Hello everyone, My app (App ID: 6758463939) has been waiting for review since February 3 and the status has not changed since then. All issues from the previous rejection were fixed: App name corrected and now matches after installation Demo account with full access provided All requested changes completed I also contacted App Review through Resolution Center and opened a support case, but have not received any response yet. I just want to confirm that everything is normal and that the app is still in the review queue. Has anyone experienced similar delays recently with first submissions? If there is any additional step I should take or another place to contact Apple, please let me know. Thank you.
Search results for
Apple Maps Guides
154,002 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I keep submitting versions of my app, but days go by without review, and I am forced to resubmit (development does not stop obviously). It has now been 8 days since I have been trying to submit 1.1, with no success. Previously review happened within 12-24 hours. What happened? This is a key time in my development, as the first update has many improvements, and I have fresh installs that I don't want to disappoint. Please help me out. App ID: 6758430790
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
OK. In that case I don’t see any way to make this work )-: When you set an on-demand rule, connections that match that rule are held until the demand is satisfied. This makes sense when you think about the intended use case for on-demand rules, namely, a split VPN. Typically this pans out as follows: There’s a site that’s only available on the organisation’s intranet. The device manager deploys an on-demand VPN configuration to access that intranet. The user runs an app that connects to that site. The system treats that as demand and starts the VPN connection. And holds the app’s connection until the VPN connection is established. Once that’s done, it releases the app’s connection, which then connects to the site over the VPN. This yields an obvious chicken’n’problem when the VPN provider relies on a connection that also matches the on-demand rule. The system can avoid this problems if the provider does it directly, from within its own process. This is the same sort of logic that NECP uses to avoid VPN loops.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
I can’t see how you’d make that work given that no third-party code can run at the FileVault unlock screen. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
[quote='876592022, Pushpak-Ambadkar123, /thread/815498?answerId=876592022#876592022, /profile/Pushpak-Ambadkar123'] how we can achieve same in case of NEURLFilterManager [/quote] This is just a special case of my previous answer: There are no configuration options like this with URL filter. If you’d like to see us add something for this, you should file an enhancement request explaining your requirements. Oh, one further point here. With URL filter it’s possible for third-party apps to opt in to filtering via the NEURLFilter type. What they do in the .deny case is up to them. You could imagine an extension to that API that returns the reason for the denial — so they could add that to their own custom UI — but that does present some privacy concerns. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
[quote='876583022, TChrist, /thread/813973?answerId=876583022#876583022, /profile/TChrist'] the Memory utilization increased again. [/quote] Bummer. But my previous advice still holds: If you continue to have problems with this on 26.4b1, it’s best to file a new bug with the details. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
Hi, After the release of macOS Tahoe 26.2. We are seeing memory leaks if our Network Protection Extension is used alongside the Apple Built In Firewall, a second Security Solution that does Network Protection and a VPN. Our NEXT, socketfilterfw and the other security solution consume instead of a few MB of Memory now multiple Gigabytes of Memory. This issue started with the public release of macOS Tahoe 26.2, this issue was not present in earlier versions of macOS and the same set of Software. Just testing our solution by itself will not show this behavior. I unfortunately can't try to reproduce the issue on my test device that runs the latest 26.3 beta as I do not have the third party software installed there and I can't get it. Our Network extension implements depending on the license and enabled features: NEFilterDataProvider NEDNSProxyProvider NETransparentProxyProvider For all man in the middle Use Cases we are using Network Framework, to communicate with the peers. And leaks suggest that the th
[quote='876587022, rbmanian75, /thread/815676?answerId=876587022#876587022, /profile/rbmanian75'] I tried this and it works. [/quote] Yay! [quote='876587022, rbmanian75, /thread/815676?answerId=876587022#876587022, /profile/rbmanian75'] If i make this changes whether the app will pass the app review? [/quote] I don’t work for App Review and thus can’t make definitive statements about their policy. However, my experience is that App Review is very skeptical about any use of temporary exception entitlements. However, one valid use case is working around bugs, and so I think it’s worthwhile you attempting this here. You can improve your chances by limiting this entitlement claim to specific OS versions. You do that with the :before:MAJOR.MINOR clause, as illustrated by this page. Now, the question is, what to use for MAJOR.MINOR? The obvious choice here is 26.4, on the assumption that the bug in question will be fixed in some later seed of macOS 26.4 beta. However, I can’t guarantee that that will happen. And, i
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Core OS
Tags:
[quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] You advised that I should enable all the settings. [/quote] Well, yes, if you read that one sentence in isolation. However, I made it clear that one specific setting, Enable Soft Mode for Memory Tagging, reduces security, so if you goal is security then enabling that is probably not a good choice (-: [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am therefore inclined not to enable it. [/quote] Or you could profile your app and see if it makes a difference in pratice. That’s generally the best way to approach performance trade-offs. [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am not entirely sure what is meant by logging in [Soft Mode] [/quote] Quoting Enabling enhanced security for your app: This entitlement makes hardware memory tagging operate in soft mode, where the system produces a simulated crash instead
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
I am absolutely sure yes, other members of this team have access to certificates on https://developer.apple.com/ Removing me and adding me back does not fix the issue. My account is also enrolled on an individual Apple Developer Program.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Apple Developer Program
Tags:
[quote='816041021, LCTech, /thread/816041, /profile/LCTech'] if i extract the ipa file and compare the checksum will it match? [/quote] This question doesn’t make sense because a .ipa is only used to upload your app to the App Store. It has no presence on the device itself. But regarding the big picture question about checking app integrity, see my reply here. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
I read through your posts a couple of time and I’m not sure what you’re asking about here. Please elaborate. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Apple Developer Program
Tags:
See my reply here. [quote='816045021, crewshin, /thread/816045, /profile/crewshin'] everything I'm seeing suggests I need to put in a request to Apple to turn on NetworkExtension [/quote] Does “everything I’m seeing” refer to stuff from Apple? Or stuff on the ’net? Because if it’s advice from Apple then I’d appreciate you replying here with info on where you saw Apple give you that advice, because I’d like to correct it. Sadly, I can’t fix the Internet (-: Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
I'm debugging an app I'm building and everything I'm seeing suggests I need to put in a request to Apple to turn on NetworkExtension → Packet Tunnel Provider entitlement for our Team ID and bundle IDs. 1: Is this true? 2: Doesn't the option in xcode handle this?
There isn’t a specific affordance for renewing certificates. Rather, you simply create a new one. That’s the same for all our code-signing certificate types. For Developer ID I generally do this using the Developer website rather than Xcode. That’s because Developer ID certificates are precious, as I explain in The Care and Feeding of Developer ID. When you create a certificate using the website, you supply a certificate signing request (CSR). This includes the public key that’ll be embedded in the certificate, the one that matches your private key so that, when the website issues your certificate, the certificate and the private key form a code-signing identity. That gives you two choices: You can create a new CSR, containing the public key from a newly generated key pair. You can reuse the CSR you used previously. Note From a certain perspective, you could interpret the first option as ‘creating a new certificate’ and the second option as ‘renewing a certificate’, but that’s a bit of a stretch. I prefer the
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags: