We are conducting iBeacon compliance testing for our device and would like to clarify two test items from the iBeacon test specification: Regarding Tx power stability verification over time and across different battery capacities: Could you please specify the required test duration and the exact test procedure? Specifically, how long should the Tx power be monitored to verify stability within the 2dB standard deviation requirement, and what battery capacity levels (e.g., 100%, 50%, 20%, low battery threshold) should be tested? Regarding device interoperability with iOS CoreLocation APIs for beacon-based region monitoring and ranging: Could you please provide guidance on the test methodology? Specifically, what test cases, expected behaviors, and pass/fail criteria should we follow to verify correct interoperability with region monitoring (didEnter/didExit) and ranging (didRangeBeacons) APIs? Any official test guidelines or reference documents would be greatly appreciated.

I’m seeing a Bluetooth call audio routing issue on a new iPhone 17 Pro running iOS 26.5.1, build 23F81. Bluetooth media audio works normally. Music and video audio stay on Bluetooth headphones without issues. The problem appears only when the device switches into call audio / HFP mode. Tested with multiple earbuds: Samsung, OPPO, Huawei and CMF Buds Pro 2. The behavior is similar with all of them. There are no other Bluetooth devices connected. Call Audio Routing is already set to Bluetooth Headset in Accessibility settings. The issue affects cellular calls, FaceTime Audio, Telegram and Signal. In some cases the earbuds seem to switch into call mode, but the call audio route falls back to the iPhone receiver or speaker instead of staying on the Bluetooth headset. After the call ends, Bluetooth media audio returns normally. I captured a sysdiagnose right after reproducing the issue. Relevant observations from the logs: Device: iPhone18,2 iOS: 26.5.1 Build: 23F81 Sysdiagnose time: 2026-06-03 11:22:03 +0300 In Bluetooth/CoreCapture/bluetooth_status.txt, Bluetooth was ON 3 paired devices were present 1 device was connected Connected device at the time: CMF Buds Pro 2 So the headset was not simply disconnected from the phone. In the powerlog, before the call the audio route was HeadphonesBT for media playback. Around the FaceTime Audio test, HeadsetBT / PhoneCall appeared, but then the route moved to ReceiverAndMicrophone / Speaker instead of staying on HeadsetBT. During a later cellular call, the active PhoneCall route was also ReceiverAndMicrophone rather than HeadsetBT. After the call ended, the route returned to HeadphonesBT for media playback. This looks like the Bluetooth connection remains alive, but call audio / HFP routing fails. The same sysdiagnose also contains CentauriFirmwareEvent entries under crashes_and_spins from the previous day. They show: subsystem = BT host-reason = firmware crash BTMAIN panic faulting_task = link_manager_thread LMAC_5G watchdog expired SCAN watchdog expired These firmware crash events do not happen at the exact same timestamp as the call test, so I’m not claiming that every call directly crashes Bluetooth firmware. But the sysdiagnose shows both incorrect Bluetooth call audio routing and separate BT firmware crash events. Has anyone seen similar behavior on iPhone 17 / iOS 26 with Bluetooth HFP call audio? Could this be a known iOS 26 / Apple N1 / Bluetooth firmware issue, or does it look more like a hardware defect of this particular device?

Is there any UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities string that can be used to restrict an app to Apple TV 4K (2nd generation) or later hardware? I can’t find one. I’m working on a tvOS app that uses Continuity Camera. That feature only works on Apple TV 4K (2nd gen) and Apple TV 4K (3rd gen) hardware. There seems be no way to warn App Store customers that the app will not work on Apple TV 4K (1st gen). In the App Store or TestFlight, a user with a 1st gen device incorrectly sees a compatibility note that the app “Works on this Apple TV”. Setting a minimum OS version is not currently a helpful path for me — even tvOS 26.5 is compatible with 1st generation hardware. I can’t think of a good way to prevent users with an incompatible Apple TV 4K from installing an app that won’t work on their 1st generation devices. Any ideas? Am I missing something?

On Apple Watch (reported several times, but also on a powerful Ultra3), the CMAltimeter occasionally stops delivering updates for a while (a couple of minutes) then resumes. This makes for a terrible user experience. What could cause this? Is there a way to (best case) prevent this, or (workaround) detect it? This is production critical, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot!

