Sorry it’s taken me a few days to wade in here; I’m only now just catching up with the backlog that built up over the winter break. [quote='772227021, FCG, /thread/772227, /profile/FCG'] Could this issue also be related to a code signing configuration that needs adjustment? [/quote] On your part? No. First, some background. When you call the PAM API, PAM loads plug-ins into your process. This is subject to library validation, as explained here. IMPORTANT The following discusses implementation details that will help you understand what’s going on, but are not considered API. Don’t ship products that rely on this stuff. The exact rules for library validation are different for code that’s built-in to the OS [1]. For third-party code you have to opt in to library validation, either directly, via the library option when signing your code, or indirectly, via the hardened runtime. In contrast, built-in code is always subject to library validation, with an option to opt out. You can see this in action with the author
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization