We have a launch daemon which can check for team identifier and some other signing information of any application on machine and match it with provided information to confirm the validity of the application/binary. We use SecStaticCodeCreateWithPath to read the signing information of the app/binary which works in most cases. However, for some third party daemon processes, the static code creation fails with error "Operation not permitted". We are having difficult time identifying why static code creation would fail specially when our process is running with root privileges. Can you please help us understand in what scenario can this API fail with this error? Can there be any process or rule which can deny creating static code of a process like endpoint security extensions/daemon? We are using default flags in SecStaticCodeCreateWithPath.

Hello everyone, I'm currently in the process of implementing platform SSO (Single Sign-On) in macOS and could use some guidance. I find myself a bit confused during the device registration phase, particularly because my Identity Provider (IdP) needs to support it. I'm wondering if Platform SSO will handle this automatically or if there are specific steps I need to take. Additionally, I'm unsure whether I need to share the device signing and encryption key in my identity. Could someone please clarify this for me? Finally, I would greatly appreciate it if someone could provide me with some sample code or starting pointers to help me get started on the right track. More into apart from OpenID, SAML protocol what else the Idp needs to change to support Platform SSO. Thank you in advance for your assistance!

While adopting SwiftUI (and Swift Concurrency) into a macOS/AppKit application, I'm making extensive use of the .task(id:) view modifier. In general, this is working better than expected however I'm curious if there are design patterns I can better leverage when the number of properties that need to be "monitored" grows. Consider the following pseudo-view whereby I want to call updateFilters whenever one of three separate strings is changed. struct FiltersView: View { @State var argument1: String @State var argument2: String @State var argument3: String var body: some View { TextField($argument1) TextField($argument2) TextField($argument3) }.task(id: argument1) { await updateFilters() }.task(id: argument2) { await updateFilters() }.task(id: argument3) { await updateFilters() } } Is there a better way to handle this? The best I've come up with is to nest the properties inside struct. While that works, I now find myself creating these "dummy types" in a bunch of views whenever two or more properties need to trigger an update. ex: struct FiltersView: View { struct Components: Equatable { var argument1: String var argument2: String var argument3: String } @State var components: Components var body: some View { // TextField's with bindings to $components... }.task(id: components) { await updateFilters() } } Curious if there are any cleaner ways to accomplish this because this gets a bit annoying over a lot of views and gets cumbersome when some values are passed down to child views. It also adds an entire layer of indirection who's only purpose is to trigger task(id:).

