I'm seeing what appears to be different UISceneAppIntent behavior between iOS and Designed for iPad on macOS, and I'd like to confirm whether this is expected. I'm working on an iOS app that defines an AppIntent conforming to UISceneAppIntent from the AppIntents framework. The intent is handled by a scene delegate conforming to both UIWindowSceneDelegate and AppIntentSceneDelegate. On iOS, everything works as expected: If the app is launched for the first time from Shortcuts, the intent is available via connectionOptions.appIntent in scene(_:willConnectTo:options:). If the app is already running, scene(_:willPerformAppIntent:) is called. However, when running the same iOS app on macOS in Designed for iPad mode, the behavior is different: If the app is launched from Shortcuts, connectionOptions.appIntent is always nil in scene(_:willConnectTo:options:). If the app is already running, scene(_:willPerformAppIntent:) is never called, even though the application is successfully activated. Is this expected behavior? I noticed that the AppIntents framework explicitly marks both AppIntentSceneDelegate and UISceneAppIntent as unavailable on macOS: @available(iOS 26.0, tvOS 26.0, *) @available(macOS, unavailable) @available(watchOS, unavailable) public protocol AppIntentSceneDelegate : UISceneDelegate Since the app is running on macOS in Designed for iPad mode and still uses the iOS binary, I wasn't sure whether these scene-based APIs are expected to work in this environment or whether they are intentionally unsupported. Has anyone from Apple or the community been able to confirm whether this behavior is by design, or whether it should be considered a bug? I'd appreciate any clarification.

Hello, In my app, I want to create a CSSearchableItem using the initialiser that accepts an appEntity so I can update the item expirationDate when indexing. This initialiser is marked as iOS 18.0+ but as soon as I launch my app, it crashes. I filed a feedback: FB23270394 Can you help? Thank you Axel dyld[62169]: Symbol not found: _$s10AppIntents13IndexedEntityPAAE15hideInSpotlightSbvg Referenced from: <150E43FA-D9F4-3DF3-88C1-86E3DA3B272B> /Users/axel/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/2C645A0F-45E5-429E-82EE-0C71D83407E3/data/Containers/Bundle/Application/18F00389-5CE8-49A2-883A-CDA38DDB03C4/Skipper.app/Skipper.debug.dylib Expected in: <F5744EDB-79CF-333C-A49A-8E9C5C3ACD10> /Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/System/Library/Frameworks/AppIntents.framework/AppIntents Symbol not found: _$s10AppIntents13IndexedEntityPAAE15hideInSpotlightSbvg Referenced from: <150E43FA-D9F4-3DF3-88C1-86E3DA3B272B> /Users/axel/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/2C645A0F-45E5-429E-82EE-0C71D83407E3/data/Containers/Bundle/Application/18F00389-5CE8-49A2-883A-CDA38DDB03C4/Skipper.app/Skipper.debug.dylib Expected in: <F5744EDB-79CF-333C-A49A-8E9C5C3ACD10> /Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/System/Library/Frameworks/AppIntents.framework/AppIntents dyld config: DYLD_ROOT_PATH=/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/Users/axel/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Skipper-gayhthkwqznqqkeoqazrmncvolcq/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/usr/lib/libLogRedirect.dylib:/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/usr/lib/libMainThreadChecker.dylib:/usr/lib/libRPAC.dylib:/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/usr/lib/libViewDebuggerSupport.dylib DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH=/Users/axel/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Skipper-gayhthkwqznqqkeoqazrmncvolcq/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator:/Users/axel/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Skipper-gayhthkwqznqqkeoqazrmncvolcq/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/PackageFrameworks DYLD_FALLBACK_FRAMEWORK_PATH=/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/System/Library/Frameworks DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Volumes/iOS_22A3351/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Profiles/Runtimes/iOS 18.0.simruntime/Contents/Resources/RuntimeRoot/usr/lib Debug session ended with code 9: killed

Hello, I have an AppEntity with an EntityQuery that conforms to EnumerableEntityQuery by providing an allEntities() method. This creates a default "Find" action in the Shortcuts app for that entity, including automatic filtering on primitive properties such as dates and numbers. The entity has an AppEnum property. However, the "Find" action returns zero results when filtering by that property – even though the enum value is correctly displayed when using the "View" action on the same entity. Conforming to EntityPropertyQuery and manually defining comparators does fix the enum filtering, but it replaces all of the system-generated filtering, requiring me to reimplement comparators for every property I want to remain filterable. Is this the intended behavior, or is automatic filtering on AppEnum properties something that should be supported out of the box? Sincerely, Holger

