Search results for

“ITMS-90338”

1,704 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Set CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName as "Companion" then get error "ITMS-90129: The bundle uses a bundle name or display name that is already taken." always but when I change app name to others such as "ECHO" then the build can be uploaded.
I have the problem after I upload build to App Store Connect. I always get error ITMS-90129: The bundle uses a bundle name or display name that is already taken.. when I set CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName to be Companion but if I set to others such as ECHO then it can be uploaded without error. I contact to support via email and case number is 102554754170 and Bobby from developer support suggested me. The problem was that the Product Name was different than the Display Name.” I replied email that I tried it as below. Target Name = Companion, Product Name = $(TARGET_NAME), CFBundleDisplayName = $(PRODUCT_NAME), CFBundleName = $(PRODUCT_NAME) Target Name = Companion, Product Name = Companion, CFBundleDisplayName = Companion, CFBundleName = Companion I still get error but if I change CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName to be other app name such as ECHO, Facebook then it can be uploaded successfully. I'm not sure if there is something with Companion on validation process. Then he suggest me to co
2
0
378
Mar ’25
Reply to Invalid binary rejected
App Store Connect Hello, We noticed one or more issues with a recent submission for App Store review for the following app: Name of my App Version 1.0.23 Build 1 Please correct the following issues and upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/FirebaseCore.framework/FirebaseCore”, which includes FirebaseCore, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. If a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. For more details about this policy, including a list of SDKs that are required to include signatures and manifests, visit: https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements. ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/Fireba
Mar ’25
"Invalid Binary" error
After submitting our binary for review, we are receiving the Invalid Binary error, which appears to be related to the absence of privacy manifests for our third-party SDKs. Here is the part of an Appstore Connect email response (it's a part of a long email, containing such errors for 18 SDKs): ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/AppAuth.framework/AppAuth”, which includes AppAuth, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. If a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. Our application is built using Xamarin, and there are currently no available updates for the libraries that include the required manifests. Instead, we have a single consolidated privacy manifest that contains data for all the SDKs used
1
0
385
Mar ’25
I am not using push notification service, i am only use local notification in my app how to solve this issue
ITMS-90078: Missing potentially required entitlement - Your app, or a library that’s included in your app, uses Apple Push Notification service (APNs) registration APIs, but the APS Environment Entitlement isn’t included in the app signature’s entitlements. If your app uses APNs, make sure the App ID is enabled for push notifications in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles, sign the app with a distribution provisioning profile that includes the APS Environment Entitlement, and upload a new build to ensure that push notifications function as intended. For details, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/registering-your-app-with-apns.
8
0
774
Mar ’25
Reply to AppStore submission for Ruby/Glimmer app on MacOS without Xcode
Thanks for detailed commands! That really helped. I found the matching profile, copied it over to embedded.provisionprofile, resigned the executable & bundle, and uploaded using Transporter. Received missing an application identifier error and fixed it from https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/748589?login=true and TestFlight, Provisioning Profiles, and the Mac App Store Uploaded & Validated w/ Transporter, but received an email about: ITMS-91109: Invalid package contents - The package contains one or more files with the com.apple.quarantine extended file attribute, such as “com.chipcastle.pathmanager.pkg/Payload/PATHmanager.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile”. This attribute isn’t permitted in macOS apps distributed on TestFlight or the App Store. Please remove the attribute from all files within your app and upload again. Attempted to remove extended attributes as follows (sudo had no effect): ~/Desktop/distribution/PATHmanager.app/Contents λ xattr embedded.provisionprofile com.app
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: General
Mar ’25
New iOS-style App Groups Prevent App Submission
We have a macOS app that has a Photos Extension, which shares documents with the app via an app group container. Historically we used to have an iOS-style group identifier (group.${TeamIdentifier}${groupName}), because we were lead by the web interface in the developer portal to believe this to be the right way to name groups. Later with the first macOS 15 betas last year there was a bug with the operating system warning users, our app would access data from different apps, but it was our own app group container directory. Therefore we added a macOS-style group identifier (${TeamIdentifier}${groupName}) and wrote a migration of documents to the new group container directory. So basically we need to have access to these two app group containers for the foreseeable future. Now with the introduction of iOS-style group identifiers for macOS, Xcode Cloud no longer archives our app for TestFlight or AppStore, because it complains: ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s si
1
0
385
Mar ’25
SDK version issue
Hi, our team received this message ITMS-90725: SDK version issue - This app was built with the iOS 17.0 SDK. Starting April 24, 2025, all iOS and iPadOS apps must be built with the iOS 18 SDK or later, included in Xcode 16 or later, in order to be uploaded to App Store Connect or submitted for distribution. We still have a requirement to support iOS 12.5.7 for our users. If I change to build SDK iOS18 using Xcode 16 or later, will my app submission be rejected during review process? (since I specified my minimum iOS version to be 12)
1
0
7k
Mar ’25
ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing.
