Search results for

“4.3”

624 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to App rejected for Guideline 4.3(a) due to similar app on old account I cannot access
Thank you for your post. There are several factors that may contribute to an app not following App Review Guideline 4.3. Typically, these apps share a similar binary, metadata, and overall concept as apps already on the App Store, with only minor differences. If you have questions about App Review's review of your app, we recommend requesting an appointment with App Review during the bi-weekly Meet with Apple event. Sign in with your Developer ID and select App Review Appointment. A member of the App Review team will help you with your questions regarding the review process and the App Review Guidelines. Appointments are subject to availability during your local business hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Jun ’25
App rejected for Guideline 4.3(a) due to similar app on old account I cannot access
Hello, I am facing an issue with App Store Review Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. My app was rejected because it was found to be similar to another app previously uploaded on a different Apple Developer account. However, I have lost access to my old developer account and cannot remove or modify the previous submission. Currently, I am unable to: Log in to the old Apple Developer account Remove or update the app that is causing the conflict My new app is intended for internal testing only and is not yet published on the App Store. I have made efforts to modify the app, but the system still detects similarities with the old app. I would like to ask for advice or assistance on how to proceed in this situation, as I no longer have control over the previous account. Has anyone experienced a similar situation, and is there any way Apple can help resolve this? Thank you very much for your support.
1
0
113
Jun ’25
Reply to Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hey lifeofjer, I'm really glad you shared this, because we’re going through a very similar situation right now with our app Cloose. Although Cloose isn’t a dating app, Apple keeps interpreting it as one and rejecting us under 4.3(b) – Spam. Our concept is a social map, built around real-time location and spontaneous proximity, where users can connect if they happen to be nearby and active on the map — no swipe mechanics, no auto-matching, no profiles sorted like in dating apps. We even removed all “dating-like” terminology and visuals, including hearts, swipes, and the word “match.” Still, we keep getting the same general response from Apple: that the app doesn’t provide a unique enough experience. To really demonstrate how different our app is, we even created a full walkthrough video showing all the redesigned functionalities, safety mechanics, merge-based interaction logic, delayed/obfuscated location, and more. But honestly, we’re not sure if the review team has watched it. Here’s the video, in c
Jun ’25
Reply to Review-Spam 4.3
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out to seek advice and support regarding a confusing issue I’m experiencing with my app’s review process. App ID: 6744330283 Here’s the situation: Versions 1.0 and 1.1 of my app were approved and successfully published on the App Store. However, updates 1.2 and 2.0 have both been rejected for Guideline 4.3 – Spam. The rejection happens extremely fast – less than 10 seconds after the app goes “In Review”, it gets rejected. There is no indication that the reviewer even launched the app. This is very frustrating because: The app has real user reviews, In-App Purchases, and active paying users. My app is 100% original – it is not a copy or template-based app. Even worse, the review process for versions 1.2 and 2.0 took over 7 days before even starting, and then they were rejected instantly, again without being opened. I’m happy to cooperate and improve my app further, but I feel like this may be a misunderstanding or a mistaken flag by an automated process. Has anyone experie
Jun ’25
App Rejected for 4.3 Spam Without Proper Review – Need Clarification
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out to seek advice and support regarding a confusing issue I’m experiencing with my app’s review process. App ID: 6744330283 Here’s the situation: Versions 1.0 and 1.1 of my app were approved and successfully published on the App Store. However, updates 1.2 and 2.0 have both been rejected for Guideline 4.3 – Spam. The rejection happens extremely fast – less than 10 seconds after the app goes “In Review”, it gets rejected. There is no indication that the reviewer even launched the app. This is very frustrating because: The app has real user reviews, In-App Purchases, and active paying users. My app is 100% original – it is not a copy or template-based app. Even worse, the review process for versions 1.2 and 2.0 took over 7 days before even starting, and then they were rejected instantly, again without being opened. I’m happy to cooperate and improve my app further, but I feel like this may be a misunderstanding or a mistaken flag by an automated process. Has anyone experie
2
0
216
Jun ’25
Reply to Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hello, That's a thoughtful response. You may need to provide more evidence of uniqueness to support this claim: Its mechanics — from conversation caps to safety scores — are fundamentally different from other offerings in the App Store’s dating category. Similarly, we recommend reaching out to App Review to provide more detailed feedback on how guideline 4.3(b) was applied.