I found a UI/error-handling issue involving Siri AI where a raw/internal-looking error code is shown directly to the user instead of a user-friendly message. Environment: Device: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) iOS/iPadOS version: 27.0 Siri / Apple Intelligence enabled: Yes App involved: Files & PDF Expert UI/context: Siri AI interaction with a document from Files File type: .doc Observed behavior: I asked Siri AI to create a new note inside a document through the app integration. Instead of completing the request or showing a user-friendly failure message, iOS displayed this raw error notification: “From PDF Expert: The operation couldn’t be completed. (TypedValueToContentGraphResolutionErrorDomain error 4.)” Expected behavior: Siri AI should handle this failure gracefully and explain that it could not create a new note in the document, instead of exposing the raw error domain and error code to the user. Screenshot:

Not sure if this is an intented change in terms of UI on 27 beta 1, but I think the previous implementation of configuring array of App Entity is better with a list and options and reorder and remove items. My widget configuration code: struct BusWidgetConfiguration: WidgetConfigurationIntent { static var title: LocalizedStringResource { "Bus Stop Configuration" } static var description: IntentDescription { "Configure youe top 3 most commonly used bus stop to open in app." } @Parameter(title: "Bus Stop", default: [], size: IntentCollectionSize(min: 0, max: 3)) var busStops: [BusStopEntity] @Parameter(title: "Open in Maps", default: false) var openInMaps: Bool } iOS 27 Beta 1: iOS 26.5:

In visionOS 2, the system search displays the icon of each App Entity registered. It used to work up to visionOS 26 beta 7. But since visionOS 26 beta 8, visionOS 26.x , and still in the current visionOS 27 Beta 2 the system search no longer display the right icon. Instead it displays the icon of an AppShortcut declared by the source code which uses the AppEntities. This does not help the users to find the right AppEntity in a search with multiple results as they all have the same AppShortcut icon. This "bug" also make the search result differ from the experience with iOS and iPadOS which display each AppEntity icon. You can use the Apple sample to see this bug on visionOS 27 Beta 2 and 26. Accelerating app interactions with App Intents AppEntities are an important part of Apple Intelligence, the system integration is really important for a great user experience. FB19915478

I just watched the "Build Intelligent Siri experiences with App Schemas" and I'm confused about how to integrate my app with the new Apple Intelligence + Siri in iOS27. I think it mentions specifically that Siri needs to adopt App Schemas, and that just adopting App Intents in my app isn't enough for it to integrate with the new Siri. Is that correct? The 'schemas' seem to be a narrow set of specific activities. What if my app's actions (or intents) don't match closely with it? For example, in my app, I have entities like Tags and Contacts. I can 'create tag' as well as 'add tags to a contact' as 2 different App intents. If I'm using just App Intents on their own, would these not map to the new Siri? I can also add a 'task' to a 'contact'. Would that possibly work with Siri? The videos just don't seem to make an effort to explain what is and what isn't possible.

Hello, the only way to make Siri AI pick up my intent, or action on my intent + entity is that if BOTH use an schema? For example, I have an intent that adopts a schema, but my entity doesn't. That means Siri AI can't do anything with my intent? What if neither use a schema? Siri AI can't do anything with it? I'm asking because schema seems limited to only few domains which I'm not sure how I'll integrate with my apps.

I'm trying to associate a Core Spotlight item with an AppEntity during indexing by calling CSSearchableItemAttributeSet.associateAppEntity(_:priority:). However, every time I do so, I get the following warning in the console: {CSInlineDonation[async]: "my.app.bundle.identifier" add-update-items:1 delete-items:0}: Failed to request donation Error Domain=CSIndexErrorDomain Code=-1000 "Failed to request donation" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Failed to request donation, NSUnderlyingError=0x143f54ae0 {Error Domain=com.apple.CascadeSets.Set Code=3 "Access denied (<BMResource: set/App.Intents.IndexedEntity [CCSetDescriptor - key: sourceIdentifier value: my.app.bundle.identifier]>)" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Access denied (<BMResource: set/App.Intents.IndexedEntity [CCSetDescriptor - key: sourceIdentifier value: my.app.bundle.identifier]>), NSUnderlyingError=0x143f54ba0 {Error Domain=BMAccessErrorDomain Code=11 "Failed to prepare resource" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to prepare resource}}}}} The relevant code is: let attributeSet = CSSearchableItemAttributeSet(contentType: .audiovisualContent) let appEntity = VideoAppEntity(...) attributeSet.associateAppEntity(appEntity) The Spotlight item itself is indexed successfully, but the associateAppEntity call appears to fail with an "Access denied" error related to App.Intents.IndexedEntity. Has anyone encountered this before? Are there additional entitlements, App Intents configuration requirements, or indexing prerequisites needed for associateAppEntity(_:priority:) to work correctly?

