Recently, we have received continuous feedback from users that the Bluetooth key and digital key are not working properly or are not functioning; Through analysis of App logs, it was found that after the iOS system locks the screen, the iBeacon background keep-alive function fails, Bluetooth connection also fails, and system callbacks cannot be obtained; the digital key also fails, and it fails simultaneously with the Bluetooth key; We have checked the specific permission configuration and it aligns with the recommended configuration in the official documentation, with no abnormalities. Although this type of issue is not a widespread problem, it has been continuously reported by users and is very troublesome. Does the official team have a clear explanation? Why are both Bluetooth keys and digital keys affected after the app is locked? Digital keys should be less affected. The following is a log analysis of a certain user 1: Step 2, the App entered the background; Step 3, the App's Bluetooth was disconnected; 3-4 The App remained in the background for 5 hours before being launched again 2: This type of issue is due to the system disconnecting the Bluetooth connection when the app enters the background; most likely, the app has been killed by the system when the user gets out of the car, and it has not been revived; the car key also does not work; During the time period from 2026-03-23T17:59:33 to 2026-03-23T21:23:49, why didn't carkey work properly 1：2026-03-23T16:52:11.676+08:00 new_carkey: key:, rssi:-89, AUTH_OK 2：2026-03-23T17:55:51.782+08:00 new_carkey: AppMonitor appDidEnterBackground bleStatus: success(Nimbus.NIOCarBLEKey.State.connected) 3：2026-03-23T17:59:33.747+08:00 new_carkey: ibeacon: didExitRegion, vid: NIO BLE Key, uuid: *** bleStatus: failure(Error Domain=CBErrorDomain Code=15 ""Failed to encrypt the connection, the connection has timed out unexpectedly."" UserInfo={key_device_name=NIO Key 0201 , NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to encrypt the connection, the connection has timed out unexpectedly., vehicle_id=}) " 4：2026-03-23T21:23:49.920+08:00 new_carkey: AppMonitor appDidFinishLaunching: [:] bleStatus: success(Nimbus.NIOCarBLEKey.State.disconnected) 5：2026-03-23T22:01:51.235+08:00 new_carkey: key:****, rssi:-90, AUTH_OK

Hi everyone, We have recently started distributing iOS 26 Apple Wallet boarding passes, which support new features such as: Live Activities Automatic updates for flight-related information (e.g., gate changes, departure time updates) While these features are useful, we are looking for ways to control or limit some of this behavior. Our requirements Live Activity Control We would like to prevent Live Activities from being automatically shown when a boarding pass is added to Wallet. Automatic Flight Data Updates We would like to control or disable the automatic updates performed by Wallet for flight information. Reason for this requirement We already provide our own Live Activity implementation with more customization, and having two Live Activities leads to a poor user experience. We have observed that Wallet’s automatic updates can sometimes be delayed, and since Wallet overrides our data, we lose control over the displayed information. Question Is there any supported way to: Disable or control Live Activities triggered by Wallet passes? Disable or override Wallet’s automatic flight updates? Or are these behaviors managed entirely by the system with no developer control? Any guidance or documentation references would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Regards,

Apple MacOS Sequoia 15.4.1 Creates a ton of unused network interfaces and it's a nightmare trying to figure out what they all do, what theyr're linked to, etc. It appears that network links utun0, utun1, utun2, ... are never used or useful. ip link shows they are all status UNKNOWN. I don't use a VPN or anything like that, and the documentation on these interfaces does not exist. I'd like to permanently delete them and permanently prevent them from ever being created again -- how can I accomplish this task?

Hey there, We are being incorrectly blocked by Time Limits since the iOS 26 update released earlier this year. We are receiving complaints from parents that set a screentime limit for "All apps", and then add an exception for us, that they are still getting blocked by the OS after a certain period of time. While we originally thought this was fixed in 26.1, we have recently been made aware it still occurs. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Is there something we can do from our side to protect ourselves from this? Telling customers to remove their "All app" limit isn't really practical given our customer base, so we're looking to see if there's something on Apple's end or our end that can alleviate this.

Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your support. I have reviewed the documentation for Local Push Connectivity (see URL below) and, following the instruction in the "Important" section to "Request this entitlement from the Entitlement Request Page," I completed the application process for this Entitlement on March 11, 2026. [Local push connectivity] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/local-push-connectivity?language=objc#Supporting-APNs-and-local-push-connectivity-in-one-app Subsequently, on March 13, 2026, I received the following reply from Apple: Sub : Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement From: Local Push Review Sent: Friday, March 13, 2026 4:09 AM Hi, Thank you for your interest in the Local Push Connectivity entitlement. Your entitlement request has been approved for: Team ID: NWKYYYYYYY Technical documentation on this API is available here: -(Omission) - Best Regards, Apple Developer Relations My understanding is that upon approval of this application, an "Entitlements" field should be added to the input fields for creating provisioning profiles. However, as of today(March 18, 2026), it has not yet been added. Will the Entitlements field be added if I simply wait? My account (Apple ID), which submitted the application, belongs to three Team IDs. For convenience, I will refer to them as Team ID SV3XXXXXXX, Team ID NWKYYYYYYY, and Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ. The application status for Entitlements for each Team ID is as follows: Team ID SV3XXXXXXX Entitlements: Present. Applied for Entitlements on February 6, 2021. (Received "Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement" email on February 6, 2021) Team ID NWKYYYYYYY Entitlements: Not present. Applied for Entitlements on March 13, 2026. (Received "Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement" email on March 13, 2026) Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ Entitlements: Present. No record (email) of applying for Entitlements. Because of this, I am concerned that the Entitlements applied for Team ID NWKYYYYYYY may have been mistakenly granted to Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ, and I am inquiring about this. Will the Entitlements field for Team ID NWKYYYYYYY be added if I simply wait? Thank you in advance.

在iOS26.4中，新的交易完成后[NSBundle mainBundle] appStoreReceiptURL 获取的是历史票据，未给出新的票据

In iOS 26.4 beta 4, the receipt returned by StoreKit payments via [[NSBundle mainBundle] appStoreReceiptURL] corresponds to the previous transaction; the content only becomes correct after restarting the app.

Hello, I am investigating a case where two different transaction IDs appear to refer to the same purchase, and I would like clarification on whether this behavior is expected. Additional context StoreKit version: StoreKit 1 (SKPaymentTransaction) Environment: Production Product type: Auto-renewable subscription Transaction sources The values are obtained from the following APIs: transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/skpaymentqueue receipt_data from the App Store receipt https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/bundle/appstorereceipturl Observed behavior After an In-App Purchase completes, the app receives: a transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction the corresponding receipt_data for the purchase When inspecting the receipt, the transaction_id inside latest_receipt_info differs from the transaction_id received directly from the purchase transaction. For clarity: A = transaction_id received from the purchase flow (SKPaymentTransaction) A' = transaction_id found in receipt_data.latest_receipt_info The two values are different, but they differ only by 1. Additional observation The original_transaction_id for A and A' is identical, which suggests that both transaction IDs belong to the same subscription purchase chain. Pattern observation on the ID difference We have observed that the difference between A and A' is consistently exactly 1 (i.e., A' = A + 1) across multiple transactions, not just a single case. This appears to be a reproducible pattern rather than a coincidence. This observation raises an additional question (Question 6 below). API verification When calling: GET /inApps/v1/transactions/{transactionId} Both A and A' return what appears to be the same purchase record. The response data is effectively identical except for the transactionId field. However, when calling: GET /inApps/v2/history/{transactionId} A does not appear in the transaction history only A' appears in the history response Questions If A does not appear in transaction history, where does this transaction ID originate from? Why does Get Transaction Info (/inApps/v1/transactions/{transactionId}) return a valid response for A even though it is not present in the transaction history? Why do A and A' both resolve to what appears to be the same purchase? In this situation, which transaction ID should be treated as the canonical transaction ID for server-side validation? Is this difference related to how StoreKit 1 (SKPaymentTransaction) and the App Store Server API represent transactions? Is the consistent off-by-one difference between the transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction and the one recorded in latest_receipt_info an intentional behavior of StoreKit 1's internal transaction ID assignment? Specifically, we are wondering whether StoreKit 1 applies some form of internal offset when delivering the transaction ID to the client, while the App Store server records a different (adjacent) ID in the receipt. If so, is this documented anywhere? Note We are currently in the process of migrating to StoreKit 2, but this behavior was observed while investigating our existing StoreKit 1 implementation. Any clarification would help us better understand the correct transaction model during the migration.

Hi, We are facing issue with purchases on iOS 26.4. The app store receipt received is from previous transaction leading to receipt validation failures. There are some purchase success observed for pending transactions but success rate for pending transactions is also very low. We are using Unity In-App Purchasing (IAP) 4.13.0. Let us know for any more details and any fix / workaround available. Thanks.