Crash Stack: thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x19ba3bb04) frame #0: 0x000000019ba3bb04 CoreFoundation`forwarding.cold.2 + 92 frame #1: 0x000000019b8ab718 CoreFoundation`forwarding + 1288 frame #2: 0x000000019b8ab150 CoreFoundation`_CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 96 frame #3: 0x000000019df230b0 CoreText`TCFRef<CTRun*>::Retain(void const*) + 40 frame #4: 0x000000019e052050 CoreText`CreateFontWithFontURL(__CFURL const*, __CFString const*, __CFString const*) + 476 frame #5: 0x000000019e052874 CoreText`TCGFontCache::CopyFont(__CFURL const*, __CFString const*, __CFString const*) + 144 frame #6: 0x000000019df27dcc CoreText`TBaseFont::CopyNativeFont() const + 232 frame #7: 0x000000019df8ee64 CoreText`TBaseFont::GetInitializedGraphicsFont() const + 152 frame #8: 0x000000019df26d70 CoreText`TBaseFont::CopyVariationAxes() const + 296 frame #9: 0x000000019df2d148 CoreText`TDescriptor::InitBaseFont(unsigned long, double) + 768 frame #10: 0x000000019df21358 CoreText`TDescriptor::CreateMatchingDescriptor(__CFSet const*, double, unsigned long) const + 604 frame #11: 0x000000019df251f8 CoreText`CTFontCreateWithFontDescriptor + 68 frame #12: 0x00000001bff8dfb8 WebCore`WebCore::createCTFont(__CFDictionary const*, float, unsigned int, __CFString const*, __CFString const*) + 124 frame #13: 0x00000001bff8e8bc WebCore`WebCore::FontPlatformData::fromIPCData(float, WebCore::FontOrientation&&, WebCore::FontWidthVariant&&, WebCore::TextRenderingMode&&, bool, bool, std::__1::variant<WebCore::FontPlatformSerializedData, WebCore::FontPlatformSerializedCreationData>&&) + 228 frame #14: 0x00000001c128eef4 WebKit`IPC::ArgumentCoder<WebCore::Font, void>::decode(IPC::Decoder&) + 1352 frame #15: 0x00000001c1333ca4 WebKit`std::__1::optional<WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>> IPC::ArgumentCoder<WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>, void>::decodeIPC::Decoder(IPC::Decoder&) + 480 frame #16: 0x00000001c1333a5c WebKit`std::__1::optional<WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>> IPC::Decoder::decode<WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>>() + 28 frame #17: 0x00000001c1333804 WebKit`std::__1::optional<std::__1::pair<WebCore::AttributedString::Range, WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>>> IPC::Decoder::decode<std::__1::pair<WebCore::AttributedString::Range, WTF::HashMap<WTF::String, WebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::DefaultHashWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWTF::String, WTF::HashTraitsWebCore::AttributedString::AttributeValue, WTF::HashTableTraits>>>() + 156 frame #18: 0x00000001c121f368 WebKit`IPC::ArgumentCoder<WebCore::AttributedString, void>::decode(IPC::Decoder&) + 172 frame #19: 0x00000001c121f124 WebKit`std::__1::optionalWebCore::AttributedString IPC::Decoder::decodeWebCore::AttributedString() + 28 frame #20: 0x00000001c12594ec WebKit`IPC::ArgumentCoder<WebCore::DictionaryPopupInfo, void>::decode(IPC::Decoder&) + 76 frame #21: 0x00000001c12d0660 WebKit`std::__1::optionalWebCore::DictionaryPopupInfo IPC::Decoder::decodeWebCore::DictionaryPopupInfo() + 28 frame #22: 0x00000001c12ceef0 WebKit`IPC::ArgumentCoder<WebKit::WebHitTestResultData, void>::decode(IPC::Decoder&) + 1292 frame #23: 0x00000001c1338950 WebKit`std::__1::optionalWebKit::WebHitTestResultData IPC::Decoder::decodeWebKit::WebHitTestResultData() + 28 frame #24: 0x00000001c1ec7edc WebKit`WebKit::WebPageProxy::didReceiveMessage(IPC::Connection&, IPC::Decoder&) + 31392 frame #25: 0x00000001c1fb8f28 WebKit`IPC::MessageReceiverMap::dispatchMessage(IPC::Connection&, IPC::Decoder&) + 272 frame #26: 0x00000001c19ab2c0 WebKit`WebKit::WebProcessProxy::didReceiveMessage(IPC::Connection&, IPC::Decoder&) + 44 frame #27: 0x00000001c1fb3254 WebKit`IPC::Connection::dispatchMessage(WTF::UniqueRefIPC::Decoder) + 252 frame #28: 0x00000001c1fb3768 WebKit`IPC::Connection::dispatchIncomingMessages() + 576 frame #29: 0x00000001b9ab90c4 JavaScriptCore`WTF::RunLoop::performWork() + 204 frame #30: 0x00000001b9ab9fec JavaScriptCore`WTF::RunLoop::performWork(void*) + 36 frame #31: 0x000000019b8cc8a4 CoreFoundation`CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE0_PERFORM_FUNCTION + 28 frame #32: 0x000000019b8cc838 CoreFoundation`__CFRunLoopDoSource0 + 176 frame #33: 0x000000019b8cc59c CoreFoundation`__CFRunLoopDoSources0 + 244 frame #34: 0x000000019b8cb138 CoreFoundation`__CFRunLoopRun + 840 frame #35: 0x000000019b8ca734 CoreFoundation`CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 588 frame #36: 0x00000001a6e39530 HIToolbox`RunCurrentEventLoopInMode + 292 frame #37: 0x00000001a6e3f348 HIToolbox`ReceiveNextEventCommon + 676 frame #38: 0x00000001a6e3f508 HIToolbox`_BlockUntilNextEventMatchingListInModeWithFilter + 76 frame #39: 0x000000019f442848 AppKit`_DPSNextEvent + 660 frame #40: 0x000000019fda8c24 AppKit`-[NSApplication(NSEventRouting) _nextEventMatchingEventMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 688 frame #41: 0x000000019f435874 AppKit`-[NSApplication run] + 480 frame #42: 0x000000019f40c068 AppKit`NSApplicationMain + 888 frame #43: 0x00000001ca56a70c SwiftUI`merged generic specialization <SwiftUI.TestingAppDelegate> of function signature specialization <Arg[0] = Existential To Protocol Constrained Generic> of SwiftUI.runApp(__C.NSResponder & __C.NSApplicationDelegate) -> Swift.Never + 160 frame #44: 0x00000001ca9e09a0 SwiftUI`SwiftUI.runApp<τ_0_0 where τ_0_0: SwiftUI.App>(τ_0_0) -> Swift.Never + 140 frame #45: 0x00000001cad5ce68 SwiftUI`static SwiftUI.App.main() -> () + 224 frame #46: 0x0000000105943104 MyApp Dev.debug.dylib`static MyMacApp.$main() at :0 frame #47: 0x0000000105943c9c MyApp Dev.debug.dylib`main at MyMacApp.swift:24:8 frame #48: 0x000000019b464274 dyld`start + 2840