Hello, I have a question about App Intents and the Action button on iPhone. I have an App Intent that opens the app and navigates to a specific entity, conforming to OpenIntent with a single AppEntity parameter. The entity conforms to EnumerableEntityQuery, and the intent is registered as an App Shortcut via the AppShortcutsProvider. When assigning this shortcut to the Action button in Settings, the system doesn’t prompt the user to select a default entity upfront. Instead, it prompts on every activation, creating friction. In contrast, shortcuts like “Open Note…” and other third-party ones prompt the user for a note to open when setting up the Action button, and its title also includes three dots, indicating a pre-configurable parameter. My shortcut’s title shows no dots. What’s required to make an App Shortcut prompt for a default parameter during Action button setup? Sincerely, Holger

I've created a Snippet for my iOS app which I want to be able to run from the LockScreen via a Shortcuts widget. All works fine except when I run the shortcut and the App Snippet appears, it doesn't always render the SwiftUI view in the same way. Sometimes the width boundaries are respected and sometimes not. I've tested this on iOS 26.1 and iOS 26.2 beta 3 I think this is a bug but it would be great if anyone could see what I might be doing wrong if it's not. Incase it is a bug I've filed a feedback (FB21076429) and I've created a stripped down sample project showing the issue and added screenshots showing the issue. Basic code to reproduce issue: // Intent.swift // SnippetBug import AppIntents import Foundation import SwiftUI struct SnippetEntryIntent: AppIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Open Snippet" static let description = IntentDescription("Shows a snippet.") // Don’t open the app – stay in the snippet surface. static let openAppWhenRun: Bool = false func perform() async throws -> some ShowsSnippetIntent { .result(snippetIntent: TestSnippetIntent()) } } struct TestSnippetIntent: SnippetIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Snippet Intent" static let description = IntentDescription("Action from snippet.") @MainActor func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult & ShowsSnippetView { .result(view: SnippetView(model: SnippetModel.shared)) } } @MainActor final class SnippetModel { static let shared = SnippetModel() private init() { } } struct SnippetView: View { let model: SnippetModel var body: some View { HStack { Text("Test Snippet with information") Spacer() Image(systemName: "heart") }.font(.headline) } } struct Shortcuts: AppShortcutsProvider { static var appShortcuts: [AppShortcut] { AppShortcut( intent: SnippetEntryIntent(), phrases: [ "Snippet for \(.applicationName)", "Test Snippet \(.applicationName)" ], shortTitle: "Snippet", systemImageName: "barcode" ) } } You also need these lines in your main App entry point: import AppIntents @main struct SnippetBugApp: App { init() { let model = SnippetModel.shared AppDependencyManager.shared.add(dependency: model) } var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } } } This is correct This is incorrect

On https://developer.apple.com/documentation/AppIntentsTesting/testing-your-app-intents-code Apple showcases the following example using AppIntentsTesting to query entities indexed in spotlight. For me, calling .spotlightQuery on any entity definition causes a crash. func testAllEventsIndexed() async throws { let eventDef = definitions.entities["EventEntity"] let allIndexed = try await eventDef .spotlightQuery(nil) XCTAssertGreaterThanOrEqual(allIndexed.count, 3) } Crash: expression unexpectedly raised an error: Failed to obtain the result of the distributed invocation after it was executed. Remote threw executionPermissionDenied(requestBundleID: Is anyone else seeing this crash, or is it just me? Thanks!

I have a widget that uses a WidgetConfigurationIntent where a user can pick what to display in the widget. This configurable widget works fine in iOS 26, but if the app is built with the iOS 27 SDK / Xcode 27, it no longer will respond to any changes from the parameter, and the default is always shown. Is this behavior a bug, or have there been underlying changes in this area that need new accommodations? Thanks!

