column

Thank you! The column name through me off. Thought it was only storing the response body. Depending on whether NSURLSession implements freshness based on Last-Modified (doesn't look like it from the docs, have asked in a separate question, to be approved) I was keen on implementing it. For that purpose, is there a way to reuse whatever information is stored in the cache or expected to implement that independently?

You have a delegate function for tableView that just do this :func tableView(tableView: NSTableView, viewForTableColumn tableColumn: NSTableColumn?, row: Int) -> NSView?It gets data from the dataSource to display in the tableYou have to set a unique identifier each column in IB : name, ageYou have your data source (an array with 2 columns) that stores your data: items[row] is an array (you could alos use a dictionary)Here is from an excellent online tutorial (CocoaProgramming from AppleProgramming) an exampleimport Cocoa class Person: NSObject { var name : String var age : Int override init() { self.name = String() self.name = Yoda self.age = 300 super.init() } init(name: String, age: Int) { self.name = name self.age = age } required convenience init?(coder decoder: NSCoder) { self.init() self.name = decoder.decodeObjectForKey(name) as! String self.age = decoder.decodeObjectForKey(age) as! Int } } / extension Person: NSCoding { func encodeWithCoder(coder: NSCoder) { coder.encodeObject(sel

I'm not sure I made my problem clearWhile I set the values in the table using the tableView method I'm allowing the user to change the values in the tableview by making the cells in the second column editable.I want to know how to retrieve the new values the user has entered from the table.I notice there are two versions of the tableView function. the first is called by the tableview to populate the cells.I'm unclear as to how/when the second version of the function is called:func tableView(tableView: NSTableView, setObjectValue object: AnyObject?, forTableColumn tableColumn: NSTableColumn?, row: Int) { an example of how to get the value for row n, column i of a tableview would be appreciated.Thanks for your help!

My save function in GameScene:func saveGame() { let fetch = NSFetchRequest(entityName: GameState) do { let state = try moc.executeFetchRequest(fetch) as! [GameState] if state.count > 0 { moc.deleteObject(state[0]) try moc.save() } } catch { fatalError(Failure to save context: (error)) } let entity = NSEntityDescription.entityForName(GameState, inManagedObjectContext:moc) let state = NSManagedObject(entity: entity!, insertIntoManagedObjectContext: moc) state.setValue(cards, forKey: cardArray) state.setValue(topCards, forKey: topCards) state.setValue(moves, forKey: moves) state.setValue(time, forKey: time) do { try moc.save() } catch { fatalError(Failure to save context: (error)) } }Loading the elements in didMoveToView:let fetch = NSFetchRequest(entityName: GameState) do { let state = try moc.executeFetchRequest(fetch) as! [GameState] if state.isEmpty == true { //code to start a new game } else { cards = state[0].cardArray moves = Int(state[0].moves) topCards = state[0].topCards time = Int(state[0].time) fo

I think it has always been UDID, although they may show the word Identifier instead of UDID in some places. For example, when I go to the Certificates, IDs, and Profiles page for my account, then click one of the choices in the Devices category, the list shown has Identifier as the title of the second column, but the numbers are all UDIDs.

As Ken says, you should be adding [colonneR copy] (or mutableCopy if you need to modify it later) to ligneR to ensure that all the entries in ligneR refer to distinct array instances, not all pointing to the same column array repeated many times.But the array cannot magically become empty... I suspect the problem may be in the code that you have omitted in order to make it easier to read 🙂Do you have a property named ligneR? Is it that property that is 0 (whatever that means)? Again, as Ken pointed out, your code snippet is declaring a *local variable* named ligneR; all of that code would affect only the local variable, not the property, if that was your intention.