Network Extension

RSS for tag

Customize and extend the core networking features of iOS, iPad OS, and macOS using Network Extension.

Posts under Network Extension tag

200 Posts
Sort by:

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Question about publishing vpn app in app store
Hello, we are developing an open source vpn program that is developed with Flutter and native parts with Swift, and we plan to publish it on the App Store soon, but the project programmers say that you must have an account to publish this app on the App Store. On the other hand, my other friends say that this is not the case, and to publish a vpn app, only one Apple Developer account is enough, and there is no need for a business account!
2
0
312
Apr ’24
Async operations with Network Extension
Hi, I was working on some new filtering logic for my Content Filter that I would like to add. It involves making requests to remote DNS resolvers. Is it possible to use it within sync override func handleNewFlow(_ flow: NEFilterFlow) -> NEFilterNewFlowVerdict of the NEFilterDataProvider? As of right now, I have a concept working in Command Line Tool and playground, however, when I try to add working module to the main project, it's not working (connections are not loading). Function that makes requests to the servers: In this function I use DispatchGroup and notify for non-main queue @available(iOS 12, *) public class NetworkService { private let nonMainQueue: DispatchQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "non-main-queue") func isBlocked(hostname: String, completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) { var isAnyBlocked = false let group = DispatchGroup() for server in servers { group.enter() let endpoint = NWEndpoint.Host(server) query(host: endpoint, domain: hostname, queue: .global()) { response, error in defer { group.leave() } /* * some code that determines the filtering logic * if condition is true => isAnyBlocked = true & return */ } } group.notify(queue: nonMainQueue) { completion(isAnyBlocked) } } } And, for example, in playground Semaphores make it work as expected, but the same approach doesn't work with the NEFilterDataProvider playground code sample let hostname = "google.com" func returnResponse() -> String { var result = "" let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0) DispatchQueue.global().async { NetworkService.isBlocked(hostname: hostname) { isBlocked in result = isBlocked ? "blocked" : "allowed" semaphore.signal() } } semaphore.wait() return result } print(returnResponse()) Output: allowed
1
0
289
Apr ’24
Issue with Establishing VPN Connection Through Custom App
Description: I am experiencing a persistent issue with establishing a VPN connection through a custom app I've developed using Swift. While the VPN configuration appears to be loaded successfully, attempts to connect result in immediate disconnection. Here are the details: Problem Summary: I have implemented a VPN connection using Swift with the NetworkExtension and TunnelKit frameworks. My application successfully loads the VPN configuration, but when attempting to connect, the VPN status quickly changes from connecting to disconnected without ever achieving a stable connection. Manually attempting to toggle the connection from device settings results in the toggle switching off as soon as it is turned on. The console logs indicate a transition from 'connecting' to 'disconnected' almost simultaneously. Technical Details: Here is an overview of the relevant part of the code used for setting up and managing the VPN connection: import TunnelKitOpenVPNCore import NetworkExtension import TunnelKit class VPNManager { static let shared = VPNManager() private var providerManager: NETunnelProviderManager? init() { NotificationCenter.default.addObserver(self, selector: #selector(vpnStatusDidChange), name: .NEVPNStatusDidChange, object: nil) } deinit { NotificationCenter.default.removeObserver(self) } @objc func vpnStatusDidChange(notification: Notification) { guard let status = self.providerManager?.connection.status else { return } switch status { case .connecting: print("VPN is connecting") case .connected: print("VPN is connected") case .disconnecting: print("VPN is disconnecting") case .disconnected: print("VPN is disconnected") case .invalid: print("VPN configuration is invalid") case .reasserting: print("VPN is reasserting") @unknown default: print("Unknown VPN status") } } func loadAndCreateVPNProfile(completion: @escaping (Bool, Error?) -> Void) { self.providerManager = NETunnelProviderManager() guard let ovpnURL = Bundle.main.url(forResource: "client", withExtension: "ovpn"), let ovpnContents = try? String(contentsOf: ovpnURL) else { completion(false, NSError(domain: "VPNManagerError", code: 1, userInfo: [NSLocalizedDescriptionKey: "Configuration file could not be read or found."])) return } // Parsing and configuration logic here... self.providerManager?.saveToPreferences { error in if let error = error { print("Error saving preferences: \(error.localizedDescription)") completion(false, error) } else { print("VPN profile saved successfully.") completion(true, nil) } } } func connect() { self.providerManager?.loadFromPreferences { [weak self] error in guard let strongSelf = self else { print("Reference to VPNManager lost.") return } if let error = error { print("Failed to load preferences: \(error.localizedDescription)") return } do { try strongSelf.providerManager?.connection.startVPNTunnel() } catch NEVPNError.configurationInvalid { print("VPN Configuration is invalid.") } catch NEVPNError.configurationDisabled { print("VPN Configuration is disabled.") } catch let error { print("Unexpected error: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } } func disconnect() { providerManager?.connection.stopVPNTunnel() } }
3
0
315
Apr ’24
[macOS]: In sonoma 14.4, Network issues and devices hanging after waking from sleep.
