Prevent access to the Screen Time API without guardian approval and provide opaque tokens that represent apps and websites.

All subtopics
Posts under Family Controls topic

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

DeviceActivityMonitor: increase memory limit from 6MB
Dear Screen Time Team! The current 6 MB memory limit for the DeviceActivityMonitor extension no longer reflects the reality of modern iOS devices or the complexity of apps built on top of the Screen Time framework. When Screen Time APIs were introduced with iOS 15, hardware constraints were very different. Since then, iPhone performance and available RAM have increased significantly…but the extension memory limit has remained unchanged. My name is Frederik Riedel, and I’m the developer of the screen time app “one sec.” Our app relies heavily on FamilyControls, ManagedSettings, and DeviceActivity to provide real-time interventions that help users reduce social media usage. In practice, the 6 MB limit has become a critical bottleneck: The DeviceActivityMonitor extension frequently crashes due to memory pressure, often unpredictably. Even highly optimized implementations struggle to stay within this constraint when using Swift and multiple ManagedSettings stores. The limit makes it disproportionately difficult to build stable, maintainable, and scalable architectures on top of these frameworks. This is not just an edge case…it directly impacts reliability in production apps that depend on Screen Time APIs for core functionality. Modern system integrations like Screen Time are incredibly powerful, but they also require a reasonable amount of memory headroom to function reliably. The current limit forces developers into fragile workarounds and undermines the robustness of apps that aim to improve users’ digital wellbeing. We would greatly appreciate if you could revisit and update this restriction to better align with today’s device capabilities and developer needs. Thank you for your continued work on Screen Time and for supporting developers building meaningful experiences on top of it. Feedback: FB22279215 Best regards, Frederik Riedel (one sec app)
5
3
329
1d
Best practices for sharing data between main app and `DeviceActivityMonitor`?
Dear Developer Technical Support, I wanted to ask for technical advice regarding the DeviceActivityMonitor which is part of the DeviceActivity framework: The DeviceActivityMonitor has a very strict memory limit of 6MB. That’s not a lot and it doesn't leave a lot of room for any kind of code that accesses permanently stored data. I would therefore like to ask for advice on best-practices on how to share information between the main app and that extension: Is UserDefaults a good idea to use here? Can/should we use CoreData or SwiftData? Should we build super small file-based data sharing (e.g. via .plists)? Why is it necessary to share data? This can be simple things that inform the decision of the device activity monitor in intervalDidStart, intervalDidEnd, eventDidReachThreshold, eventWillReachThresholdWarning. For example a setting where the user decides if they want to receive a push notification on eventWillReachThresholdWarning. Or the list of tokens that is supposed to be blocked in eventDidReachThreshold or intervalDidStart. I’m asking because even though we are super careful and conservative about memory allocations in our DeviceActivityMonitor we are regularly seeing it being killed due to memory pressure. What’s the best way to approach this? I’m grateful for any kinds of hints! Thanks a lot and have a great day! – Frederik
1
1
250
1d
Screen Time APIs showing severe inconsistencies (DeviceActivity not firing + impossible usage data)
Hi everyone, I’m the developer of one sec, an app used by a large number of users globally to reduce time spent on social media and to build healthier digital habits. Because of this, we rely heavily on Apple’s Screen Time / DeviceActivity / FamilyControls, ManagedSettings APIs – and unfortunately, we’re seeing increasingly severe issues in production that directly impact hundreds of thousands of real iOS users. During the past years, we have been busy filing dozens of feedback requests for different Screen Time issues – and there has been no response from Apple at all. Developer Relations might be able to "confirm" that the bugs are present and that they ended up with the right team – but they are never addressed, neither are workarounds provided. Instead, the situation gets worse and worse. iOS 26 introduced a series of heavy regressions (which have been reported via Apple’s official bug report tool "Feedback Assistant" on iOS 26 beta 1 in June 2025 – and have not been addressed 10 Months later). This is very frustrating for us as developers, but also for our end-users who run into these issues every day. In the end this impacts our ability to build an amazing product and hurts revenue (which affects both us and Apple). 1. DeviceActivity thresholds are not firing at all This affects both: our app’s usage of the API and Apple’s own Screen Time limits Radars: FB22304617, FB20526837, FB15491936, FB12195437, FB15663329, FB18198691, FB18289475, FB19827144 2. Screen Time usage data is clearly corrupted Websites showing hundreds of hours per week Up to ~20 hours per day of usage reported for a single domain Radars: FB22304617, FB17777429, FB18464235 3. DeviceActivity thresholds reaching threshold immediately Newly introduced with iOS 26 Reported on iOS 26 beta 1 in June No response so far / no workaround DeviceActivity calls didReachThreshold immediately after creating the DeviceActivityEvent – instead of waiting till the defined threshold is actually reached. Radars: FB13696022, FB18351583, FB21320644, FB18927456, FB18061981 4. Randomly Randomizing ApplicationTokens From time to time, and without consistency, Screen Time suddenly provides new, random, unknown tokens to my app in the ShieldConfigurationDataSource and ShieldActionDelegate. This has been reported on many times before here on the dev forms, many many years back already: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/756440 https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/758325 https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/758325?answerId=793267022#793267022 Radars: FB14082790 and FB18764644 5. Moving Tokens from one ManagedSettingsStore to Another Removing an ApplicationToken from one SettingsStore and then adding it to another while the target app remains in foreground leads to the re-use of the ShieldConfiguration. Which can be wrong in many scenarios. It is not possible to request a re-request of the ShieldConfiguration in that scenario. Radar: FB14237883 6. Unable to Open Parent App (one sec) from Shield Many times, when a target app is blocked by a shield, the user wants to perform some action (e.g. to unlock more time for the target app via an intervention). That means, that somehow I have to forward the user from a ShieldActionDelegate back into my target app. Unfortunately, there’s no API for that. Many apps on the App Store rely on private API to achieve that, but that’s too risky for a popular app like one sec. Radar: FB15079668 7. Unable to Open Target App from an ApplicationToken When a user has completed an intervention within one sec, and they indend to to continue to the target app, there is no way that one sec can open the target app just from the token alone. Sure, there are URL schemes, but that means the user has to manually assign URL schemes to each ApplicationToken. That is not a very user friendly process (and in many cases impossible, because not every app registers URL schemes). It would be better if there was a way that my app could open a target app directly from an ApplicationToken, e.g. via an AppIntent that can be run on a button press. This way, the selected apps would remain fully private while still offering advanced functionality: struct OpenTargetAppIntent: AppIntent, OpenAppFromApplicationTokenIntent { func perform() { return .result(openAppFromApplicationToken: applicationToken) } } Radar: FB15500695 Summary Thanks a lot for taking the time to read my feedback. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me any time. I’m always happy to provide more details, logs, and steps to reproduce in my radars / feedback requests or in-person in Cupertino. It would be extremely helpful if someone from the Screen Time / DeviceActivity engineering team could: Take a look at the listed radars. Work on bug fixes and be transparent about when fixes will be shipped. Provide workarounds in the meantime. We genuinely want to build great, reliable experiences on top of Screen Time – but in its current state, it’s becoming very difficult to depend on. – Frederik
3
8
1.1k
1d
App Store Connect upload rejected — Invalid NSExtensionPointIdentifier for FamilyControls extensions despite approved entitlement
Our app com.dalesidebottom.betterus (Team: TK8M23SECQ) cannot upload to App Store Connect. Build 28, v2.0.0 is rejected server-side with a 409 error for two new extension points in v2.0: • com.apple.ManagedSettings.ShieldConfigurationExtensionPoint — Error ID: 7624408a-f318-4b4f-a8b8-1c359923f560 • com.apple.deviceactivity.report-extension — Error ID: 51b40a9e-fc60-402d-9ba7-f29bfbfc84b5 The com.apple.developer.family-controls Distribution entitlement IS correctly in our Distribution provisioning profiles (resolved via case 102892887667). The rejection is not a provisioning issue — it is App Store Connect's submission validation layer rejecting these extension point identifiers because they are new in v2.0 (not present in our approved v1.0). Our com.apple.deviceactivity.monitor-extension passes fine as it was in v1.0. We need these two extension points authorised on the App Store Connect submission backend for this app. We have been waiting weeks and have case 102892887667 open with no resolution.
1
0
95
2d
ManagedSettingsUI ShieldConfiguration.backgroundColor shows square corners in App Switcher
I am seeing a reproducible App Switcher rendering artifact with ManagedSettingsUI shield customization. When a Screen Time shield is customized with ShieldConfiguration.backgroundColor, the shield appears with an uncropped rectangular background layer in the iOS App Switcher. Square corners become visible around the shield card/background layer. This disappears when backgroundColor is nil, and reappears as soon as any UIColor is provided. I also observed the same behavior in another Screen Time app that customizes its shield background, so this does not appear to be specific to my app. Minimal repro: Create an iOS app using FamilyControls, ManagedSettings, and ManagedSettingsUI. Add a ShieldConfigurationDataSource extension. Return a ShieldConfiguration with backgroundColor set to any UIColor. Shield an app and open the shielded app. Open the iOS App Switcher. Example: return ShieldConfiguration( backgroundBlurStyle: .regular, backgroundColor: UIColor(red: 246/255, green: 238/255, blue: 227/255, alpha: 1) ) Expected: The shield background should be clipped consistently with the App Switcher card/screen corner mask. Actual: The shield background appears as a full rectangular layer in the App Switcher, exposing square corners. Control tests: backgroundColor = nil: no square-corner artifact. backgroundColor = UIColor(...): square-corner artifact appears. The issue occurs regardless of backgroundBlurStyle, including nil, .regular, and .systemUltraThinMaterialLight. I filed this through Feedback Assistant as well. Has anyone found a workaround that still allows a custom shield background color?
0
0
28
3d
Family Controls entitlement missing from Distribution Provisioning Profile — Archive fails for App Store
Hi, I’m building an iOS app that uses FamilyControls to let users block distracting apps during study sessions. Everything works fine in Debug on a real device: the authorization request succeeds and app blocking works correctly. The problem is when I try to create an Archive for App Store Connect. Xcode gives me this error: “Provisioning profile ‘iOS Team Store Provisioning Profile: com.(ID)’ doesn’t include the com.apple.developer.family-controls entitlement.” I also get a warning saying that my bundle identifier is using the development-only version of the Family Controls capability and that I should request access to the distribution version. I’ve already added the Family Controls capability, enabled the required entitlements, and I’m using automatic signing. I also tried enabling the capability for my App ID in the Apple Developer portal, but it either doesn’t save or the distribution profile still doesn’t include the entitlement. Does the Family Controls distribution entitlement require approval from Apple before it can be used in an App Store build? If so, where do I request it? Has anyone successfully published an app using FamilyControls and run into this issue? Thanks.
1
0
77
6d
FamilyControls entitlement pending since June 2, 2026 — Team ID 5499VUQ6PC
Hello, I am the developer of Kiddowall, a B2C parental control app for iOS. I submitted a request for the com.apple.developer.family-controls entitlement on June 2, 2026 (support case #102905280650), and also followed up via an existing case #102905007339. Apple support indicated a 48-hour (2 business days) response time when the case was created. We are now past that window with no update on entitlement status. Request details: Team ID: 5499VUQ6PC Bundle ID: com.kiddowall.child App Bundle ID (parent): com.kiddowall.parent — Kiddowall — Parental Control (BDC, France) Entitlement requested: com.apple.developer.family-controls Support case: #102905280650 Current status: Submitted (no update in 4 days) Context: Kiddowall is a B2C parental control application for French families. Without the FamilyControls entitlement, we cannot implement proper on-device content filtering or screen time management without requiring MDM supervision — which is not viable for a consumer app (it requires factory reset via Apple Configurator 2 or ABM/DEP enrollment). FamilyControls is the only Apple-approved path to build a real parental control app for B2C without supervision. We are committed to full compliance with Screen Time API guidelines. Can anyone from Apple staff confirm the status of case #102905280650, or advise on next steps to expedite this request? Thank you. — Franck MAUDET (Kiddowall)
0
0
64
6d
Screen time API can be disabled easily
We have developed a Parental/Self control app using Screen time API. We have used individual authentication to authorize the app, using the instructions here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/familycontrols/authorizationcenter The problem is , that individual auth can be disabled easily , by the following steps: enter Settings app. in Settings app, click on the Parental/Self control app. click to disable screen time restriction. show the device owner's face/fingerprint. (or pin code) Why is that a problem: Parental control apps, or self-control apps, are about giving control to the software, To make it hard for the user to disable the restrictions. So using the flow I have introduced above, it's super-easy for a user to disable his Parental control restrictions, which misses the entire point of Parental/Self control idea. Furthermore, not only the user have the means to unlock his screen time restrictions, he also MUST have the means to unlock it. This makes Screen time (with individual auth) useless: I have a code ready to make a great parental control app for my clients, with amazing ideas, but I can't use the Screen time API unless this problem is fixed. Why child-parent auth is not enough: My clients are grownups people between ages of 15-40, that are interested in self-control, so they don't have iCloud child accounts. also, the child-parent auth solution forces my clients to give some control to other person, and my clients prefer their privacy. Some of them prefer self-control and not parental-control. What I suggest as a solution: 1: Give more options to users how to disable the Screen time restrictions. including: a second faceID / FingerPrint (that isn't the same as the one used to unlock the device) a second pin password. a string password 2: Give the users the option to choose to not have the device's owner Face/Finger/Pincode ID , as a method to disable the Screen time restrictions.
19
3
7.1k
1w
[REGRESSION iOS 26.6] ManagedSettingsStore.webContent.blockedByFilter = .specific(…) blocks adult content
Hello, we’re seeing a rather serious regression on iOS 26.6: The issue appears to reproduce with a single named ManagedSettingsStore: import ManagedSettings let store = ManagedSettingsStore(named: ManagedSettingsStore.Name("specific")) store.webContent.blockedByFilter = .specific([ WebDomain(domain: "specific-domain-marker.example") ]) Expected behavior: Only the explicitly configured .specific(...) web domain filter should be reflected in the effective ManagedSettings / ManagedConfiguration state. Observed behavior: After configuring this single store with .specific(...), I’m seeing unexpected additional websites being blocked (mostly adult content) which should only happen when using the .auto(…) API. Documented under FB22890915 with Sample Project and Sysdiagnose.
0
2
233
1w
FamilyControls Distribution entitlement
Hi Apple Developer Support, I am writing to escalate an urgent unresolved request regarding our app BetterUs (Team ID: TK8M23SECQ, Bundle ID: com.dalesidebottom.betterus). Timeline of attempts: ~1 May 2026 — Submitted FamilyControls Distribution entitlement request via the official form at developer.apple.com/contact/request/family-controls-distribution for bundle IDs com.dalesidebottom.betterus.shield and com.dalesidebottom.betterus.report. No confirmation number received, no response. ~20 May 2026 — Raised support case 102892887667 via developer.apple.com/contact. Received acknowledgement from Eugene. ~21 May 2026 — Replied with all requested information (date of submission, business need, bundle IDs). Today — Still no approval and no further response. It has now been over 3 weeks since the original request. What I need: The FamilyControls Distribution entitlement is already approved on my account for: com.dalesidebottom.betterus ✅ com.dalesidebottom.betterus.monitor ✅ I simply need it extended to these two sub-extensions of the same app: com.dalesidebottom.betterus.shield (Shield Configuration extension) com.dalesidebottom.betterus.report (DeviceActivity Report extension) These are not new use cases — they are part of the same approved parental screen time app. Without this, BetterUs cannot be submitted to the App Store at all. I have active testers waiting and this delay is significantly impacting our launch. I would greatly appreciate urgent attention on this matter. Thank you, Dale Sidebottom
1
0
788
2w
Patience had gone! Watting for nearly two months to get Family Controls Distribution entitlement, but still NO RESPONSE
Ive spent nearly one month to develop my first app, and now its done. but i am stuck with getting Family Controls Distribution entitlement. i`ve request that one month and half ago. but still get no response. I tried connect the apple developer support、send post on Forum、send code-level support on appstoreconnect. All completely disappeared into a black hole. I understand that you may be facing a significant backlog, waiting for nearly two months without any response or update regarding the Family Controls Distribution entitlement is extremely difficult for me to understand. I genuinely cannot understand why Apple’s review process is operating with such low efficiency.