Our App has a feature that needs to determine if the phone was stationary during the last 10 seconds. For the past several years, we have been using CMMotionActivityManager for this feature and it has worked very reliably. We query motion activity for the past 10 seconds (using queryActivityStarting(from:to:to:) method) and check for any events where the stationary property is false. However, the behavior of CMMotionActivityManager has changed in iOS 16.4 Beta: CMMotionActivityManager no longer reports motion as it did on iOS 16.3 and earlier versions. With iOS 16.4 Beta, CMMotionActivityManager will falsely return events where the stationary property is true (or return no events) even though the phone was in motion during the query interval. There are times when it does return motion events correctly, but that only happens if the phone is in constant motion for a sustained period of time. This behavior is drastically different from previous iOS versions where even the slightest bit of movement would generate motion events. i'm really hoping this is an issue in the beta and will be sorted out soon. Feedback Filed: FB12005598

So for last two years ive been dealing with unwanted unauthorized access to my data having zero clue what was the reasoning it. I need help to fix this please. I deal with random people "linking" up to my "whatever syncing or streamin" I never signed up for anything this and lost everything in my life over this. I finally found out the root (which is this program apple offers) and it's being used maliciously 100%. please help

Filing this for engineering visibility and to ask whether the observed behavior matches expected M5 Pro DCP architecture. FB22701284 contains full sysdiagnose and supporting data. Hardware Configuration MacBook Pro 16-inch (Mac17,8) M5 Pro chip, 18-core CPU 64GB unified memory (highest M5 Pro memory tier) 1TB SSD macOS Tahoe 26.4.1 (build 25E253) AppleDCP-1041.100.97~429-t605xdcp.RELEASE Display Configuration Two identical LG UltraGear 27GM950B monitors: 27" Mini LED panels, native 5120x2880 DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (80 Gbps capable) 165Hz native refresh, HDR-capable Connection topology (all third-party display software removed for clean test): Mac TB5 port 1 → Silkland DP80 USB-C cable (VESA-certified) → Monitor #1 USB-C input Mac TB5 port 2 → Silkland DP80 USB-C cable (VESA-certified) → Monitor #2 USB-C input DisplayLink Manager fully uninstalled No dock, no MST hub, no signal converters Apple Specification Context Per the MacBook Pro user guide, M5 Pro supports dual displays at 5K@120Hz (support.apple.com/guide/macbook-pro/apd8cdd74f57/mac), with the documented instruction to "connect the display with the highest resolution first." Observed Behavior Solo connection (either monitor) Either monitor in isolation: 5120x2880 @ 144Hz, Maximum Source Bandwidth 27,400 Mbps, 10-bit, HDR enabled. Dual connection (BetterDisplay 4.3.3 diagnostic) Monitor on dispext0@B0000000: 5120x2880 @ 144Hz, Maximum Source Bandwidth: 27,400 Mbps, HDR enabled Monitor on dispext1@90000000: Degraded from native 5K, Maximum Source Bandwidth: 13,700 Mbps, HDR disabled The 27,400/13,700 split is deterministic and follows connection order. Hardware substitution (cables, ports, monitor positions) confirmed the allocation follows position in connection order, not specific hardware. Each monitor achieves full 27,400 Mbps when solo. Per-pipe budget structure exposed in BetterDisplay 4.3.3 Recent BetterDisplay versions expose allocation limits in display reports: Allocation limits - horizontal: 3360, 3840 pixels HiDPI (6720, 7680 pixels LoDPI) Allocation limits - vertical: 2304 pixels HiDPI (4608 pixels LoDPI) This matches the per-sub-pipe budget structure documented in third-party M5 Max DCP firmware analysis, where M5 Max shows MaxSrcRectWidthForPipe = (6720, 7680, 7680, 7680). M5 Pro appears to expose only two values (6720, 7680). WindowServer assertion failure WindowServer crash on 2026-05-16 with assertion failure in the function calculating per-pipe maximum source rectangle widths: Thread 16 Crashed: com.apple.coreanimation.render-server CA::WindowServer::AppleDisplay::max_src_rect_width_by_pipes(unsigned char) const + 92 CA::WindowServer::AppleDisplay::max_src_rect_pixels() const + 60 CA::WindowServer::Server::get_display_info() + 1812 Exception: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT), Abort trap 6. This is the same function third-party DCP firmware analysis identifies as governing the per-sub-pipe budget calculation. Reference to Existing Thread Apple CoreOS DTS Engineer Kevin Elliott in thread 814201 (https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/814201) described M5 MacBook Pro display architecture: "Driving the display at 240Hz require both of the two display 'pipes' and the system ends up allocating both pipes to the first monitor it discovers. That prevents it from lighting up the second monitor, as there isn't currently any way for software to shift allocations of display pipes between machines." That thread addressed a single-display 4K@240Hz scenario where the second display failed to initialize. The underlying allocation mechanism (first-come-first-served pipe assignment, no dynamic reallocation) appears consistent with the dual-display configuration I'm observing, with the manifestation differing (both displays initialize but the second is bandwidth-constrained rather than absent). Specific Technical Questions Is the 27,400/13,700 Mbps asymmetric allocation observed on dual 5K configurations the expected manifestation of the two-pipe architecture described in thread 814201, or a distinct allocation policy specific to dual-display scenarios? The advertised dual 5K@120Hz capability requires approximately 28 Gbps per stream. The observed allocation appears insufficient to drive both displays at this specification simultaneously. Is there a configuration approach that allows both displays to receive adequate bandwidth allocation? Multiple sources document that M5 Max has more display engine output channels than M5 Pro. Is the architectural difference between M5 Pro and M5 Max sub-pipe count (per the BetterDisplay allocation limits and third-party firmware analysis) the underlying explanation for the differential dual-display capability? The WindowServer assertion failure in max_src_rect_width_by_pipes() — is this a known edge case for dual high-bandwidth display configurations on M5 Pro, or should this be filed as a separate issue from the bandwidth allocation behavior? Supporting Data Available BetterDisplay 4.3.3 diagnostic reports for both monitors WindowServer crash report (2026-05-16) ioreg output showing DCP unit assignments sysdiagnose attached to FB22701284 Happy to provide additional FB tickets with focused diagnostic captures if specific data would help engineering investigation.