I tried using Pluginkit via terminal to determine if a File Provider Extension is enabled on Mac OS. Although I see the extension listed in the output of pluginkit -m, The status of + or - doesn't seem to change in this output when I disable or enable the FileProvider extension in System Settings. Is there a more reliable way to determine if the extension is enabled ?

Reproduction procedure Launch Xcode and press shift+command+N to create a macOS App project. Edit the generated ContentView.swift to the following content: struct ContentView: View { @State var txt: String = “” var body: some View { VStack { Text(“Hello, world!\(txt)”) TextField(“input”, text: $txt) onSubmit { // lack of a period letter. // .onSubmit { // Correct code print(“onSubmit\(txt)”) } } } } Build with command+B and it succeeds. Debug with command+R, but a rainbow wheel appears and the window does not show. An error is displayed in Xcode’s Preview Canvas, preventing preview.

@Quinn, The application which is not made with Xcode, has a provision profile, but App Store Connect says "Not Available for Testing". My Googlefu appears weak as I can't seem to figure out why this is, except that it mentions you need to be using Xcode 13 or newer. Am guessing Xcode is adding some meta data to the Info.plist file which TestFlight requires. Is it possible to know which keys and values are required to satisfy TestFlight? If it's not plist keys, is there something else that's needed, that can be shared? We can do this privately if desired.