0
0
446
2w
FamilyActivityPicker missing search bar when embedded inline on iPad
When FamilyActivityPicker is used as an embedded view (not via the .familyActivityPicker sheet modifier), the search bar that normally appears at the bottom is not rendered on iPad. The same code shows the search bar correctly on iPhone. Environment Frameworks: SwiftUI, FamilyControls Device: iPad (reproduces on multiple models / iPadOS versions — 26.2, 26.5) iPhone: search bar appears as expected Usage The picker is placed directly inside a SwiftUI view hierarchy: import SwiftUI import FamilyControls struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection = FamilyActivitySelection() var body: some View { FamilyActivityPicker(selection: $selection) } } Expected A search field is visible at the bottom of the sheet (same as iPhone), allowing the user to search for apps/categories/websites. Actual On iPad, no search field is rendered. The picker only shows the category/app list. There is no way to search. Notes I would like the embedded FamilyActivityPicker to show the same search affordance on iPad that it shows on iPhone, so apps that rely on custom surrounding UI don't have to give it up to gain search.
1
0
194
2w
Search Functionality Missing in FamilyActivityPicker on iPadOS 26.0+
Issue: The search functionality in FamilyActivityPicker has disappeared on iPadOS 26.0+. This feature was working in previous versions but is now missing. Framework: FamilyControls Expected: Search bar should be available in FamilyActivityPicker to help users find apps quickly. Actual: Search functionality is completely missing. Impact: Makes app selection difficult for users with many installed apps. Is this a known issue? If it's a bug, please address it in an upcoming update. If intentional, guidance on alternatives would be appreciated. Thank you.
2
1
227
2w
Sending screentime data to firebase then to accountability partner
Hey . So i'm building a screentime app whereby users can add an accountability partner who will be able to see their total screentime.(no app breakdowns included) . This will require me to send the data to firebase realtime database and retrieve for the accountability partner to see. Problem is , I've literally tried everything but the screentime still shows 0m on the accountabiliy partner's end. I need the data to be displayed rounded down to the nearest 0.5 e.g 1hr43mins ->1.5hrs+ ,2.0hrs+ ,3.5hrs+ , meaning it only moves when a threshold is crossed by the user. (this is to save database costs). Anyway i'd really appreciate if someone could help me out here. Thanks
3
0
329
2w
Family Controls (Distribution) Capability Request — Pending for Nearly a Month
Hello, I'm an iOS developer currently working on an application in Xcode. I submitted a Capability Request for Family Controls (Distribution) through App Store Connect, but the status has remained "Submitted" with no approval to date. My oldest request was filed on April 21, 2026, so it has now been almost a month. Approval of this request is essential for releasing my application, and the length of this review process has become a significant source of stress. Based on what I've seen from other developers, most requests are approved within four weeks at the latest. I would like to know when I can expect a decision on my requests. The Request IDs in question are the following five: AS9LZVLSRX, 2UB9RY7AJF, LJ5TWZ6HH3, DGA3UBV6W9, ANZD3T8X23 Please note that some of these are duplicate submissions for the same identifier, so I'd appreciate it if you could check and consolidate them as needed. Thank you in advance for looking into this. Best regards, Tomo
0
0
115
3w
Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement stuck at "Submitted" since April 19, 4 weeks, no update
Hi everyone, I submitted my Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement request on April 19 and it's been stuck on "Submitted" for over 4 weeks now, no approval, no rejection, nothing. My app is an anti-doomscrolling app that uses the Screen Time API to block distracting apps until the user completes a workout. Individual use, not parental control. I have Family Controls (Development) approved on all targets, but Distribution is still stuck on Submitted for all of them: com.kmgzora.replock com.kmgzora.replock.MORADeviceActivityMonitor com.kmgzora.replock.MORAShieldAction com.kmgzora.replock.MORAShieldConfig The app is fully ready to ship, this is my last step. I've seen a few threads here where DTS engineers helped people in similar situation, hoping someone can take a look. Thanks in advance.
0
0
125
3w
Family Controls entitlement stuck after app transfer
Hi Apple DTS, FivePrayer is a live App Store app and we are blocked by Family Controls (Distribution) after an app transfer. Bundle ID: com.fiveprayer.app Current team: FivePrayer LLC Previous team: Gansoft Inc. App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fiveprayer/id6755536905 This same app previously had Family Controls (Distribution) approved under Gansoft Inc. After the transfer to FivePrayer LLC, the capability did not carry over, so we had to request it again. It has now been pending for almost one month, and we cannot ship critical updates because Family Controls is a core dependency of the app. Is there a way to re-associate the previously approved entitlement with the transferred App ID, or route this to the correct Managed Capabilities / Entitlements team? Thank you.
