Search results for

“build disappears”

51,284 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Unable to Download Apps via TestFlight - "The requested app is not available or doesn't exist" Error
Hi everyone I recently build an app and deployed it through app store connect and testet it on TestFlight. Everything worked fine up until build 1.0.3. Since then I have not been able to install the app on my phone through TestFlight - even though build and submission runs through successfully on eas, expo and app store. I have tried deleting and reinstalling the TestFlight from my phone. removing and adding back myself as tester. checking logs and commits from the shift from build 1.0.3 to build 1.0.4. I can see I changed name and slug, so I tried removing the app from app store connect and added a new one with new build and submission. Ran through successfully but still could not install the app through TestFlight on my iPhone. I have also tried reaching out to Apple Developer Support, but I have not heard from them. Has anyone tried something similar?
7
0
510
5d
90919: Invalid entitlement error in ASC
I have an existing app in App Store Connect. I added the SharedWithYou functionality to the app code and tested it on several devices. Everything is working as expected. One of the first steps was to add the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement to the Entitlements.plist file. This required a round of updates for app identifiers and provisioning profiles. When I upload the production build for testing in TestFlight I receive the following error: 90919: Invalid entitlement. The “” bundle has the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement, but it doesn’t use the Shared with You framework. Please remove the entitlement and upload a new build. I'm using SWHighlight, SWHighlightCenter, and SWAttributionView in several places throughout my app... I filed an issue in the Feedback Assistant but so far, have not received any response.
1
0
352
6d
sysextd: "no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications" - NEFilterDataProvider system extension on macOS 26
I'm developing a macOS security tool using NEFilterDataProvider as a system extension. On macOS 26 beta (25E241), sysextd consistently rejects my extension with: sysextd: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications Configuration: App installed in /Applications/ Signed with Developer ID Application (693DSH8GN5) Entitlement: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = content-filter-provider com.apple.developer.system-extension.install = true Developer Mode enabled on test machine Comparison with Little Snitch: Little Snitch runs correctly on the same machine. Key differences I found: Little Snitch uses content-filter-provider-systemextension instead of content-filter-provider Little Snitch has com.apple.security.app-sandbox = false Both signed with Developer ID Application When I switch to content-filter-provider-systemextension, Xcode rejects every provisioning profile because none match that entitlement value, and the Developer Portal doesn't expose fine-grained control over the Network Extensio
2
0
55
6d
Reply to sysextd: "no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications" - NEFilterDataProvider system extension on macOS 26
It sounds like you’re using Developer ID signing for day-to-day development. That’s a mistake on multiple levels. I talk about this in general in The Care and Feeding of Developer ID, but there are extra issues with system extensions, where system policy requires that Developer ID signed sysexen be notarised. So my advice in this case. Use Apple Development code signing for day-to-day development. Use Developer ID for pre-release testing and distribution. There are a couple of key benefits with this approach: It lets you build and debug without enabling development mode, which is a big win IMO. Xcode’s automatic code signing works well with Apple Development signing. Even if you’re not using Xcode, you can create a small test project in Xcode, get it working, and then follow the same path it took. See Debugging a Network Extension Provider for specific advice on how to bring up a provider in Xcode. One thing that Xcode doesn’t handle is the -systemextension suffix )-: To learn more about that, read E
6d
iPhone 17 Pro on iOS 26.3 stays unavailable in xcrun devicectl list devices even with Xcode 26.4 beta 2
