Search results for

“4.3”

625 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Metal performance compared to OpenCL
This is an interesting thread, thanks for the orig post. I was under the impression that Metal was almost always faster than OpenCL because OpenCL is and old and clunky higher level API, but Metal goes right to the metal as they say. I guess not? I would suggest looking into the global memory access times if you can, e.g. the read-write refs to the device declared arrays. I am unsure of the latest tools for this, but you can try to check into the problem by removing device arrays from the picture and just doing fake calculations. E.g. try to set up some local arrays in thread or threadgroup storage instead of device storage for the arrays xyin, xyout and spherical_params (see https://developer.apple.com/metal/Metal-Shading-Language-Specification.pdf section 4.3) and dont even bother to initialize them. Just let the array dereferences and calculations stay the same in your kernel and let it run on bogus float data in those threadgroup arrays. See if it is faster. It should be a lot faster. If it is fa
Topic: Graphics & Games SubTopic: General Tags:
Nov ’20
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
Apple rejected many times.What to do ? Please help me. 4. 3 Design: Spam Guideline 4.3 - Design - Spam Your app primarily features astrology, horoscopes, palm reading, fortune telling or zodiac reports. As such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store. While these app features may be useful, informative or entertaining, we simply have enough of these types of apps on the App Store, and they are considered a form of spam. Next Steps We encourage you to review your app concept and incorporate different content and features that are in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.
Nov ’20
Apple review team violates policy
According to Apple's new policy ( https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=84w3e5bm ) - bug fixes will no longer be delayed over guideline violations except for those related to legal issues. You’ll instead be able to address guideline violations in your next submission.. In 2019 updates to my apps were rejected due to apple Guidelines (note - not safety, not legal - guidelines) violation 4.3 - smap (I have only few of them and they are NOT reskins - they do share similar functionality, though not the same, and different graphics - they are similar only in a way any match 3 is similar to each other). A week ago I wanted to publish and update (SDK update and bugfixed, not gameplay or etc) again, and was still rejected - though obviously it should be allowed. Correct me if I am wrong or misunderstood the sentence from the top of my post. Otherwise whom do I contact to change my reviewer for the one that follows rules? Thank you
0
0
243
Nov ’20
Whitelabelled app built from open source refused with 4.3 "Spam"
Hi, I've built my own Collaboration/Messenger App based on Rocket.Chat from the open source, bound to my server and necessary to receive push notifications from my server. My app was refused today with: Guideline 4.3 - Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam. The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved. Guideline 4.2 - Design - Minimum Functionality We found that the usefulness of your app is limited because it seems to be intended for a small, or niche, set of users. I'm pretty puzzled. Regarding 4.2, how should I deploy an app to potential 250 users of my sports club if not via the AppStore. This is not a company where BusinessManager etc. can be used, I have no control over any devices. But finally 4.3 ... what I read my understanding of Spam i
1
0
635
Oct ’20
4.3 spam
my app was creating problem with deseign spam but somehow i managed to make it work and get accepted by apple store but now while updating it, it still showing same issue 4.3 spam I am totally pissed off and losing hope for my business, can anybody have any solution
2
0
1.8k
Sep ’20
3. 2.0 Business: Other Business Model Issues
My app rejected in from apple side. How can I solve this issue? Guideline 3.2 - Business During our review, we found that this app was designed for a specific business or organization, including its partners, clients or employees, and not for general distribution on the App Store. Business apps available on the App Store are meant for use by a wide variety of external customers around the world. As this app is not intended for general distribution, it cannot be made available on the App Store. We encourage you to review the other ways to distribute your business app and choose one that better meets your business needs. If you revise your app concept and features to provide substantial value to a wide variety of external customers around the world, we recommend that you also review our App Store Review Guidelines, including, among others, guidelines 2.5.4 - Background Location, 3.2.2 - Unacceptable Business Models, 4.0 - Design, 4.2 - Minimum Functionality, and 4.3 - Spam, prior to resubmitting the ap
0
0
994
Aug ’20
Our app got rejected the second time because of 4.3 design spam reason. Need help
Hi, we submitted our app for review after 1 year of development, and 4 months waiting to finally make payment and enable developer account. After review, app was rejected for 4.3 reason design spam as there are already lots of dating apps in the store reason. We have a unique audience and features (of course also common features like other dating as cannot be avoided chat, some like function etc), and a lof of users were looking forward to our ios version, they are still using the web and ask us every day when they can use ios app. App got rejected and what is unfair is that we can mention at least 5 apps that are total trash in terms of features that do exist in app store same category and are our rivals published without any problem. We submitted after 2 weeks a totally new concept for the app, new menus, animations etc to make it more unique so is not anymore under design spam. Now it was rejected again for same reason and we are out of ideas what to change for the next submission. Our designers a
8
0
3.0k
Aug ’20
Build Failing - Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
Hi Team, I am getting the below error when I build the app. Please someone guide me in resolving this issue? I have already tried these solutions. 1) Enable bitcode --> No Undefined symbols for architecture x8664: boost::redetail106300::perlmatcher<char const*, std::_1::allocator, boost::regextraits<char, boost::cppregextraits >::find(), referenced from: bool boost::regexsearch<char const*, std::1::allocator, char, boost::regextraits<char, boost::cppregextraits >(char const*, char const*, boost::matchresults<char const*, std::1::allocator >&, boost::basicregex<char, boost::regextraits > const&, boost::regexconstants::matchflags, char const*) in libFlipper-Folly.a(Uri.o) folly::detail::crc32ccombinehw(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned long), referenced from:... yarpl::credits::add(long long, long long), referenced from:... yarpl::credits::consume(long long&, long long), referenced from:... folly::init(int*, char***, bool), referenced from:... boost::redetail10630
0
0
1.5k
Jul ’20
4.3 Design on my own sequel of my previous game
Hi guys, The ultimate carnage 2 is the sequel to the ultimate carnage on the app store. Witch is my own games. The game is totally different, it adds many new game modes, graphics and performance improvements. So I don't understand why it was rejected under 4.3 Design spam guidelines. How can I get my game to be accepted ? Thank you!