1
2
285
3w
Family Controls Resources
General: Forums topic: Family Controls Forums tag: Family Controls Configuring Family Controls documentation Requesting the Family Controls entitlement documentation Screen Time Technology Frameworks documentation FamilyControls documentation What's new in Screen Time API video Meet the Screen Time API video
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
921
Activity
Jan ’26
DeviceActivityMonitor: increase memory limit from 6MB
Dear Screen Time Team! The current 6 MB memory limit for the DeviceActivityMonitor extension no longer reflects the reality of modern iOS devices or the complexity of apps built on top of the Screen Time framework. When Screen Time APIs were introduced with iOS 15, hardware constraints were very different. Since then, iPhone performance and available RAM have increased significantly…but the extension memory limit has remained unchanged. My name is Frederik Riedel, and I’m the developer of the screen time app “one sec.” Our app relies heavily on FamilyControls, ManagedSettings, and DeviceActivity to provide real-time interventions that help users reduce social media usage. In practice, the 6 MB limit has become a critical bottleneck: The DeviceActivityMonitor extension frequently crashes due to memory pressure, often unpredictably. Even highly optimized implementations struggle to stay within this constraint when using Swift and multiple ManagedSettings stores. The limit makes it disproportionately difficult to build stable, maintainable, and scalable architectures on top of these frameworks. This is not just an edge case…it directly impacts reliability in production apps that depend on Screen Time APIs for core functionality. Modern system integrations like Screen Time are incredibly powerful, but they also require a reasonable amount of memory headroom to function reliably. The current limit forces developers into fragile workarounds and undermines the robustness of apps that aim to improve users’ digital wellbeing. We would greatly appreciate if you could revisit and update this restriction to better align with today’s device capabilities and developer needs. Thank you for your continued work on Screen Time and for supporting developers building meaningful experiences on top of it. Feedback: FB22279215 Best regards, Frederik Riedel (one sec app)
Replies
5
Boosts
3
Views
329
Activity
1d
Best practices for sharing data between main app and `DeviceActivityMonitor`?
Dear Developer Technical Support, I wanted to ask for technical advice regarding the DeviceActivityMonitor which is part of the DeviceActivity framework: The DeviceActivityMonitor has a very strict memory limit of 6MB. That’s not a lot and it doesn't leave a lot of room for any kind of code that accesses permanently stored data. I would therefore like to ask for advice on best-practices on how to share information between the main app and that extension: Is UserDefaults a good idea to use here? Can/should we use CoreData or SwiftData? Should we build super small file-based data sharing (e.g. via .plists)? Why is it necessary to share data? This can be simple things that inform the decision of the device activity monitor in intervalDidStart, intervalDidEnd, eventDidReachThreshold, eventWillReachThresholdWarning. For example a setting where the user decides if they want to receive a push notification on eventWillReachThresholdWarning. Or the list of tokens that is supposed to be blocked in eventDidReachThreshold or intervalDidStart. I’m asking because even though we are super careful and conservative about memory allocations in our DeviceActivityMonitor we are regularly seeing it being killed due to memory pressure. What’s the best way to approach this? I’m grateful for any kinds of hints! Thanks a lot and have a great day! – Frederik
Replies
1
Boosts
1
Views
250
Activity
1d
Screen Time APIs showing severe inconsistencies (DeviceActivity not firing + impossible usage data)
Hi everyone, I’m the developer of one sec, an app used by a large number of users globally to reduce time spent on social media and to build healthier digital habits. Because of this, we rely heavily on Apple’s Screen Time / DeviceActivity / FamilyControls, ManagedSettings APIs – and unfortunately, we’re seeing increasingly severe issues in production that directly impact hundreds of thousands of real iOS users. During the past years, we have been busy filing dozens of feedback requests for different Screen Time issues – and there has been no response from Apple at all. Developer Relations might be able to "confirm" that the bugs are present and that they ended up with the right team – but they are never addressed, neither are workarounds provided. Instead, the situation gets worse and worse. iOS 26 introduced a series of heavy regressions (which have been reported via Apple’s official bug report tool "Feedback Assistant" on iOS 26 beta 1 in June 2025 – and have not been addressed 10 Months later). This is very frustrating for us as developers, but also for our end-users who run into these issues every day. In the end this impacts our ability to build an amazing product and hurts revenue (which affects both us and Apple). 1. DeviceActivity thresholds are not firing at all This affects both: our app’s usage of the API and Apple’s own Screen Time limits Radars: FB22304617, FB20526837, FB15491936, FB12195437, FB15663329, FB18198691, FB18289475, FB19827144 2. Screen Time usage data is clearly corrupted Websites showing hundreds of hours per week Up to ~20 hours per day of usage reported for a single domain Radars: FB22304617, FB17777429, FB18464235 3. DeviceActivity thresholds reaching threshold immediately Newly introduced with iOS 26 Reported on iOS 26 beta 1 in June No response so far / no workaround DeviceActivity calls didReachThreshold immediately after creating the DeviceActivityEvent – instead of waiting till the defined threshold is actually reached. Radars: FB13696022, FB18351583, FB21320644, FB18927456, FB18061981 4. Randomly Randomizing ApplicationTokens From time to time, and without consistency, Screen Time suddenly provides new, random, unknown tokens to my app in the ShieldConfigurationDataSource and ShieldActionDelegate. This has been reported on many times before here on the dev forms, many many years back already: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/756440 https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/758325 https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/758325?answerId=793267022#793267022 Radars: FB14082790 and FB18764644 5. Moving Tokens from one ManagedSettingsStore to Another Removing an ApplicationToken from one SettingsStore and then adding it to another while the target app remains in foreground leads to the re-use of the ShieldConfiguration. Which can be wrong in many scenarios. It is not possible to request a re-request of the ShieldConfiguration in that scenario. Radar: FB14237883 6. Unable to Open Parent App (one sec) from Shield Many times, when a target app is blocked by a shield, the user wants to perform some action (e.g. to unlock more time for the target app via an intervention). That means, that somehow I have to forward the user from a ShieldActionDelegate back into my target app. Unfortunately, there’s no API for that. Many apps on the App Store rely on private API to achieve that, but that’s too risky for a popular app like one sec. Radar: FB15079668 7. Unable to Open Target App from an ApplicationToken When a user has completed an intervention within one sec, and they indend to to continue to the target app, there is no way that one sec can open the target app just from the token alone. Sure, there are URL schemes, but that means the user has to manually assign URL schemes to each ApplicationToken. That is not a very user friendly process (and in many cases impossible, because not every app registers URL schemes). It would be better if there was a way that my app could open a target app directly from an ApplicationToken, e.g. via an AppIntent that can be run on a button press. This way, the selected apps would remain fully private while still offering advanced functionality: struct OpenTargetAppIntent: AppIntent, OpenAppFromApplicationTokenIntent { func perform() { return .result(openAppFromApplicationToken: applicationToken) } } Radar: FB15500695 Summary Thanks a lot for taking the time to read my feedback. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me any time. I’m always happy to provide more details, logs, and steps to reproduce in my radars / feedback requests or in-person in Cupertino. It would be extremely helpful if someone from the Screen Time / DeviceActivity engineering team could: Take a look at the listed radars. Work on bug fixes and be transparent about when fixes will be shipped. Provide workarounds in the meantime. We genuinely want to build great, reliable experiences on top of Screen Time – but in its current state, it’s becoming very difficult to depend on. – Frederik
Replies
3
Boosts
8
Views
1.1k
Activity
1d
App Store Connect upload rejected — Invalid NSExtensionPointIdentifier for FamilyControls extensions despite approved entitlement
Our app com.dalesidebottom.betterus (Team: TK8M23SECQ) cannot upload to App Store Connect. Build 28, v2.0.0 is rejected server-side with a 409 error for two new extension points in v2.0: • com.apple.ManagedSettings.ShieldConfigurationExtensionPoint — Error ID: 7624408a-f318-4b4f-a8b8-1c359923f560 • com.apple.deviceactivity.report-extension — Error ID: 51b40a9e-fc60-402d-9ba7-f29bfbfc84b5 The com.apple.developer.family-controls Distribution entitlement IS correctly in our Distribution provisioning profiles (resolved via case 102892887667). The rejection is not a provisioning issue — it is App Store Connect's submission validation layer rejecting these extension point identifiers because they are new in v2.0 (not present in our approved v1.0). Our com.apple.deviceactivity.monitor-extension passes fine as it was in v1.0. We need these two extension points authorised on the App Store Connect submission backend for this app. We have been waiting weeks and have case 102892887667 open with no resolution.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
95
Activity
2d
ManagedSettingsUI ShieldConfiguration.backgroundColor shows square corners in App Switcher
I am seeing a reproducible App Switcher rendering artifact with ManagedSettingsUI shield customization. When a Screen Time shield is customized with ShieldConfiguration.backgroundColor, the shield appears with an uncropped rectangular background layer in the iOS App Switcher. Square corners become visible around the shield card/background layer. This disappears when backgroundColor is nil, and reappears as soon as any UIColor is provided. I also observed the same behavior in another Screen Time app that customizes its shield background, so this does not appear to be specific to my app. Minimal repro: Create an iOS app using FamilyControls, ManagedSettings, and ManagedSettingsUI. Add a ShieldConfigurationDataSource extension. Return a ShieldConfiguration with backgroundColor set to any UIColor. Shield an app and open the shielded app. Open the iOS App Switcher. Example: return ShieldConfiguration( backgroundBlurStyle: .regular, backgroundColor: UIColor(red: 246/255, green: 238/255, blue: 227/255, alpha: 1) ) Expected: The shield background should be clipped consistently with the App Switcher card/screen corner mask. Actual: The shield background appears as a full rectangular layer in the App Switcher, exposing square corners. Control tests: backgroundColor = nil: no square-corner artifact. backgroundColor = UIColor(...): square-corner artifact appears. The issue occurs regardless of backgroundBlurStyle, including nil, .regular, and .systemUltraThinMaterialLight. I filed this through Feedback Assistant as well. Has anyone found a workaround that still allows a custom shield background color?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
28
Activity
3d
Family Controls entitlement missing from Distribution Provisioning Profile — Archive fails for App Store
Hi, I’m building an iOS app that uses FamilyControls to let users block distracting apps during study sessions. Everything works fine in Debug on a real device: the authorization request succeeds and app blocking works correctly. The problem is when I try to create an Archive for App Store Connect. Xcode gives me this error: “Provisioning profile ‘iOS Team Store Provisioning Profile: com.(ID)’ doesn’t include the com.apple.developer.family-controls entitlement.” I also get a warning saying that my bundle identifier is using the development-only version of the Family Controls capability and that I should request access to the distribution version. I’ve already added the Family Controls capability, enabled the required entitlements, and I’m using automatic signing. I also tried enabling the capability for my App ID in the Apple Developer portal, but it either doesn’t save or the distribution profile still doesn’t include the entitlement. Does the Family Controls distribution entitlement require approval from Apple before it can be used in an App Store build? If so, where do I request it? Has anyone successfully published an app using FamilyControls and run into this issue? Thanks.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
77
Activity
6d
FamilyControls entitlement pending since June 2, 2026 — Team ID 5499VUQ6PC
Hello, I am the developer of Kiddowall, a B2C parental control app for iOS. I submitted a request for the com.apple.developer.family-controls entitlement on June 2, 2026 (support case #102905280650), and also followed up via an existing case #102905007339. Apple support indicated a 48-hour (2 business days) response time when the case was created. We are now past that window with no update on entitlement status. Request details: Team ID: 5499VUQ6PC Bundle ID: com.kiddowall.child App Bundle ID (parent): com.kiddowall.parent — Kiddowall — Parental Control (BDC, France) Entitlement requested: com.apple.developer.family-controls Support case: #102905280650 Current status: Submitted (no update in 4 days) Context: Kiddowall is a B2C parental control application for French families. Without the FamilyControls entitlement, we cannot implement proper on-device content filtering or screen time management without requiring MDM supervision — which is not viable for a consumer app (it requires factory reset via Apple Configurator 2 or ABM/DEP enrollment). FamilyControls is the only Apple-approved path to build a real parental control app for B2C without supervision. We are committed to full compliance with Screen Time API guidelines. Can anyone from Apple staff confirm the status of case #102905280650, or advise on next steps to expedite this request? Thank you. — Franck MAUDET (Kiddowall)
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
64
Activity
6d
Screen time API can be disabled easily
We have developed a Parental/Self control app using Screen time API. We have used individual authentication to authorize the app, using the instructions here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/familycontrols/authorizationcenter The problem is , that individual auth can be disabled easily , by the following steps: enter Settings app. in Settings app, click on the Parental/Self control app. click to disable screen time restriction. show the device owner's face/fingerprint. (or pin code) Why is that a problem: Parental control apps, or self-control apps, are about giving control to the software, To make it hard for the user to disable the restrictions. So using the flow I have introduced above, it's super-easy for a user to disable his Parental control restrictions, which misses the entire point of Parental/Self control idea. Furthermore, not only the user have the means to unlock his screen time restrictions, he also MUST have the means to unlock it. This makes Screen time (with individual auth) useless: I have a code ready to make a great parental control app for my clients, with amazing ideas, but I can't use the Screen time API unless this problem is fixed. Why child-parent auth is not enough: My clients are grownups people between ages of 15-40, that are interested in self-control, so they don't have iCloud child accounts. also, the child-parent auth solution forces my clients to give some control to other person, and my clients prefer their privacy. Some of them prefer self-control and not parental-control. What I suggest as a solution: 1: Give more options to users how to disable the Screen time restrictions. including: a second faceID / FingerPrint (that isn't the same as the one used to unlock the device) a second pin password. a string password 2: Give the users the option to choose to not have the device's owner Face/Finger/Pincode ID , as a method to disable the Screen time restrictions.
Replies
19
Boosts
3
Views
7.1k
Activity
1w
[REGRESSION iOS 26.6] ManagedSettingsStore.webContent.blockedByFilter = .specific(…) blocks adult content
Hello, we’re seeing a rather serious regression on iOS 26.6: The issue appears to reproduce with a single named ManagedSettingsStore: import ManagedSettings let store = ManagedSettingsStore(named: ManagedSettingsStore.Name("specific")) store.webContent.blockedByFilter = .specific([ WebDomain(domain: "specific-domain-marker.example") ]) Expected behavior: Only the explicitly configured .specific(...) web domain filter should be reflected in the effective ManagedSettings / ManagedConfiguration state. Observed behavior: After configuring this single store with .specific(...), I’m seeing unexpected additional websites being blocked (mostly adult content) which should only happen when using the .auto(…) API. Documented under FB22890915 with Sample Project and Sysdiagnose.
Replies
0
Boosts
2
Views
233
Activity
1w
FamilyControls Distribution entitlement
Hi Apple Developer Support, I am writing to escalate an urgent unresolved request regarding our app BetterUs (Team ID: TK8M23SECQ, Bundle ID: com.dalesidebottom.betterus). Timeline of attempts: ~1 May 2026 — Submitted FamilyControls Distribution entitlement request via the official form at developer.apple.com/contact/request/family-controls-distribution for bundle IDs com.dalesidebottom.betterus.shield and com.dalesidebottom.betterus.report. No confirmation number received, no response. ~20 May 2026 — Raised support case 102892887667 via developer.apple.com/contact. Received acknowledgement from Eugene. ~21 May 2026 — Replied with all requested information (date of submission, business need, bundle IDs). Today — Still no approval and no further response. It has now been over 3 weeks since the original request. What I need: The FamilyControls Distribution entitlement is already approved on my account for: com.dalesidebottom.betterus ✅ com.dalesidebottom.betterus.monitor ✅ I simply need it extended to these two sub-extensions of the same app: com.dalesidebottom.betterus.shield (Shield Configuration extension) com.dalesidebottom.betterus.report (DeviceActivity Report extension) These are not new use cases — they are part of the same approved parental screen time app. Without this, BetterUs cannot be submitted to the App Store at all. I have active testers waiting and this delay is significantly impacting our launch. I would greatly appreciate urgent attention on this matter. Thank you, Dale Sidebottom
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
788
Activity
2w
Family Controls distribution entitlement - 1 month waiting
Hi, I am experience bad customer service from Apple not answering, or updating anything about my request for family controls. Is there a way we can speed up things?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
92
Activity
2w
Patience had gone! Watting for nearly two months to get Family Controls Distribution entitlement, but still NO RESPONSE
Ive spent nearly one month to develop my first app, and now its done. but i am stuck with getting Family Controls Distribution entitlement. i`ve request that one month and half ago. but still get no response. I tried connect the apple developer support、send post on Forum、send code-level support on appstoreconnect. All completely disappeared into a black hole. I understand that you may be facing a significant backlog, waiting for nearly two months without any response or update regarding the Family Controls Distribution entitlement is extremely difficult for me to understand. I genuinely cannot understand why Apple’s review process is operating with such low efficiency.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
