ITMS-90338

1,571 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - No such asset is present in the asset catalog.
I have added an alternate icon in my iOS app which I am setting using setAlternateIcon method. It works perfectly during development and local app distribution, however when I try to upload a build to App Store Connect, I get the following error: ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons.CFBundleAlternateIcons contains an entry “AppIconTwo” that references asset “AppIconTwo” No such asset is present in the asset catalog. I'm unable to upload builds with this extra app-icon added. Kindly help me solve this.
3
0
690
Nov ’23
Can't submit new app to Appstore
Hey! Since thursday we are have problem that we can not submit new builds on app store. This is the error we are getting: ITMS-90338: Non-public API usage - The app references non-public selectors in Frameworks/UnityFramework.framework/UnityFramework: initWithImageData:. If method names in your source code match the private Apple APIs listed above, altering your method names will help prevent this app from being flagged in future submissions. In addition, note that one or more of the above APIs may be located in a static library that was included with your app. If so, they must be removed. For further information, visit the Technical Support Information at http://developer.apple.com/support/technical/ App validates fine in xcode before uploading, but after uploading we get this error, any suggestions what to do?
1
0
382
May ’24
About ITMS-91065
In order to facilitate management, we integrate some SDKs such as Firebase into one of our own internally used SDKs. Recently, when submitted to the appstore, we were prompted that FirebaseCrashing included in the SDK lacked the necessary signature (ITMS-91065). The information that can be confirmed is that after packaging the SDK through secondary packaging, the original signature is lost. And we have a static reference. So what I want to ask is whether we can only manually sign our secondary packaging sdk (the signature is our own certificate different from the original Firebase) to solve this ITMS-91065 problem. According to the description of the Apple Developer Conference, Apple only verifies the consistency and security of the SDK and does not record the signature of each SDK on Apple's servers. Therefore, you should only need to ensure that the SDK is in a signed state to comply with Apple's review requirements. (My guess is still being verified)
2
0
1.4k
May ’24
App Store Mac Catalyst warning; asking for a minimum version of macOS that doesn't exist
While I'm keen on being on the latest version of macOS, I'm having trouble meeting the requirement that my app can run on a version of macOS that doesn't exist :) I'm using Xcode 15.2 (15C500b), targeting iOS 17.2. I've elected to have the App Store choose the minimum version for Catalyst. I've also tried selecting a version. ITMS-90899: Apple silicon Mac support issue - The app is not compatible with the provided minimum macOS version of 14.2. It can run on macOS 14.4 or later. Please specify an LSMinimumSystemVersion value of 14.4 or later in a new build, or select a compatible version in App Store Connect. For details, visit: ... Is there something I could be doing wrong to prompt this behaviour?
4
0
1.6k
Feb ’24
Asset validation failed (90085): Static Framework Embedded in Dynamic Framework
One of our apps got hit by the ITMS-91065: Missing Signature issue when we attempted to distribute it to externally via TestFlight. The email said FirebaseCore is missing the signature file within our own framework. After investigation, I realized our recent update to the version of Firebase that has the proper signatures and privacy manifest wasn't enough by itself. Similar to Apple's own instructions on embedding static frameworks since Xcode 15, Firebase instructs us to select the Embed & Sign option. After making the appropriate changes though, we're getting the error in Transporter: Asset validation failed (90085): No architectures in the binary Our setup is as follows: We have an analytics dynamic framework, which depends on Firebase's static framework. The Firebase related frameworks are embedded and signed in our analytics framework. Our app depends on the analytics dynamic framework, which now includes Firebase frameworks within its framework. Since the Firebase frameworks are static, on
1
0
764
May ’24
Reply to libswift ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration
Hello, which version of xcode are you using ? I have the same issue here : ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration - The PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy for the “Frameworks/libswiftAssetsLibrary.dylib” file contains “85F4.1” as the value for a NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypeReasons key instead of a valid reason code for using an API in the NSPrivacyAccessedAPICategoryUserDefaults category. Values for NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypeReasons keys in any privacy manifest must be valid reason codes for the corresponding API category. For more details about this policy, including a list of required reason APIs and approved reasons for usage, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/privacy_manifest_files/describing_use_of_required_reason_api. Here the message i have for several items I have tried to embed those with my app but it does not help. Here is my privacy file Thanks in advance :)
May ’24
libswift ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration
I've complied with the reason declaration following the links sent by the autogenerated emails for the surface level Runner declaration, however libswift has the incorrect values for the reason codes for UserDefaults. I've checked their github and there is no way to add issues since it is read-only. I'm also in the dark for who to contact regarding this. Does anyone have any idea how to resolve this aside from manually changing the privacy files? I don't want to have to do this each time I do pod install. ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration - The PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy for the “Frameworks/libswiftObjectiveC.dylib” file contains “DDA9.1” as the value for a NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypeReasons key instead of a valid reason code for using an API in the NSPrivacyAccessedAPICategoryUserDefaults category.
