“A Summary of the WWDC26 Group Lab”

The profile expiration date is approaching, and no amount of inquiries will solve it. Create a new profile Download a new profile from Xcode Press archive, press Distribute App, press Enterprise, and distribute Invalid expiration date in profile of summary of review app.ipa content I've tried everything that comes out by Googleing profiles, such as regenerating profiles, erasing caches, updating Xcode, updating macOS, deleting existing profile information, etc. Expiration date different from the expiration date of the profile created in that menu is displayed. The expiration date of the profile I created is December 8, 2026, and the previous certificate is January 22, 2026. However, the profile information of the generated ipa is February 12, 2026. So I can't distribute this app because I'm scared, and the expiration date is coming up. Users should have a period of time to update. Get me a novice developer who's choking up.

I have already created a function to fetch active energy data from HealthKit. But if I try to fetch records of 1 year with multiple active energy records per day, the app hangs and in some cases App does crash and I don't get any data. I couldn't find any other way to access the summary day values for Active Energy from Apple HealthKit. Below is my code for getting Active Energy from HealthKit. func getActiveEnergy(startDate : Date) { ttvar startingDate = startDate tt ttHealthKitSetupManager.getActiveEnergy(date: startDate, withSuccess: { (isSuccess, error) in ttttif isSuccess { ttttttprint(Active Energy Fetch) tttt} tttt ttttstartingDate = NSCalendar.current.date(byAdding: .day, value: 1, to: startDate) ?? Date() tttt ttttif startingDate <= Date() { ttttttself.getActiveEnergy(startDate: startingDate) tttt} else { ttttttself.getSickNumber(startDate : self.globalDate) tttt} tt}) } HealthKitSetupManager.swift class func getActiveEnergy(date:Date, withSuccess: @escaping(Bool,String?) -> Void) { tt

I have Installed beta 3 and my iphone 6 has stopped functioning properly. Issues reported are as follows1. Touch ID stopped working. Showing error message Touch ID can not activate on this phone2. Heating issue... Phone is showing adnormal heating issue with the temperature increased during charging or left idle3. Power draining rapidly overnight... If I charge phone 100% and leave it idle it will drain an die by morning so lets say between 11PM to 8AM phone drains 100%Performance of application also not good as whats app crashes in between giving dark screen.Not sure if this is with the whats app issue of ios...Please help I dont wish to downgrade rather would like to get some solution as downdrading I may endup loosing data and settings...ThanksMahi

Hi, I have pseudo code for a repeating task of work: api_call(/status) { tif response.statusCode == 418 { ttapi_call(/rotate-credentials) { ... } t} telse { ttdoSomeWork() t} tsleep(60) tapi_call(/status) } I want to make a call to /status roughly every 60 seconds, but if the response is a 418 then I want to complete a call to /rotate-credentials before continuing with the next status request. There are other api calls going on as well, triggered by user interaction. These other api calls should wait until the /status call is completed in full (including if a credential rotation is triggered). This implies a serial queue? But that won't wait for the completions to finish, so I should be looking at a dispatch group enter(), leave() and wait() right? I can't find/understand from the docs where completion handlers go, in terms of execution, relative to dispatch queues. So where is the completion handler execution of the subsequent call to /rotate-credentials ? If I wrap the status call in a dispatch group

Due to business requirements, we need to transfer our app Gem Space for iOS from our current Apple Developer account to a new account. We have a major concern regarding our users and the data associated with the app. The user data is currently stored using an App Group with the identifier, for example: group.com.app.sharedData According to some information we’ve found, it might be possible to complete the transfer by removing the App Group from the old account and creating a new one with the same identifier in the new account. However, other sources suggest that App Group containers are owned by the specific team, and data stored in the container may become inaccessible after the app is transferred to a different team. This raises concerns about the possibility of users losing access to their data after updating the app from the new account. Could you please clarify the expected behavior of App Groups in this case? Do we need to perform any kind of data migration, and if so

Do App Groups still work on Watch OS 2 as a mechanism for sharing files between the watch and iPhone?(Since WatchKit extension will now reside on the watch instead of the iPhone)What changes to we need to make to the existing codebase?

Overall love this version, but am seeing 2 issues with this new version: 1) Groups I've created in Contacts are no longer visible, and the option to create Groups also is not available. When I switch back to the old Outlook (it's a toggle at the top of the screen), Groups are back and usable 2). I have multiple O365 accounts (3) that I use in Outlook, one of the accounts does not seem to function properly when I switch to the new version. Would welcome input on both

Prior to Sequoia, Mac Catalyst Apps worked fine when using group folders that started with group. They now get an alert that the Mac Catalyst app is trying to access data from other applications. This may also impact some SwiftUI developers. According to this the documentation for the App Group Entitlements entitlement, on macOS we should begin use the Team Identifier instead of group. Should Mac Catalyst follow the macOS or iOS rules for com.apple.security.application-groups? If they should need to follow the macOS rules now, that creates several issues for developers. We would now need separate build targets to pick up the different Entitlements files. More distressing is that we would need to do some kind of migration process to get our files to the new location. There wouldn't be a transparent way to do so where the user wasn't warned about the application accessing files that don't belong to it. Any clarification on what Mac Catalyst developers should be doing

For the current app, I can get the Application Scripts directory with FileManager.url(for: .applicationScriptsDirectory, in: .userDomainMask, appropriateFor: nil, create: true), but I cannot find a similar API for application groups. Does one exist, or do I have to construct the URL manually? That would probably be ~/Library/Application Scripts/[app group id], but there doesn't seem to be a FileManager API to access ~ either, as FileManager.default.homeDirectoryForCurrentUser returns /Users/username/Library/Containers/[app id]/Data/.

<key>Entitlements</key> <dict> <key>application-identifier</key> <string>A1B2C3D4E5.com.example.myapp</string> <key>aps-environment</key> <string>production</string> <key>get-task-allow</key> </false> <key>keychain-access-groups</key> <array> <string>A1B2C3D4E5.*</string> </array> </dict>Would using a wildcard keychain in two shared Apps from the same publisher mean that each app can access every keychain item of the other?ie. if A1B2C3D4E5.com.example.myapp and A1B2C3D4E5.com.example.myOtherApp had the keychain groups as defined above, then would each of them be able to access ALL of the keychain items of the other? even the ones stored under the group A1B2C3D4E5.com.example.myapp or A1B2C3D4E5.com.example.myOtherApp?

Under testers & groups, I only have all testers and iTunes connect users. There is no + for adding testers in all testers and the + in iTunes connect users is only for adding internal testers. I don't have any groups shown nor do I have the option to add a group.I had external testers before (and they still appear in all testers) but I did not create any groups.Maybe the problem is that I have not uploaded any builds yet?

Recently I have added new purchases in subscription group, now many users are complaining of getting charged for multiple subscription in the same group. Can somebody please help me in understanding in terms of consumer, how it will proceed?. As per documentation user should have been charged only with the newly chosen subscription and should have received partial refund for the older one.