2
0
304
1d