Flutter iOS App. Previous version submitted passed. Only change the version and some text, submit has error: ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing. Rebuild your app using the current public (GM) version of Xcode and resubmit it. the release steps: flutter clean; flutter pub get; flutter build ios --release; xcode - clean build folder; archive; distribute app Searched online and tried many suggestions, none works.
2
0
347
Feb ’25
Reply to Invalid code signing entitlements with app group on macOS
I also have been blocked by a sudden failure to upload macOS archives to App Store Connect the past few days, but finally managed to fix it by forcing XCode 16.3 beta to regenerate the provisioning profile(s) of the offending app extensions that uses the App Groups capability. I deliberately include all the steps I took to provide as much detail as possible for anyone else facing the same issue. The exact error I got is as follows (redacted for privacy reasons): ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s signature contains code signing entitlements that aren’t supported on macOS. Specifically, the “[group.com.xxx]” value for the com.apple.security.application-groups key in “com.xxx.appname.pkg/Payload/appname.app/Contents/PlugIns/AppNameExtension.appex/Contents/MacOS/AppNameExtension” isn’t supported. This value should be a string or an array of strings, where each string is the “group” value or your Team ID, followed by a dot (“.”), followed by the group name. If you'r
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
Feb ’25
ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing. Rebuild your app using the current public (GM) version of Xcode and resubmit it.
I'm trying to use Transporter to upload my .ipa file to the Apple Store and make it available on TestFlight. I'm generating the .ipa with the command eas build -p ios --profile production. However, I'm receiving the ITMS-90426 error in my email. I've seen many suggested solutions for this issue, but most of them involve using Xcode. The problem is, I don't use Xcode. I only use Transporter on my Mac to upload the app, and I develop on a Windows environment. Could you please guide me on how to generate the required files using Expo/EAS to avoid this issue?
1
0
593
Feb ’25
Reply to ShazamKit supported for iOS apps that can run on Mac silicon?
I’m having the same problem, only with another Lib: This is what the E-Mail from Apple sais about my App: Although delivery was successful, you may want to correct the following issues in your next delivery. Once you've corrected the issues, upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-90863: Macs with Apple silicon support issue - The app links with libraries that aren’t present in macOS: /usr/lib/swift/libswiftWebKit.dylib And I notice that the App can’t be installed on my Mac via Testflight. The latest AppStore version of the App can be installed on the Mac (from with the AppStore). I’m not sure when exactly the issue has started, but there are other threads in the Apple developer forum where developers have the very same problem: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/766061 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/756325 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/771068
Topic: Media Technologies SubTopic: Audio Tags:
Feb ’25
Reply to Provisioning profile failed qualification. Profile doesn't support App Groups.
even with the already uploaded binary, cannot get it to be reviewed... The status of your app has changed to Invalid Binary. Please correct the following issues and upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s signature contains code signing entitlements that aren’t supported on macOS. Specifically, the “[group.com.
Feb ’25
Set CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName as "Companion" then get error "ITMS-90129: The bundle uses a bundle name or display name that is already taken." always but when I change app name to others such as "ECHO" then the build can be uploaded.
I have the problem after I upload build to App Store Connect. I always get error ITMS-90129: The bundle uses a bundle name or display name that is already taken.. when I set CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName to be Companion but if I set to others such as ECHO then it can be uploaded without error. I contact to support via email and case number is 102554754170 and Bobby from developer support suggested me. The problem was that the Product Name was different than the Display Name.” I replied email that I tried it as below. Target Name = Companion, Product Name = $(TARGET_NAME), CFBundleDisplayName = $(PRODUCT_NAME), CFBundleName = $(PRODUCT_NAME) Target Name = Companion, Product Name = Companion, CFBundleDisplayName = Companion, CFBundleName = Companion I still get error but if I change CFBundleDisplayName and CFBundleName to be other app name such as ECHO, Facebook then it can be uploaded successfully. I'm not sure if there is something with Companion on validation process. Then he suggest me to co
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
378
Activity
Mar ’25
Reply to Invalid binary rejected
App Store Connect Hello, We noticed one or more issues with a recent submission for App Store review for the following app: Name of my App Version 1.0.23 Build 1 Please correct the following issues and upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/FirebaseCore.framework/FirebaseCore”, which includes FirebaseCore, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. If a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. For more details about this policy, including a list of SDKs that are required to include signatures and manifests, visit: https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements. ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/Fireba
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Mar ’25
ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest
Hello guys i have a problem. I have one template package. and I publish many applications using this package. i change only names and colors. my other other project working fine , there is no problem. But I get this error on new one of them. My PrivacyInfo like this and my copy bundle resources like this i cant handle this problem . please help
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
273
Activity
Mar ’25
"Invalid Binary" error
After submitting our binary for review, we are receiving the Invalid Binary error, which appears to be related to the absence of privacy manifests for our third-party SDKs. Here is the part of an Appstore Connect email response (it's a part of a long email, containing such errors for 18 SDKs): ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Frameworks/AppAuth.framework/AppAuth”, which includes AppAuth, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. If a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. Our application is built using Xamarin, and there are currently no available updates for the libraries that include the required manifests. Instead, we have a single consolidated privacy manifest that contains data for all the SDKs used
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
385
Activity
Mar ’25
I am not using push notification service, i am only use local notification in my app how to solve this issue
ITMS-90078: Missing potentially required entitlement - Your app, or a library that’s included in your app, uses Apple Push Notification service (APNs) registration APIs, but the APS Environment Entitlement isn’t included in the app signature’s entitlements. If your app uses APNs, make sure the App ID is enabled for push notifications in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles, sign the app with a distribution provisioning profile that includes the APS Environment Entitlement, and upload a new build to ensure that push notifications function as intended. For details, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/registering-your-app-with-apns.
Replies
8
Boosts
0
Views
774
Activity
Mar ’25
Reply to AppStore submission for Ruby/Glimmer app on MacOS without Xcode
Thanks for detailed commands! That really helped. I found the matching profile, copied it over to embedded.provisionprofile, resigned the executable & bundle, and uploaded using Transporter. Received missing an application identifier error and fixed it from https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/748589?login=true and TestFlight, Provisioning Profiles, and the Mac App Store Uploaded & Validated w/ Transporter, but received an email about: ITMS-91109: Invalid package contents - The package contains one or more files with the com.apple.quarantine extended file attribute, such as “com.chipcastle.pathmanager.pkg/Payload/PATHmanager.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile”. This attribute isn’t permitted in macOS apps distributed on TestFlight or the App Store. Please remove the attribute from all files within your app and upload again. Attempted to remove extended attributes as follows (sudo had no effect): ~/Desktop/distribution/PATHmanager.app/Contents λ xattr embedded.provisionprofile com.app
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: General
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Mar ’25
New iOS-style App Groups Prevent App Submission
We have a macOS app that has a Photos Extension, which shares documents with the app via an app group container. Historically we used to have an iOS-style group identifier (group.${TeamIdentifier}${groupName}), because we were lead by the web interface in the developer portal to believe this to be the right way to name groups. Later with the first macOS 15 betas last year there was a bug with the operating system warning users, our app would access data from different apps, but it was our own app group container directory. Therefore we added a macOS-style group identifier (${TeamIdentifier}${groupName}) and wrote a migration of documents to the new group container directory. So basically we need to have access to these two app group containers for the foreseeable future. Now with the introduction of iOS-style group identifiers for macOS, Xcode Cloud no longer archives our app for TestFlight or AppStore, because it complains: ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s si
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
385
Activity
Mar ’25
SDK version issue
Hi, our team received this message ITMS-90725: SDK version issue - This app was built with the iOS 17.0 SDK. Starting April 24, 2025, all iOS and iPadOS apps must be built with the iOS 18 SDK or later, included in Xcode 16 or later, in order to be uploaded to App Store Connect or submitted for distribution. We still have a requirement to support iOS 12.5.7 for our users. If I change to build SDK iOS18 using Xcode 16 or later, will my app submission be rejected during review process? (since I specified my minimum iOS version to be 12)
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
7k
Activity
Mar ’25
ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing.
