Search results for

missing package product

51,070 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Unable to download iOS 26.1 Simulator Runtime - Build 23B80 not available
Even more annoying is that XCode 26.1.1 doesn't recognize any of my older platform installations. To work around this, I tried to boot and use an iOS 26.0 simulator still on my Mac but XCode refuses to acknowledge that it exists. Even if I use the Devices & Simulators window to create a new iOS 26.0 device, XCode will not let me use it without having iOS 26.1 downloaded first. With all of the 26.1 beta issues with the simulators reported on these forums over the last 2 weeks, it's insane to me that this was still pushed out to production in such as broken state.
Nov ’25
Reply to macOS 26.1 Tahoe on ARM: FinderSync extension does not work
Yes, I have already filed a bug, it's number is FB20947446. OK. The engineering team hasn't had a chance to look at it yet, but I can immediately tell you that they're going to need a sysdiagnose from the machine where the failure is happening. /Users/Shared is the default path which is used in the Xcode template when creating a Finder Sync Extension. Oh. I can see why they used that in the template (it's basically the only user path they can guarantee exists), but that's still not... ideal. However... I thought that for reproduction purposes it would be good to just use that as it is to make sure that there is no mistake on my side. ...it should work fine for basic testing, particularly on a dedicated test machine. The location that is used in our product where the problem also occurs is located in the current user directory, where I suppose that it is common to place files that should be synchronized, for which purpose the Finder Sync Extension is designed. OK, that's fine. However, not that the Fi
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Nov ’25
Reply to Module dependency cycle errors in Xcode 26
I'm having a real tough time replicating the error in some brand new packages (even though they seem essentially the same) but I have been able to isolate the issue in my two custom packages to where I can sort of see when the error exists. I have a package A that has a dependency on package B (which has two products). If I include a single Swift file in both packages with no source code it works but if I just add a single import SwiftUI statement to both package A and package B's singular file the error presents itself. I see the following note also attached in the build error: note: Swift Overlay dependency of 'SwiftUI' on 'UIKit' via Clang module dependency: 'SwiftUI.swiftmodule -> SwiftUI.pcm -> UIKit.pcm' (in target '' from project '')
Nov ’25
Reply to DriverKit IOUserSerial Driver
Hello DTS Engineers, Kevin, Quinn, Elliot.... Is this thread watched? Yes...ish? The tools for monitoring older threads are somewhat limited, which makes it easier to miss changes to older threads. The problem is that when I try to transfer larger files, the producer and consumer indexes in the SerialPortInterface get messed up. Can you summarize what's going on before I try look at the logs? __ Kevin Elliott DTS Engineer, CoreOS/Hardware
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Nov ’25
Reply to Unable to upload an app with ExtensionFoundation
Earlier I wrote: [quote='865385022, DTS Engineer, /thread/803896?answerId=865385022#865385022'] I didn’t have a chance to run further checks, like uploading it to App Store Connect. [/quote] For my own reasons I decided to bump the priority on this, and so I ran this test today. I was able to upload the build to App Store Connect and then install it via a TestFlight internal test group. I didn’t encounter any App Store Connect roadblocks and the app I installed via TestFlight worked as expected [1]. AFAIK there aren’t are any more App Store Connect checks after that point, other than App Review itself. As I reminder, I created a security helper extension as described in Creating enhanced security helper extensions. I didn’t try anything more complex than that, but I kinda assumed that such an extension would be worth you exploring for your product. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com [1] I was surprised to see that the i
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
Nov ’25
Reply to Module dependency cycle errors in Xcode 26
Hey Ed, thanks for replying! I tried to create a minimally reproducible example with some barebones packages and wasn't able to see the error. I then tried to remove all of the source code from the two packages where I was seeing the error and no longer get the build error. I'll try to do it piecewise to see exactly when I start getting the error and hopefully fix it or at least it can be more instructive in a bug report.
Nov ’25
Reply to How to perform bluetooth advertising from a MAC before login to the MAC
[quote='864564022, TataChaitanya, /thread/805809?answerId=864564022#864564022, /profile/TataChaitanya'] if I create a user agent will I be able to invoke this user agent before login to user session? [/quote] No. [quote='864564022, TataChaitanya, /thread/805809?answerId=864564022#864564022, /profile/TataChaitanya'] Because my need is to perform bluetooth advertising before user login [/quote] There’s no supported way to do this. My colleague was suggesting that you split the Bluetooth parts of your daemon out into an agent so that the agent can do Bluetooth work on the daemons behalf. The user can then grant the agent the necessary privileges. This approach works for many products that have a daemon that needs to access Bluetooth. However, it won’t work in the pre-login environment because: The only agents that run pre-login are launchd pre-login agents. Those run as root, so there’s no way for the user to grant them the required privilege. I’m presuming that you’re trying to do this as part of your
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Nov ’25
Default Mail App Ad hoc Provisioning Profile Support
Our developer account was granted the com.apple.developer.mail-client by Apple ages ago, which we use for one of our apps. At the time, this entitlement was granted through a special entitlements drop-down on the profile creation page. In fact, the entitlement is still available to us in this manner: Unfortunately, applying the entitlement directly to the profile no longer works through the App Store Connect API. Which is a bummer because we periodically use the API to update our development and ad hoc profiles with new UDIDs. I was eventually able to get Apple to migrate the entitlement to a capability that we can instead apply to the app IDs in our account. Great! However, for some reason the Default Mail App capability (on the Edit your App ID Configuration screen) shows does NOT apply to Ad hoc profiles: Note that Ad hoc is missing. This means we still need to update the Ad hoc profile for the app in question manually through the Apple developer portal. This has to be a bug. It makes no sense tha
6
0
189
Nov ’25
Reply to Notarization submission times out.
