I had VirtualBox installed when I installed OSX 10.11. It worked but had a few issues. So I decided to reinstall it then got this message…This package is Incompatible with this version of OS X and may fail to install.Which it does.
Search results for
missing package product
50,342 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
OK, I think I am still a bit confused about this. It sounds like you are saying that there is no way for the phone and watch to share a keychain with accessGroup. This would seem to imply that the user would have to log into each the watch and the phone separately for the same app, that seems wrong. However, I don't see any other way to securely do this if the keychain can't be shared. Am I missing something? Sorry for the confusion....
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
This is likely due to the package attempting to install CLI tools into /usr/bin - which is off-limits in 10.11 when SIP is enabled. Oracle will have to modify the installer to install the CLI tools into /usr/local/bin instead. You'll need to disable SIP for now.Alternatively you could:Extract the three individual PKGs from the main VBox installer and only install the resulting VirtualBox.pkg and VBoxKexts.pkg and then manually create the CLI snippets in /usr/local/bin - they're single-line bash scripts that call the actual binaries located inside the /Applications/Virtual Box.app bundle:pkgutil --expand VirtualBox.pkg ~/Documents/VirtualBox cd ~/Documents/VirtualBox sudo installer -pkg VirtualBox.pkg -target / sudo installer -pkg VBoxKexts.pkg -target / echo '#!/bin/bashnexec /Applications/VirtualBox.app/Contents/MacOS/VBoxAutostart $@' > /usr/local/bin/VBoxAutostart echo '#!/bin/bashnexec /Applications/VirtualBox.app/Contents/MacOS/VBoxBalloonCtrl $@' > /usr/local/bi
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Core OS
Tags:
Hi Folks,We're updating our packages and I'm trying to sign the meta packages using productsign at the command line (under Yosemite / Xcode 6.3.2). When I enter the productsign command, it always results in 'Could not find appropriate signing identity'. However, the signing identity is correct and as listed in my keychain and in Xcode. It's valid through 2020.The command I'm using is:productsign --sign Developer ID Installer: TOLIS Group, Inc. ./BRU PE.mpkg ./BRU PE.mpkg.signedI've also tried it with the certificate serial number in the ID with the same results.Any ideas about tracking this down?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
Signing Certificates
Provisioning Profiles
I tried this and it doesn't work , output: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x7f9773609ee0It seems compare not the array's contents but an address...@interface ListOfProductsTableViewController ()@property NSMutableArray *products;@end@implementation ListOfProductsTableViewController// When user taps A-z button sort list of products ascending- (IBAction)Ordena:(UIBarButtonItem *)sender { [self.produtos sortUsingSelector:@selector(caseInsensitiveCompare:)]; [self.tableView reloadData];
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode
Tags:
I tried to install Version 4.9.01.0280 and got this message in the logs:6/19/15 3:23:08.774 PM Installer[1926]: Package /Volumes/CiscoVPNClient/Cisco VPN Client.mpkg uses a deprecated pre-10.2 format (or uses a newer format but is invalid).
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Core OS
Tags:
I develop in augmented reality application that needs to disable the automatic rotation animation done by the system. However, after enabling support for iOS 9 split screen multitasking (UIRequiresFullScreen is false in Info.plist), the rotation animation happens no matter what I do. In the past, I was able to return NO from the shouldAutorotate method of my view controller.At this point, I have to choose: disable multitasking support, or provide a compromised experience. Is this a beta 1 bug or intended behavior? Or am I just missing some workaround?Chris
If you can have the framework project present in the same workspace as your application, you can try this:Use a shared build folder for your workspace and/or individual projects (File > Workspace/Project Settings > Advanced > Build Location)Build your frameworks targeting 'iOS Device so that when the frameworks are added the references are valid (if you select a simulator for this step, this won't work, ...who knows why this is necessary)Add the framework(s) to the project that is going to use them (probably under linked frameworks and libraries), and once they show up on the project navigator, select each one and make sure that Location (under file inspector, on your right side pane) is set to Relative to Build Products. This will make your project looks for them using the BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR environment variable, so no relative or absolute paths will be embedded in your project file (no Debug/Release-iphoneos/iphonesimulator references)With this, next time you compile your project, Xcode sh
Topic:
UI Frameworks
SubTopic:
AppKit
Tags:
Hi, If you loose your iphone or the police or 3rd partys have your device, They can turn on airplane mode with out requesting a password ! meaning if you lost your phone, they can scroll up turn on airplane mode and still leave the device on why you are unable to track your phone or delete your data, What just defeats the whole object of find your iphone or delete your data.
