Search results for

“Apple Maps Guides”

155,130 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Universal Links and Cloud-testing platforms
Thanks so much for the reply and the detailed information. Yes, looks like the resigning will cause the issue you have described. I still recommend you to test against your devices to make sure the AASA file get downloaded and works well before sending the build to the App Store. You are correct that we do not offer a native provisioning flag to bypass AASA validation. Apple’s AASA file specification fully supports listing multiple App IDs (Team ID + Bundle ID) for a single domain. You can also use TestFlight to distribute your app to test devices. Wish you luck. Looking forward to your app. Albert Pascual
  Worldwide Developer Relations.
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
1w
Reply to Universal Links and Cloud-testing platforms
Thank you for the quick response and for the clarification on how iOS enforces AASA validation, that context is very helpful. To answer your question: our cloud-based device testing environment is a third-party device farm that runs automated UI tests against real iOS devices hosted in their infrastructure, BrowserStack. In order to install our app on their devices, their platform re-signs the app using their own provisioning profile, which is where the Associated Domains entitlement is lost. We fully understand that this is a security boundary by design, we are not looking to bypass AASA validation in production. Our concern is specifically scoped to pre-production testing: we need a way to validate our authentication flow end-to-end (including the Universal Link redirect back into the app) in an automated, cloud-hosted environment before shipping to production. Given your confirmation that there is no native provisioning flag to accommodate this, we have a follow-up question: Short of the Enterprise Develop
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
1w
Concerns about App Review risk for vendor-specific device protocol that reuses Matter-derived components internally
My team is evaluating an iOS companion app for our own network-connected device, and we want to understand whether the planned architecture would likely create an App Review problem under Guideline 2.5.17. Our situation is: We are building our own device and our own companion app. We do not intend to market the device as a Matter-certified device initially. We do not intend to support Apple Home or broad third-party Matter ecosystem interoperability in the first release. We are under a tight schedule and are considering reusing Matter/CSA-derived libraries, data models, and protocol concepts internally to reduce engineering effort and move faster toward eventual certification. Our current understanding is that there are already many iOS apps that communicate with LAN-connected devices using proprietary protocols, so our initial assumption is that a vendor-specific local-network device workflow should generally be acceptable. The point we are trying to clarify is whether that changes if the implementa
1
0
43
1w
Delayed Developer Account Activation After payment
My sister paid for my Apple developer account with her credit card on the 12th of March, 2026. Apple promised to work on the account within 48 hours. Its been 11 days now and nothing from Apple. I even semt a support request email which was supposed to be responded to within 48 hours too, but nothing after days. Its quiet disappointing that it takes this long to verify a service I'm paying for. Google charges 25 dollars and still managed to activate a developers account almost immediately. Yet, 99 USD with apple amd this delay is what I get. This is wrong Please help review my account and activate my profile Thank you
0
0
35
1w
Reply to Xcode 26.4: Regressions in Intelligence features
Thanks for the detailed response! To answer your questions: OAuth - I don't see a pattern other than time. It seems to lose the OAuth token 2 or 3 times per day. It also doesn't seem to depend on idle time. I can be in the middle of working and it will lose the token. Yes, especially since thinking can go off the rails or go into a nearly-endless loop, this serves as a way to monitor and guide agent progress. I did file a feedback on all the issues, btw! (FB22310171 on the whole set of issues, and I also just filed FB22316631 per your request on this specific one.) Next time this occurs, I will attach it to the Feedback report. No, I have never downloaded or setup Codex. I especially want to highlight the additional bug I reported in my Feedback report but did not post here -- the agent will take action even if I specifically tell it to ask for approval before proceding. This is concerning because there is now some internal state where the agent believes it has gotten permission even though it hasn't
1w
App Review 2.1(b): paywall present in build but disabled — can it block review? What’s the best response?