Hello, I'm having some problems when install my Packet Tunnel network extension as system extension on my mac(macos 15.0). It stuck on Validation By Category. (it works well as NE app extension on ios) systemextensionsctl list --- com.apple.system_extension.network_extension enabled active teamID bundleID (version) name [state] <...> com.myteam.balabalabla.ne (1.0/1) - [validating by category] This is my install System Extension Code sample public class SystemExtension: NSObject, OSSystemExtensionRequestDelegate { private let forceUpdate: Bool private let inBackground: Bool private let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0) private var result: OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result? private var properties: [OSSystemExtensionProperties]? private var error: Error? private init(_ forceUpdate: Bool = false, _ inBackground: Bool = false) { } // some request function i overwrite public func activation() throws -> OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result? { let request = OSSystemExtensionRequest.activationRequest(forExtensionWithIdentifier: FilePath.packageName + ".myNeName", queue: .main) request.delegate = self OSSystemExtensionManager.shared.submitRequest(request) semaphore.wait() if let error { throw error } return result } public func getProperties() throws -> [OSSystemExtensionProperties] { let request = OSSystemExtensionRequest.propertiesRequest(forExtensionWithIdentifier: FilePath.packageName + ".myNeName", queue: .main) request.delegate = self OSSystemExtensionManager.shared.submitRequest(request) semaphore.wait() if let error { throw error } return properties! } public nonisolated static func install(forceUpdate: Bool = false, inBackground: Bool = false) async throws -> OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result? { try await Task.detached { try SystemExtension(forceUpdate, inBackground).activation() }.result.get() } public nonisolated static func uninstall() async throws -> OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result? { try await Task.detached { try SystemExtension().deactivation() }.result.get() } } // And other methods I follow this post Your Friend the System Log and use this command line to collect log. After I initiated the system extension request sudo log collect --last 5m Here is my log (),I only pasted some code snippets that caught me, full version see attachments.(only include com.apple.sysextd), if need more, plz ask me. 1. Some policy missing ```log 22:00:13.818257 `sysextd` extension mockTeamID app.balabala.com.mockbalabala (1.0/1) advancing state from staging to validating 22:00:13.818263 sysextd returning cdhash for local arch arm64 of extension app.balabala.com.mockbalabala info 2025-05-01 22:00:13.818336 sysextd Extension with identifier <private> reached state <private> 22:00:13.819185 sysextd [0x9a2034b00] activating connection: mach=false listener=false peer=false name=com.apple.CodeSigningHelper 22:00:13.819911 sysextd [0x9a2034b00] invalidated after the last release of the connection object 22:00:13.821024 sysextd making activation decision for extension with teamID teamID("mockTeamID ), identifier app.balabala.com.mockbalabala 22:00:13.821026 sysextd no related kext found for sysex `app.balabala.com.mockbalabala` 22:00:13.821027 sysextd no extension policy -- activation decision is UserOption nesessionmanager.system-extensions interrupted 22:00:14.313576 sysextd [0x9a2178280] invalidated because the client process (pid 1886) either cancelled the connection or exited 22:00:14.542154 sysextd connection to com.apple.nesessionmanager.system-extensions interrupted 22:00:14.542319 sysextd [0x9a2178000] Re-initialization successful; calling out to event handler with XPC_ERROR_CONNECTION_INTERRUPTED 22:00:14.542351 sysextd connection to com.apple.nesessionmanager.system-extensions interrupted 22:00:14.589375 nesessionmanager [0x6c80e4500] activating connection: mach=true listener=false peer=false name=com.apple.sysextd And when i debug the System Extension code i notice the request Error catch by didFailWithError public func request(_: OSSystemExtensionRequest, didFailWithError error: Error) { self.error = error semaphore.signal() } error is OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code 1 This problem has been bothering me for a long time, I would appreciate any help, if need more info, comment, thank you.

(EN): After upgrading to macOS 15+, the system contains two incompatible versions of the PingFang (苹方) font: 1. A system-provided version (/System/Library/Fonts/PingFang.ttc) 2. A user-installed version via Font Book (located in ~/Library/Fonts or /Library/Fonts) When a user installs or removes the PingFang font via Font Book after the app starts, font resolution may switch, causing garbled text in newly opened windows or views. This issue did not occur in macOS 13 or 14, and seems specific to how macOS 15+ handles system and user font overlays.

In SwiftUI for macOS, how can I animate the transition from one Tab to another Tab within TabView when the selection changes? In AppKit, we can do the following: let tabViewController = NSTabViewController() tabViewController.transitionOptions = [.crossfade, .allowUserInteraction] How can I achieve the same crossfade effect when using TabView?