There’s limits to how much I can help you with this. When you submit a product to notarytool, it makes various network connections. You have to ensure that your network is set up to allow those connections. That’s not something I can help you with, because it’s not an Apple system that blocking the connections. As to the nature of those connections, that’s documented in the Ensure your build server has network access section of Customizing the notarization workflow. Another good option is to run notarytool with verbose logging enabled. That will usually let you uncover the exact connection that’s failing. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Nov ’25
Reply to Do I need com.apple.developer.vpn.managed entitlement to read an MDM-pushed VPN profile using NETunnelProviderManager.loadAllFromPreferences()?
[quote='806802021, ShyamJiMi, /thread/806802, /profile/ShyamJiMi'] Is this entitlement mandatory for my use case … ? [/quote] It depends |-: If the MDM system installs a profile for your VPN, you will be able to see that configuration. The com.apple.managed.vpn.shared keychain access group comes into play if that profile references a credential in the standard way, meaning either a password or a digital identity. Those credentials get stored in the com.apple.managed.vpn.shared keychain access group. Third-party apps don’t have access to that group by default. If you have an enterprise-focused VPN product that needs such access, you should apply for it. For information on how to apply, see FAQ#9 in Network Extension Framework Entitlements. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Nov ’25
Reply to macOS 26.1 Tahoe on ARM: FinderSync extension does not work
Thank you for your quick response! Yes, I have already filed a bug, it's number is FB20947446. We can reproduce the issue on normal end user machines where nothing special is installed or configured. One particular machine where the problem occurs is a MacBook Pro, 13-inch, M1, 2020 with 16 GB of memory and macOS Tahoe 26.1. One machine there the problem does not occur is a MacBook Pro, 16-inch, 2019, 2.3 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i9 with 32 GB of memory and Tahoe 26.1. /Users/Shared is the default path which is used in the Xcode template when creating a Finder Sync Extension. I thought that for reproduction purposes it would be good to just use that as it is to make sure that there is no mistake on my side. And I assume that the template should work by default. The location that is used in our product where the problem also occurs is located in the current user directory, where I suppose that it is common to place files that should be synchronized, for which purpose the Finder Sync Extension is designed
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Nov ’25
App "In Review" for 29 Days (21 Days After Expedited Review Granted) - Server Logs Show No Activity
Hello everyone, I am writing to seek help with a critical App Review issue for a new application. My app has been in the In Review status for 29 consecutive days (since October 1st) without any change or feedback. This is on an experienced developer account with 5 other apps already live on the App Store. Here is the timeline of the current submission: Sep 30: Submitted new binary. Oct 1: Status changed to In Review. Oct 9: After inquiring about the long delay, Developer Support kindly granted an expedited review (Case ID 102702095699). Oct 30 (Today): The app is still In Review. It has now been 21 days since the expedited review was applied, and 29 days total. The core problem: My primary concern is that based on our server metrics, there has not been a single login attempt or health check from the App Review team since October 1st. This strongly suggests the app is technically stuck in the queue and has not even been opened or tested by a reviewer. We have been in constant contact with Developer Support, wh
5
0
430
Nov ’25
Changing watchOS Deployment Target - What happens to users on old versions
This is probably a silly question, but I couldn't find the answer to it in the forums or in the documentation, though I may be missing something. I currently have an app with a deployment target of iOS 16 and a watchOS app (not independent) with a deployment target of watchOS 7. I understand what happens when I change the deployment target on the iOS app (e.g., users with iOS/iPadOS versions less than 16 will just never see the updates in the App Store). But what happens if I change the deployment target of the watchOS dependent app to something like watchOS 8? Will users who have iOS 16 and watchOS 7 (iOS meets deployment target/watchOS does not) get the app update, and it'll just uninstall the watchOS app automatically? Will they just not see the update? Does the old version of the Watch app somehow stay on their watch while the iOS app gets updated?
4
0
2.5k
Nov ’25
Simulators (iOS 26.1) clean takes up to 15min every time
We have the following step before running any tests on CI machine: xcrun simctl shutdown all && xcrun simctl erase all It was working perfectly before Xcode 26.1. On Beta 3 it was doing it for 15 min every time. When updated to RC1, the tests with cached build are fast (clean goes up to 10 sec), but the package tests clean is still going up to 15 min every time. We did xcrun simctl runtime dyld_shared_cache update --all as advised but it's helping only temporarily. Is this going to be fixed in the official release?
2
0
217
Nov ’25