HI Team, We have recently observed a network issue, followed by device hang-ups when users come out of sleep while using the Transparent app proxy provider in Sonoma 14.4. and users are required to restart the system to resolve the problem. In the client logs, we observed that State:/Network/Global/IPv4 does not have any PrimaryInterface and there is no internet connectivity, although the internet works fine on other devices. this issue start coming in sonoma 14.4 and happen with Transparent app proxy provider. We are currently unable to pinpoint the exact issue. Are there any known issues with Sonoma 14.4?
1
0
549
Apr ’24
Unable to configure routing in NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings
I've implemented a NEPacketTunnelProvider implementation, but I can't see any packets in packet flow. Here is the settings override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) { ... let networkSettings = self.initTunnelSettings() setTunnelNetworkSettings(networkSettings) { (error) in if let error = error { completionHandler(error) return } NSLog("Proxy address: \(networkSettings.proxySettings?.httpsServer?.address)") self.readPackets() completionHandler(nil) } private func initTunnelSettings() -> NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings { let settings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "85.182.68.10") /* ipv4 settings */ settings.ipv4Settings = NEIPv4Settings(addresses: ["1.2.3.4"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.255"]) settings.ipv4Settings?.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default()] /* MTU */ settings.mtu = 1500 return settings } There is even more strange thing. If I add more specific route into includedRoutes array, I can see packets from that route traffic settings.ipv4Settings?.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default(), NEIPv4Route(destinationAddress: "192.168.0.103", subnetMask: "255.255.255.252")] With this changes I will see packets with the destination IP "192.168.0.103", but if change mask to 255.255.255.0 no packet in the packet flow again settings.ipv4Settings?.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default(), NEIPv4Route(destinationAddress: "192.168.0.103", subnetMask: "255.255.255.0")] Anyway my goal is to route all traffic through virtual interface and get all packets in the packetFlow. Can you help me? What should I change?
5
0
291
Apr ’24
Unable to start NEContentFilter on iOS
Previously, I added a post about the problem with NEFilterManager configuration. Since then, I explored the SimpleTunnel example project and I changed NEFilterManager setup to my own and it still worked well. Now, I simplified the code to just test that Content Filter is starting, but unfortunately it's displayed as 'Invalid' in System Settings. Here are the samples of my code, but I still don't understand what I am doing wrong here. I would be very grateful for any help. Test View struct ContentFilterView: View { @ObservedObject var vm = FilterManager.shared @State private var toggleState = false var body: some View { VStack { Toggle("Filter Status", isOn: $toggleState) .padding() .onChange(of: toggleState) { status in vm.setupFilter(with: status) } } .onAppear { vm.loadFilterConfiguration { success in if success { print("loadFilterConfiguration is successful") toggleState = vm.isEnabled ?? false print("NEFilterManager config: \(String(describing: NEFilterManager.shared().providerConfiguration?.organization))") } else { print("loadFilterConfiguration failed") toggleState = false } } } } } FilterManager class FilterManager: ObservableObject { @Published private(set) var isEnabled: Bool? = nil // MARK: - Properties private let manager = NEFilterManager.shared() private var subs = Set<AnyCancellable>() static let shared = FilterManager() private init() { manager.isEnabledPublisher() .receive(on: DispatchQueue.main) .sink(receiveValue: { [weak self] isEnabled in self?.setIsEnabled(isEnabled) }) .store(in: &subs) } public func setupFilter(with status: Bool) { if status && manager.providerConfiguration == nil { let newConfiguration = NEFilterProviderConfiguration() newConfiguration.username = "TestUser" newConfiguration.organization = "Test Inc." newConfiguration.filterBrowsers = true newConfiguration.filterSockets = true manager.providerConfiguration = newConfiguration print("manager configuration saved successfully: \(String(describing: manager.providerConfiguration?.organization))") } manager.isEnabled = status manager.saveToPreferences { [weak self] error in if let error { print("Failed to save the filter configuration: \(error.localizedDescription)") self?.isEnabled = false return } } } public func loadFilterConfiguration(withCompletion completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) { manager.loadFromPreferences { error in if let loadError = error { print("Failed to load the filter configuration: \(loadError)") completion(false) } else { completion(true) } } } private func setIsEnabled(_ isEnabled: Bool) { guard self.isEnabled != isEnabled else { return } self.isEnabled = isEnabled print("NEFilter \(isEnabled ? "enabled" : "disabled")") } } extension NEFilterManager { // MARK: - Publisher enabling func isEnabledPublisher() -> AnyPublisher<Bool, Never> { NotificationCenter.default .publisher(for: NSNotification.Name.NEFilterConfigurationDidChange) .compactMap { [weak self] notification in guard let self else { return nil } return self.isEnabled } .eraseToAnyPublisher() } } NEFilterDataProvider class FilterDataProvider: NEFilterDataProvider { // MARK: - Properties /// A record of where in a particular flow the filter is looking. var flowOffSetMapping = [URL: Int]() /// The list of flows that should be blocked after fetching new rules. var blockNeedRules = [String]() /// The list of flows that should be allowed after fetching new rules. var allowNeedRules = [String]() override func handleNewFlow(_ flow: NEFilterFlow) -> NEFilterNewFlowVerdict { Log("Will handle filter flow \(flow)", prefix: "[Filter Data]") return .drop() } } NEFilterControlProvider is the same as SimpleTunnel example project NEFilterControlProvider implementation. I also followed suggested steps mentioned in this post but it didn't seem to help.