Hi, we have developed an application that streams data from two BLE peripherals at a rate of 14.5kbps per peripheral. Until now, our devices streamed in near real time with no lag on all Apple devices with Bluetooth 5.0 or greater. Since the release of the iPhone 17 series and the iPad A16, we have reports from users of the data being streamed at significantly lower rates than expected. Any help here would be greatly appreciated as our customers are being affected by this change.

Watch is no longer capturing biometric data. No sleep, HR, or SPO2, steps and activity after downloading 26.5 watchOS beta. Reset watch and was not able to resolve the issue.

We were using a BLE mouse with HID command in iOS device, mainly iPhone device and we can use the mouse pointer using the assistive touch . But when we updated the iOS version to iOS 26.4.2 , the mouse pointer become very slow and jumpy. So something changed in the latest version that hurt the BLE mouse pointer Please update your feedback or similar issues

The app crashes when using EAAccessoryManager.showBluetoothAccessoryPicker(withNameFilter:) to connect to a Bluetooth accessory in a multi-accessory scenario. The crash occurs immediately after selecting an accessory from the picker UI. Steps to Reproduce: Ensure a Bluetooth accessory (Accessory A) is already connected to the iPhone/iPad and is visible in Bluetooth settings. Launch the app. Initiate a connection flow that presents the Bluetooth accessory picker using EAAccessoryManager.showBluetoothAccessoryPicker(withNameFilter:). Ensure another compatible accessory (Accessory B) is available and visible in the picker. Select Accessory B from the picker to connect. After connection, simulate a disconnect of Accessory B (e.g., power cycle or remove battery). Attempt to reconnect Accessory B by triggering the same picker flow again. Select Accessory B from the picker. Result: The accessory connects successfully at the system level. The app crashes immediately after selecting the accessory from the picker (during dismissal). Reproducibility: Occurs consistently under the described multi-accessory scenario. Not observed when only a single accessory is present.

