Search results for

“testflight the requested app is not avaliable”

416,679 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to How to recreate Apple Music mini player transition in SwiftUI
Hello @sheikhbayazid This is a great start! While we are unable to share exactly how Apple achieved this in the Music app, you might still find the following helpful: [quote='820932021, sheikhbayazid, /thread/820932, /profile/sheikhbayazid'] Should this be a custom container instead of fullScreenCover? [/quote] You might be looking for a sheet. Users can swipe down to dismiss a sheet interactively by default. .fullScreenCover has no built-in-swipe-to-dismiss, you must provide an explicit mechanism, like a dismiss button. For more information on Sheets see https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/sheets [quote='820932021, sheikhbayazid, /thread/820932, /profile/sheikhbayazid'] How would you support both new and older iOS versions? [/quote] Configure the Xcode project to support the intended lowest OS version, then use conditionals to handle differences between iOS versions with availability checks such as #available if #available(iOS 18.0, *) { // Content in iOS 18.0 and
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI Tags:
3d
iOS 26 Network Framework AWDL not working
Hello, I have an app that is using iOS 26 Network Framework APIs. It is using QUIC, TLS 1.3 and Bonjour. For TLS I am using a PKCS#12 identity. All works well and as expected if the devices (iPhone with no cellular, iPhone with cellular, and iPad no cellular) are all on the same wifi network. If I turn off my router (ie no more wifi network) and leave on the wifi toggle on the iOS devices - only the non cellular iPhone and iPad are able to discovery and connect to each other. My iPhone with cellular is not able to. By sharing my logs with Cursor AI it was determined that the connection between the two problematic peers (iPad with no cellular and iPhone with cellular) never even makes it to the TLS step because I never see the logs where I print out the certs I compare. I tried doing builder.requiredInterfaceType(.wifi) but doing that blocked the two non cellular devices from working. I also tried builder.prohibitedInterfaceTypes([.cellular]) but that also
32
0
2.2k
3d
Xcode 26.4: Regressions in Intelligence features
Just installed the new Xcode 26.4 RC build (17E192) after happily using 26.3 for a few months. I'm noticing some immediate regressions in the Intelligence features: Frequent losing of OAuth token (Claude Agent). This had previously been fixed and now is back. Agent Thinking is constrained to thought bubble windows, which are (a) too small to read, (b) not scrollable when thinking goes beyond a few paragraphs. Yes they are tappable when thinking is finished, but this doesn't help. Due to (2), in deep thinking, it's impossible to follow progress beyond the visible window, so impossible to know if the agent is going off the rails. I'm noticing just more general slowness to complete tasks. Not just complete them -- it seems like it takes longer to START tasks, which is really weird. It sits there thinking for longer. Same project, same model as before. Every time you tap New Chat it presents both Claude and Codex choices, even if you're only signed into one. This turned a simple single tap into
15
0
527
3d
Reply to Does the OS has dedicated volume levels for each AVAudioSessionCategory.
For CallKit Call Reported Calls As it is having the highest priority as a phone call , we are not changing the category to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayback , we will remain in AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayAndRecord. Even if we attempt to change the category , it will fail, we are kind of aware of this. This behaviour is applicable even for PusToTalk reported calls , can you please confirm?
Topic: Media Technologies SubTopic: Audio Tags:
4d
Pending Termination Notice (Guideline 5.6, Section 3.2(f)) – No Response After 14 Days – Case 30000003321343
Hello, I am seeking guidance regarding a Pending Termination Notice received on March 18, 2026 for the developer account of Kaagapay Platform Inc. Background: Our app, CreditKaagapay: Score & Report (App ID: 6744999391), is a credit report and loan matching platform operating in the Philippines in partnership with the Credit Information Corporation (CIC). The app maintained a 4.8-star rating with over 4,000 reviews. No prior warnings were issued before the notice. Notice Details: The notice cited Guideline 5.6 and Section 3.2(f), alleging dishonest or fraudulent activity related to account information. Timeline: • March 18: Received the Pending Termination Notice. Submitted two appeals (App Removal + Pending Account Termination) on the same day. Both received on-screen confirmation. • March 25: Submitted a follow-up through the App Review Status contact form. • March 26: Developer Support confirmed the appeal was forwarded to the App Review Bo
1
0
60
4d
Apple Engaged in Geographic Bias
We are a development team building an application targeted specifically for the Southeast Asian market. We have been caught in a frustrating review cycle and are hoping to get some guidance on how to move forward. The Situation Our application is intentionally unavailable in the United States. Per Apple's guidance, we implemented a We are currently not available in your country error screen that displays when a user's location falls outside our supported regions. This is intentional, expected behavior — not a bug. The Problem Despite providing detailed testing instructions and dedicated test accounts tied to the correct region, our Reviewers consistently: Do not use the test accounts we created for them Do not follow the regional setup instructions we provided Access the app from a US-based location See the geographic restriction screen (the one Apple instructed us to build) Flag it as a bug and reject the submission We have confirmed this is the