Hello everyone, I’m submitting an iOS app to App Review and received Guideline 2.1(b) – Information Needed. Apple says it appears the app may access or include paid digital content/subscriptions and they want details about the business model. In my project, a paywall / premium UI exists in the codebase, and subscription products are configured in App Store Connect for a future release, but in the build currently submitted: The paywall is disabled (not reachable through any UI flow / feature flags are off). There is no purchase flow (no way to subscribe in-app). There is no external purchase (no website/Stripe/etc.). Users cannot access any previously purchased subscriptions (no entitlement access / restore not exposed). Questions: Can the mere presence of a paywall screen / IAP-related code in the binary (even if disabled/unreachable) block App Review or trigger repeated 2.1(b) requests? Is it recommended to remove paywall/IAP code entirely from the review build if it’s not used yet, or is a clear ex
0
0
24
1w
Payment processed 18 days ago, but Developer Program still not activated
Hi everyone, I’m looking for some advice or assistance regarding my Apple Developer Program enrollment. I completed my purchase and paid the $99 fee back on March 5th. Today is March 23rd, and my account is still not activated. It has been 18 days of total silence. I have already sent multiple follow-up emails to Apple Support, but I haven't received a single response. My payment was successfully processed, but I haven't received any confirmation or activation emails since then. Here are my transaction details: Invoice Number: MC55225030 Web Order Number: D009495884 Sales Order Number: AEU2369279 Has anyone else experienced such a long delay recently? Is there any other way to escalate this issue besides the standard contact form? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
4
0
150
1w
Reply to Clarity App Attestation Errors
Hello there, Can i rely on the following mapping: generateKey — local only, two possible errors: featureUnsupported (simulator, iOS < 14) unknownSystemFailure (Secure Enclave fault). attestKey — contacts Apple servers, possible errors: featureUnsupported (simulator, iOS < 14) unknownSystemFailure (Secure Enclave fault) invalidInput (one time challenge is not hashed properly) invalidKey (key already attested) serverUnavailable (no network, Apple service down, rate limiting in action). generateAssertion — local only, possible errors: unknownSystemFailure((Secure Enclave fault)) invalidInput (one time challenge is not hashed properly) invalidKey (key deleted from Secure Enclave).
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
1w
Enroll in ADP pending verification
I represent a business who is trying to enroll into the Apple Developer Program. We already have a business account with Apple. Through our business account I have signed up for and provided all of the requested documentation for the Apple Developer Program. I am not the owner of the business, but I am qualified to take these actions on behalf of the business. The enrollment is pending verification since Friday. Just curious if there is anything I can do to move this along? Thank you.
0
0
35
1w
App rejected under Guideline 2.1(a) - App Completeness. Seeking advice!
Hello everyone, I recently submitted my iOS app for review, but it was unfortunately rejected under Guideline 2.1(a) - Performance - App Completeness. For context, my app is a healthcare application built with Ionic. According to the App Review team's message, they found the app to be incomplete. They stated they were unable to review the app because they couldn't get past the login screen. The Root Cause: Upon investigating, we discovered the issue is related to IP Geo-blocking. Because the app handles sensitive healthcare data, our API provider strictly blocks all network traffic originating from outside of Italy to legally comply with European GDPR regulations. Since the App Review team tests from the US, their requests are being entirely blocked by the firewall, causing the login to fail and the app to look broken on their end. What I have verified so far: I have provided valid demo account credentials in the App Store Connect App Review Information section. I have tested the app thoroughly on physical de
2
0
99
1w
Reply to Universal Links and Cloud-testing platforms
Thanks so much for the reply and the detailed information. Yes, looks like the resigning will cause the issue you have described. I still recommend you to test against your devices to make sure the AASA file get downloaded and works well before sending the build to the App Store. You are correct that we do not offer a native provisioning flag to bypass AASA validation. Apple’s AASA file specification fully supports listing multiple App IDs (Team ID + Bundle ID) for a single domain. You can also use TestFlight to distribute your app to test devices. Wish you luck. Looking forward to your app. Albert Pascual
  Worldwide Developer Relations.