I am unable to use my iPhone 17 Pro as a run destination in Xcode. The device appears at a low level, but CoreDevice / devicectl keeps reporting it as unavailable. Environment • Mac mini (Apple Silicon) • macOS 26.3 (Build 25D125) • iPhone 17 Pro • iOS 26.3 • Xcode 26.3 (Build 17C529) • Xcode 26.4 beta 2 (Build 17E5170d) Symptoms • The iPhone appears in Finder • On the iPhone, I tapped “Trust This Computer” • Developer Mode is enabled • Apple ID is added in Xcode Accounts • Team is configured in Signing & Capabilities • iOS Platform Support is installed • The device still does not become available as a run destination • Devices and Simulators does not show it in a usable state • xcrun devicectl list devices still shows unavailable Output of xcrun devicectl list devices Failed to load provisioning paramter list due to error: Error Domain=com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError Code=1002 No provider was found. UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=No provider was found.}. devicectl manage create
13
0
461
6d
“In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page not showing
I’m trying to submit my app for review, but I’m currently blocked due to a recurring issue with in-app subscriptions. Both of my auto-renewable subscriptions (premium_monthly and premium_yearly) are marked as “Waiting for Review”. However, I am still seeing the blue box stating that “your first subscription must be submitted with a new app version.” Despite creating a new version (1.0.1) and uploading/selecting a new build , I am not seeing the “In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page, and I therefore cannot link the subscriptions before submitting. This issue is blocking my ability to submit the app for review. Any help to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
3
0
171
6d
Reply to CKQuerySubscription on public database never triggers APNS push in Production environment
Hi Ziqiao, thanks for looking into this! I've verified using CKFetchSubscriptionsOperation.fetchAllSubscriptionsOperation() on both Development and Production (TestFlight) devices. All 5 subscriptions are present and correctly configured in both environments. The output is identical between both environments. Here are all 5 subscriptions as returned by CKFetchSubscriptionsOperation: fr-sub-v3 (FriendRequest) Predicate: receiverID == [userID] AND status == pending badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locKey=FRIEND_REQUEST_BODY, locArgs=[senderUsername] category=FRIEND_REQUEST, desiredKeys=[senderID, senderUsername] rec-sub-v3 (MediaRecommendation) Predicate: receiverID == [userID] AND status == pending badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locKey=RECOMMENDATION_BODY, locArgs=[senderUsername, mediaTitle] category=RECOMMENDATION, desiredKeys=[mediaTitle, mediaType, senderID, senderUsername] fs-a-sub-v3 (Friendship) Predicate: userAID == [userID] badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locK
6d
App Clips not working
Issue: after going through configuration steps for app clips, when I scan my QR code, my app clip does not appear, instead safari attempts to open the url as a web page. note: my aasa endpoint is never even getting called when scanning the QR code. Setup: App uninstalled in accordance with Apple Documentation Users don’t install App Clips, and App Clips don’t appear on the Home Screen. Similarly, testers don’t install the beta version of your App Clip testflight installed in accordance with Apple Documentation My app's Build 1.51.9 (1) uploaded and greenlit in testflight. My apple email is added as an internal tester is the same as my Apple ID for the device used. I have provided an aasa for the path: .well-known/apple-app-site-association. Here is my full url: https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/.well-known/apple-app-site-association. { appclips: { apps: [ 8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1.Clip ] }, applinks: { details: [ { components: [ { /: /appClips/referral/venueToUser } ], appIDs
6
0
169
6d
3.2(f) triggered — account pending termination despite repeated attempts to comply
Hi all, Looking for some clarity.. I have an app (Pocket Love: AI Roleplay Chat, Apple ID: 6745031268) that went through a long review process with many resubmissions. The feedback I received across those reviews was often generic “overtly sexual”) message, but without any detail on exactly what needed to change. Because of that, I approached it iteratively making adjustments each time based on what I thought the issue might be. Over time I made quite significant changes across the app (imagery, unlockable content, voice-overs, menus, copy, etc.), and increased the age rating to 18+. I also had a call with a policy eexpert & App Review. In the final interaction, I was asked to ensure all unlockable content was visible, so I re-uploaded a build and provided screenshots with everything pre-unlocked for transparency. Despite this, my account has now been flagged under 3.2(f) for “dishonest or fraudulent activity,” and is pending termination. What I’m struggling to understand is: Can repeated resubmi
6
0
149
6d
Reply to Why don't my os_log entries show up until the second time my driver loads?
Why is this and To be perfectly honest, I have no idea. There's a thread about logging in DriverKit logging here that might be worth reviewing, but that's primarily about issues with IOLog redaction, which is different than you're describing. I can't think of any reason why we'd redact the first run but not later runs. I suspect there is some kind of bug involved, but I'm going to run this by Quinn to see what he thinks. Bonus Thought: How are you signing your DEXT? Are you using automatic signing with the Development Only profiles (modern/good) or disabling SIP (old/bad)? This a blind guess, but it's possible the old (SIP disabled) approach might cause something weird like this, depending on exactly how the build was signed. See this post for more information on how to sign DEXT. However, I do have two ideas for this: more importantly, how can I fix it? The post above mentions this in passing, but Quinn's Recording Private Data in the System Log post describes how you can manually control how redact
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Drivers Tags:
6d
Reply to 3.2(f) triggered — account pending termination despite repeated attempts to comply
Thanks for the response, for context it was around 15 submissions over a few months and 30ish messages. I get your example, but I think my situation’s a bit different. The updates weren’t just micro changes trying to slip something through, there was a mix of both small tweaks and broader changes. The issue was the feedback stayed very generic (“overtly sexual”) without pointing to specific elements, so each update was essentially a best guess at what might be triggering it. Especially early on, when only metadata was flagged, I assumed the issue was relatively minor. By the end, I actually went in the opposite direction of evasion & submitted a build with everything unlocked and included screenshots showing all content upfront, so review had full visibility, as requested during a phone call. It’s possible I missed a couple of screenshots in earlier messages, but nothing was intentional. That’s why the 3.2(f) decision caught me off guard, there was no intent to hide or mislead, just trying to int
6d
ENTITY_UNPROCESSABLE.BETA_CONTRACT_MISSING – External TestFlight unavailable, internal builds not downloadable
Hi, I’m running into a persistent issue in App Store Connect related to TestFlight and app reviews, and I’m hoping someone has seen this before. Around two weeks ago, I started getting the following error when trying to create external TestFlight builds: ENTITY_UNPROCESSABLE.BETA_CONTRACT_MISSING Since then: I cannot create any external TestFlight tests Internal TestFlight builds appear, but cannot be downloaded (“The requested app is not available or doesn’t exist”) My apps do not progress properly through review One app got stuck in “In Review” for ~10 days; I eventually withdrew it and resubmitted it At this point, I cannot update two existing apps, and I can’t start testing a new app at all Important details: This is an individual developer account I am the Account Holder All contracts appear active and valid The issue affects multiple apps, not just one Nothing changed on my side (no contract updates, no account changes) before this started happening. I’ve already reached out to Apple D
1
0
115
6d
Website environment disappears suddenly
After I updated to visionOS 26.4, I noticed my website environment would suddenly turn off occasionally while I was watching YouTube in Safari. My M2 AVP was still warm after the update. Is turning off a website environment expected behavior when the headset gets warm (e.g., perhaps to reduce load)? If not, anyone have an idea this might happen?
1
0
243
6d
macOS App: In-App Purchases section missing from version page - IAPs stuck for 3+ days, 4 app versions approved but IAPs never reviewed
Hello everyone, I'm experiencing a critical issue with App Store Connect for our macOS application and I'm hoping someone from Apple or the community can help. THE PROBLEM: The In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section is completely missing from the version page in App Store Connect. According to Apple's documentation, this section should appear between Build and App Review Information on the version page, allowing developers to select and attach IAP products before submitting for review. In our case, this section simply does not exist. WHAT WE'VE TRIED: Submitted 4 separate app versions , ALL approved by App Review Each time, the IAP products were NOT included because the section to attach them is missing Opened a support case on March 23 - no response after 2 business days Opened a second case through the App Setup channel Requested expedited review multiple times Added notes in the App Review Notes field explaining the issue OUR SETUP: We have three IAP products configured (two auto-renewable sub
4
0
99
6d
Unable to Download Apps via TestFlight - "The requested app is not available or doesn't exist" Error
Hi everyone I recently build an app and deployed it through app store connect and testet it on TestFlight. Everything worked fine up until build 1.0.3. Since then I have not been able to install the app on my phone through TestFlight - even though build and submission runs through successfully on eas, expo and app store. I have tried deleting and reinstalling the TestFlight from my phone. removing and adding back myself as tester. checking logs and commits from the shift from build 1.0.3 to build 1.0.4. I can see I changed name and slug, so I tried removing the app from app store connect and added a new one with new build and submission. Ran through successfully but still could not install the app through TestFlight on my iPhone. I have also tried reaching out to Apple Developer Support, but I have not heard from them. Has anyone tried something similar?