1
0
50
4d
Siri not calling my INExtension
Things I did: created an Intents Extension target added Supported Intents to both my main app target and the intent extension, with INAddTasksIntent and INCreateNoteIntent created the AppIntentVocabulary in my main app target created the handlers in the code in the Intents Extension target class AddTaskIntentHandler: INExtension, INAddTasksIntentHandling { func resolveTaskTitles(for intent: INAddTasksIntent) async -> [INSpeakableStringResolutionResult] { if let taskTitles = intent.taskTitles { return taskTitles.map { INSpeakableStringResolutionResult.success(with: $0) } } else { return [INSpeakableStringResolutionResult.needsValue()] } } func handle(intent: INAddTasksIntent) async -> INAddTasksIntentResponse { // my code to handle this... let response = INAddTasksIntentResponse(code: .success, userActivity: nil) response.addedTasks = tasksCreated.map { INTask( title: INSpeakableString(spokenPhrase: $0.name), status: .notCompleted, taskType: .completable, spatialEventTrigger: nil, tempo
3
0
575
4d
Reply to Entitlement values for the Enhanced Security and the Additional Runtime Platform Restrictions
I have the same issue now after Xcode 26.4 has been released and changed these entitlements. My apps have been rejected with the following: Entitlement com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version-string value must be boolean and true. Entitlement com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions-string value must be boolean and true. It seems to be the same problem where the App Review automated system hasn't been updated to accept the new entitlements even though Xcode 26.4 has been out for more than a week now. I've raised FB22387339 for this.
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
4d
Reply to How to recreate Apple Music mini player transition in SwiftUI
Hello @sheikhbayazid This is a great start! While we are unable to share exactly how Apple achieved this in the Music app, you might still find the following helpful: [quote='820932021, sheikhbayazid, /thread/820932, /profile/sheikhbayazid'] Should this be a custom container instead of fullScreenCover? [/quote] You might be looking for a sheet. Users can swipe down to dismiss a sheet interactively by default. .fullScreenCover has no built-in-swipe-to-dismiss, you must provide an explicit mechanism, like a dismiss button. For more information on Sheets see https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/sheets [quote='820932021, sheikhbayazid, /thread/820932, /profile/sheikhbayazid'] How would you support both new and older iOS versions? [/quote] Configure the Xcode project to support the intended lowest OS version, then use conditionals to handle differences between iOS versions with availability checks such as #available if #available(iOS 18.0, *) { // Content in iOS 18.0 and
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
3d
iOS 26 Network Framework AWDL not working
Hello, I have an app that is using iOS 26 Network Framework APIs. It is using QUIC, TLS 1.3 and Bonjour. For TLS I am using a PKCS#12 identity. All works well and as expected if the devices (iPhone with no cellular, iPhone with cellular, and iPad no cellular) are all on the same wifi network. If I turn off my router (ie no more wifi network) and leave on the wifi toggle on the iOS devices - only the non cellular iPhone and iPad are able to discovery and connect to each other. My iPhone with cellular is not able to. By sharing my logs with Cursor AI it was determined that the connection between the two problematic peers (iPad with no cellular and iPhone with cellular) never even makes it to the TLS step because I never see the logs where I print out the certs I compare. I tried doing builder.requiredInterfaceType(.wifi) but doing that blocked the two non cellular devices from working. I also tried builder.prohibitedInterfaceTypes([.cellular]) but that also
Replies
32
Boosts
0
Views
2.2k
Activity
3d
Xcode 26.4: Regressions in Intelligence features
Just installed the new Xcode 26.4 RC build (17E192) after happily using 26.3 for a few months. I'm noticing some immediate regressions in the Intelligence features: Frequent losing of OAuth token (Claude Agent). This had previously been fixed and now is back. Agent Thinking is constrained to thought bubble windows, which are (a) too small to read, (b) not scrollable when thinking goes beyond a few paragraphs. Yes they are tappable when thinking is finished, but this doesn't help. Due to (2), in deep thinking, it's impossible to follow progress beyond the visible window, so impossible to know if the agent is going off the rails. I'm noticing just more general slowness to complete tasks. Not just complete them -- it seems like it takes longer to START tasks, which is really weird. It sits there thinking for longer. Same project, same model as before. Every time you tap New Chat it presents both Claude and Codex choices, even if you're only signed into one. This turned a simple single tap into
Replies
15
Boosts
0
Views
527
Activity
3d
Reply to Subscription waiting for review
Thank you for your post. We're investigating currently. A representative from App Review will contact you to provide further assistance. If you continue to experience issues during review, please contact us.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Subscription waiting for review
Hi, I am trying to get my subscription reviewed. Its sitting there as “waiting for review“ and its been nearly 1 week. I’ve tried msging and replying to the Apple review team to request the review bur so far no luck. Can I please kindly get assistance as to how I can get it reviewed? Any help will be much appreciated.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
46
Activity
4d
Reply to Does the OS has dedicated volume levels for each AVAudioSessionCategory.