Flutter iOS App. Previous version submitted passed. Only change the version and some text, submit has error: ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing. Rebuild your app using the current public (GM) version of Xcode and resubmit it. the release steps: flutter clean; flutter pub get; flutter build ios --release; xcode - clean build folder; archive; distribute app Searched online and tried many suggestions, none works.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
347
Activity
Feb ’25
Reply to Invalid code signing entitlements with app group on macOS
I also have been blocked by a sudden failure to upload macOS archives to App Store Connect the past few days, but finally managed to fix it by forcing XCode 16.3 beta to regenerate the provisioning profile(s) of the offending app extensions that uses the App Groups capability. I deliberately include all the steps I took to provide as much detail as possible for anyone else facing the same issue. The exact error I got is as follows (redacted for privacy reasons): ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s signature contains code signing entitlements that aren’t supported on macOS. Specifically, the “[group.com.xxx]” value for the com.apple.security.application-groups key in “com.xxx.appname.pkg/Payload/appname.app/Contents/PlugIns/AppNameExtension.appex/Contents/MacOS/AppNameExtension” isn’t supported. This value should be a string or an array of strings, where each string is the “group” value or your Team ID, followed by a dot (“.”), followed by the group name. If you'r
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’25
Reply to Getting "Invalid binary" when trying to submit app to review
check your email, there is a new requirement ITMS-91061 for Privacy manifests . Your app probably has some 3-rd Party libraries that dont have it.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’25
Reply to ShazamKit supported for iOS apps that can run on Mac silicon?
@elementarteilchen, please see my previous response for how to take action to get your issue ITMS-90863 resolved. Don't forget to post the FB number here. — Ed Ford,  DTS Engineer
Topic: Media Technologies SubTopic: Audio Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’25
ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing. Rebuild your app using the current public (GM) version of Xcode and resubmit it.
I'm trying to use Transporter to upload my .ipa file to the Apple Store and make it available on TestFlight. I'm generating the .ipa with the command eas build -p ios --profile production. However, I'm receiving the ITMS-90426 error in my email. I've seen many suggested solutions for this issue, but most of them involve using Xcode. The problem is, I don't use Xcode. I only use Transporter on my Mac to upload the app, and I develop on a Windows environment. Could you please guide me on how to generate the required files using Expo/EAS to avoid this issue?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
593
Activity
Feb ’25
Reply to ShazamKit supported for iOS apps that can run on Mac silicon?
I’m having the same problem, only with another Lib: This is what the E-Mail from Apple sais about my App: Although delivery was successful, you may want to correct the following issues in your next delivery. Once you've corrected the issues, upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-90863: Macs with Apple silicon support issue - The app links with libraries that aren’t present in macOS: /usr/lib/swift/libswiftWebKit.dylib And I notice that the App can’t be installed on my Mac via Testflight. The latest AppStore version of the App can be installed on the Mac (from with the AppStore). I’m not sure when exactly the issue has started, but there are other threads in the Apple developer forum where developers have the very same problem: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/766061 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/756325 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/771068
Topic: Media Technologies SubTopic: Audio Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’25
Reply to Provisioning profile failed qualification. Profile doesn't support App Groups.
even with the already uploaded binary, cannot get it to be reviewed... The status of your app has changed to Invalid Binary. Please correct the following issues and upload a new binary to App Store Connect. ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s signature contains code signing entitlements that aren’t supported on macOS. Specifically, the “[group.com.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’25