8
0
587
Apr ’24
Detecting Fast-User Switch with a Network System Extension
I am running into an issue with running a PacketTunnelProvider as a system extension, and fast user switching. Since the VPN is running as root, it runs outside any user context, and is accessible to all users on the machine. I can see the following behavior: Login to User A Connect VPN Fast switch to user B Open Safari, observe that traffic is directed and sent out the VPN. (As noted by the ability to browse otherwise un-reachable websites). Is there a way to detect that a fast user switch is happening? And disconnect the VPN when user B takes control of the screen. I know NSWorkspace is not a daemon-safe API. So NSWorkspaceSessionDidResignActiveNotification and like will not be useful here. One alternative would be to use NSWorkspace notifications in the GUI and alert the system extension via XPC. But that wouldn't work in the case where there isn't a GUI, such as with ConnectOnDemand. Is there a daemon-safe API to use or some other alternative? Thanks
3
0
410
Apr ’24
Mail Protocols Proxy at System Level
i'd like to set up an app proxy server at local to resolve contents in mail protocols with SSL/TLS. using VPN(App Proxy Provider only support HTTP?) to tunnel flows about mail protocols to proxy server seems impracticable system configuration only supports HTTP and FTP? is there a way to set a Mail Protocols Proxy at system Level? or is there a way to route all transport layer flows(not only particular Application layer protocol) to proxy server?
1
0
297
Apr ’24
VPN: Denied Resouces are getting tunneled [VA]
We are trying to configure split tunnel with tunnel routes with the below Tunnel Provider configuration tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.includeAllNetworks = NO; tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.excludeLocalNetworks = NO; tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.enforceRoutes = YES; We are adding some IPs in the excludeRoutes[10.168.10.182 and 192.168.10.65]. Please refer the below network settings for VPN IPv4Settings = { configMethod = manual addresses = ( 10.168.10.68, ) subnetMasks = ( 255.255.255.255, ) includedRoutes = ( { destinationAddress = 0.0.0.0 destinationSubnetMask = 0.0.0.0 }, ) excludedRoutes = ( { destinationAddress = 192.168.10.65 destinationSubnetMask = 255.255.255.255 }, { destinationAddress = 10.168.10.182 destinationSubnetMask = 255.255.255.255 }, ) overridePrimary = NO } Issue: when we are trying to access excludedRoute's IP [10.168.10.182 and 192.168.10.65] , it's getting tunneled. Expected Results : excludedRoutes IPs should go via physical interface.
