“testflight the requested app is not avaliable”

I have an iOS project based on SwiftUI in which almost all code is organised in Packages. With Xcode 26.2 and 26.3, I can preview all SwiftUI views without issues. With Xcode 26.4, the same previews don't work, in the canvas appears this error message: Cannot preview in this file. Could not find target description for “TaskListView.swift”. The explanation is: The list of source files that produce object files did not contain this file to be previewed. Check to make sure it is not excluded using the EXCLUDED_SOURCE_FILE_NAMES build setting. If I add a SwiftUI view to the main project files (not in a package), the preview works as expected. Is it an Xcode 26.4 regression? Or do I need to modify some configuration file?

Environment Xcode 26.5 beta iOS 26.5 beta Using AccessorySetupKit + AccessoryTransportExtension framework Three extensions: AccessoryTransportAppExtension, AccessoryTransportSecurityExtension, AccessoryDataProviderExtension Background Everything worked correctly on iOS 26.4 beta. All three extensions shared the entitlement com.apple.developer.accessory-transport-extension, and the system launched them as expected. After upgrading to iOS 26.5 beta (both Xcode and device), the app compiles and runs, the accessory pairs and connects successfully (state = authorized, BLE connected, notification forwarding = allow), but none of the extensions are launched by the system. Investigation Captured system Console logs from the device and found these errors from deviceaccessd: error deviceaccessd ### Extension 'com.huami.NotificationForwardingDemo.AccessoryDataProviderExtension' is missing entitlement: com.apple.developer.accessory-data-provider for com.apple.accessory-data-provider error deviceaccessd ### Exten

Hello, I’m experiencing an issue with auto-renewable subscriptions in App Store Connect and would appreciate any guidance. I have created two subscriptions (monthly and yearly), and all required metadata appears to be fully completed: pricing (price tiers set and saved) availability (countries selected) localization (titles and descriptions added) App Review screenshot uploaded However, both subscriptions remain in the “Missing Metadata” status, and the “Submit for Review” option is not available. Because of this, I am unable to attach the subscriptions to my app version and proceed with App Review (Guideline 2.1(b) - App Completeness). What I have already tried: re-saving all fields multiple times re-uploading the App Review screenshot verifying pricing and availability checking localization reviewing introductory offers The issue persists. Has anyone encountered this before or knows what might be causing this status, even when all fields seem co

Description Our app, Octory, allows users to create onboarding and communication workflows composed of slides containing various UI components, including embedded video players powered by AVPlayerView. Since macOS 26.4 Beta, the app crashes at launch whenever a workflow contains a video component. Workflows without video components load and render without issue, which points to a regression in AVKit's player control rendering pipeline. As anyone seen similar behaviour when using AVKit or is it something we do not do properly? Expected Behavior The app opens and renders the workflow, including the embedded video component. Actual Behavior The app briefly launches and immediately crashes with SIGABRT on the main thread. Crash Analysis Key takeaways for anyone investigating: Root cause — abort() inside NSImageSymbolConfiguration The crash occurs entirely within Apple frameworks, with no third-party code in the faulting call chain (aside from the app's

We are trying to intercept raw reports from the built-in MacBook haptic trackpad using a DriverKit IOUserHIDEventDriver dext. Our dext installs and activates successfully: OSSystemExtensionRequest finishes with result 0 systemextensionsctl list shows the dext as activated enabled the dext is embedded correctly in the app bundle However, it never attaches to the built-in trackpad IOHIDInterface. ioreg shows the built-in trackpad interface still matched only by Apple’s HID dext. We also observed that Apple’s own HID dext appears to use com.apple.developer.driverkit.builtin, while that entitlement is not available in our provisioning profile. Our dext specifically relies on: IOUserHIDEventDriver::handleReport(...) SetProperties() with kIOHIDEventDriverHandlesReport Questions: Is com.apple.developer.driverkit.builtin required for a third-party IOUserHIDEventDriver to match a built-in internal trackpad IOHIDInterface? Is that entitlement public/requestable, or Apple-internal only? At wha

Hello, I hope you’re doing well. I recently submitted an update for my app, and I would really appreciate it if you could review it when possible. The latest version includes important fixes and improvements. Please let me know if anything else is needed from my side. Thank you for your time and support.

Hi everyone, I am experiencing a strange rendering issue on iPadOS 26 when sizeRestrictions.minimumSize is set on a UIWindowScene. After rotating the device and then rotating it back to the original orientation, the window appears to be stretched based on its previous dimensions. This resulting stretched area does not resize or redraw correctly, leaving a significant black region on the screen. Interestingly, as soon as I interact with the window (e.g., a slight drag or touch), the UI snaps back to its intended state and redraws perfectly. Here is a sample code and capture of behavior. class SceneDelegate: UIResponder, UIWindowSceneDelegate { var window: UIWindow? func scene(_ scene: UIScene, willConnectTo session: UISceneSession, options connectionOptions: UIScene.ConnectionOptions) { guard let windowScene = (scene as? UIWindowScene) else { return } windowScene.sizeRestrictions?.minimumSize = CGSize( width: 390, height: 844 // larger than the height of iPad in landscape ) // initialize... } } Has an

Hi everyone, I recently got rejected under Guideline 1.1.1 - Safety - Objectionable Content and I'm struggling to understand how my app falls under this category. Looking for advice from anyone who's dealt with similar rejections. What the app does: AutoSignal is a vehicle notification app designed for the Bulgarian market. It solves a very common real-world problem - needing to contact a car owner when their vehicle is double-parked, blocking you in, has its lights left on, or has been hit/damaged while parked. The core flow is: A user scans a license plate using their phone camera If the car owner is registered in the app, they receive an anonymous push notification (e.g., Your car with plate XX 1234 XX is blocking someone or Your lights are on) The car owner can then take action Users can also report vehicle damage cases with temporary witness notes that auto-expire after 7 days. Why I believe it doesn't violate 1.1.1: The app does not expose any person