Replies
7
Boosts
0
Views
510
Activity
5d
90919: Invalid entitlement error in ASC
I have an existing app in App Store Connect. I added the SharedWithYou functionality to the app code and tested it on several devices. Everything is working as expected. One of the first steps was to add the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement to the Entitlements.plist file. This required a round of updates for app identifiers and provisioning profiles. When I upload the production build for testing in TestFlight I receive the following error: 90919: Invalid entitlement. The “” bundle has the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement, but it doesn’t use the Shared with You framework. Please remove the entitlement and upload a new build. I'm using SWHighlight, SWHighlightCenter, and SWAttributionView in several places throughout my app... I filed an issue in the Feedback Assistant but so far, have not received any response.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
352
Activity
6d
sysextd: "no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications" - NEFilterDataProvider system extension on macOS 26
I'm developing a macOS security tool using NEFilterDataProvider as a system extension. On macOS 26 beta (25E241), sysextd consistently rejects my extension with: sysextd: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications Configuration: App installed in /Applications/ Signed with Developer ID Application (693DSH8GN5) Entitlement: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = content-filter-provider com.apple.developer.system-extension.install = true Developer Mode enabled on test machine Comparison with Little Snitch: Little Snitch runs correctly on the same machine. Key differences I found: Little Snitch uses content-filter-provider-systemextension instead of content-filter-provider Little Snitch has com.apple.security.app-sandbox = false Both signed with Developer ID Application When I switch to content-filter-provider-systemextension, Xcode rejects every provisioning profile because none match that entitlement value, and the Developer Portal doesn't expose fine-grained control over the Network Extensio
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
55
Activity
6d
Reply to sysextd: "no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications" - NEFilterDataProvider system extension on macOS 26
It sounds like you’re using Developer ID signing for day-to-day development. That’s a mistake on multiple levels. I talk about this in general in The Care and Feeding of Developer ID, but there are extra issues with system extensions, where system policy requires that Developer ID signed sysexen be notarised. So my advice in this case. Use Apple Development code signing for day-to-day development. Use Developer ID for pre-release testing and distribution. There are a couple of key benefits with this approach: It lets you build and debug without enabling development mode, which is a big win IMO. Xcode’s automatic code signing works well with Apple Development signing. Even if you’re not using Xcode, you can create a small test project in Xcode, get it working, and then follow the same path it took. See Debugging a Network Extension Provider for specific advice on how to bring up a provider in Xcode. One thing that Xcode doesn’t handle is the -systemextension suffix )-: To learn more about that, read E
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
6d
iPhone 17 Pro on iOS 26.3 stays unavailable in xcrun devicectl list devices even with Xcode 26.4 beta 2
I am unable to use my iPhone 17 Pro as a run destination in Xcode. The device appears at a low level, but CoreDevice / devicectl keeps reporting it as unavailable. Environment • Mac mini (Apple Silicon) • macOS 26.3 (Build 25D125) • iPhone 17 Pro • iOS 26.3 • Xcode 26.3 (Build 17C529) • Xcode 26.4 beta 2 (Build 17E5170d) Symptoms • The iPhone appears in Finder • On the iPhone, I tapped “Trust This Computer” • Developer Mode is enabled • Apple ID is added in Xcode Accounts • Team is configured in Signing & Capabilities • iOS Platform Support is installed • The device still does not become available as a run destination • Devices and Simulators does not show it in a usable state • xcrun devicectl list devices still shows unavailable Output of xcrun devicectl list devices Failed to load provisioning paramter list due to error: Error Domain=com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError Code=1002 No provider was found. UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=No provider was found.}. devicectl manage create
Replies
13
Boosts
0
Views
461
Activity
6d