Hello, I am currently developing an MDM solution, including both the sever-side(.NET) and the client app. I have recently been granted the "MDM CSR" signing permission in the Certificates, Identifier & Profiles of my developer account. I am following the official Apple documentation, "Setting up Push Notifications for your MDM Customers," to generate the required MDM Push Certificate. However, I keep encountering the "Invalid Certificate Signing Request" error when uploading the encoded .plist file to the Apple Push Certificates Portal(identity.apple.com/pushcert). The steps I have taken so far: Generated .csr file via Keychain Access Used the MDM SCR certificate to sign the request. Created a .plist file for th final upload containing : Customer CSR: Base64 encoded Signature : Signed using the SHA256withRSA algorithm and Base64 encoded. Certificate Chain : Including my MDM Vendor Signing Certificate, the Apple WWDR intermediate certificate, and the Apple Root CA. Issues/Questions: Is there a specific requirement for the order of the certificates in the chain? Are there common pitfalls regarding the .plist structure or the encoding of the signature that might cause the "Invalid CSR" error? Is there a tool or a specific validation step I can use to verify the integrity of the generated .plist before uploading? I have double-checked the encoding and the signing process, but the portal continues to reject the request. Any insights or guidance from community would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your help!

Hey We have noticed a change in the retry behavior of Apple Server Notifications webhooks V2 starting around March 12–13, 2026. Previously, when our webhook endpoint returned an HTTP 400 response, Apple would retry the notification delivery multiple times according to the documented retry policy. However, beginning around March 12–13, it appears that Apple no longer retries the webhook when a 400 response is returned. The notification is sent only once and no further retry attempts are made. From our understanding of the documentation, retries should occur when delivery fails, and historically we observed retries even for some 4xx responses. We would like to confirm: Has Apple recently changed the retry behavior for Server Notifications? Are HTTP 4xx responses (specifically 400) now considered terminal failures that will not trigger retries? Is this change intentional or related to a rollout in the webhook delivery system? We have called the "Notification History" endpoint for some users who purchased a sub and we are only getting one attempt with the following data in it: { attemptDate: 1773469202552, (2026-03-14T06:20:02.552Z) sendAttemptResult: 'UNSUCCESSFUL_HTTP_RESPONSE_CODE', } This was 2 days ago, based on the docs, the user should have a few attempts at least. This behavior change affects systems that rely on retries to handle temporary validation issues or transient failures. Thanks!

I’m working on a Flutter application that implements subscriptions using in-app purchases (IAP). I currently have two apps under the same developer account: One for staging One for production In App A (staging), I successfully created a monthly subscription with the product ID: rc_1299_monthly However, when I try to create a subscription with the same product ID (rc_1299_monthly) in App B (production), I encounter the following error: "The Product ID you entered is already being used by another subscription." My understanding was that product IDs are scoped per app, but this error suggests there may be account-level constraints. Has anyone encountered this before? Is it required to use unique product IDs across all apps under the same account, or is there a recommended approach for handling staging vs production setups? Any clarification or best practices would be appreciated.

We have been using the purchase date to identify the latest transaction_id for a given original_transaction_id. However, I’ve noticed several cases where an immediate upgrade does not result in a later purchase date—in some instances, it is actually earlier than the previous transaction. Given this inconsistency, would it be more reliable to sort by transaction_id in descending order instead?

Any plans to be able to allow to store Uric Acid (UA) and Ketones readings in Apple Health with HealthKit? There are now many blood test strips in the market that allow to read Glucose, UA and Ketones and currently only Glucose seems to be supported by HealthKit. Thank you

I have two different VersionedSchema accessed via two different and distinct in-memory ModelContainers. However, both schemas have a model named Item. LocalSchema.Item and RemoteSchema.Item have slightly different properties. If I create and save RemoteSchema.Item in one context then I cannot create and save LocalSchema.Item in a different context due to missing origin property. enum LocalSchema: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] = [ Item.self ] @Model class Item { @Attribute(.unique) var title: String var created: Date var modified: Date init(title: String, created: Date, modified: Date) { self.title = title self.created = created self.modified = modified } } } enum RemoteSchema: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] = [ Item.self ] @Model class Item { var title: String var created: Date var modified: Date var origin: String init(title: String, created: Date, modified: Date, origin: String) { self.title = title self.created = created self.modified = modified self.origin = origin } } } In the above example, saving RemoteSchema.Item will cause LocalSchema.Item to fail. The error message I see is *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSUnknownKeyException', reason: '[<NSManagedObject 0xa120f3750> setValue:forUndefinedKey:]: the entity Item is not key value coding-compliant for the key "origin".' Test Code @Test func createLocalItemWithManualSave() async throws { let context = ModelContext(try localStore()) let item = LocalSchema.Item(title: "local", created: .now, modified: .now) context.insert(item) try context.save() } @Test func createRemoteItemWithManualSave() async throws { let context = ModelContext(try remoteStore()) let item = RemoteSchema.Item(title: "remote", created: .now, modified: .now, origin: "from space") context.insert(item) try context.save() } func localStore() throws -> ModelContainer { let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: LocalSchema.self) let config = ModelConfiguration("local", schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: true, allowsSave: true, cloudKitDatabase: .none) return try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: config) } func remoteStore() throws -> ModelContainer { let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: RemoteSchema.self) let config = ModelConfiguration("remote", schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: true, allowsSave: true, cloudKitDatabase: .none) return try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: config) } I have created FB22310365