0
0
286
Jul ’20
Our app has a Design-Spam/Duplicate Issue
Hi, We keep receiving this response from the App Store review: Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted by you or another developer to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Apps that simply duplicate content or functionality create clutter, diminish the overall experience for the end user, and reduce the ability of developers to market their apps. Next Steps Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines. Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program. Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review. And those are the main steps to reproduce the issue: Create our app. Submit the app to the App Store. The app got approved. Our business has requested a different bundle ID. Remove our app. Recreate our app with a different bundle ID. Submit the app to the App Store. App got rejected. Several messages, emails hav
2
0
3.6k
Jun ’20
Appstore Rejection every time with reason Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other app
Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted by you or another developer to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Apps that simply duplicate content or functionality create clutter, diminish the overall experience for the end user, and reduce the ability of developers to market their apps. The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved. Next Steps Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines. Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program. Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review. Submitting apps designed to mislead or harm customers or evade the review process may result in the termination of your Apple Developer Program account. Review the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program to le
1
0
963
Jun ’20
Reply to Give existing users in-app purchase for free
The established technique is to examine the receipt of the app. It will have a field in it entitled original_application_version. That will indicate the 'Build' number (unfortunately not the Version number!!!) of the app that the user originally purchased. In your 'new' free app you use a different Build number - like 4.1 then 4.2 then 4.3. You use that Build number to separate the paid purchases from the free purchases.(iOS - Build number; for Mac Apps it's the version number)https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/releasenotes/General/ValidateAppStoreReceipt/Chapters/ReceiptFields.htmlhttps://forums.developer.apple.com/message/11915#11915https://forums.developer.apple.com/message/185419#185419
Jun ’20
Upload issue
Dear all,we are developed app for company/organization.not able ot finish uploading. facing lot of pbmcan any one guide me how to upload app for company usage.Error detailsGuideline 3.2 - BusinessDuring our review, we found that this app was designed for a specific business or organization, including its partners, clients or employees, and not for general distribution on the App Store. Business apps available on the App Store are meant for use by a wide variety of external customers around the world.As this app is not intended for general distribution, it cannot be made available on the App Store. We encourage you to review the other ways to distribute your business app and choose one that better meets your business needs.If you revise your app concept and features to provide substantial value to a wide variety of external customers around the world, we recommend that you also review our App Store Review Guidelines, including, among others, guidelines 2.5.4 - Background Location, 3.2.2 - Unacceptable Business
3
0
504
Apr ’20
Guideline 4.3 about container app
Here is what we got.Our Apple Developer Program account has 21 games in sale. Last year we wanted to update one of them and we got a rejection of 4.3-Design. The Review Team suggested us to combine our apps into a single container app.Then we spent about three months to develop a brand new version which three of our apps were included in one. But when we submitted this version, we still got a rejection of 4.3-Design. Now we are so confused about how to solve this issue. Should we combine all 21 games into one? Or should we remove all other 20 games from sale to make this one's update approved?We are planning to keep just one of our apps in sale and remove all the others. The review team just do the copy and paste work and they didn't answer any of our questions. Could anybody tell us how can we update our app?
3
0
936
Jan ’20
Reply to Metal performance compared to OpenCL
This is an interesting thread, thanks for the orig post. I was under the impression that Metal was almost always faster than OpenCL because OpenCL is and old and clunky higher level API, but Metal goes right to the metal as they say. I guess not? I would suggest looking into the global memory access times if you can, e.g. the read-write refs to the device declared arrays. I am unsure of the latest tools for this, but you can try to check into the problem by removing device arrays from the picture and just doing fake calculations. E.g. try to set up some local arrays in thread or threadgroup storage instead of device storage for the arrays xyin, xyout and spherical_params (see https://developer.apple.com/metal/Metal-Shading-Language-Specification.pdf section 4.3) and dont even bother to initialize them. Just let the array dereferences and calculations stay the same in your kernel and let it run on bogus float data in those threadgroup arrays. See if it is faster. It should be a lot faster. If it is fa
Topic: Graphics & Games SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Nov ’20
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
Apple rejected many times.What to do ? Please help me. 4. 3 Design: Spam Guideline 4.3 - Design - Spam Your app primarily features astrology, horoscopes, palm reading, fortune telling or zodiac reports. As such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store. While these app features may be useful, informative or entertaining, we simply have enough of these types of apps on the App Store, and they are considered a form of spam. Next Steps We encourage you to review your app concept and incorporate different content and features that are in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Nov ’20
Apple review team violates policy
According to Apple's new policy ( https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=84w3e5bm ) - bug fixes will no longer be delayed over guideline violations except for those related to legal issues. You’ll instead be able to address guideline violations in your next submission.. In 2019 updates to my apps were rejected due to apple Guidelines (note - not safety, not legal - guidelines) violation 4.3 - smap (I have only few of them and they are NOT reskins - they do share similar functionality, though not the same, and different graphics - they are similar only in a way any match 3 is similar to each other). A week ago I wanted to publish and update (SDK update and bugfixed, not gameplay or etc) again, and was still rejected - though obviously it should be allowed. Correct me if I am wrong or misunderstood the sentence from the top of my post. Otherwise whom do I contact to change my reviewer for the one that follows rules? Thank you
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
243
Activity
Nov ’20
Whitelabelled app built from open source refused with 4.3 "Spam"
Hi, I've built my own Collaboration/Messenger App based on Rocket.Chat from the open source, bound to my server and necessary to receive push notifications from my server. My app was refused today with: Guideline 4.3 - Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam. The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved. Guideline 4.2 - Design - Minimum Functionality We found that the usefulness of your app is limited because it seems to be intended for a small, or niche, set of users. I'm pretty puzzled. Regarding 4.2, how should I deploy an app to potential 250 users of my sports club if not via the AppStore. This is not a company where BusinessManager etc. can be used, I have no control over any devices. But finally 4.3 ... what I read my understanding of Spam i
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
635
Activity
Oct ’20
4.3 spam
my app was creating problem with deseign spam but somehow i managed to make it work and get accepted by apple store but now while updating it, it still showing same issue 4.3 spam I am totally pissed off and losing hope for my business, can anybody have any solution
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
1.8k
Activity
Sep ’20
3. 2.0 Business: Other Business Model Issues
My app rejected in from apple side. How can I solve this issue? Guideline 3.2 - Business During our review, we found that this app was designed for a specific business or organization, including its partners, clients or employees, and not for general distribution on the App Store. Business apps available on the App Store are meant for use by a wide variety of external customers around the world. As this app is not intended for general distribution, it cannot be made available on the App Store. We encourage you to review the other ways to distribute your business app and choose one that better meets your business needs. If you revise your app concept and features to provide substantial value to a wide variety of external customers around the world, we recommend that you also review our App Store Review Guidelines, including, among others, guidelines 2.5.4 - Background Location, 3.2.2 - Unacceptable Business Models, 4.0 - Design, 4.2 - Minimum Functionality, and 4.3 - Spam, prior to resubmitting the ap
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
994
Activity
Aug ’20
Our app got rejected the second time because of 4.3 design spam reason. Need help
Hi, we submitted our app for review after 1 year of development, and 4 months waiting to finally make payment and enable developer account. After review, app was rejected for 4.3 reason design spam as there are already lots of dating apps in the store reason. We have a unique audience and features (of course also common features like other dating as cannot be avoided chat, some like function etc), and a lof of users were looking forward to our ios version, they are still using the web and ask us every day when they can use ios app. App got rejected and what is unfair is that we can mention at least 5 apps that are total trash in terms of features that do exist in app store same category and are our rivals published without any problem. We submitted after 2 weeks a totally new concept for the app, new menus, animations etc to make it more unique so is not anymore under design spam. Now it was rejected again for same reason and we are out of ideas what to change for the next submission. Our designers a
Replies
8
Boosts
0
Views
3.0k
Activity
Aug ’20
Dating app removed for 4.3 design spam
Dating app removed for 4.3 design spam. What would be the easiest way to get approved again?
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
3.7k
Activity
Aug ’20
Build Failing - Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
Hi Team, I am getting the below error when I build the app. Please someone guide me in resolving this issue? I have already tried these solutions. 1) Enable bitcode --> No Undefined symbols for architecture x8664: boost::redetail106300::perlmatcher<char const*, std::_1::allocator, boost::regextraits<char, boost::cppregextraits >::find(), referenced from: bool boost::regexsearch<char const*, std::1::allocator, char, boost::regextraits<char, boost::cppregextraits >(char const*, char const*, boost::matchresults<char const*, std::1::allocator >&, boost::basicregex<char, boost::regextraits > const&, boost::regexconstants::matchflags, char const*) in libFlipper-Folly.a(Uri.o) folly::detail::crc32ccombinehw(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned long), referenced from:... yarpl::credits::add(long long, long long), referenced from:... yarpl::credits::consume(long long&, long long), referenced from:... folly::init(int*, char***, bool), referenced from:... boost::redetail10630
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
1.5k
Activity
Jul ’20
4.3 Design on my own sequel of my previous game
Hi guys, The ultimate carnage 2 is the sequel to the ultimate carnage on the app store. Witch is my own games. The game is totally different, it adds many new game modes, graphics and performance improvements. So I don't understand why it was rejected under 4.3 Design spam guidelines. How can I get my game to be accepted ? Thank you!
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
286
Activity
Jul ’20
Our app has a Design-Spam/Duplicate Issue
Hi, We keep receiving this response from the App Store review: Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted by you or another developer to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Apps that simply duplicate content or functionality create clutter, diminish the overall experience for the end user, and reduce the ability of developers to market their apps. Next Steps Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines. Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program. Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review. And those are the main steps to reproduce the issue: Create our app. Submit the app to the App Store. The app got approved. Our business has requested a different bundle ID. Remove our app. Recreate our app with a different bundle ID. Submit the app to the App Store. App got rejected. Several messages, emails hav
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
3.6k
Activity
Jun ’20
Appstore Rejection every time with reason Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other app
Guideline 4.3 - Design This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted by you or another developer to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam. Apps that simply duplicate content or functionality create clutter, diminish the overall experience for the end user, and reduce the ability of developers to market their apps. The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved. Next Steps Review the Design section of the App Store Review Guidelines. Ensure your app is compliant with all sections of the App Store Review Guidelines and the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program. Once your app is fully compliant, resubmit your app for review. Submitting apps designed to mislead or harm customers or evade the review process may result in the termination of your Apple Developer Program account. Review the Terms & Conditions of the Apple Developer Program to le
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
963
Activity
Jun ’20
Reply to Give existing users in-app purchase for free
The established technique is to examine the receipt of the app. It will have a field in it entitled original_application_version. That will indicate the 'Build' number (unfortunately not the Version number!!!) of the app that the user originally purchased. In your 'new' free app you use a different Build number - like 4.1 then 4.2 then 4.3. You use that Build number to separate the paid purchases from the free purchases.(iOS - Build number; for Mac Apps it's the version number)https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/releasenotes/General/ValidateAppStoreReceipt/Chapters/ReceiptFields.htmlhttps://forums.developer.apple.com/message/11915#11915https://forums.developer.apple.com/message/185419#185419
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’20
Upload issue
Dear all,we are developed app for company/organization.not able ot finish uploading. facing lot of pbmcan any one guide me how to upload app for company usage.Error detailsGuideline 3.2 - BusinessDuring our review, we found that this app was designed for a specific business or organization, including its partners, clients or employees, and not for general distribution on the App Store. Business apps available on the App Store are meant for use by a wide variety of external customers around the world.As this app is not intended for general distribution, it cannot be made available on the App Store. We encourage you to review the other ways to distribute your business app and choose one that better meets your business needs.If you revise your app concept and features to provide substantial value to a wide variety of external customers around the world, we recommend that you also review our App Store Review Guidelines, including, among others, guidelines 2.5.4 - Background Location, 3.2.2 - Unacceptable Business
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
504
Activity
Apr ’20
Guideline 4.3 about container app
Here is what we got.Our Apple Developer Program account has 21 games in sale. Last year we wanted to update one of them and we got a rejection of 4.3-Design. The Review Team suggested us to combine our apps into a single container app.Then we spent about three months to develop a brand new version which three of our apps were included in one. But when we submitted this version, we still got a rejection of 4.3-Design. Now we are so confused about how to solve this issue. Should we combine all 21 games into one? Or should we remove all other 20 games from sale to make this one's update approved?We are planning to keep just one of our apps in sale and remove all the others. The review team just do the copy and paste work and they didn't answer any of our questions. Could anybody tell us how can we update our app?
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
936
Activity
Jan ’20