4.3

Watch OS 4.3 dev ᵦ6 (15T5212a)Series 0 42mm sport.Battery life 42% after 12 hours... 2-column activity rings face with fantastical complication. Also, did a mile (indoor walk). Dramatic increase in battery life since last couple of betas. I did remove SIRI as one of my available watch faces if that matters.

And as assumed, it got rejected:From Apple4. 3 Design: SpamGuideline 4.3 - DesignWe noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved.

Did you try to submit the app under your own developer account? Or did you enroll the client, and submit their customized app through that client’s own developer account? (Note that you could contract to manage each client’s enrollment, which might potentially allow creating some nice ongoing revenue streams for you. Thus, if Apple approves each client’s apps when submitted under their own account, then rule 4.3 could create additional business opportunities for you.)

Dealing with 4.3(a) rejections can be frustrating. Since you've already made technical changes without success, I'd recommend escalating to the App Review Board detailing your uniqueness or added value. They may be able to provide clearer guidance on exactly what needs to change to meet the guidelines. You can request an App Review Board review directly in App Store Connect under the Submit an Appeal option.

Hi, I have the same problem... No matter what now, they reject anything I try to do. All telling me to make a container app. i have an unique app, (we think there is not other similar in all store) ... we submit.... and after one minute they reject with the same copy and paste reply... 4.3 Design spam.... absurd and frustating!!!! PLEASE, STOP USE BOT FOR APP REVIEW

This solution was solved? Because its seens like same issue. My customers creates their own accounts, but the 4.3 Spam will take it out again, because already exist another app with the same estruture or not?Thinking about it, 2 or 3 customers upload their apps so its give a rejected spam because its the same app each other, dont you?sorry for my bad english

I also received this message and the problem is our app has an online version already. We just fixed some bugs and tried to upgrade the version of our application in the AppStore. We tried about 4 times, the reason was always 4.3 Degisn: Spam. We are confused because we didn't change any of the binary or concept or UI, just some inner bugs fix. We tried to appeal but got no reply.

>and also similar design >because as a great part of features will be shared between the apps, we will reuse great (or at least some) of the codeIf app review sniffs out seemingly templated apps in your case, I think your primary concern should be with 4.2.6, instead. 4.3 kicks in when you have more than a few apps...have you a number, yet?Perhaps the best approach is for each client to have their own dev account, and their own unique app. Only app review knows how they will react otherwise.

Hi Jinkal, I come across your question in other post in relation to the “4.3 spam - your app primarily features astrology, horoscopes, palm reading, fortune telling or zodiac reports. as such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store” just wondering if your app has successfully surpass this issue in the end? I’m coming across the same issue. Any lights shed would be appreciated.

Masatoshi,You said in one of your ealier posts thatI also removed ALL OF MY LAW APPS from sale, including the previous version app.I got 4.3 rejection AGAIN this morning.Yet, you were somehow able to get through the review process and get approved later. What exactly did you do differently next time around? Did you remove ALL your apps from sale and then went through the approval again?I got the following rejectionDesign 4.3Thank you for your resubmission. However upon further review we continue to find that your photo taking apps are very similar. We understand that these apps are not exactly the same. However, apps that provide the same or similar feature set is not appropriate for the App Store.I removed all of my photography apps except for one. Submitted that for review and I still got the same Design 4.3 rejection. So that did you do different in your case? Whatelse did you end up removing? I have no idea whatelse they want me to do? I have no photography app left after removing all. I

By way of an update, even though it would cause our customers to lose their purchase, I've followed Apple's implied advice and deleted the 'new' app and gone back to using the 'old' undeleteable app record (so there's only one app record, no chance of confusion).But my submission has been rejected yet again, citing the same 4.3 guideline. Since the app is not similar to any other app we have... what are they talking about??I'm really out of ideas.

Guideline 4.3 - DesignWe noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps you've submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language.Next StepsTo resolve this issue, please combine apps with similar feature sets into a single container app. You may want to consider using the in-app purchase API to deliver the different content to your users.Best regards,App Store Reviewhi my apps rejected this issue are you help me

Because 4.3 is as you note about spam*, not branding per se, first things first**...Did you appeal?If so, what did you say?How many times?How many rejections?What did each rejection say?Were you told to make changes to meta data and not re-submit another build?Were you told to resubmit?And, since this might be about you/your account, and not simply this app, this time.How many apps of this general type have you put in the store so far that are yours for your product?How many apps of this general type have you put in the store so far that are for clients w/their own accounts and their own products?** Note these are simply questions to learn more details about what’s transpired to this point, not suggestions on what you should do next.* • 4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. Also avoid piling on to

I don't believe the tool is supported on windows...From the iAPT download page:Software and Hardware RequirementsOS X 10.10.4 Yosemite or lateriBooks Author support requires iBooks Author 2.0 or later, iBooks (iOS) 4.3, and iBooks (OS X) 1.1.1 or laterPreview in iOS Simulator requires iOS 9.0 SDK or later. iOS 9 SDK is included with Xcode.Preview on an iOS device requires iOS 9.0 or later.

Your issue is the exact scenario that actually makes sense. Are you going to create 100 animal hunting games? You should have one app and they choose the animal game within in, you are bloating the store.However, in our case, we actually have distinct customers, that want their own app. They do not want to share between competitors and other organizations. This should not be combined into one app, this 4.3 does not make sense for us and is cause by apps like yours which cause bloat in the app store.