For CallKit Call Reported Calls As it is having the highest priority as a phone call , we are not changing the category to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayback , we will remain in AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayAndRecord. Even if we attempt to change the category , it will fail, we are kind of aware of this. This behaviour is applicable even for PusToTalk reported calls , can you please confirm?
Topic: Media Technologies SubTopic: Audio Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Pending Termination Notice (Guideline 5.6, Section 3.2(f)) – No Response After 14 Days – Case 30000003321343
Hello, I am seeking guidance regarding a Pending Termination Notice received on March 18, 2026 for the developer account of Kaagapay Platform Inc. Background: Our app, CreditKaagapay: Score & Report (App ID: 6744999391), is a credit report and loan matching platform operating in the Philippines in partnership with the Credit Information Corporation (CIC). The app maintained a 4.8-star rating with over 4,000 reviews. No prior warnings were issued before the notice. Notice Details: The notice cited Guideline 5.6 and Section 3.2(f), alleging dishonest or fraudulent activity related to account information. Timeline: • March 18: Received the Pending Termination Notice. Submitted two appeals (App Removal + Pending Account Termination) on the same day. Both received on-screen confirmation. • March 25: Submitted a follow-up through the App Review Status contact form. • March 26: Developer Support confirmed the appeal was forwarded to the App Review Bo
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
60
Activity
4d
Reply to Pending Termination Notice (Guideline 5.6, Section 3.2(f)) – No Response After 14 Days – Case 30000003321343
Thank you for your post and appeal. We're investigating and will contact you in App Store Connect to provide further assistance. If you continue to experience issues during review, please contact us.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Reply to My App stuck in "Waiting for Review" two week
Thank you for your post. We're investigating and will contact you in App Store Connect to provide further assistance. If you continue to experience issues during review, please contact us.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Apple Engaged in Geographic Bias
We are a development team building an application targeted specifically for the Southeast Asian market. We have been caught in a frustrating review cycle and are hoping to get some guidance on how to move forward. The Situation Our application is intentionally unavailable in the United States. Per Apple's guidance, we implemented a We are currently not available in your country error screen that displays when a user's location falls outside our supported regions. This is intentional, expected behavior — not a bug. The Problem Despite providing detailed testing instructions and dedicated test accounts tied to the correct region, our Reviewers consistently: Do not use the test accounts we created for them Do not follow the regional setup instructions we provided Access the app from a US-based location See the geographic restriction screen (the one Apple instructed us to build) Flag it as a bug and reject the submission We have confirmed this is the
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
50
Activity
4d
Reply to Apple Engaged in Geographic Bias
Thank you for your post. A representative from App Review will contact you to provide further assistance. If you continue to experience issues during review, please contact us.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Reply to Siri not calling my INExtension
Bumping this up as it's kinda a blocker for my app :)
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Siri not calling my INExtension
Things I did: created an Intents Extension target added Supported Intents to both my main app target and the intent extension, with INAddTasksIntent and INCreateNoteIntent created the AppIntentVocabulary in my main app target created the handlers in the code in the Intents Extension target class AddTaskIntentHandler: INExtension, INAddTasksIntentHandling { func resolveTaskTitles(for intent: INAddTasksIntent) async -> [INSpeakableStringResolutionResult] { if let taskTitles = intent.taskTitles { return taskTitles.map { INSpeakableStringResolutionResult.success(with: $0) } } else { return [INSpeakableStringResolutionResult.needsValue()] } } func handle(intent: INAddTasksIntent) async -> INAddTasksIntentResponse { // my code to handle this... let response = INAddTasksIntentResponse(code: .success, userActivity: nil) response.addedTasks = tasksCreated.map { INTask( title: INSpeakableString(spokenPhrase: $0.name), status: .notCompleted, taskType: .completable, spatialEventTrigger: nil, tempo
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
575
Activity
4d
Reply to Xcode now hangs; SDKs are "status unavailable"
The latest Xcode Beta does not work either. Hangs almost immediately.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d
Reply to Entitlement values for the Enhanced Security and the Additional Runtime Platform Restrictions
I have the same issue now after Xcode 26.4 has been released and changed these entitlements. My apps have been rejected with the following: Entitlement com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version-string value must be boolean and true. Entitlement com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions-string value must be boolean and true. It seems to be the same problem where the App Review automated system hasn't been updated to accept the new entitlements even though Xcode 26.4 has been out for more than a week now. I've raised FB22387339 for this.
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
4d