I'm facing a bizarre issue with the Apple's Accessibility APIs. I am registering an AXObserver that listens for, among other things, the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotification. For many new users, the kAXSelectTextChangedNotification is not triggered, even though they have enabled Accessibility permission for the app. Other notifications are getting through (kAXWindowMovedNotification, kAXWindowResizedNotification, kAXValueChangedNotification etc - full list here), just not the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotification! We've found that we can reproduce the error by removing accessibility permission for the app and rebooting our computers. After restarting and reenabling accessibility permissions, the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotification was not received, even though other notifications were fine. Strangely, the issue can be resolved by launching Apple's Accessibility Inspector app on an impacted computer. Once the Accessibility Inspector is loaded, the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotifications start coming through as expected. This implies to me that either: We are missing some needed setup when starting the observers. Accessibility Inspector gets it right, thus ‘starting’ the system properly. Accessibility Inspector is using some Apple private APIs that we don’t have access to. Things I’ve tried: I've tried subscribing the AXSelectedTextChangedNotification to different AXUIElements, including the SystemWide element, the Application element, and children elements from the AXApplication. None of these received the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotification, until Accessibility Inspector is booted up. No surprises here, as Apple's documentation confirms that you should add the notification to the root Application AXUIElement if you want to receive notifications for all its children. I had a theory that the issue might be due to my code calling AXUIElementCreateApplication multiple times, possibly creating multiple "Applications" in Apple's Accessibility implementation. If that’s the case, the notifications might be sent to the wrong application AXUIElement. However, refactoring my code to only call AXUIElementCreateApplication once didn't resolve the issue. I thought the issue may be caused by subscribing the AXSelectedTextChangedNotification on the high-level application element (at odds with Apple's documentation). I've tried traversing the child AXUIElements until we find one with the kAXSelectedTextAttribute and then subscribing to that. This did not resolve the issue. I don’t think it's the correct path to continue exploring, given that the notifications are received correctly after AccessibilityInspector is launched. There is one exception to the above: if I add the kSelectedTextChangedNotification listener to a specific text field AXUIElement, I do receive the notification on that text field. However, this is not practical; I need a solution that will work for all text fields within an app. The Accessibility Inspector appears to be doing something that causes the selected-text-changed notifications to be correctly passed up to the high-level application AXUIElement. Another thought is that I could traverse the entire Accessibility hierarchy and add listeners to every subview that has the kAXSelectedTextAttribute. However, I don’t like this long-term solution. It will be slow and incomplete: new elements get added and removed frequently. I just want the kAXSelectedTextChangedNotification to be received by the high-level Application AXUIElement, which the documentation suggests it should be. I also have evidence that this can work, since notifications start coming through after Accessibility Inspector is launched. It’s just a matter of discovering how to replicate whatever Accessibility Inspector is doing. An interesting wrinkle: I implemented the 'traverse' strategy above, but was surprised by how few elements were in the hierarchy. Most apps only go down ~2-3 levels, which didn't seem right to me. Perhaps the Accessibility tree isn't fully initialized? I tried adding a 5-second delay to allow more initialization time, but it didn't change anything. Does anyone have any ideas? Here's our file.

Hello, I’ve uploaded a new build of my macOS app with the first two in-app purchases, but it was rejected under 2.1.0 Performance: App Completeness. After further investigation, it seems that the Apple review team is unable to fetch products. The following code: private let productIDs = ["co.app.freetrial", "co.app.full"] self.products = try await Product.products(for: productIDs) is returning an empty array. (In the TestFlight build, it correctly returns the products.) For me, everything works as expected via Xcode and on a fresh machine using TestFlight. Here’s what I’ve tried so far: The in-app purchases were added to the binary with the first build. I confirmed that each in-app purchase is free of any yellow or red warning messages. Downloaded the app from TestFlight and confirmed that all in-app purchases are available. Updated the in-app purchase price in App Store Connect and verified that the new price is reflected in the app (to rule out any ID mismatches). Reviewed all agreements to ensure no missing signatures. (A few sources online suggested that this could potentially cause issues with in-app purchases for the review team.) I created a new build using a 3rd-party certificate and a provision profile. (Older builds - before adding in-app purchases - were signed with a development certificate and no provision profile, yet they still made it to the App Store. I’m not sure how that was possible or if it contributed to this issue.). Despite these steps, the app continues to be rejected for the same reason. I’m struggling to understand how products are successfully fetched for testers via TestFlight while the review team repeatedly sees zero products. Any guidance on how to resolve this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

In SwiftUI's List, on macOS, if I embed a TextField then the text field is presented as non-editable. If the user clicks on the text and waits a short period of time, the text field will become editable. I'm aware this is generally the correct behaviour for macOS. However, is there a way in SwiftUI to supress this behaviour such that the TextField is always presented as being editable? I want a scrollable, List of editable text fields, much like how a Form is presented. The reason I'm not using a Form is because I want List's support for reordering by drag-and-drop (.onMove). Use Case A view that allows a user to compose a questionnaire. They are able to add and remove questions (rows) and each question is editable. They require drag-and-drop support so that they can reorder the questions.

On macOS, it's not uncommon to present windows as sheets that can be resized. By setting the NSWindow's various frame auto save properties, you can restore the size of the sheet the next time it is presented. When presenting a Sheet from within SwiftUI using the .sheet view modifier, how can I preserve and restore the sheet's frame size? The closest I've been able to come is to put the SwiftUI view into a custom NSHostingController and then into an NSViewControllerRepresentable and then override viewWillAppear and look for self.view.window, which is all little awkward. Is there a more idiomatic way to achieve this in "pure" SwiftUI?