3
0
1.4k
Mar ’24
ITMS-90895
Apple send a mail when I publish my ipa. Please correct the following issues, then upload again. ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons~ipad.CFBundleAlternateIcons contains an entry “app-alt-icon-mountain” that references asset “山青.” No such asset is present in the asset catalog. ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons~ipad.CFBundleAlternateIcons contains an entry “app-alt-icon-fantasy” that references asset “梦幻.” No such asset is present in the asset catalog. ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons~ipad.CFBundleAlternateIcons contains an entry “app-alt-icon-bubble” that references asset “泡泡.” No such asset is present in the asset catalog. ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons~ipad.CFBundleAlternateIcons contains an entry “app-alt-icon-night” that references asset “暗夜.” No such asset is present in the asset catalog. ITMS-90895: Missing Icon - The Info.plist key CFBundleIcons~ipad.CFB
2
0
1.5k
Jul ’21
Corrupt Image file when uploading to testflight
Hi, our app has been using single size app icon for a while and today when I trying to upload a new version of our app I got an email from App Store Connect saying ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file 'AppIcon60x60@2x.png' appears to be corrupt. We haven't touched the image for ages and these 60x60 image were generated by Xcode from the single 1024x1024 image supplied. I've tried to use a new image and still got the same error. Does anyone experienced this recently?
2
0
440
May ’24
ITMS-90714: Invalid binary - The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Please rebuild the app and resubmit.
While uploading the application into the TestFlight the following error received, ITMS-90714: Invalid binary - The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Please rebuild the app and resubmit. After sometimes generate same configuration the application successfully submitted on the TestFlight. We are using Xcode 15.3
2
0
922
May ’24
iOS ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File image file 'AppIcon60x60@2x.png
After uploading a new iOS build, we received an error message via email from Apple stating: ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file AppIcon60x60 2x.png appears to be corrupt. Strangely, we don't have any image file with that name in our project. It seems to be a build processing error on Apple's side. While I've seen similar issues reported for Apple TV in the past, this is happening with our iOS build. Has anyone discovered a workaround? I've uploaded another app build and haven't encountered any errors.
4
0
1.9k
May ’24
Apple TV - ITMS 90013 - Corrupt Image File
Hi, I am receiving the above error after trying to upload it to the App Store. I would know what to do IF Xcode would provide WHICH file is corrupt. The error reads: ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file $[IconName] appears to be corrupt. Again, I would know what to do if I had more information about which file(s) to fix. Could anyone FROM APPLE help me or give me a hint? Thanks, Dan Uff
2
0
605
Jan ’24
Reply to Apple TV - ITMS 90013 - Corrupt Image File
I just got this error too even though 1) our app icons haven't changed for a long time and many previous builds have been accepted with the same icon set 2) they all render fine in Xcode and 3) I checked the icon locally and the PNG file renders fine. This is the error message in my case: ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file 'AppIcon60x60[@]2x.png' appears to be corrupt. I reached out to Apple to see if they have a problem with their backend. Note I enclosed the @ symbol with square brackets so the forum allows me to post this message.
May ’24
ITMS-91054: Invalid API category declaration
I added Privacy manifest for my app and submit it to review and apple reject my app with what comment ITMS-91054: Invalid API category declaration - The PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy for the “Frameworks/SmartlookAnalytics.framework/SmartlookAnalytics” file contains “Disk Space” as the value for a NSPrivacyAccessedAPIType key, which is invalid. Values for NSPrivacyAccessedAPIType keys in any privacy manifest must be valid API categories. For more details about this policy, including a list of required reason APIs and approved reasons for usage, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/privacy_manifest_files/describing_use_of_required_reason_api. i look at the package manifest and all looks fine (attached image). Maybe somebody saw that issue - and may tell me how can i fix it.
3
0
1.4k
May ’24