column

Hello @himanshujnaidu, I can't tell for sure but it sounds like the matrix you show above is different than how you are interpreting it. Camera Transform = simd_float4x4( [ [0.98446155, -0.030119859, 0.172998, 0.0], // column 0 [0.023979114, 0.9990097, 0.037477385, 0.0], // column 1 [-0.17395553, -0.032746706, 0.98420894, 0.0], // column 2 [0.024039675, -0.037087332, -0.22780673, 0.99999994] // column 3 ]) First up, keep in mind that float4x4's init method is column major. So each 'row' in that code is a column in the matrix. So in this case the position of the camera relative to the origin is 0.024039675, -0.037087332, -0.22780673 Second, the upper-left part of the float4x4 matrix is a float3x3 and represents the orientation. The eulerAngles property on the frame.camera re-interprets this 3x3 matrix as the familiar Euler angles. You can find the orientation of the camera relative to the frame via let rotation = frame.camera.eulerAngles rotation.y will be

[quote='844785022, neha24, /thread/788736?answerId=844785022#844785022, /profile/neha24'] Does SecItemDelete should also fail … in case of Device in locked state … right? [/quote] No. The keychain database as a whole is available at all times. Keychain item protection is implemented by encrypting specific attributes of the keychain item. When you read the item, the system goes to decrypt those attributes. If the required key material isn’t available, then the read operation fails. However, the system doesn’t need that key material in order to delete the item, and thus it’s possible to delete an item that you can’t currently access. This makes more sense if you have a little understanding of how the keychain actually works internally. Have a read of SecItem: Fundamentals, and specifically its The Four Freedoms^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Functions section. In that model, the content column of a row is encrypted (based on the kSecAttrAccessible column) but that doesn’t stop you from deleting the entire ro

Hmmmm, this is working for me. Here’s what I did: Using Xcode 26.0 beta on macOS 15.5, I created a new project from the iOS > App template. In Signing & Capabilities, I added Wi-Fi Aware. And enabled the Publish option. I selected Any iOS Device as my run destination. And then built the app. This is what I see: % codesign -d --entitlements - Test788807.app Executable=/Users/quinn/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Test788807-dcmkbvkgvfliviecoruqexidkqbe/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos/Test788807.app/Test788807 [Dict] [Key] application-identifier [Value] [String] SKMME9E2Y8.com.example.apple-samplecode.Test788807 [Key] com.apple.developer.team-identifier [Value] [String] SKMME9E2Y8 [Key] com.apple.developer.wifi-aware [Value] [Array] [String] Publish [Key] get-task-allow [Value] [Bool] true % security cms -D -i Test788807.app/embedded.mobileprovision | plutil -p - { … Entitlements => { application-identifier => SKMME9E2Y8.com.example.apple-samplecode.Test788807 com.apple.developer.team-identifier =

In Xcode select the project in the sidebar, select the target in the first column, select Info in the top tab bar. Under custom iOS Target Properties hover over the table and click plus to add a new row. Enter NSLocationRequireExplicitServiceSession for the key, choose Bool for the type, and choose YES for the value. This is shown the below screenshot:

I'd like to answer the second question first. The lldb config file can be selected by editing the Run scheme action. Specifically, use the menu bar, go to Product -> Scheme. Make sure the desired scheme is selected, and click on Edit Scheme.... In the pop up window, select the Run action from the column on the left. Then click on the Info tab. The lldbinit file can be specified through the field in the middle. Going back to the first question. Since we can explicitly specify a path to the lldbinit file, we can place it anywhere in the project. Is this sufficient to get you going? Please let us know and I will follow up. Thanks!

Are you using zombie in the technical sense used by Unix-y systems? That is, ps ajx shows Z in the STAT column? Or are you just referring to a process that hangs around longer than you expect it to? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

I think it should work. A way to read the columns separately .btn-primary { color: #fff; background-color: #0275d8; border-color: #0275d8; } .btn { display: inline-block; font-weight: 400; line-height: 1.25; text-align: center; white-space: nowrap; vertical-align: middle; -webkit-user-select: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; border: 1px solid transparent; padding: .5rem 1rem; font-size: 1rem; border-radius: .25rem; -webkit-transition: all .2s ease-in-out; transition: all .2s ease-in-out; } label { display: inline-block; margin-bottom: .5rem; } //181b1d btn primary background-color: 37474F; .btn-primary.active, .btn-primary:active, .show>.btn-primary.dropdown-toggle { color: #fff; background-color: #025aa5; background-image: none; border-color: #01549b; } .btn-primary.focus, .btn-primary:focus { -webkit-box-shadow: ‪0 0 0 2‬px rgba(2, 117, 216, .5); box-shadow: ‪0 0 0 2‬px rgba(2, 117, 216, .5); } .btn-primary:hover { color: #fff; background-color: #025aa5; bo

I am having the same issue with the Column N.A. How can we solve this?

I have some potential progress, but due to the nature of this crash, I don't know if this is correct or not. After inspecting the sqlite-files that represents the backingdata, I discovered that a property backed by an integer was set to null after migration even the original value was 3. Upon inspection, I realized this was the very first property I ever migrated, so it was still annotated with @Attribute(orginalName: propertyName), even tho the migration which crashed for me was the 9th migration step overall for the app. Thus, with the Schema I was migrating from being: struct SchemaV7 { @Model class Item { @Attribute(originalName: propertyName) var newPropertyName: Int } } And then removing it in the destination Schema: struct SchemaV8 { @Model class Item { var newPropertyName: Int } } made me able to complete the migration without crashing. Wether this was the solution or not, I have no idea, but it could explain some of the crashes I've seen earlier... The property which was crashing the app have never b