missing package product

The lost mode command requires that the device is supervised. The error is what I would expect if the device isn't supervised.

On a CI infrastructure, we connect nodes through SSH and launch automated app testing. So, I'm going to start with a very short answer, then try and give a much longer answer. So, the short answer first: open /Applications/Pages.app Great! You should do that! /Applications/Pages.app/Contents/MacOS/ Yes, you really shouldn't do this. Long Answer: Let's start with what this actually does: open /Applications/Pages.app Part of our system’s fundamental design is the idea of execution contexts. If you want to learn more about some of the details, the great classic, TN2083: Daemons and Agents, is probably the best entry point. However, summarizing the most relevant details... First off, for our purposes, there are two relevant execution contexts: The global or system session. This is running all the time and cannot present any kind of user interface. This is where daemons run. User or login sessions (there can be more than one if multiple users are logged in). Logging in creates a login session, and logging out dest

Kevin and ssmith_c for your assistance. I fortunately managed to file in the bug: FB20677188 Thank you! Looking over the bug, there was one point I wanted to comment on: For the Matter Media Device Basic Video Player Type Apple Home does support the commissioning (adding the device to the list of accessories displayed in Home App), but no controls are displayed. Not even the mandatory required controls: ... This type of Matter Device, which is part of the standard, should at least expose the mandatory controls and commands. The idea that Apple (and general ecosystem vendors more broadly) should try and support the full range of the Matter specification is, IMHO, one of those ideas which sounds reasonable on the surface but is, in fact, a very bad idea. First off, quoting myself: The Matter specification itself is sufficiently broad and complex that, in practice, I'm not sure it will ever really be possible to create a high-quality controller app* that actually supports EVERY possible accessory configuration i

I am working on a Gaussian Splatting App using the UnityGaussianSplatting package and building for Apple Vision Pro. I want to be able to load splat (.ply / .splat) files from the Vision Pro's storage into the application. OK. So the main issue to be aware of here is the difference between works fine for a developer and works well for a user. For development purposes, you can basically just set the two keys (UIFileSharingEnabled/LSSupportsOpeningDocumentsInPlace) and then use your Documents directory as your working storage. There could be issues if you edited or deleted those files while your app was actively running, but you will just avoid those issues... by not doing that. On the other hand, if you're planning to ship this to end users then you'll need to use things like file coordination to avoid those issues. Similarly, apps that are more viewer oriented (meaning, they don't edit the files they're working with) often use an import model where they copy (actually clone, so they don't use additio

Is tap to pay still needed? i don't want to read passes from wallet nor accept payments. I want to use nfc card reader on the credit card from the bank i work for in the bank of the app i work for to validate the card and activate it. I don't see how it would be related to tap to pay or wallet. we already have apple pay setup but we still get an error about the entitlements missing. So i'm wondering which one i need and if i need to do a specific request to have them knowing we are a bank and already have com.apple.developer.payment-pass-provisioning

Thanks @DTS Engineer for your quick & detailed answer!! So, my immediate question here is what your larger goal here actually is? I am working on a Gaussian Splatting App using the UnityGaussianSplatting package and building for Apple Vision Pro. I want to be able to load splat (.ply / .splat) files from the Vision Pro's storage into the application. This won't work. The primary goal of the App Sandbox is to protect user data, which is exactly the kind of data you want access to. Yeah, that was also what I suspected. Hence my question what the intended way to access files from an app would be. apps get access to files through one of two broad mechanisms: Thanks for referring to these, I think I stumbled upon it while researching, but did not consider them further yet because they are solutions that require editing the code in Xcode. Which poses two problems for me: 1 - I don't have a lot of experience with Swift and how Xcode apps are structured. 2 - The Xcode project is generated from Unity, s