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to Universal Links and Cloud-testing platforms
Thank you for the quick response and for the clarification on how iOS enforces AASA validation, that context is very helpful. To answer your question: our cloud-based device testing environment is a third-party device farm that runs automated UI tests against real iOS devices hosted in their infrastructure, BrowserStack. In order to install our app on their devices, their platform re-signs the app using their own provisioning profile, which is where the Associated Domains entitlement is lost. We fully understand that this is a security boundary by design, we are not looking to bypass AASA validation in production. Our concern is specifically scoped to pre-production testing: we need a way to validate our authentication flow end-to-end (including the Universal Link redirect back into the app) in an automated, cloud-hosted environment before shipping to production. Given your confirmation that there is no native provisioning flag to accommodate this, we have a follow-up question: Short of the Enterprise Develop
Topic: Code Signing SubTopic: Entitlements Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
How do you collect eye gaze data from vision pro
Hello, I know that Apple bans user from accessing to raw gaze data like gaze vector (x,y,z) or eye position. But when you do research on gaze data, how did you collect them from vision pro? Is there any App to solve this problem?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
104
Activity
1w
Concerns about App Review risk for vendor-specific device protocol that reuses Matter-derived components internally
My team is evaluating an iOS companion app for our own network-connected device, and we want to understand whether the planned architecture would likely create an App Review problem under Guideline 2.5.17. Our situation is: We are building our own device and our own companion app. We do not intend to market the device as a Matter-certified device initially. We do not intend to support Apple Home or broad third-party Matter ecosystem interoperability in the first release. We are under a tight schedule and are considering reusing Matter/CSA-derived libraries, data models, and protocol concepts internally to reduce engineering effort and move faster toward eventual certification. Our current understanding is that there are already many iOS apps that communicate with LAN-connected devices using proprietary protocols, so our initial assumption is that a vendor-specific local-network device workflow should generally be acceptable. The point we are trying to clarify is whether that changes if the implementa
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
43
Activity
1w
Delayed Developer Account Activation After payment
My sister paid for my Apple developer account with her credit card on the 12th of March, 2026. Apple promised to work on the account within 48 hours. Its been 11 days now and nothing from Apple. I even semt a support request email which was supposed to be responded to within 48 hours too, but nothing after days. Its quiet disappointing that it takes this long to verify a service I'm paying for. Google charges 25 dollars and still managed to activate a developers account almost immediately. Yet, 99 USD with apple amd this delay is what I get. This is wrong Please help review my account and activate my profile Thank you
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
35
Activity
1w
Reply to Xcode 26.4: Regressions in Intelligence features
Thanks for the detailed response! To answer your questions: OAuth - I don't see a pattern other than time. It seems to lose the OAuth token 2 or 3 times per day. It also doesn't seem to depend on idle time. I can be in the middle of working and it will lose the token. Yes, especially since thinking can go off the rails or go into a nearly-endless loop, this serves as a way to monitor and guide agent progress. I did file a feedback on all the issues, btw! (FB22310171 on the whole set of issues, and I also just filed FB22316631 per your request on this specific one.) Next time this occurs, I will attach it to the Feedback report. No, I have never downloaded or setup Codex. I especially want to highlight the additional bug I reported in my Feedback report but did not post here -- the agent will take action even if I specifically tell it to ask for approval before proceding. This is concerning because there is now some internal state where the agent believes it has gotten permission even though it hasn't
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
App Review 2.1(b): paywall present in build but disabled — can it block review? What’s the best response?
