“translate scheme”

@giantramen I faced the same issue with my app, which also uses Unity. I was able to resolve it and run tests on the simulator by disabling the Thread Performance Checker in the test scheme.

Now the problem. When the application was initially in the foreground and has an established server connection, we initially keep the server connection active when the app enters the background state, until a certain timeout or the system decides our app needs to be killed/removed from memory. This allows us to finish an incoming audio stream, quickly react on incoming responses, etc. When we then receive an incoming audio stream after a certain delay (for example, 5 seconds), we call the channelManager.setRemoteParticipant method (using try await syntax). So, the short summary is that this should just work. More specifically, all PTT apps are allowed to initiate playback at any time by calling setRemoteParticipant(), even if they're in the background. In particular, what you're describing here: we initially keep the server connection active when the app enters the background state, until a certain timeout or the system decides our app needs to be killed/removed from memory. ...is actually pretty common to mo

In a comment, @txzkbs said: 感谢您的回复！您提供的几个关于这个问题的问答，我之前就已经尝试过了，今天再次去试，无论是重新让Xcode生成桥接头文件，还是检查other linker.... 最终的结果都是报错： Validation failed (409) The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Rebuild the app and resubmit. (ID: d9bb0d99-4116-41bb-aa6d-f4cad6353887) 非常奇怪，始终是同样的错误码和错误提示，没有具体的信息，期待您的再次回复，感谢！ With some help from a machine translation of what you wrote above, I understand that you tried some things from the threads that my colleague linked to. Can you be specific about what you tried, including the command line tools that you used and the results of those commands? Additionally, if you haven't opened a bug report regarding this with your app's .ipa file attached, please do so and share the FB number here so I can locate it. — Ed Ford,  DTS Engineer

It appears the memory consumption was due to the Shader and API Validation I had enabled in my scheme. Once I disabled these, memory use went back down to normal.

[quote='871489022, MikasaAlen, /thread/805248?answerId=871489022#871489022, /profile/MikasaAlen'] Does iOS 26 completely prohibit the use of private APIs? [/quote] It’s best not to think about this stuff in terms of public and private APIs. Rather, there are APIs, the public things that we specifically publish for third-party developers to use, and implementation details, meaning everything else. Once you think about it this way, the consequences are clear: If you use APIs, you can reasonably expect consistent behaviour. If you rely on implementation details, the behaviour can change between different OS releases, different device types, different users, and so on. [quote='871489022, MikasaAlen, /thread/805248?answerId=871489022#871489022, /profile/MikasaAlen'] And is the only recommended method for opening the [Settings app] now the use of [UIApplicationOpenSettingsURLString] API? [/quote] Supported URL Schemes lists lots of different APIs for opening Settings, each focused on a specific test. But i

You'd need to generate a set of Path instances from the characters in your text. This is only really suitable for small amounts, e.g. the Welcome animation or clock digits, etc., because it's not the most performant thing. Also, bigger text is better. Lastly, remember to wrap it all in a GlassEffectContainer to avoid each character's glass being rendered in a discrete pass. Actually lastly: you'll need to adjust the location of the text using .offset(x:y:) or by tweaking the path creation to include better offset translations. This is my quick & dirty attempt. Since .glassEffect() is designed similarly to a fill API, you need something non-empty to 'fill' with your text. Color.clear gets elided by the rendering engine, but what I've found is that Color.white.opacity(0) works to cause an actual (invisible) view to render and take up space during layout calculations. And now: the code! This was written for tvOS, so it uses BIG fonts and offsets to write big numbers. I had it draw a counter that inc

I see the community bringing this up from time to time, and so would like to take this chance to hopefully get it sorted. For the clarify of the discussion, I'd split this question into three parts: Does App Review guideline allow a keyboard extension to launch its container app? If yes, is there any API to do so? Is there any API for the container app to bring the host app back to the foreground? The first part is about App Review policy, and so only the App Review team has the final answer, but looking into the App Review Guideline, you can see the following related to keyboard extensions: 4.4.1 Keyboard extensions have some additional rules. ... They must not: Launch other apps besides Settings; Here the guideline uses other apps, rather than simply apps or any app. I believe that means to say that launching the container app is allowed. To make sure my understanding is correct, I've reached out my App Review colleague, and they've confirmed that launching the container app from a keyboard extension (to do

[quote='869978022, MikasaAlen, /thread/805248?answerId=869978022#869978022, /profile/MikasaAlen'] iOS 26 only provides an API to jump to the [Settings app] path? [/quote] Not quite. It has APIs to get to various locations within Settings. I’ve includes links to all the ones I know about in Supported URL Schemes. [quote='869978022, MikasaAlen, /thread/805248?answerId=869978022#869978022, /profile/MikasaAlen'] Will attempts to jump to other submenus in the system settings be redirected here by default? [/quote] If you attempt to navigate to specific Settings pages by opening undocumented URLs, you’re exercising implementation details. The exact behaviour you get isn’t documented and may change from release to release. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

I see, thank you for pointing this out. So it is not a percentage, but an actual number of pages. Could you expand a little on how to interpret in your previous answer? So, stepping back for a moment, the basic issue here is deciding when should the kernel stop just blindly backing memory. It COULD (and, historically, did) just limit that to total available storage; however, in practice, that just means the machine grinds itself into a useless state without actually failing. So, what macOS does is artificially limit the VM system to ensure that the machine remains always in a functional state. The next question then becomes how to implement that limit. There are lots of places you COULD limit the VM system, but the problem is that the VM system is complicated enough that many obvious metrics don't really work. For example, purgable memory[1] means that simply dirty pages doesn't necessarily work“ - a process could have a very large number of dirty pages, but if they're all purgable, they shouldn't really coun