“translate scheme”

Ah. Correct, we only support /v1 prefixes at the moment. Please file a feedback request so we can bump the priority on this. As an alternative, you could have a local service act as a passthrough so you can make that service implement /v1 and then bounce to your other URL scheme from there.

I’m interested in developing (or interfacing with) an accessory that transmits video over USB using the UVC standard, and I’d like to better understand how this works within the MFi (Made for iPhone) program. This is actually pretty easy to answer, as the answer is it doesn't. That is, the MFi program simply doesn't have anything to do with this. Let me start by explaining what's going on here: From what I understand, USB-C iPads appear to offer more direct support for standard UVC devices. So, there are actually two iPad-specific options here: iPadOS support DriverKit, which, at a purely technical level, means it's possible to create an iPadOS app that directly communicates with any USB device. iPadOS also includes a class-compliant driver for UVC (USB Video Class) devices. For more information on that, see Support external cameras in your iPadOS app from WWDC2023. To some extent, #2 exists to minimize unnecessary disruption from #1. That is, it was (and is) always going to be possible to make a camera work

This week-end, I played a bit with Xcode 26.3 coding agent. I wanted to use Claude model served by Amazon Bedrock. I found three different ways, summarised in two blog posts. Part 1: https://stormacq.com/2026/02/19/xcode-openrouter-bedrock.html. Part 2: https://stormacq.com/2026/02/21/xcode-local-proxy-bedrock.html I wrote a small local proxy (In Swift) that translate OpenAI Chat Completion API Calls issued by Xcode into Anthropic message API on Bedrock. GitHub repo: https://github.com/sebsto/anthropic-proxy Don't install a binary proxy distributed as a DMG as you can't audit what that app does.

If you use your intent phrase inside of the Xcode scheme settings (there is a place called Siri Intent Query where you can type it in), does the same thing happen? If that's still giving you trouble, then the next thing I'd do is create a brand new test project in Xcode, give it an app name that's pretty unique, and bring in the basic outline of your Siri intent code, and make sure everything is working there. The goal of that is so that you review all of the integration steps again from a clean slate to make sure you didn't miss anything, as well as validating that once the code does run, you have a basic functional outline you can build upon for exploring the API as you build out the feature for your real app. Jumping ahead a step, one additional thing that trips people up when debugging their intent extension is a misunderstanding of when the code runs — it is in a separate process, and so depending how you launch it, breakpoints you set for debugging may or may not be activated. A good rule of th

[quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] You advised that I should enable all the settings. [/quote] Well, yes, if you read that one sentence in isolation. However, I made it clear that one specific setting, Enable Soft Mode for Memory Tagging, reduces security, so if you goal is security then enabling that is probably not a good choice (-: [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am therefore inclined not to enable it. [/quote] Or you could profile your app and see if it makes a difference in pratice. That’s generally the best way to approach performance trade-offs. [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am not entirely sure what is meant by logging in [Soft Mode] [/quote] Quoting Enabling enhanced security for your app: This entitlement makes hardware memory tagging operate in soft mode, where the system produces a simulated crash instead

Does this mean that the team working on Rosetta 2 is aware of the bug, and addressing it? I understand that you cannot speak about the future, but can you speak to the here and now? Is it being worked on? Is there any way the community can support the team working on this bug? I understand this may not seem like a big issue in the grand scheme of things, but there is a large community of people who would really like this fixed. Thank you for all of your work.

Rosetta 2 Deadlock on M5 January 2026 Blizzard update causes a deadlock in Rosetta 2 on M4 chips. CodeWeavers (the developer of CrossOver) has analyzed the issue and identified it as a Rosetta translation failure, not a CrossOver application-level bug. Hardware: M5 Mac Book Pro System: Tahoe 26.2 Impacted Software: CrossOver 25.1.1 Diablo II: Resurrected

Yes, it makes sense now, so you are letting us know the API: guard let url = URL(string: https://www.apple.com) else { return } if UIApplication.shared.canOpenURL(url) { UIApplication.shared.open(url) } else { print(Could not open URL) } Is not working? I can help you with that as there is no bugs on that api at all. I just put the simple app to open and opens safari, but if there is no browser nothing will open? import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { VStack { Image(systemName: globe) .imageScale(.large) .foregroundStyle(.tint) Text(Hello, world!) }.task { guard let url = URL(string: https://www.apple.com) else { return } if UIApplication.shared.canOpenURL(url) { UIApplication.shared.open(url) } else { print(Could not open URL) } } .padding() } } #Preview { ContentView() } However the API requires an app capable of handling this request as explained here: (Launching the app brings the other app to the foreground.) If no app is capable of handling the specified scheme, the com