Search results for

“4.3”

649 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

4.3 beta 2 - Unable to install update
After downloading and verifying, the error dialog is:Unable to Install UpdateAn error occurred installing the latest version of watchOS on your Apple WatchButtons: “Close” and “Open App”Rebooted both the watch and phone. Watch fully charged and connected to phone. Phone on charger and at 52%. Both on WiFi.
1
0
3.7k
Feb ’18
Reply to XCode 6 with deployment target iOS5 possible?
As far as I tested, when I set the Deployment Target down to 4.3 in the Info pane of the PROJECT setting, I can choose down to 4.3 in the General pane of the TARGETS. This may depend on other settings and I haven't checked all combinations, so please start checking with a simple new project.Anyway, I couldn't find any announcements regarding the deplpyment target from Apple, other than- You need to build your app with the 8.0 SDK or later.- Your app needs to suppert 64-bit.So, apps targeting iOS 5 should be approved for the App Store, if you can fulfill other requirements.Sorry, but the minimum targeted version of our recently released apps is iOS 6, so I may be missing something.
Jul ’15
Resolving 2nd Repeated "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam" Rejection Within Six Months
We are reaching out for guidance after encountering 2nd repeated Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam rejections for our WeNote app. Here’s a brief timeline of our journey: 2018: We launched the WeNote Android app on Google Play Store. 2019: We started promoting WeNote on YouTube and began development of the WeNote iOS app. Our progress was publicly visible on our Trello board and discussed on the Apple Developer forum. August 17, 2021: We filed an official complaint with Apple regarding a *** company infringing on our app logo, title, and description. The issue was resolved when *** agreed to update their app’s branding. 2022 Year: *** company is terminated from App Store. June 2022: WeNote for iOS was officially released on the Apple App Store. June 17, 2024: We received a rejection from the Apple Review team citing Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program accoun
2
0
778
Nov ’24
App Review Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam for our own App
Hi all Our App was rejected for being suspected Spam, copied from another entiy's App witht he following narrative: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. We explained this on the form, but the case is not being progressed, jsut ignored. Is there a good way forward to resolve this that is good for Apple as well. Here is our response in the Form: Dear App Review, Thank you for flagging this point and we fully understand and appreciate your concern for protection of our App from being put to unauthorised use. This App and has been developed solely for us and on our instruction and under our direction. As you have noticed, our developer submitted our App to your App Store years ago and it was available for several years from this account. Then some months ago we decided with the developer to move it to our own account. And as you also noticed, some small changes to simplify the flow were made inte
1
0
142
Feb ’26
App previously approved, later rejected under 4.1 / 4.3 without metadata changes - looking for similar experiences
Hello, I’m looking for advice from developers who may have encountered similar App Review situations. I have an iOS game (“Next Run Game”), a fantasy roguelike RPG. App version 1.0.13 was reviewed and approved by App Review, but it was not released publicly on the App Store. Later, I submitted version 1.0.14. This update contained only minor changes: small balance tweaks bug fixes localization text fixes No changes were made to metadata or presentation: app name icon screenshots description branding overall concept After submitting version 1.0.14, the app began to be rejected under: Guideline 4.3 (Spam) later also Guideline 4.1 (Copycats) The review messages are generic and state that the app or its metadata “appears to be misrepresenting itself as another popular app,” but no specific example, reference app, or concrete issue has been provided. What is confusing to me: The same app (version 1.0.13) was previously approved by App Review. Metadata did not change between the approved and rejected submi
1
0
81
Dec ’25
App Rejected Under Guideline 4.3(a) - “Spam” for Unofficial Telegram Client with Unique Features
Hi everyone, I’m currently working on a project based on the Telegram iOS open-source code. My goal is to build an unofficial Telegram client with Telegram’s permission (they have publicly allowed third-party clients under their open-source license). My app includes unique new features and UI improvements that are not present in the official Telegram app. Essentially, it’s Telegram plus additional features — built from the official source, but extended significantly. However, when I try to submit my app to the App Store, Apple rejects the build under Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam with this message: “We still noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps.” I completely understand Apple’s intent to prevent low-effort clones or spam apps. However, in my case, this is
1
0
258
Oct ’25
4.3 beta 2 - Unable to install update
After downloading and verifying, the error dialog is:Unable to Install UpdateAn error occurred installing the latest version of watchOS on your Apple WatchButtons: “Close” and “Open App”Rebooted both the watch and phone. Watch fully charged and connected to phone. Phone on charger and at 52%. Both on WiFi.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
3.7k
Activity
Feb ’18
Reply to what is highest version of osx I can develop on to target ios 5
According to the wikipedia Xcode, Xcode 6.4 is the latest version where minimum Deployment Target is iOS 4.3 or iOS 5.1.1.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XcodeAnd currently you can submit apps with Xcode 6.x. (Though I'm not sure if you need it.)
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’17
Reply to Whatsapp Sticker Apps Getting Rejected
Today iMessage Sticker app got rejected as well with same reason: 4.3 Design: Spam. It doesn't have any design, it's a sticker app from default Xcode project. It has original content from original artist. These app reviews are getting weirder.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Nov ’18
Reply to 7.1 Won't Install
Same error.I downloaded xcode 7.1 see Launchpad 4.3GB of 4.3 gb then get message from mac app store try again purchased page.and I try again 3 times still face same error.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’15
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
That stinks. I got a 4.3 just a short while ago and feel super stuck on figuring out how to solve it. My content is unique but apple is claiming the same things they did for you. Did you have any luck figuring this out seeing how it's been years? Thx