6
0
661
Apr ’24
VPN Tunnel is moved to Disconnected state after 5 mins in Reasserting state when no network
Issue Description: I have an iOS VPN application. When VPN tunnel is in connected state and network goes off, it’s designed to stay in reasserting state until network is back. But with iOS 17 and later tunnel is moved to disconnected state after 5 mins in reasserting state when no network. Logs on iOS 16 and Below: Upto iOS 16 and below, When tunnel is in connected state and network goes off, VPN state is moved to reasserting state and it stays in this state until network is back. We can see below device console logs: Entering state NESMVPNSessionStateReasserting status changed to reasserting Logs on iOS 17 and Later: But from iOS 17 and later, When tunnel is in connected state and network goes off, VPN state is moved to reasserting state and it stays in this state for 5 mins and later moved to disconnected state when no network. We can see below device console logs: Entering state NESMVPNSessionStateReasserting, timeout 300 seconds status changed to reasserting We can see a timeout of 300 secs added from iOS 17 and later. Because of this new change in iOS 17 and later, end users using my application have to connect back to VPN when network is back(Since tunnel is in disconnected state). Steps to reproduce: Connect to VPN when network is reachable Turn off network (WiFi, Mobile data) Application is moved to reasserting state. It will be in reasserting state for 5 mins Later application is moved to disconnected state. Queries: From the above observation my queries are, Is there a way to keep VPN tunnel in reasserting state even after 5 mins when no network from iOS 17 and later ? (To get the same behaviour as iOS 16 and below) Why is the timeout of 300 secs added from iOS 17 and later ? What benefit this is giving ? Is there any document related to this timeout change added from iOS 17 and later ?
3
1
729
Apr ’24
VPN: excludedRoutes IPs are going via virtual adapter
[iOS 17] We are trying to configure below Tunnel Provider configuration and we are saving it in NETunnelProviderManager preferences before calling startTunnelWithOptions tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.includeAllNetworks = YES; tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.excludeLocalNetworks = NO; tunnelProvider.protocolConfiguration.enforceRoutes = NO; We are adding an IP in the excludeRoutes which belongs to server address[10.97.6.244]. Please refer the below network settings for VPN IPv4Settings = { configMethod = manual addresses = ( 10.97.4.188, ) subnetMasks = ( 255.255.255.255, ) includedRoutes = ( { destinationAddress = 0.0.0.0 destinationSubnetMask = 0.0.0.0 }, ) excludedRoutes = ( { destinationAddress = 10.97.6.244 destinationSubnetMask = 255.255.255.255 }, ) overridePrimary = NO } Issue: when we are trying to access server address, it's getting tunneled because of that few of our APIs are sending failure and we are unable to connect to VPN. Expected Results : excludedRoutes IPs should go via physical interface. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Configure VPN packet tunnel provider config as mentioned above and add some IPs in excludeRoutes Save the configuration to NETunnelProviderManager preferences using “saveToPreferencesWithCompletionHandler” Try to connect to VPN excludeRoutes are tunneled via VA
3
0
378
Apr ’24
System Extension deactivationRequest fails with error "The operation couldn’t be completed. (OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 13.)"
We have a main app that handles UI and interaction with the user. And we also have daemon contained inside of it. Daemon has all the business logic and FDA and root permissions. Now we want to add a network extension. First we added the Network Extension to Main app and it was working fine (to test the waters). But then we decided to move it to Daemon since it has all the business logic and NE mostly contains business logic and no UI. It needs to be there. Now NE activationRequest(forExtensionWithIdentifier is working fine. But deactivationRequest(forExtensionWithIdentifier: during uninstall always fails with this error System Extension deactivationRequest fails with error he operation couldn’t be completed. (OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 13.) OSSystemExtensionError Code 13 says "An error code that indicates the system was unable to obtain the proper authorization." What does this actually mean. Also if there is an error why is it throwing it during uninstall rather than install? To make it more clear this is our app structure is Main.app -> Contents -> Mac OS -> Daemon.app -> Contents -> Library -> SystemExtensions -> System Extension Bundle Apple doc says @discussion This method creates a new request to activate/deactivate a System Extension. Extensions are discovered from the `Contents/Library/SystemExtensions` directory of the main application bundle. Our System Extension is present on the main app bundle and has Contents/Library/SystemExtensions structure but one extra layer deep. Is this supported app structure?. If not is there any way to succesfully uninstall NE from code. Right now systemextensionsctl uninstall won't work without System Integrity Protection disabled. Keeping NE on the main app will break our project structure and require major rewrite of the app. Also whenever I run systemextensionsctl with SIP on I get this message At this time, this tool cannot be used if System Integrity Protection is enabled. This limitation will be removed in the near future. Please remember to re-enable System Integrity Protection! Apple introduced System Extensions in 2019. It is still not there yet. Does anybody have any idea when will Apple make it work? if at all?
2
0
559
Apr ’24
[macOS] Disable the option to modify the status of the Transparent Proxy.
Hi Team, Im trying to disable the option to change the status of the Transparent Proxy enable/disable but there is no API which works in NETransparentProxyManager. Could you suggest, how to disable the option to change the status of the Transparent Proxy enable/disable? We want to disable it so that no one can modify it from the settings. This option is coming in Network -&gt; Vpn &amp; Filters I observed that some other providers disabled it in the "Network -&gt; VPN &amp; Filters" settings.
1
0
388
Apr ’24