You get many review by beeing great or by sucking. Ok by annoying the users you will probably get 1 stars, too. If you need feedback better provide a feedback form in your app people can use when they miss something.
Topic:
Programming Languages
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
The introductory playground at the start of the Swift book is a very good idea.I work as a maths tutor, which boils down to how to teach a brain new skills. Essential is 2-way. You present something. Straightaway you ask a question. This stimulates recall in the student's brain. Similarly giving an exercise stimulates recall.This is training.The traditional lecturing style of teaching is ineffective. Too much information entering, no reinforcement. It's lacking 2-way.Playgrounds provide much of this already. You can present material and give an exercise.In fact, you could define in a separate file:func f() { for i in 1...3 { print( i ) } }And then in your main playground, say:f() 1 2 3 Try implementing f yourselfAnd the student can use CMD+CLICK either to check/inspect your solution, or if they get stuck.That's good, it practices recall.But what is currently lacking is the ability to unfold a section:Challenge: print the numbers from one to 10 <foldout> Solution: for i in 1...10 { println(i) } </fold
The cloud toolbar item, the one that allows you to open on the Mac pages that are open on your devices, seems to have gone missing. Surely Apple moved this function elsewhere and I can't find it, rather than decided to remove the useful feature?
Swift wants to be the next safe (!) language. In order to make it a safe language you sometimes have to remove assumptions and add clarity to code. I can think of a number of reasons why this notation is used: - easier interopability with Obj-C - if you have a method with one argument it is usually easy to determine what the argument means, if you have multiple, it becomes a lot harder. Chris Lattner mentioned in one of the WWDC talks the horror of unprefixed booleans e.g. remove(tag, true, true) - Swift allows function overloading both on argument types and return types. The arguments prefixes can add a little extra clarity to which function you intended to call (e.g. beforeLayer vs afterLayer mentioned above) With every new language you'll learn there will be a few things you like and a couple of things you miss from other languages. Especially in Ruby you can write a lot of code a lot shorter than in Swift, but it doesn't necessarily make it better code. I kinda like Swift's attitude towards a sin
Topic:
Programming Languages
SubTopic:
Swift
Tags:
Core Data has this nasty habit of object inaccessible exceptions if a relationship is missing. This is an area that iOS 9 and OS X 10.11 are going to fix (yay!), but for the reality of today what are the ways most of you guys handle this issue? In ObjC we just use a @try/catch which works well for this situation (we call it on specific relationship calls). Since no such thing exists in Swift…do you just make it an ObjC call?
I am using IAPS but every time i click on one it only comes up with add 3 rather than the correct amount. i am using swift 2 here is my code://///// import UIKitimport iAdimport StoreKitclass ViewController4: UIViewController, ADBannerViewDelegate, SKProductsRequestDelegate, SKPaymentTransactionObserver { @IBOutlet var s3: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s6: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s13: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s22: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s30: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s45: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s60: UIButton! @IBOutlet var s100: UIButton! @IBOutlet var rf: UIButton! @IBOutlet var ise: UIButton! @IBOutlet var info: UIButton! @IBOutlet var home: UIButton! @IBOutlet var banner: ADBannerView! @IBOutlet var restore: UIButton! override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() s3.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s6.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s13.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s22.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s30.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s45.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s60.layer.cornerRadius = 10 s100.layer.cornerRadius = 10 rf.layer.cornerRadius = 10