Jun ’25
Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hey everyone, We recently submitted our new dating app, Rove Dating, and it’s been rejected under Guideline 4.3(b) — “Design: Spam.” I’d really appreciate your insights, especially from anyone who’s faced something similar or has experience getting nuanced apps approved in a saturated category. Before building Rove, we spoke to dozens of users of existing dating platforms. We consistently heard the same thing: people are deeply dissatisfied with current apps. They’re overwhelmed, burned out by swiping, and frustrated by endless choices and low-quality interactions. It became clear that the problem isn’t that there are “too many” dating apps — it’s that most aren’t adapting to how people actually want to date in 2025. We designed Rove to address those pain points head-on, with a totally different approach to matching, message limits, and emotional safety. We believe our app meaningfully improves the dating experience — but we’re having trouble getting that across in the review process. Below is the ex
3
0
220
Jun ’25
Continous 4.3 (a) Spam rejection
I built an app which is a modern twist on a game called Reversi. My app is fundamentally different than the original game because it adds a different game dynamics (a point scoring version and a puzzle mode). Not to mention, it is free and ad-free for users. However, my app continues to get the same boiler plate rejection from Apple. I understand Apple wants to reduce the number of similar apps and also prevent spam, however it is disappointing they take no time to read my responses or provide more information on what the issue is. It's a disappointing experience as a developer, as all of the effort I've put into this app feels like a gamble with Apple as they don't take my submission seriously. Also, the app reviewers have not answered any of my questions through the mail. Unsure of how to continue. If Apple is going to reject an app merely on concept there should be a way to do that before someone spends the time finalising and polishing the game.
2
0
135
Jun ’25
Reply to 4.3.0 Design: Spam
Thank you for your post. There are several factors that may contribute to an app not following App Review Guideline 4.3. Typically, these apps share a similar binary, metadata, and overall concept as apps already on the App Store, with only minor differences. If you have questions about App Review's review of your app, we recommend requesting an appointment with App Review during the bi-weekly Meet with Apple event. Sign in with your Developer ID and select App Review Appointment. A member of the App Review team will help you with your questions regarding the review process and the App Review Guidelines. Appointments are subject to availability during your local business hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Jun ’25
Reply to App Rejected (4.3.0 Design Spam) (I'm a iOs developer since 2009 and this is the first time)
There are several reasons for 4.3 rejection, some are not spam by itself but overcrowded category. b) Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated;… We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience. Searching on the AppStore, one can see there are a lot of puzzle games. So may be that's just the reason. If so, have you arguments to convince reviewer that your app creates a unique, high-quality experience ?
Jun ’25
Reply to 4.3.0 Design: Spam
See section 4.3 of the App Review Guidelines here: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#spam Whether Apple believes you’re submitting a too-similar app with minimal changes, or maybe the app category is too overrun? Or shorter, whether this is case 4.3(a) or case 4.3(b)?
Jun ’25
Reply to A problem I'm going through
We are going through a same problem. We have spent about 1 year in developing our multiplayer card game. All the code is written from scratch by our team in unity. For design, we purchased some of the assets pack from unity asset store and we do have the licence to use them. We were very happy with the quality of our game and when we received this weird message (Guideline 4.3 - Design) from the App Store review team, all of us are in shock. So, is our hard work going in vain because we really can't change anything in our game and if we change anything, we will see bugs in our game and it becomes very hard to handle online games. We are feeling very helpless and our team are not able to work since we received this message. Please, if anyone can help us, that will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Jun ’25
Reply to App Store Review 4.3 . help!help!help!
We are going through a same problem. We have spent about 1 year in developing our multiplayer card game. All the code is written from scratch by our team in unity. For design, we purchased some of the assets pack from unity asset store and we do have the licence to use them. We were very happy with the quality of our game and when we received this weird message (Guideline 4.3 - Design) from the App Store review team, all of us are in shock. So, is our hard work going in vain because we really can't change anything in our game and if we change anything, we will see bugs in our game and it becomes very hard to handle online games. We are feeling very helpless and our team are not able to work since we received this message. Please, if anyone can help us, that will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Jun ’25
Reply to App rejected for Guideline 4.3(a) due to similar app on old account I cannot access
Thank you for your post. There are several factors that may contribute to an app not following App Review Guideline 4.3. Typically, these apps share a similar binary, metadata, and overall concept as apps already on the App Store, with only minor differences. If you have questions about App Review's review of your app, we recommend requesting an appointment with App Review during the bi-weekly Meet with Apple event. Sign in with your Developer ID and select App Review Appointment. A member of the App Review team will help you with your questions regarding the review process and the App Review Guidelines. Appointments are subject to availability during your local business hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
App rejected for Guideline 4.3(a) due to similar app on old account I cannot access
Hello, I am facing an issue with App Store Review Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. My app was rejected because it was found to be similar to another app previously uploaded on a different Apple Developer account. However, I have lost access to my old developer account and cannot remove or modify the previous submission. Currently, I am unable to: Log in to the old Apple Developer account Remove or update the app that is causing the conflict My new app is intended for internal testing only and is not yet published on the App Store. I have made efforts to modify the app, but the system still detects similarities with the old app. I would like to ask for advice or assistance on how to proceed in this situation, as I no longer have control over the previous account. Has anyone experienced a similar situation, and is there any way Apple can help resolve this? Thank you very much for your support.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
113
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hey lifeofjer, I'm really glad you shared this, because we’re going through a very similar situation right now with our app Cloose. Although Cloose isn’t a dating app, Apple keeps interpreting it as one and rejecting us under 4.3(b) – Spam. Our concept is a social map, built around real-time location and spontaneous proximity, where users can connect if they happen to be nearby and active on the map — no swipe mechanics, no auto-matching, no profiles sorted like in dating apps. We even removed all “dating-like” terminology and visuals, including hearts, swipes, and the word “match.” Still, we keep getting the same general response from Apple: that the app doesn’t provide a unique enough experience. To really demonstrate how different our app is, we even created a full walkthrough video showing all the redesigned functionalities, safety mechanics, merge-based interaction logic, delayed/obfuscated location, and more. But honestly, we’re not sure if the review team has watched it. Here’s the video, in c
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to Review-Spam 4.3
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out to seek advice and support regarding a confusing issue I’m experiencing with my app’s review process. App ID: 6744330283 Here’s the situation: Versions 1.0 and 1.1 of my app were approved and successfully published on the App Store. However, updates 1.2 and 2.0 have both been rejected for Guideline 4.3 – Spam. The rejection happens extremely fast – less than 10 seconds after the app goes “In Review”, it gets rejected. There is no indication that the reviewer even launched the app. This is very frustrating because: The app has real user reviews, In-App Purchases, and active paying users. My app is 100% original – it is not a copy or template-based app. Even worse, the review process for versions 1.2 and 2.0 took over 7 days before even starting, and then they were rejected instantly, again without being opened. I’m happy to cooperate and improve my app further, but I feel like this may be a misunderstanding or a mistaken flag by an automated process. Has anyone experie
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to App Rejected for 4.3 Spam Without Proper Review – Need Clarification
I have also sent emails and made several phone calls, but the responses I received were very generic. The previous versions were approved and published, but there is no clear explanation as to why the later versions were flagged as Spam under guideline 4.3 (A).
