4.3

I am building my 2nd React-Native app which is a very simple Notes app. The functionalities are to be able to add, edit & delete notes. And, on the home page where the user can change the orientation of the notes to be in 2 column like a grid or just a list. My app has been getting rejected for Minimal design guideline & I don't know what to do to make it more complex. My first iOS React-Native app was just a single-page Weather app, again that was pretty simple. So, my question is what do I do? OR is the trick that I just keep doing little changes and try to submit & see which one gets accepted??

Hi guys, The ultimate carnage 2 is the sequel to the ultimate carnage on the app store. Witch is my own games. The game is totally different, it adds many new game modes, graphics and performance improvements. So I don't understand why it was rejected under 4.3 Design spam guidelines. How can I get my game to be accepted ? Thank you!

The FxRemoteWindow API in Fxplug 4.3 does not provide window.frame.origin. How to set a window that can be positioned and sized higher than the motion?

Hey everyone, I'm in a bit of a frustrating situation and could really use some advice from anyone who's been through something similar. So here's what happened: I built a VPN app and submitted it from my personal developer account a few months ago. It got rejected because apparently VPN apps need to be submitted under an organization account, not individual. I went ahead and created a new organization developer account, deleted the app from my personal account, and resubmitted the exact same app. Same code, same assets, everything identical - just from the new organization account. Now I keep getting 4.3(a) spam rejections. I'm pretty sure it's because Apple's system is flagging this as the same app from different accounts even though I legitimately needed to switch account types. I've tried explaining this in my appeal responses but they just keep sending back the same 4.3(a) rejection template. I'm starting to think the reviewers aren't even reading my explanations. Has anyone dealt with

Hi, We have an app live on the App Store since August 2020. We have made some 50+ updates on the app with minor & major changes throughout these 3+ years. A few months ago we submitted an update as usual with some minor changes and a new feature but got 'Design Spam, 4.3' rejection saying: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. 1st question, how does an app that has been doing the same things for 3+ years suddenly gets 'Design Spam' ???? Then we sent a message to App Review with some screenshots of our app's update history taken from App Store Connect console and a message stating the same question as above. We got a reply: Hello, Thank you for your reply. During our review, we found that this app duplicates the content and functionality and icon of other apps submitted to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam and is not appropriate for the App Store. Now they mentioned

Current:iPhone 6 Plus and iPad Air 2 here + iOS 9.3.2 + clean install versionYou go in other room, in this case 10m + 2 walls + 2 doors.Then activate iOS wifi personal hotspot in this room. Bluetooth is off. Only mobile data and wifi personal hotspot is on.In other room searching this wifi hotspot not working. Signal not available!!With my old iOS devices same issue iPhone 3gs,4,4s,5. Reset? Not fixed!!Hardware issue? No. The iOS devices in Apple-Store same issue. I said this issue in year 2011. And now? year 2016 with iOS 9.3.2. not fixed!!Android devices wifi personal hotspot Samsung Galaxy S3 (Android 4.0),S5(Android 5),S6(Android 6), Huawei Mate 7(Android 5), Sony Xperia Z(Android 4), Google Nexus 5 (Android N preview), iMac 2011 (OS X 10.11.5 wifi ad-hoc). No issue.If searching this wifi hotspots signal good-very good. Signal available!!Not forget Samsung devices have Broadcom wifi-chip as the iPhone or iPad.I wait since iOS 4.3 on the bug fixes.Second issue:iOS wifi personal hotspot not support

Hello and sorry if this is posted in the wrong forum.I am in the process of creating a Whitelabel application which acts as a frontend to a forum. The forum is a web forum that many users can have separate installations of. The iOS app in question would therefore be almost exactly the same app, but branded to the specific forum, and connects to that forum only.Now in order to be able to publish these apps, and if the idea picks up and there are many users willing to get the app, would this break the AppStore Review Guideline 4.3? https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#spamI would like to know that before going through the project and wasting developer time and money if this an unacceptable business model on the AppStore.Thanks for any insights.