We have a Privileged Helper tool that we install with SMJobBless. I would like to debug it. I've added WaitForDebugger in our helper tool launchd plist and it does wait. But I can't attach to it via Debug->Attach to Process in Xcode with error: Code: 3 Failure Reason: tried to attach to process as user 'myusername' and process is running as user 'root' I set Debug process as: root in scheme settings. But I'm not sure if it does anything since I'm not running this particular scheme at the moment of attach. I tried unsuccessfully to set "Wait for the executable to be launched" but I had to create a new scheme for it since helper is built as part of the main app so maybe I did something wrong. Am I doing something wrong or is it not possible to attach to root process?

I am aware the USB / HID devices can come and go, if you have a long running application that's what you want to monitor. But for a "one-shot" command-line tool for example, I would like to enumerate the devices present on a system at a certain point in time, interact with a subset of them (and this interaction can fail since the device may have been disconnected in-between enumerating and me creating the HIDDeviceClient), and then exit the application. It seems that HIDDeviceManager only allows monitoring an Async[Throwing]Stream which provides the initial devices matching the query but then continues to deliver updates, and I have no idea when this initial list is done. I could sleep for a while and then cancel the stream and see what was received up to then, but that seems like the wrong way to go about this, if I just want to know "which devices are connected", so I can maybe list them in a "usage" or help screen. Am I missing something?

We are encountering a download issue in Safari 18.2 on macOS Sequoia 15.2 where file downloads initiated by our AngularJS application (such as Excel exports) are silently blocked. There are no errors in the browser console, and the download does not occur. Interestingly, after testing on Safari 18.3 with Sequoia 15.3, the downloads worked as expected. However, the problem reappeared on Safari 18.4 with Sequoia 15.4. We suspect that recent changes in Safari’s security or download handling may be preventing downloads triggered via asynchronous JavaScript (e.g., AJAX calls) that are not initiated directly by user interaction. We would appreciate any insights, suggestions, or possible workarounds from the community. Looking forward to your guidance on this matter.

How do you atomically set a Picker's selection and contents on macOS such that you don't end up in a situation where the selection is not present within the Picker's content? I presume Picker on macOS is implemented as an NSPopUpButton and an NSPopUpButton doesn't really like the concept of "no selection". SwiftUI, when presented with that, outputs: Picker: the selection "nil" is invalid and does not have an associated tag, this will give undefined results. Consider the following pseudo code: struct ParentView: View { @State private var items: [Item] var body: some View { ChildView(items: items) } } struct ChildView: View { let items: [Item] @State private var selectedItem: Item? var body: some View { Picker("", selection: $selectedItem) { ForEach(items) { item in Text(item.name).tag(item) } } } } When items gets passed down from ParentView to the ChildView, it's entirely possible that the current value in selectedItem represents an Item that is not longer in the items[] array. You can "catch" that by using .onAppear, .task, .onChange and maybe some other modifiers, but not until after at least one render pass has happened and an error has likely been reported because selectedItem is nil or it's not represented in the items[] array. Because selectedItem is private state, a value can't easily be passed down from the parent view, though even if it could that just kind of moves the problem one level higher up. What is the correct way to handle this type of data flow in SwiftUI for macOS?

Hi there, I'm trying to use SFAuthorizationPluginView in order to show some fields in the login screen, have the user click the arrow, then continue to show more fields as a second step of authentication. How can I accomplish this? Register multiple SecurityAgentPlugins each with their own mechanism and nib? Some how get MacOS to call my SFAuthorizationPluginView::view() and return a new view? Manually remove text boxes and put in new ones when button is pressed I don't believe 1 works, for the second mechanism ended up calling the first mechanism's view's view() Cheers, -Ken

I have a simple document-based application for macOS. struct ContentView: View { @Binding var document: TextDocument var body: some View { .onReceive(NotificationCenter.default.publisher(for: .notificationTextWillAppendSomeTextt), perform: { _ in }) VStack { TextEditor(text: $document.text) } } } extension Notification.Name { static let notificationTextWillAppendSomeTextt = Notification.Name("TextWillAppendSomeText") } Suppose that my application currently has three tabs. If I call a menu command through post(name:object:) this menu command call will affect all three of them. This stackoverflow topic talks about it, too. So how could I tell which window should get a call and others don't? Thanks.