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’22
Reply to 1 month under review
Hi, What does your app do, that you got flagged for SPAM? Guideline 4.3 - Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jan ’23
Reply to XCode 6 with deployment target iOS5 possible?
As far as I tested, when I set the Deployment Target down to 4.3 in the Info pane of the PROJECT setting, I can choose down to 4.3 in the General pane of the TARGETS. This may depend on other settings and I haven't checked all combinations, so please start checking with a simple new project.Anyway, I couldn't find any announcements regarding the deplpyment target from Apple, other than- You need to build your app with the 8.0 SDK or later.- Your app needs to suppert 64-bit.So, apps targeting iOS 5 should be approved for the App Store, if you can fulfill other requirements.Sorry, but the minimum targeted version of our recently released apps is iOS 6, so I may be missing something.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jul ’15
Resolving 2nd Repeated "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam" Rejection Within Six Months
We are reaching out for guidance after encountering 2nd repeated Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam rejections for our WeNote app. Here’s a brief timeline of our journey: 2018: We launched the WeNote Android app on Google Play Store. 2019: We started promoting WeNote on YouTube and began development of the WeNote iOS app. Our progress was publicly visible on our Trello board and discussed on the Apple Developer forum. August 17, 2021: We filed an official complaint with Apple regarding a *** company infringing on our app logo, title, and description. The issue was resolved when *** agreed to update their app’s branding. 2022 Year: *** company is terminated from App Store. June 2022: WeNote for iOS was officially released on the Apple App Store. June 17, 2024: We received a rejection from the Apple Review team citing Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program accoun
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
778
Activity
Nov ’24
Reply to Concerns About Rule 4.3 Spam Restriction - Enlightenment Needed
I had a similar issue, and it took a lot of email, phone calls and appeals to finally have Apple understand the apps I'm developing. The reviewers are over zealous in their quest to enforce rule 4.3 and are doing more harm than good. I felt it was a huge waste of time and energy.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Dec ’17
Reply to App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
@App Review After our video call with the Apple Review Team, they mentioned they had reviewed and confirmed that there were no issues with the app, and requested us to re-submit. However, after doing so, they rejected the app again citing the same reason (4.3). ** What is the actual issue here? This is really confusing.**
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Mar ’25
White Label apps / Apple 4.3 spam design
Wanted to check if there's really a issue for a genuine company going to release a white label solution( with different branding, logo, look and feel) for their product using same apple store account, app template but with different bundle id?
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
7.1k
Activity
Sep ’19
App Review Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam for our own App
Hi all Our App was rejected for being suspected Spam, copied from another entiy's App witht he following narrative: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. We explained this on the form, but the case is not being progressed, jsut ignored. Is there a good way forward to resolve this that is good for Apple as well. Here is our response in the Form: Dear App Review, Thank you for flagging this point and we fully understand and appreciate your concern for protection of our App from being put to unauthorised use. This App and has been developed solely for us and on our instruction and under our direction. As you have noticed, our developer submitted our App to your App Store years ago and it was available for several years from this account. Then some months ago we decided with the developer to move it to our own account. And as you also noticed, some small changes to simplify the flow were made inte
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
142
Activity
Feb ’26
Reply to 4.3 Design Spam (Suggestion for Apple)
We have the same experience, a large number of app in China because 4.3 was shelved or rejected, some developers commissioned a lawyer to appeal to the China State Administration for Industry and Commerce. I think Apple's abuse of the hands of the right to deprive developers and users of the right.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’17
App previously approved, later rejected under 4.1 / 4.3 without metadata changes - looking for similar experiences
Hello, I’m looking for advice from developers who may have encountered similar App Review situations. I have an iOS game (“Next Run Game”), a fantasy roguelike RPG. App version 1.0.13 was reviewed and approved by App Review, but it was not released publicly on the App Store. Later, I submitted version 1.0.14. This update contained only minor changes: small balance tweaks bug fixes localization text fixes No changes were made to metadata or presentation: app name icon screenshots description branding overall concept After submitting version 1.0.14, the app began to be rejected under: Guideline 4.3 (Spam) later also Guideline 4.1 (Copycats) The review messages are generic and state that the app or its metadata “appears to be misrepresenting itself as another popular app,” but no specific example, reference app, or concrete issue has been provided. What is confusing to me: The same app (version 1.0.13) was previously approved by App Review. Metadata did not change between the approved and rejected submi
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
81
Activity
Dec ’25
App Rejected Under Guideline 4.3(a) - “Spam” for Unofficial Telegram Client with Unique Features
Hi everyone, I’m currently working on a project based on the Telegram iOS open-source code. My goal is to build an unofficial Telegram client with Telegram’s permission (they have publicly allowed third-party clients under their open-source license). My app includes unique new features and UI improvements that are not present in the official Telegram app. Essentially, it’s Telegram plus additional features — built from the official source, but extended significantly. However, when I try to submit my app to the App Store, Apple rejects the build under Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam with this message: “We still noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps.” I completely understand Apple’s intent to prevent low-effort clones or spam apps. However, in my case, this is
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
258
Activity
Oct ’25