I’m currently developing an iOS app that relies heavily on location details. I'm using MapKit and MKMapItem as my primary data source, which works perfectly for standard metadata. However, I’ve hit a roadblock: I want to display opening hours inline within my location details, but it seems Apple doesn't expose a public API or property for this in MKMapItem (even though the data is clearly visible in the native Apple Maps app). Since I'm building this as an indie developer/startup, the Google Places API is unfortunately too expensive for my current budget. ⁠Is there any legitimate, native way to get opening hours from Apple that I might have missed? ⁠If not, what are your best practices or recommended indie-friendly alternatives (e.g., Yelp Fusion API, OpenStreetMap, Foursquare)? Any tips on how to handle this elegantly and cost-efficiently would be highly appreciated! Thanks in advance.

I am using Significant Location Change (SLC) monitoring to relaunch my app after it has been terminated. I have implemented SLC in two separate apps installed on the same device, and I would like to understand how the system delivers SLC events in this scenario. Specifically: Will both apps receive the SLC event at the same time, or can there be differences in the timing of delivery? If there are differences, what factors influence when each app receives the event? What criteria or system conditions determine how and when SLC events are delivered to different apps on the same device? Any clarification on the event delivery behavior would be greatly appreciated.

Hi, I want to create a ControlWidget button that acts as a shortcut in the control center open a specific view within my app to show a badge. Problem: I can‘t get it to open my host app. I tried a custom myapp:// protocol - did not work, I tied AppIntent with the openAppWhenRun set to true - did not work and the strange thing is the debugger breakpoint in perform will only get triggered if this is set to false. OpenIntent did not work either even if I use a dummy swift app as host to try it out. What is the current supported way (iOS 18 and 26) to open your app when a static ControlWidget button is clicked, what could I have done wrong / am missing?

When iterating over a CMSensorDataList (which conforms to NSFastEnumeration) returned by CoreMotion's CMSensorRecorder's accelerometerData(from:to:) method, we sometimes see the crash below, with the frame above pointing to the close brace of the for loop iterating over the list. 0 CoreMotion 0x000000019fcf01dc CLInternalGetPinnedLocationAuthorizationState + 423316 1 CoreMotion 0x000000019fcf036b CLInternalGetPinnedLocationAuthorizationState + 423715 2 CoreMotion 0x000000019fcf02cb CLInternalGetPinnedLocationAuthorizationState + 423555 3 CoreMotion 0x000000019fbb8553 CLMotionActivity::isStatic() const + 1751823 It has been incredibly difficult to reproduce. We managed to reproduce a similar crash stack twice in a separate app that misused accelerometerData(from:to:) by providing a from and to Date that were more than 12 hours apart and iterating over the returned data, but it only occurred twice in many hours of testing. We hope to know if this could be a bug in Core Motion or it is definitely in our SDK, or if there is any way to fail gracefully in this scenario.

I am implementing an Unwanted Communication Reporting Extension (IdentityLookupUI) to allow users to report spam messages to our backend. The extension works perfectly in terms of data collection and network reporting (using ILClassificationExtensionNetworkReportDestination). However, I’ve encountered an issue with the message lifecycle: whenever the user taps "Done" and I return a response, the system automatically moves the reported message to the Recently Deleted folder. I want to report the data but keep the message in its current folder (especially when the user classifies it as "Safe"). I have tried varying the ILClassificationAction, but it seems the system ignores the action in favor of "cleaning up" the thread. Example of my current implementation: override func classificationResponse(for request: ILClassificationRequest) -> ILClassificationResponse { // Even when returning .none or .reportNotJunk let action: ILClassificationAction = (self.type == "spam") ? .reportJunk : .none let response = ILClassificationResponse(action: action) response.userInfo = ["type": self.taggedType, "sender": self.sender] return response } My Questions: Is there a specific ILClassificationAction or userInfo key that tells iOS not to move the message? Is this movement a mandatory "post-report cleanup" behavior of the IdentityLookup framework that cannot be overridden? Does anyone know a workaround to report the communication while maintaining its original location in the Messages app?