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
App Rejected for 4.3 Spam Without Proper Review – Need Clarification
Hello everyone, I’m reaching out to seek advice and support regarding a confusing issue I’m experiencing with my app’s review process. App ID: 6744330283 Here’s the situation: Versions 1.0 and 1.1 of my app were approved and successfully published on the App Store. However, updates 1.2 and 2.0 have both been rejected for Guideline 4.3 – Spam. The rejection happens extremely fast – less than 10 seconds after the app goes “In Review”, it gets rejected. There is no indication that the reviewer even launched the app. This is very frustrating because: The app has real user reviews, In-App Purchases, and active paying users. My app is 100% original – it is not a copy or template-based app. Even worse, the review process for versions 1.2 and 2.0 took over 7 days before even starting, and then they were rejected instantly, again without being opened. I’m happy to cooperate and improve my app further, but I feel like this may be a misunderstanding or a mistaken flag by an automated process. Has anyone experie
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
216
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hello, That's a thoughtful response. You may need to provide more evidence of uniqueness to support this claim: Its mechanics — from conversation caps to safety scores — are fundamentally different from other offerings in the App Store’s dating category. Similarly, we recommend reaching out to App Review to provide more detailed feedback on how guideline 4.3(b) was applied.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Struggling With Guideline 4.3(b) Rejections – Would Love Dev Insight
Hey everyone, We recently submitted our new dating app, Rove Dating, and it’s been rejected under Guideline 4.3(b) — “Design: Spam.” I’d really appreciate your insights, especially from anyone who’s faced something similar or has experience getting nuanced apps approved in a saturated category. Before building Rove, we spoke to dozens of users of existing dating platforms. We consistently heard the same thing: people are deeply dissatisfied with current apps. They’re overwhelmed, burned out by swiping, and frustrated by endless choices and low-quality interactions. It became clear that the problem isn’t that there are “too many” dating apps — it’s that most aren’t adapting to how people actually want to date in 2025. We designed Rove to address those pain points head-on, with a totally different approach to matching, message limits, and emotional safety. We believe our app meaningfully improves the dating experience — but we’re having trouble getting that across in the review process. Below is the ex
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
220
Activity
Jun ’25
Continous 4.3 (a) Spam rejection
I built an app which is a modern twist on a game called Reversi. My app is fundamentally different than the original game because it adds a different game dynamics (a point scoring version and a puzzle mode). Not to mention, it is free and ad-free for users. However, my app continues to get the same boiler plate rejection from Apple. I understand Apple wants to reduce the number of similar apps and also prevent spam, however it is disappointing they take no time to read my responses or provide more information on what the issue is. It's a disappointing experience as a developer, as all of the effort I've put into this app feels like a gamble with Apple as they don't take my submission seriously. Also, the app reviewers have not answered any of my questions through the mail. Unsure of how to continue. If Apple is going to reject an app merely on concept there should be a way to do that before someone spends the time finalising and polishing the game.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
135
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to 4.3.0 Design: Spam
Thank you for your post. There are several factors that may contribute to an app not following App Review Guideline 4.3. Typically, these apps share a similar binary, metadata, and overall concept as apps already on the App Store, with only minor differences. If you have questions about App Review's review of your app, we recommend requesting an appointment with App Review during the bi-weekly Meet with Apple event. Sign in with your Developer ID and select App Review Appointment. A member of the App Review team will help you with your questions regarding the review process and the App Review Guidelines. Appointments are subject to availability during your local business hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to App Rejected (4.3.0 Design Spam) (I'm a iOs developer since 2009 and this is the first time)
There are several reasons for 4.3 rejection, some are not spam by itself but overcrowded category. b) Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated;… We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience. Searching on the AppStore, one can see there are a lot of puzzle games. So may be that's just the reason. If so, have you arguments to convince reviewer that your app creates a unique, high-quality experience ?
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to 4.3.0 Design: Spam
Hoffman ,Thank you for your comment. It's Guideline 4.3(a).
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to 4.3.0 Design: Spam
See section 4.3 of the App Review Guidelines here: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#spam Whether Apple believes you’re submitting a too-similar app with minimal changes, or maybe the app category is too overrun? Or shorter, whether this is case 4.3(a) or case 4.3(b)?
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to A problem I'm going through
We are going through a same problem. We have spent about 1 year in developing our multiplayer card game. All the code is written from scratch by our team in unity. For design, we purchased some of the assets pack from unity asset store and we do have the licence to use them. We were very happy with the quality of our game and when we received this weird message (Guideline 4.3 - Design) from the App Store review team, all of us are in shock. So, is our hard work going in vain because we really can't change anything in our game and if we change anything, we will see bugs in our game and it becomes very hard to handle online games. We are feeling very helpless and our team are not able to work since we received this message. Please, if anyone can help us, that will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25
Reply to App Store Review 4.3 . help!help!help!
We are going through a same problem. We have spent about 1 year in developing our multiplayer card game. All the code is written from scratch by our team in unity. For design, we purchased some of the assets pack from unity asset store and we do have the licence to use them. We were very happy with the quality of our game and when we received this weird message (Guideline 4.3 - Design) from the App Store review team, all of us are in shock. So, is our hard work going in vain because we really can't change anything in our game and if we change anything, we will see bugs in our game and it becomes very hard to handle online games. We are feeling very helpless and our team are not able to work since we received this message. Please, if anyone can help us, that will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’25