“build disappears”

Is it mandatory for all developers to migrate to Xcode 26 starting from April 28, 2026? What happens if a developer submits or distributes a build created using Xcode 16 after April 28, 2026? Will it still be accepted or supported? Our app is distributed only via an internal company portal (not through the App Store). In this case, are we still required to build and distribute the app using Xcode 26 after April 28, 2026? If a hotfix is required before our next planned release (July 2026), how safe is it to use the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility flag as a temporary solution, assuming Xcode 26 becomes mandatory? Are there any risks or limitations associated with this approach? What are the potential issues if a team continues development on Xcode 16 while others have migrated to Xcode 26? For example, could there be compatibility, build, or integration challenges in such a mixed environment? If the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility flag is used as a temporary workaround, what would be the

Hi everyone, I'm building an iOS app using Capacitor 6 with Swift Package Manager (SPM). I have a custom native plugin (AppleIAPPlugin) for StoreKit 2 In-App Purchases that lives in the App target (not as an SPM package). Despite compiling successfully, the JavaScript bridge throws: AppleIAP plugin is not implemented on ios Setup AppleIAPPlugin.swift: swift import Foundation import Capacitor import StoreKit @objc(AppleIAPPlugin) public class AppleIAPPlugin: CAPPlugin, CAPBridgedPlugin { public let identifier = AppleIAPPlugin public let jsName = AppleIAP public let pluginMethods: [CAPPluginMethod] = [ CAPPluginMethod(name: getProducts, returnType: CAPPluginReturnPromise), CAPPluginMethod(name: purchase, returnType: CAPPluginReturnPromise), CAPPluginMethod(name: restorePurchases, returnType: CAPPluginReturnPromise), CAPPluginMethod(name: getCurrentEntitlements, returnType: CAPPluginReturnPromise), CAPPluginMethod(name: openManageSubscriptions, returnType: CAPPluginReturnPromise), ] @objc func getProduc

Hey Apple team, I'd love to see a native wind animation layer added to Apple Maps and MapKit. A built-in, system-level wind visualization — similar to the animated weather layers seen in third-party apps — would be an incredibly powerful tool for developers building weather, aviation, marine, outdoor recreation, and navigation apps. Having this baked natively into MapKit would mean smoother performance, better battery efficiency, and a consistent experience across iOS, iPadOS, and macOS — rather than every developer having to reinvent the wheel with custom particle systems or third-party SDKs. Please Apple — this would be a fantastic addition to the Maps ecosystem. 🌬️🗺️

I'm writing a read-only filesystem extension. I see that the documentation for loadResource(resource:options:replyHandler:) claims that the --rdonly option is supported, which suggests that this should be possible. However, I have never seen this option provided to my filesystem extension, even if I return usableButLimited as a probe result (where it doesn't mount at all - FB19241327) or pass the -r or -o rdonly options to the mount(8) command. Instead I see those options on the volume's activate call. But other than saving that readonly state (which, in my case, is always the case) and then throwing on all write-related calls I'm not sure how to actually mark the filesystem as read-only. Without such an indicator, the user is still offered the option to do things like trash items in Finder (although of course those operations do not succeed since I throw an EROFS error in the relevant calls). It also seems like the FSKit extensions that come with the system handle read-only strangely as well. For example, fo

I'm in the process of writing a DriverKit USBHostInterface driver, and while I'm finally starting to get there, I've run into a bit of a frustration with logging. Naturally I have a liberal amount of os_log calls that I'm using to troubleshoot my driver. However I've noticed that they don't show up until after the first time my driver has loaded. Meaning, for example, suppose I make a new build of my driver and it's bundled user-mode app, install the bundle to /Applications, run the installer, verify it took with systemextensionsctl list, fire up Console and start streaming log entries, then plug in my device. I can see the log entries that show that my driver is loaded, etc., then a bunch of kernel -> log entries, but none of my Start method log entries. If I unplug my device and plug it in again, my log entries show up as expected. Why is this and, more importantly, how can I fix it? I'd like to see those log entries the first time the driver loads, if I could.

Hi everyone I recently build an app and deployed it through app store connect and testet it on TestFlight. Everything worked fine up until build 1.0.3. Since then I have not been able to install the app on my phone through TestFlight - even though build and submission runs through successfully on eas, expo and app store. I have tried deleting and reinstalling the TestFlight from my phone. removing and adding back myself as tester. checking logs and commits from the shift from build 1.0.3 to build 1.0.4. I can see I changed name and slug, so I tried removing the app from app store connect and added a new one with new build and submission. Ran through successfully but still could not install the app through TestFlight on my iPhone. I have also tried reaching out to Apple Developer Support, but I have not heard from them. Has anyone tried something similar?

I have an existing app in App Store Connect. I added the SharedWithYou functionality to the app code and tested it on several devices. Everything is working as expected. One of the first steps was to add the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement to the Entitlements.plist file. This required a round of updates for app identifiers and provisioning profiles. When I upload the production build for testing in TestFlight I receive the following error: 90919: Invalid entitlement. The “” bundle has the com.apple.developer.shared-with-you entitlement, but it doesn’t use the Shared with You framework. Please remove the entitlement and upload a new build. I'm using SWHighlight, SWHighlightCenter, and SWAttributionView in several places throughout my app... I filed an issue in the Feedback Assistant but so far, have not received any response.

I'm developing a macOS security tool using NEFilterDataProvider as a system extension. On macOS 26 beta (25E241), sysextd consistently rejects my extension with: sysextd: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications Configuration: App installed in /Applications/ Signed with Developer ID Application (693DSH8GN5) Entitlement: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = content-filter-provider com.apple.developer.system-extension.install = true Developer Mode enabled on test machine Comparison with Little Snitch: Little Snitch runs correctly on the same machine. Key differences I found: Little Snitch uses content-filter-provider-systemextension instead of content-filter-provider Little Snitch has com.apple.security.app-sandbox = false Both signed with Developer ID Application When I switch to content-filter-provider-systemextension, Xcode rejects every provisioning profile because none match that entitlement value, and the Developer Portal doesn't expose fine-grained control over the Network Extensio