Reply to iPhone 17 Pro on iOS 26.3 stays unavailable in xcrun devicectl list devices even with Xcode 26.4 beta 2
Have you solved it ? I am facing same issue with IPhone 14 (26.04) and Xcode (26.4). CoreDevice / devicectl layer the device remains unavailable, and Xcode cannot use it for on-device build/run.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
6d
“In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page not showing
I’m trying to submit my app for review, but I’m currently blocked due to a recurring issue with in-app subscriptions. Both of my auto-renewable subscriptions (premium_monthly and premium_yearly) are marked as “Waiting for Review”. However, I am still seeing the blue box stating that “your first subscription must be submitted with a new app version.” Despite creating a new version (1.0.1) and uploading/selecting a new build , I am not seeing the “In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page, and I therefore cannot link the subscriptions before submitting. This issue is blocking my ability to submit the app for review. Any help to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
171
Activity
6d
Reply to CKQuerySubscription on public database never triggers APNS push in Production environment
Hi Ziqiao, thanks for looking into this! I've verified using CKFetchSubscriptionsOperation.fetchAllSubscriptionsOperation() on both Development and Production (TestFlight) devices. All 5 subscriptions are present and correctly configured in both environments. The output is identical between both environments. Here are all 5 subscriptions as returned by CKFetchSubscriptionsOperation: fr-sub-v3 (FriendRequest) Predicate: receiverID == [userID] AND status == pending badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locKey=FRIEND_REQUEST_BODY, locArgs=[senderUsername] category=FRIEND_REQUEST, desiredKeys=[senderID, senderUsername] rec-sub-v3 (MediaRecommendation) Predicate: receiverID == [userID] AND status == pending badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locKey=RECOMMENDATION_BODY, locArgs=[senderUsername, mediaTitle] category=RECOMMENDATION, desiredKeys=[mediaTitle, mediaType, senderID, senderUsername] fs-a-sub-v3 (Friendship) Predicate: userAID == [userID] badge=true, sound=default, contentAvail=false locK
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
6d
App Clips not working
Issue: after going through configuration steps for app clips, when I scan my QR code, my app clip does not appear, instead safari attempts to open the url as a web page. note: my aasa endpoint is never even getting called when scanning the QR code. Setup: App uninstalled in accordance with Apple Documentation Users don’t install App Clips, and App Clips don’t appear on the Home Screen. Similarly, testers don’t install the beta version of your App Clip testflight installed in accordance with Apple Documentation My app's Build 1.51.9 (1) uploaded and greenlit in testflight. My apple email is added as an internal tester is the same as my Apple ID for the device used. I have provided an aasa for the path: .well-known/apple-app-site-association. Here is my full url: https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/.well-known/apple-app-site-association. { appclips: { apps: [ 8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1.Clip ] }, applinks: { details: [ { components: [ { /: /appClips/referral/venueToUser } ], appIDs
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
169
Activity
6d
3.2(f) triggered — account pending termination despite repeated attempts to comply
Hi all, Looking for some clarity.. I have an app (Pocket Love: AI Roleplay Chat, Apple ID: 6745031268) that went through a long review process with many resubmissions. The feedback I received across those reviews was often generic “overtly sexual”) message, but without any detail on exactly what needed to change. Because of that, I approached it iteratively making adjustments each time based on what I thought the issue might be. Over time I made quite significant changes across the app (imagery, unlockable content, voice-overs, menus, copy, etc.), and increased the age rating to 18+. I also had a call with a policy eexpert & App Review. In the final interaction, I was asked to ensure all unlockable content was visible, so I re-uploaded a build and provided screenshots with everything pre-unlocked for transparency. Despite this, my account has now been flagged under 3.2(f) for “dishonest or fraudulent activity,” and is pending termination. What I’m struggling to understand is: Can repeated resubmi
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
149
Activity
6d
Reply to Why don't my os_log entries show up until the second time my driver loads?