I'm trying to understand the intended relationship between OpenIntent and the new .system.open App Intent schema introduced in iOS 27. From the documentation: OpenIntent (available since iOS 16) is described as an intent that opens an associated item. iOS 27 introduces the .system.open schema, which also appears to represent opening an entity or piece of app content. My questions are: For an app that supports iOS 27+, is .system.open intended to replace OpenIntent, or do the two serve different purposes? For apps that support both iOS 26 and iOS 27+, is the recommended approach to have two structs that implement the same opening logic, one with @AppIntent(schema: .system.open) and the other implementing the OpenIntent protocol? Thanks! References: open protocol OpenIntent

The documented template for @AppEntity(schema: .messages.message) at Integrating your messaging app with Apple Intelligence and on the MessagesEntity.message reference page shows: var reaction: <#ReadReaction#>? with <#ReadReaction#> rendered as a placeholder (the Xcode placeholder syntax). A natural reading is "fill in your own type that you want to use here". I tried several: Tapback? where Tapback is @AppEnum(schema: .messages.customReaction) MessageReaction? (same, renamed) MessageReaction? with manual AppEnum conformance (no schema decoration) AttributedString? AttributedString (non-optional) field omitted entirely Each variant produced one of: error: Property 'reaction' type does not match required AppSchemaEntity property type 'ReadReactionCases:(Schema<Tapback> | AttributedString)' error: Required AppSchemaEntity property 'reaction' must be optional error: Missing required property 'reaction' from AppSchemaEntity 'messages.message' The phrase ReadReactionCases:(Schema<Tapback> | AttributedString) is opaque — ReadReactionCases isn't a public type, Schema<Tapback> isn't constructable from outside, and the documentation doesn't mention @UnionValue in this context. The actual working pattern, which I only found by downloading the UnicornChat sample and reading MessageEntity.swift, is: @UnionValue enum MessageReaction: Sendable { case customReaction(CustomReaction) } @AppEnum(schema: .messages.customReaction) enum CustomReaction: String, AppEnum { case sticker static let caseDisplayRepresentations: [Self: DisplayRepresentation] = [ .sticker: "Sticker" ] } Two suggestions: Update the schema-template comment in the docs to either name MessageReaction explicitly with a @UnionValue annotation, or include a one-line note: "The reaction field is a @UnionValue enum wrapping the customReaction schema enum — see UnicornChat sample." The current placeholder <#ReadReaction#> plus the prose suggesting "you can generate the properties... with the @AppEntity(.messages.message) Swift macro" reads as if the developer just supplies any AppEnum-conformer. Improve the diagnostic. Property type does not match required AppSchemaEntity property type 'ReadReactionCases:(Schema<Tapback> | AttributedString)' is unhelpful because ReadReactionCases doesn't appear in any reachable type. Either rename to something developer-facing, or include a fix-it that suggests @UnionValue. iOS 27.0 beta, Xcode 27 beta, macOS Tahoe 26.4.

Our app already has a huge set of App Intents and Entities. Conceptually, our entities and intents matches well to the existing schemas (like the Notes schema). But because we have existing intents, we ran into two problems: Our existing intents/entities used different property names in the past and some properties are slightly different then the schema. Our existing intents are already used on older Versions of macOS / iOS. But the schema domain is only available on OS27 and later. What can we do to adopt the schema? Should we just duplicate all Intents / Entities and mark them as isAssistantOnly and limit their availability to OS27 and later?

It’s been since the end of WWDC Keynote, I’m still waitlisted for “New Siri” iOS 27 is done indexing. This is ridiculous. How many years I’ve been paying for a developer membership and they cannot release a simple plist file to open up the servers and let us in. Only the first that downloaded in the first 10 minutes got it while the rest of us that downloaded in the first 30 minutes are still waiting. its insane.

It has been been days since WWDC without Siri at this point as it says it is still indexing. Does anyone have any suggestions?

For intents that return complex markdown, code snippets, or structured layouts, what are the rendering capabilities and resource constraints of custom SwiftUI views returned via Snippet inside the Siri voice overlay? Are interactive controls (like buttons, copy-to-clipboard, or scroll views) supported inside the Siri-overlay SwiftUI container?

Can the new Siri correctly handle SiriKit INIntent? My app uses INIntent like INSendMessageIntent. It is used not only for Siri action but also used Communication notifications and CarPlay and more OS features. Is any migration required?