Is there any information available on how developers can implement the "Firmware Update Readiness" and/or "Firmware Update Status" characteristics in HomeKit? Many consumer devices support this (showing an "update available" icon), however, there appears to be nothing in the documentation about this characteristic, and it is not listed as an option in the HomeKit Accessory Simulator. Thanks in advance!

Hi, I am trying to build a very simple iOS app in Xcode that starts an NFCNDEFReaderSession when I press a button. My goal right now is only to verify that the NFC reading process starts correctly on a real iPhone. I am not trying to publish the app on the App Store. When I try to start the session, I get this error in the console: -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:outError:]:435 XPC Error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service named com.apple.nfcd.service.corenfc was invalidated: Connection init failed at lookup with error 159 - Sandbox restriction." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service named com.apple.nfcd.service.corenfc was invalidated: Connection init failed at lookup with error 159 - Sandbox restriction.} and then my app reports that NFC is not available on this device. Important details: I added Near Field Communication Tag Reading in Signing & Capabilities. I added the NFC privacy usage description in the target settings. I am using automatic signing. I am not using an Apple Developer Program paid account. I am using a Personal Team / free account. I should also mention that I am not experienced with Swift/iOS development, so I may be missing something basic in the setup. My question is: Is this expected when using a Personal Team / free account, or is there some configuration issue I should still check? I am happy to provide any additional information needed

DJI's DNG files display abnormally in the Apple Photos app on iOS devices, with dark areas showing as very black, but the same files appear normal in Photoshop. I'm curious about what causes this issue.

Hi everyone, I'm developing a standalone Matter controller app on iOS 18+ using Apple's Matter.framework directly — without integrating with Apple Home or HomeKit. We manage our own Matter fabric and handle the full commissioning flow ourselves. Current setup: BLE-based Matter device discovery and commissioning via Matter.framework Own fabric management (not adding devices to Apple Home) During development, we rely on the "Bluetooth Central Matter Client Developer Mode" profile to enable BLE access The challenge: As we approach our App Store release, we need end users to be able to commission Matter devices without installing any developer profiles. I'm trying to figure out the correct entitlement path for a non-HomeKit Matter controller app in production. Questions: Which entitlements are required for a third-party Matter controller app using Matter.framework directly (not via HomeKit) to work in production? Is there a formal entitlement request process for something like com.apple.developer.matter.allow-setup-payload? If so, where do we initiate it? Are there additional program memberships or certifications required beyond the standard Apple Developer Program membership? We've gone through the Matter framework documentation and relevant WWDC sessions but haven't found a clear answer specifically for non-HomeKit standalone Matter controller apps. Would appreciate any input from Apple staff or developers who've shipped a similar app. Happy to provide more details if needed. Tagging for visibility: @Apple or relevant team — this involves a non-HomeKit Matter.framework usage pattern and entitlement approval process.

After hardware and mobile phone hid mode pairing, the first connection is successful, after a while disconnect and reconnect,APP monitoring Bluetooth error NSLocalizedDescription = "Peer removed pairing information"; Failed to connect Hardware engineers detect the pairing information and find that the local pairing information of the iPhone has changed, which is a non-mandatory phenomenon

