“Visual Studio Maui IOS”

Hi @CharlieN133 I am having the exact same problem. Things I have tried: Multiple company visa card Multiple personal visa card Ensuring billing address matches my visa cards Turn off VPN Try my personal IOS device My personal cards should work because I have paid for apple products with it. I do not think this is an isolated incident and that Apple should look into this immediately to prevent blocking developer enrolment.

It means apps don't need to actively track the current location of their files, but can instead determine its current location whenever the user actually asks for it. What should happen if you expand a directory with four subfolders in a NSBrowser (so four columns). And the third folder moves? If an app just follows the file reference URL the UI is broken. I mean if there are/were APIs that handled this in file reference world I'm with you! The concept of file location matters to users and to a lot of apps. I hope Apple doesn't want to put apps in single file jail. Here you get that one txt document and if it moves don't worry we got you. There are other types of apps that do other things. Please don't turn macOS into iOS :)

We do not use CallKit. The call is handled entirely using a custom in-app call UI. This is a bad idea. It's going to significantly complicate your app’s audio logic and, most practically, it means that ANY other incoming call from ANY CallKit app will IMMEDIATELY interrupt your app’s audio. It's also going to allow a variety of other odd edge cases which will be similarly disruptive (for example, now playing activity can interrupt your calls). The PRIMARY reason CallKit was originally created was so the system could properly arbitrate and manage the audio of VoIP apps, preventing all those edge cases. However, the exact rules and thresholds for these violations are not clearly documented, so I’d like to ask a few questions to better understand the expected behavior. The basic policy rule is that your app is not required to report a call if it either: Is already on a call. Is in the foreground. However, in practice, both of those criteria are much harder to implement than they seem. The problem here is that yo

I Have the same issue. MacOS 26.3.1, Xcode 26.2, iOS 26.3.1 iPhone 17 Pro Max and WatchOS 26.3 Apple Watch S10.

Thanks for all that extra info. So, it’s definitely correlated with iOS 26.3. Which is strange, because I can’t think of any iOS 26.3 aligned change to local network privacy that would affect this. You could file a bug about this issue, but I’m not sure it’d get traction. As you noted in your first post, this whole process is a bit of a kludge, and it’s hard to argue that we should fix this (in contrast to FB12846267, which we definitely should fix, but haven’t yet). But if you do file a bug, please post your bug number, just for the record. At this point I think it might be worth considering different approaches. I zenned on that a bit today and I wasn’t able to come up with anything I’m truly happy with. One approach that I like is to have your UI test use some sort of IPC mechanism to the app, have the app connect to the accessory under test, and then proxy the UI test’s requests to that accessory. Unfortunately I couldn’t think of a good way to do that. It is possible to set up an IPC ch

I am seeing this exact same thing with the iOS Simulator running iOS version 26.3.1.

Sure In the app i develop i have a list of items that can be downloaded when an item is downloaded it changes appearance so to show its downloaded. This is stored in core data, but i have a user that after core data should have been cleared (with code in first post) still have some of the previous item as downloaded with should not happen if all of core data have been destroyed/deleted. The users that have this problem is using a old iPad that is running iOS 16.7.13 and have around 3 GB of free space, not sure if this Hope this helps Best Thomas