Why is this and To be perfectly honest, I have no idea. There's a thread about logging in DriverKit logging here that might be worth reviewing, but that's primarily about issues with IOLog redaction, which is different than you're describing. I can't think of any reason why we'd redact the first run but not later runs. I suspect there is some kind of bug involved, but I'm going to run this by Quinn to see what he thinks. Bonus Thought: How are you signing your DEXT? Are you using automatic signing with the Development Only profiles (modern/good) or disabling SIP (old/bad)? This a blind guess, but it's possible the old (SIP disabled) approach might cause something weird like this, depending on exactly how the build was signed. See this post for more information on how to sign DEXT. However, I do have two ideas for this: more importantly, how can I fix it? The post above mentions this in passing, but Quinn's Recording Private Data in the System Log post describes how you can manually control how redact
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Drivers Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
6d
Reply to 3.2(f) triggered — account pending termination despite repeated attempts to comply
Thanks for the response, for context it was around 15 submissions over a few months and 30ish messages. I get your example, but I think my situation’s a bit different. The updates weren’t just micro changes trying to slip something through, there was a mix of both small tweaks and broader changes. The issue was the feedback stayed very generic (“overtly sexual”) without pointing to specific elements, so each update was essentially a best guess at what might be triggering it. Especially early on, when only metadata was flagged, I assumed the issue was relatively minor. By the end, I actually went in the opposite direction of evasion & submitted a build with everything unlocked and included screenshots showing all content upfront, so review had full visibility, as requested during a phone call. It’s possible I missed a couple of screenshots in earlier messages, but nothing was intentional. That’s why the 3.2(f) decision caught me off guard, there was no intent to hide or mislead, just trying to int
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
6d
ENTITY_UNPROCESSABLE.BETA_CONTRACT_MISSING – External TestFlight unavailable, internal builds not downloadable
Hi, I’m running into a persistent issue in App Store Connect related to TestFlight and app reviews, and I’m hoping someone has seen this before. Around two weeks ago, I started getting the following error when trying to create external TestFlight builds: ENTITY_UNPROCESSABLE.BETA_CONTRACT_MISSING Since then: I cannot create any external TestFlight tests Internal TestFlight builds appear, but cannot be downloaded (“The requested app is not available or doesn’t exist”) My apps do not progress properly through review One app got stuck in “In Review” for ~10 days; I eventually withdrew it and resubmitted it At this point, I cannot update two existing apps, and I can’t start testing a new app at all Important details: This is an individual developer account I am the Account Holder All contracts appear active and valid The issue affects multiple apps, not just one Nothing changed on my side (no contract updates, no account changes) before this started happening. I’ve already reached out to Apple D
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
115
Activity
6d
Website environment disappears suddenly
After I updated to visionOS 26.4, I noticed my website environment would suddenly turn off occasionally while I was watching YouTube in Safari. My M2 AVP was still warm after the update. Is turning off a website environment expected behavior when the headset gets warm (e.g., perhaps to reduce load)? If not, anyone have an idea this might happen?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
243
Activity
6d
macOS App: In-App Purchases section missing from version page - IAPs stuck for 3+ days, 4 app versions approved but IAPs never reviewed
Hello everyone, I'm experiencing a critical issue with App Store Connect for our macOS application and I'm hoping someone from Apple or the community can help. THE PROBLEM: The In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section is completely missing from the version page in App Store Connect. According to Apple's documentation, this section should appear between Build and App Review Information on the version page, allowing developers to select and attach IAP products before submitting for review. In our case, this section simply does not exist. WHAT WE'VE TRIED: Submitted 4 separate app versions , ALL approved by App Review Each time, the IAP products were NOT included because the section to attach them is missing Opened a support case on March 23 - no response after 2 business days Opened a second case through the App Setup channel Requested expedited review multiple times Added notes in the App Review Notes field explaining the issue OUR SETUP: We have three IAP products configured (two auto-renewable sub
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
99
Activity
6d