I have been searching for newly released apps and came across following account:https://itunes.apple.com/us/developer/free-las-vegas-casino-card-games/id1038615411?mt=8Appannie link:https://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/publisher/1038615411/Every 3 days a new apps is being published.While the app title limit is 30 charcters but his newest releases have 50 characters in app names in English which is very surprising as the web page on itunesconnect never allows to save if app title > 30 charsTotal 128 apps live till nowAll apps are same. Not even similar but same.All apps have same descriptionUnrelated words in app title and some questionable keywords too like casino, HuuugeSame screenshots with just minor modificationsSame app size.15th April app released: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id11748533741st May app releases: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1174853378Both above apps have size of 35.8MB and same screenshots and description of app. Only minor difference in the app icon. Like these, there are so many pairs

For testing business chat, i need login business chat sanbox, but always faild and give me message like below:-----------------------------Device is not supportedBusiness Chat requires the following OS version:iOS - 11.3 and highermacOS - 10.13.4 and higherwatchOS - 4.3 and higher--------------------------------but mine testing env highest version is:iOS - 11.2.6macOS - 10.13.3please help.BTW:iCloud, iMessage, Business Chat Sandbox use one account like apple required.

Good afternoon, I will tell you my case, 2 years ago I uploaded applications to the store without any problem, I even uploaded my first application that was an application to download wallpapers, after that I was developing games, of which I went up to the store without problems, now I have been developing applications by hobby, but in all the cases that I have tried to publish them I find myself with the same copy / paste of 4.3 - Design spam, which always leaves me in them, I don't know what to add or remove for that my application is not considered spam, sometimes it seems that they do not even review it, there are occasions that the review does not last 5 minutes. What would you recommend me to do? Thanks

I'm in the process of updating an app that uses complications that originally had a deployment target of watchOS 4.3. These complications used CLKComplicationSupportedFamilies defined in Info.plist. There are no CLKComplicationDescriptors in use. Updated complications that use a new CLKComplicationDescriptor.identifier display correctly in the complication picker, but the original complication that's using CLKDefaultComplicationIdentifier displays -- or --- depending on placement. This happens whether you are using a ComplicationController instance or WidgetKit. Using CLKDefaultComplicationIdentifier as the identifier when creating the CLKComplicationDescriptor doesn't work: the complication doesn't appear in the picker. My question is there a way to upgrade an older complication configured by the customer to a new complication identifier? I'm not using WidgetKit for this project so a widgetMigrator isn't an option. -ch

Hello, Thank you for your efforts to follow our guidelines. There are still some issues that need your attention. If you have any questions, we are here to help. Reply to this message in App Store Connect and let us know. Review Environment Submission ID: 10286862-58d0-4abf-a767-24b885a8a25c Review date: June 17, 2024 Version reviewed: 1.0.0 Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. Next Steps Since we do not accept spam apps on the App Store, we encourage you to review your app concept and submit a unique app with distinct content and functionality. Resources Some factors that contribute to a spam rejection may include: Submitting an app with the same source code or assets as other apps already submitted to the App Store Creat

Greetings, We have been rejected in the review of our App for a code non-compliance with 4.3 Design guidelines. Our App appears to be similar to others, and indeed it is similar in functionality and appearance. The others that are similar have been developed by us as well, these being customisations that are specifically targeted at the companies or accounts we deal with. The truth is that we have gone through several reviews of the other Apps before when we submitted them for publication at the time. We know that there are other development companies that customise Apps for different brands and in these cases there has been no reason for rejection by the Apple Store. We are beginning to think that there may be certain factors that are directly influencing the rejection of this App: The mockups or screenshots we are using are similar to those of another App we have published with the same functionalities. The backgrounds of the App have a gem of colours similar to that of the other App. And now we wo

We have published an app to show biblical information from a book God's Word written in the stars for all constellations and sub-constellations. This is not a star gazing app and we are not duplicating any content whatsoever. We are building the sky image, the constellation images by ourselves and the content is from the above mentioned book. We have published the app 2-3 times but every time we get rejected owing to following design guidelines: Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps on the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Guideline 5.2.1 - Legal - Intellectual Property Any help on this is much much appreciated.

Hello, I'm almost mad with the AppStore review. Our application was first published on AppStore(iOS) last month, version 2.2.5 is our first online version. After we noticed some bugs and fixed them, we submitted new version to AppStore, tried to fix the bugs of our application. But the reviewer always give us rejection, the reason is 4.3 - Design, said our application is spam. I can't understand, because our new version is the same with the online version 2.2.5. We just fixed some bugs. The rejection keeps 3 times, can you tell me what I can do to against this unreasonable condition? And another thing is the MacOS application. The reviewer said our application requires user to right-click the menu bar to quit our application. So we made change and made users can quit the application by clicking the red button on the application window like all other applications. We also uploaded a picture and noted this change in the submission. But the reviewer rejected it again, gave us the same reason. I can feel