We are unable to process your request

When a popover is presented from a view that uses glassEffect(.regular.interactive()), I’m seeing mutually exclusive behavior: either the popover’s chrome (its navigation bar / toolbar) uses Liquid Glass or the originating control keeps its Liquid Glass “morph” behavior — but not both at the same time. There are two ways that I can enable Liquid Glass on the container: Option 1 (background capsule with .glassEffect) → The popover’s toolbar shows Liquid Glass, but the menu button loses its morph effect. Option 2 (.glassEffect applied to the HStack) → The menu button keeps the morph effect, but the popover’s toolbar does not have Liquid Glass. I'm using XCode 26.0.1, with latest iOS 26.0 stable simulator installed. Here's an example code to reproduce the issue: import PlaygroundSupport import SwiftUI // MARK: - TestView struct TestView: View { @State private var isPresented = false var body: some View { VStack { Spacer() HStack { Button(, systemImage: plus) { isPresented = true } .popover(isPresented: $isPresen

Hi! Is it possible to disable the option for users to 'Sign in with Another Device'? I encounter this message during the authentication process and I want to prevent it from appearing. I appreciate your help and look forward to your response.

I just wanted to update my app, as it seems the in-app purchases were not updated in the first submission. I created a new build and increased the version number by a minor increment, from 1 to 1.1, to ensure it gets processed. The build appears in TestFlight, but the plus button adjacent to the Build subsection does not appear, preventing me from selecting a new version. Please see the attached images. VERY VERY FRUSTRATING

Hello, I am currently implementing a biometric authentication registration flow using WebAuthn. I am using ASAuthorizationPlatformPublicKeyCredentialRegistrationRequest, and I would like to know if there is a way to hide the Save to another device option that appears during the registration process. Specifically, I want to guide users to save the passkey only locally on their device, without prompting them to save it to iCloud Keychain or another device. If there is a way to hide this option or if there is a recommended approach to achieve this, I would greatly appreciate your guidance. Also, if this is not possible due to iOS version or API limitations, I would be grateful if you could share any best practices for limiting user options in this scenario. If anyone has experienced a similar issue, your advice would be very helpful. Thank you in advance.

I'm working on integrating Passkey functionality into my iOS app (targeting iOS 16.0+), and I'm facing an issue where the system dialog still shows the Save to another device option during Passkey registration. I want to hide this option to force users to create Passkeys only on the current device. 1. My Current Registration Implementation Here’s the code I’m using to create a Passkey registration request. I’ve tried to use ASAuthorizationPlatformPublicKeyCredentialProvider (which is supposed to target platform authenticators like Face ID/Touch ID), but the Save to another device option still appears: `// Initialize provider for platform authenticators let provider = ASAuthorizationPlatformPublicKeyCredentialProvider(relyingPartyIdentifier: domain) // Create registration request let registrationRequest = provider.createCredentialRegistrationRequest( challenge: challenge, name: username, userID: userId ) // Optional configurations (tried these but no effect on another device option) registrat

I am using iPhone 16 pro, and I am running on the IOS 26.1 (23B5064e) in settings, going to Camera, then to formats, then in “Pro Raw and Resolution Control”, I am only getting “Pro Raw Format”(JPEG Lossless Most Compatible), but despite after numerous attempts I am unable to find the option for “Pro Raw Max”(upto 48 MP) or HEIF Max (upto 48 MP); please help me anyone I desperately want “Pro Raw Max”, moreover I cannot find the “Raw Max” option in the camera app, but only getting the “Raw” option; thanks a lot in advance…🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Hello, As I've been tinkering with the new URL filtering API I've been struggling to create bloom filters. I have been referencing this developer's post heavily: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/791352?answerId=851527022#851527022 He suggests that the expected FNV-1a implementation has the multiply and xor operations inverted, while an Apple engineer suggests that this will be updated on the offical iOS26 release (which has already happened). What is the correct FNV-1a implementation? In this sample project (which is from july, so pre-release ios 26): https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/filtering-traffic-by-url Is the included bloom filter data correct? I can only assume the other developer used this as a reference to then conclude that multiplying and xor-ing should be inverted, so I'm really not sure if this bloom filter bitVectorData here is trustworthy. Is there any reference implementation for this hashing procedure? How do we generate a bloom filter properly and

Hello, I am currently working on personal project based on Matter. I need to create a Basic Video Player as specified in Matter's standard embedding the Media Playback Cluster. I went through the reading of how Apple now supports Matter as a standard : linkText My understanding of the following schematic, is alongside : HomeKit Accessory Protocol (HAP) Framework API Related HAP accessories underneath the homeKit framework. Developpers also find under the Homekit framework : CHIP (Connected Home IP) Framework API Related Matter accessories this time Both types of accessories/devices can be commissioned in the HomeKit ecosystem seemlessly. Each framework has it's documentation : HAP : https://developer.apple.com/documentation/homekit/hmhomemanager CHIP : https://developer.apple.com/documentation/matter I want through the process of installing XCode and the HomeKit Accessory Simulator. In the list of HomeKit Accessories I did not see any Media related devices : The list of currently supported devices is

Hello Apple Developer Community, We’re building an MDM product (SaaS, multi-tenant). I’d like clarification on the APNs MDM push certificate usage model for service providers (MSPs). Question: Is it acceptable for an MDM vendor to use a single APNs MDM push certificate owned by the vendor to manage devices for multiple, independent customer organizations? Or is it required/recommended that each customer (company) must obtain and use its own APNs MDM push certificate (issued under the customer’s Apple ID) for their tenant? Why we’re asking: We understand that many guides show the process where each customer logs into the Apple Push Certificates Portal with their own Apple ID, uploads a CSR provided by the MDM, and then renews yearly. Practically, for a small team and early-stage deployments, using one vendor-owned certificate across multiple tenants would be simpler. We want to ensure we’re not violating any policy, terms, or technical requirements (e.g., certificate ownership, topic binding, device t

Hi everyone, We’re developing a Unity project for Apple Vision Pro that connects PSVR2 Sense controllers for advanced interaction and input. We’ve encountered a major limitation: when the controller is not held close to the designated hand (e.g., resting on a table or held by the non designated hand), the Sense controller enters a low-power or reduced-update mode. This results in noticeably reduced tracking update frequency and responsiveness until the controller is held again. For certain use cases, this behavior is undesirable. In our case, it prevents continuous real-time tracking of the controller even when it’s stationary or being tracked externally. Request: Please consider exposing an API flag or developer option in ARKit to disable and optionally delay the low-power mode when the app requires full-rate updates regardless of proximity or hand pose detection.

With macOS Tahoe, Launchpad has been replaced by an App Library–style mode within Spotlight. While the alleged intention is UX consistency across the Apple ecosystem, the result is both a catastrophic usability regression and a radical break in consistency with iOS and iPadOS. Predefined App Library categorization is functionally incoherent: On iOS and now macOS, Apple’s predefined App Library categories place apps with seemingly identical functionality into unrelated groups—for example, 3D scanning tools scattered across Education, Utilities, and Productivity. Instead of making apps easier to find, this effectively creates a labyrinth that users must traverse to locate apps whose names and icons they may not recall. However Apple defines its app categories, they are not only inconsistent but also hopelessly inadequate for the long tail of real-world applications and user workflows. Loss of user control: Launchpad enabled users to group and organize applications according to their workflows. This aligns with