Hello everyone, I’m submitting an iOS app to App Review and received Guideline 2.1(b) – Information Needed. Apple says it appears the app may access or include paid digital content/subscriptions and they want details about the business model. In my project, a paywall / premium UI exists in the codebase, and subscription products are configured in App Store Connect for a future release, but in the build currently submitted: The paywall is disabled (not reachable through any UI flow / feature flags are off). There is no purchase flow (no way to subscribe in-app). There is no external purchase (no website/Stripe/etc.). Users cannot access any previously purchased subscriptions (no entitlement access / restore not exposed). Questions: Can the mere presence of a paywall screen / IAP-related code in the binary (even if disabled/unreachable) block App Review or trigger repeated 2.1(b) requests? Is it recommended to remove paywall/IAP code entirely from the review build if it’s not used yet, or is a clear ex
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
24
Activity
1w
Payment processed 18 days ago, but Developer Program still not activated
Hi everyone, I’m looking for some advice or assistance regarding my Apple Developer Program enrollment. I completed my purchase and paid the $99 fee back on March 5th. Today is March 23rd, and my account is still not activated. It has been 18 days of total silence. I have already sent multiple follow-up emails to Apple Support, but I haven't received a single response. My payment was successfully processed, but I haven't received any confirmation or activation emails since then. Here are my transaction details: Invoice Number: MC55225030 Web Order Number: D009495884 Sales Order Number: AEU2369279 Has anyone else experienced such a long delay recently? Is there any other way to escalate this issue besides the standard contact form? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
150
Activity
1w
No Sales Data since 3/16/2026
I am not seeing any sales data in the app store since 3/16/2026 but there are units sold and proceeds displayed. Anyone from Apple to give an update? Any other developers seeing the same problem?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
40
Activity
1w
Reply to Clarity App Attestation Errors
Hello there, Can i rely on the following mapping: generateKey — local only, two possible errors: featureUnsupported (simulator, iOS < 14) unknownSystemFailure (Secure Enclave fault). attestKey — contacts Apple servers, possible errors: featureUnsupported (simulator, iOS < 14) unknownSystemFailure (Secure Enclave fault) invalidInput (one time challenge is not hashed properly) invalidKey (key already attested) serverUnavailable (no network, Apple service down, rate limiting in action). generateAssertion — local only, possible errors: unknownSystemFailure((Secure Enclave fault)) invalidInput (one time challenge is not hashed properly) invalidKey (key deleted from Secure Enclave).
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Enroll in ADP pending verification
I represent a business who is trying to enroll into the Apple Developer Program. We already have a business account with Apple. Through our business account I have signed up for and provided all of the requested documentation for the Apple Developer Program. I am not the owner of the business, but I am qualified to take these actions on behalf of the business. The enrollment is pending verification since Friday. Just curious if there is anything I can do to move this along? Thank you.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
35
Activity
1w
How does Apple Review Work with peripheral devices?
I’m working toward an official release of our application. The app is designed to interface with peripheral devices, which means users need both the mobile app and the peripheral devices to log in and use it. Because of that, how would the review process work when I get to that point?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
69
Activity
1w
Reply to Uric Acid and Ketones in HealthKit
Apple folks can't comment future plans based on the company's policy. I'd say that your ask is best handled as a feedback report for HealthKit. Do you have a feedback report yet? If not, I’d suggest that you file one and share your report ID here. Thanks. Best, —— Ziqiao Chen  Worldwide Developer Relations.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
App rejected under Guideline 2.1(a) - App Completeness. Seeking advice!
Hello everyone, I recently submitted my iOS app for review, but it was unfortunately rejected under Guideline 2.1(a) - Performance - App Completeness. For context, my app is a healthcare application built with Ionic. According to the App Review team's message, they found the app to be incomplete. They stated they were unable to review the app because they couldn't get past the login screen. The Root Cause: Upon investigating, we discovered the issue is related to IP Geo-blocking. Because the app handles sensitive healthcare data, our API provider strictly blocks all network traffic originating from outside of Italy to legally comply with European GDPR regulations. Since the App Review team tests from the US, their requests are being entirely blocked by the firewall, causing the login to fail and the app to look broken on their end. What I have verified so far: I have provided valid demo account credentials in the App Store Connect App Review Information section. I have tested the app thoroughly on physical de
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
99
Activity
1w
Reply to How to create ControlWidget button that opens my App
I found a solution my putting the intent into a shared framework and linking it with public struct SharedIntentsPackage: AppIntentsPackage to the app and the widget so iOS will propagate it into the metadata. It works but looks to unintuitive to me compared to the usual apple system integration apis.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w