446
Activity
2w
FamilyControls entitlement request submitted
Just curious if there is anyway to expedite the FamilyControl entitlement. I have seen few people stuck in this step for few days. I submit mine on the 4/18, and my Case ID: 102874096254 Just want to see if I can see any estimate time for my request. Thanks, Jing
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
322
Activity
2w
FamilyActivityPicker missing search bar when embedded inline on iPad
When FamilyActivityPicker is used as an embedded view (not via the .familyActivityPicker sheet modifier), the search bar that normally appears at the bottom is not rendered on iPad. The same code shows the search bar correctly on iPhone. Environment Frameworks: SwiftUI, FamilyControls Device: iPad (reproduces on multiple models / iPadOS versions — 26.2, 26.5) iPhone: search bar appears as expected Usage The picker is placed directly inside a SwiftUI view hierarchy: import SwiftUI import FamilyControls struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection = FamilyActivitySelection() var body: some View { FamilyActivityPicker(selection: $selection) } } Expected A search field is visible at the bottom of the sheet (same as iPhone), allowing the user to search for apps/categories/websites. Actual On iPad, no search field is rendered. The picker only shows the category/app list. There is no way to search. Notes I would like the embedded FamilyActivityPicker to show the same search affordance on iPad that it shows on iPhone, so apps that rely on custom surrounding UI don't have to give it up to gain search.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
194
Activity
2w
Sharing ScreenTime data to a custom server
With the ScreenTime API Apple talks a lot about their focus on privacy and the data not leaving the device. Does that mean there would be a problem with an app where the users ScreenTime data is shared to a custom backend? Could this potentially cause an app to be rejected from the AppStore?
Replies
4
Boosts
2
Views
1.2k
Activity
2w
Search Functionality Missing in FamilyActivityPicker on iPadOS 26.0+
Issue: The search functionality in FamilyActivityPicker has disappeared on iPadOS 26.0+. This feature was working in previous versions but is now missing. Framework: FamilyControls Expected: Search bar should be available in FamilyActivityPicker to help users find apps quickly. Actual: Search functionality is completely missing. Impact: Makes app selection difficult for users with many installed apps. Is this a known issue? If it's a bug, please address it in an upcoming update. If intentional, guidance on alternatives would be appreciated. Thank you.
Replies
2
Boosts
1
Views
227
Activity
2w
Sending screentime data to firebase then to accountability partner
Hey . So i'm building a screentime app whereby users can add an accountability partner who will be able to see their total screentime.(no app breakdowns included) . This will require me to send the data to firebase realtime database and retrieve for the accountability partner to see. Problem is , I've literally tried everything but the screentime still shows 0m on the accountabiliy partner's end. I need the data to be displayed rounded down to the nearest 0.5 e.g 1hr43mins ->1.5hrs+ ,2.0hrs+ ,3.5hrs+ , meaning it only moves when a threshold is crossed by the user. (this is to save database costs). Anyway i'd really appreciate if someone could help me out here. Thanks
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
329
Activity
2w
Family Controls (Distribution) Capability Request — Pending for Nearly a Month
Hello, I'm an iOS developer currently working on an application in Xcode. I submitted a Capability Request for Family Controls (Distribution) through App Store Connect, but the status has remained "Submitted" with no approval to date. My oldest request was filed on April 21, 2026, so it has now been almost a month. Approval of this request is essential for releasing my application, and the length of this review process has become a significant source of stress. Based on what I've seen from other developers, most requests are approved within four weeks at the latest. I would like to know when I can expect a decision on my requests. The Request IDs in question are the following five: AS9LZVLSRX, 2UB9RY7AJF, LJ5TWZ6HH3, DGA3UBV6W9, ANZD3T8X23 Please note that some of these are duplicate submissions for the same identifier, so I'd appreciate it if you could check and consolidate them as needed. Thank you in advance for looking into this. Best regards, Tomo
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
115
Activity
3w
Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement stuck at "Submitted" since April 19, 4 weeks, no update
Hi everyone, I submitted my Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement request on April 19 and it's been stuck on "Submitted" for over 4 weeks now, no approval, no rejection, nothing. My app is an anti-doomscrolling app that uses the Screen Time API to block distracting apps until the user completes a workout. Individual use, not parental control. I have Family Controls (Development) approved on all targets, but Distribution is still stuck on Submitted for all of them: com.kmgzora.replock com.kmgzora.replock.MORADeviceActivityMonitor com.kmgzora.replock.MORAShieldAction com.kmgzora.replock.MORAShieldConfig The app is fully ready to ship, this is my last step. I've seen a few threads here where DTS engineers helped people in similar situation, hoping someone can take a look. Thanks in advance.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
125
Activity
3w
Family Controls entitlement stuck after app transfer
Hi Apple DTS, FivePrayer is a live App Store app and we are blocked by Family Controls (Distribution) after an app transfer. Bundle ID: com.fiveprayer.app Current team: FivePrayer LLC Previous team: Gansoft Inc. App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fiveprayer/id6755536905 This same app previously had Family Controls (Distribution) approved under Gansoft Inc. After the transfer to FivePrayer LLC, the capability did not carry over, so we had to request it again. It has now been pending for almost one month, and we cannot ship critical updates because Family Controls is a core dependency of the app. Is there a way to re-associate the previously approved entitlement with the transferred App ID, or route this to the correct Managed Capabilities / Entitlements team? Thank you.
Replies
1
Boosts
2
Views
285
Activity
3w