EASession(accessory:forProtocol:) always returns nil — MFI accessory iAP2 Platform: iOS 17+ | Hardware: Custom MFI-certified accessory (USB-C, iAP2) | Language: Swift Problem We have a custom MFI-certified accessory communicating over USB-C using ExternalAccessory. The app calls EASession(accessory:forProtocol:) after receiving EAAccessoryDidConnect but it always returns nil. We never get past session creation. What we have verified We captured a sysdiagnose on-device and analysed the accessoryd-packets log. The full iAP2 handshake completes successfully at the OS level: USB attach succeeds MFI auth certificate is present and Apple-issued Auth challenge and response complete successfully IdentificationInformation is accepted by iOS — protocol string and Team ID are correct EAAccessoryDidConnect fires as expected iOS sends StartExternalAccessoryProtocolSession — the OS-level session is established So the hardware, MFI auth, protocol string, and Team ID are all correct. Despite this, EASession(accessory:forProtocol:) returns nil in the app. We also confirmed: Protocol string in UISupportedExternalAccessoryProtocols in Info.plist matches the accessory exactly Protocol string in code matches Info.plist App entitlements are correctly configured EAAccessoryManager.shared().registerForLocalNotifications() is called before connection Current connection code @objc private func accessoryDidConnect(_ notification: Notification) { guard let accessory = notification.userInfo?[EAAccessoryKey] as? EAAccessory else { return } DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 1.0) { self.tryConnectToAccessory() } } private func tryConnectToAccessory() { DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 3.0) { for accessory in EAAccessoryManager.shared().connectedAccessories { let session = EASession(accessory: accessory, forProtocol: "") // session is always nil here } } } Questions The packet log shows a ~4 second gap between EAAccessoryDidConnect firing and iOS internally completing session readiness (StartExternalAccessoryProtocolSession). Is there a reliable way to know when iOS Is it actually ready to grant an EASession, rather than using a fixed delay? Is there a delegate callback or notification that fires when the accessory protocol session is ready to be opened, rather than relying on EAAccessoryDidConnect + an arbitrary delay? Are there any known conditions on iOS 17+ under which EASession returns nil even though the iAP2 handshake completed successfully at the OS level? Is retrying EASession after a nil result a supported pattern, or does a nil result mean the session will never succeed for that connection? Any guidance appreciated.

In an application we are developing, we would like to show a (non-interactable) textfield when a hardware keyboard is connected to the iPad. Therefore my question: Using SwiftUI, is it possible to detect the presence of a hardware keyboard and store that state inside a boolean like isHardwareKeyboardConnected?

Hi, We are currently in the process of getting an custom iAP2 device communicating via USB-C. We have been using the 'EADemo' app as a test app to ensure full function before certification. Currently, the device completes the authentication and identification successfully. The device appears within the 'EADemo' app, and we are able to select it and see the available protocol. Selecting the protocol sends the EAStartSession command to the accessory and we ACK it. This is where the issues begin. Attempting to send either a string or hex packet results in nothing being sent. The app does not appear to attempt to send a packet when these are pressed. The 'EADemo' app also does not increment its receive counter when the accessory sends an EA packet, but we do receive the ACK from the device. This indicates the device is receiving the packet, but not processing it in app. Sending the EASessionStatus from the accessory with a status of okay does not change the behavior. Sending the EASessionStatus packet from the accessory with a status of closed results in the device sending an EAStopSession packet. The issue does not appear to be with the accessory or the underlying transport layer. Previous attempts to contact MFi support resulted in them referring me to developer support. Are there any known issues within the 'EADemo' app that we should know about/and or need to fix? Does Apple have any other EA example application? Are there any other publicly avalilbe EA examples that Apple would recommend us trying? Thanks, Mike

Hello dear Apple Platform Engineers, I'm working on an iOS App that connects to a Bluetooth Low Energy Peripheral in the foreground. Whenever the App moves into Background, we want to continue syncing data & therefore implemented State Restoration to be informed about Discovery, Connect, Disconnect or Characteristic changes in the Background in order to wake the App up whenever it was "Terminated due to memory issue". I consulted https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/CoreBluetooth_concepts/CoreBluetoothBackgroundProcessingForIOSApps/PerformingTasksWhileYourAppIsInTheBackground.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40013257-CH7-SW1 for this & assigned: CBCentralManagerOptionRestoreIdentifierKey Reinstantiate the dedicated CentralManager & implemented the centralManager(_ central: CBCentralManager, willRestoreState dict: [String : Any]) Delegate Additionally, I assigned the following keys on connect(_ peripheral: CBPeripheral, options: [String : Any]? = nil) CBConnectPeripheralOptionNotifyOnConnectionKey CBConnectPeripheralOptionNotifyOnDisconnectionKey CBConnectPeripheralOptionNotifyOnNotificationKey However, from my experience the App gets woken up, but neither the willRestoreState nor the didDiscover, didConnect or didDisconnectPeripheral is called even though launchOptions?[UIApplication.LaunchOptionsKey.bluetoothCentrals] as? [String] is not empty. What might I be missing when trying to make this approach work? Thanks a lot for any insights & support!