5.1.1

I have been finished install Tensorflow env step by step from https://developer.apple.com/metal/tensorflow-plugin/ https://developer.apple.com/metal/Tensorflow-plugin/ Tf is working! but when i import sklearn package, have an error message like this: ImportError: dlopen(/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/python3.9/site-packages/scipy/spatial/qhull.cpython-39-darwin.so, 0x0002): Library not loaded: @rpath/liblapack.3.dylib Referenced from: /Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/python3.9/site-packages/scipy/spatial/qhull.cpython-39-darwin.so Reason: tried: '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/liblapack.3.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/liblapack.3.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/python3.9/site-packages/scipy/spatial/../../../../liblapack.3.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/liblapack.3.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforge3/envs/tf/lib/liblapack.3.dylib' (no such file), '/Users/mecilmeng/miniforg

As per policy mention in Apple Store guideline in section 5.1.1 related to Data Collection and Storage, it is mentioned to have Delete functionality within app if account creation option is present. I am facing challenge for one of my enterprise app developed for the client, where account creation and sign in feature is present, but that login credentials are 'inter-link' to multiple other client's websites/tools/applications. In this case if user delete the app, it will unconditionally delete from all others too, without knowing that to user. Is there any way that we can get clarity on below points: If we implement with delete option only setting up a flag in app that user won't access with same ID login? Like a 'soft delete'? If user not creating account from app but still able to login with existing account with client ID, still delete feature would required? What are more expectation and details which Apple will going to check for Account Delete feature? Thanks in advance.

Regarding, all apps that allow for account creation must also allow users to initiate deletion of their account from within the app. If the app has a Create Account link that opens in Safari where the account is created (i.e. outside the app), is the app still considered to allow for account creation and therefore required to allow for account deletion per the new requirement being enforced?

If there is no option to create an account in the app, is there no need to provide the option to delete an account?

From 5.1.1: The account deletion option should be easy to find in your app. Is including deletion in the Settings section sufficiently easy to find? People should be able to delete the account along with their personal data. How much of this action must be enabled within the app? From the update all apps that allow for account creation must also allow users to initiate deletion of their account from within the app What constitutes initiating deletion? Is clicking a button that takes you to a pre-filled email requesting deletion sufficient?

The new account deletion requirements stated in the app review guidelines (5.1.1(v)) state that: If your app supports account creation, you must also offer account deletion within the app. But what about if the account is owned by a different entity than the user itself, such as for someone using a work account that is owned by their employer? Are we still obligated to offer the employee a way to delete their account within the app?

If our app doesn't allow in-app account creation, as such we won't be required to offer in app account deletion. Do we have to publish that we don't allow account creation? Is there a button to check to declare that we don't allow account creation in our app?

App Store Review Guidelines 5.1.1 If the app supports account creation, it must also provide the ability to delete accounts within the app. I would like to ask you about the meaning of account deletion of the item. In the case of a financial institution (bank), we ask if it can be interpreted as account termination and cancellation of electronic finance (banking app). thank you.

I have news app for a newspaper in Alaska. The app does not collect any information from the users. However, the app has been rejected by Apple to the following: Regarding the 5.1.1 issue, we found in our review that your app provides services or requires sensitive user information related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis, services and information related to it are considered to be part of the healthcare industry. In addition, the seller and company names associated with your app are not from a recognized institution, such as a governmental entity, hospital, insurance company, non-governmental organization, or university. I appealed the rejection stating that the news articles, are just that ... articles about COVID related to the newspaper's community. The articles are just plain information. No user data is collected, and none of the articles are opinion pieces ... The are just number of cases reported in the community, etc. The appeal was rejected wit

HI,I've been getting app review rejections for my handwashing app due to the actual coronavirus situation. They say that this kind of applications should be published under a seller and company name of a recognized institution, while there already are a bunch of applications in the store having similar behaviour, and not from institutions. I don't understand why... handwashing is something totally unrelated to COVID-19, now it just make more sense to do it. Can anyone help and tell me what should I do?The full apple text: We found in our review that your app still provides services or requires sensitive user information related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis, services and information related to it are considered to be part of the healthcare industry. In addition, the seller and company names associated with your app are not from a recognized institution, such as a governmental entity, hospital, insurance company, non-governmental organization, or university.Per

This is a massive clause change and it doesn't seem like enough people are discussing this as the update to the the anti-steering clause is the hotter topic (with everyone forgetting that its no longer of any benefit to them if users don't give you their email addresses anyway). Apps may request basic contact information (such as name and email address) so long as the request is optional for the user, features and services are not conditional on providing the information, and it complies with all other provisions of these guidelines, including limitations on collecting information from kids.” Ok. So now, if my app has account based features, they would need to register. If they register, if we don't use a phone number or email address, we would have to use a unique identifier. So ok, let's use a unique identifier. Now, that user forgets their password. Well, good luck to you, you didn't give us your email or number, so we can't verify that it was you who created the account. Like how Reddit does it. Ecommerce