“4.3”

How much different is Metal's computer shader pipeline vs. OpenGL 4.3? I am interested in learning how to port some OpenGL compute shaders to metal for a game, but some I have heard from a manager that his dev told them it could not be done because Metal is missing some key features of OpenGL 4.3. Does anyone know what Metal's limitations are vs. OpenGL 4.3 when it comes to compute shaders? Thanks.

Hello, I submitted an appeal after my app was rejected under Guideline 4.3(a). It has now been over 5 days and I have not received any reply from the App Review Team. Has anyone experienced similar delays recently? Does Apple respond eventually or is there something else I should do? Thank you in advance.

Hello, We have two chat applications that are based on the same source code but are owned by different individuals. These apps have distinct names, color themes, and user bases, although they share the same underlying source code. Both apps were uploaded to the App Store over three years ago. However, when we attempted to update one of the apps recently, it was rejected for violating Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. The rejection message stated: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. We are seeking guidance on how to obtain approval for this update. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Hello everyone, I’m looking for advice from developers who may have faced a similar situation, as we appear to be stuck in a long-running loop of Guideline 4.3(a) rejections on iOS with no actionable feedback from App Review. Over an extended period, our iOS app has been repeatedly rejected under Guideline 4.3(a) (“similar or repackaged”), regardless of the changes we make. The responses from App Review consistently use the same high-level language and do not indicate what specifically is considered problematic. Some relevant context: The app is built with Flutter using a single shared codebase. The macOS version, built from the same codebase with the same overall structure and UI, has been approved without issues. The iOS version, using that same implementation, continues to receive 4.3(a) rejections. We do not use purchased templates and do not operate multiple developer accounts. Like most apps, we use some third-party and open-source components where technically appropriate. Acr

Hello there, We have created fresh new app for Password auto fill and passkey handling with unique UI and then when we submitted out app apple rejected app for the reason App Review Guideline 4.3(a) so please guide us how we can resolve still we have created as new app and code was also created by us! Thank you, LOGICLINE Infotech.

As many developers have already experienced (see https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/82935, https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/82964, https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/46910), Apple started to agressively apply the 4.3 guideline asking the developers to consolidate their existing apps into 1 container app. We experienced this ourselves recently.Our apps are designed to help people pass their UK theory test. As there are 5 different vehicle categories (which are not related to each other in any way) we obviously have an app for each of these categories. Apple is asking us to bundle cars, motorcycles, lorries, etc all into one container app.We already responded to the App Review team highlighting many reasons why we believe that this is a wrong application of the 4.3 guideline. Some of these are listed below:We develop all the code ourselves and we do not use any commercial templates.These apps target different sets of users (even the age profile is different)These apps co

Good afternoon, I will tell you my case, 2 years ago I uploaded applications to the store without any problem, I even uploaded my first application that was an application to download wallpapers, after that I was developing games, of which I went up to the store without problems, now I have been developing applications by hobby, but in all the cases that I have tried to publish them I find myself with the same copy / paste of 4.3 - Design spam, which always leaves me in them, I don't know what to add or remove for that my application is not considered spam, sometimes it seems that they do not even review it, there are occasions that the review does not last 5 minutes. What would you recommend me to do? Thanks

My game was submitted for app review for few round, every time they rejected and i resolve the issue, but latest they reject as Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam and dont have response more than 1 week, I am confusing, early stage was Code of developer (showing what my game have with recording),later follow by some bug fix, then design copy-cat ( the game is totally written by me), but then i asked many round please pin point which part. End up they reject with Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam and i replied with full list of unique feature my game have and explaination on some feature where mostly every game have it such as stamina regen, ranking, gacha. Please help, my game was on google play for 1 week plus, some players of follower was asking for ios. google play link : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bubluestudio.beyondgod

My dating app has now been rejected by Apple under Guideline 4.3(b) for the fourth time. The reason given is that the App Store already contains enough apps in this category. I understand that Apple does not want duplicate or copycat apps. However, my app is not simply another dating app with a different name and design. The app has several core features specifically built around real-life dating: Real Date Score: Users receive a score based on completed real-life dates. This score is displayed on their profile and helps other users understand whether someone actually goes on dates and follows through. Real Date Planner: Users can plan real-life dates through the app. Group Dates: Users can organize dates with groups of up to 10 people. Group Chat: Up to 10 people can participate in a group conversation. Ghosting Protection: Users who repeatedly ghost after matching can be permanently banned. Mandatory Selfie Verification: Users must complete verification to use the platform. Singles & Couples: T

Hello dear friends, I created the application from scratch, but Apple writes to me to do it as a mistake, please tell me 😭😭😭 Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program account. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. Next Steps Since we do not accept spam apps on the App Store, we encourage you to review your app concept and submit a unique app with distinct content and functionality. Resources Some factors that contribute to a spam rejection may include: Submitting an app with the same source code or assets as other apps already submitted to the App Store Creating and submitting multiple similar apps using a repackaged app template Purchasing an app template with problematic code from a third party Submitting several similar apps across multiple accounts Learn more about our requ

hii submitted app yesterday to review, This morning I was surprised that the application was rejected, Reason 4.3 Design: Spam.And I've introduced an application programmed by myself, and a unique design.This message I receivedGuideline 4.3 - DesignWe noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved.what should I do ?

hi all, i have dating app, approved in google store, and working website but i cant get approval from apple review team ( Guideline 4.3(b) - Design - Spam) can someone help/suggest how to solve it our app has 2000 clients already

Hello. Appstore is rejecting my app according to article 4.3. But the app is not a copy, what should I do in this case? It is useful to specify the details; I had previously registered with my personal account and the Appstore stated that unfortunately VPN applications are not accepted with a personal account. Then they told me to register with a company account and make this application from the company account. (When I sent the application for review on my personal account, there were only a few incorrect items and the most important reason why it was not accepted was that it was a personal account). Now we send the application for review with our company account, but as soon as it is put into in review mode, it is quickly rejected due to 4.3 spam. The app is not a copy but completely custom created. I don't know how to find a solution. Can you please help with the issue?

Hello everyone, When I submit the game I developed with Unity, it's constantly being rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. Unfortunately, I haven't received any detailed information. I've changed almost all the assets in the code. I'm not using any code other than my own. But I can't overcome this problem. How can I find out where this problem occurs? Thank you very much in advance for your support.

I have made an application with the main function to enter birth dates and export information based on the Mayan calendar in Japan. I explained to the reviewer about the Mayan calendar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_calendar And I still get a rejection from the reviewer: Guideline 4.3 - Design - Spam It took me a lot of time to make this app. How do I pass this assessment? Everyone helped me with it. Thank you.